The introduction of targeted therapies has revolutionized treatment and improved outcomes in patients with leukemias and lymphomas. However, many patients experience relapse caused by the persistence of residual malignant cells. Cytogenetic and molecular techniques are increasingly being used to assess and quantify minimal residual disease (MRD). The emergence of advanced technologies has led to the discovery of multiple novel molecular markers that can be used to detect MRD and predict outcome in patients with leukemias and lymphomas. Gene expression signatures that predict clinical outcomes in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma have been identified. In chronic myelogenous leukemia, molecular monitoring has become more important in assessing response and detecting resistance to therapy. In acute leukemias, several new markers have shown potential in prognostication and monitoring treatment. In leukemias and lymphomas, microRNAs have been identified that may be useful in diagnostics and prognostication. To address these issues, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) organized a task force consisting of a panel of experts in leukemia and lymphoma to discuss recent advances in the field of molecular markers and monitoring MRD.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Diamandis EP, Fritsche HA, Lilja H., eds. Tumor Markers: Physiology, Pathobiology, Technology and Clinical Applications. Washington, DC: AACC Press; 2002.
Drexler HG, MacLeod RA, Borkhardt A, Janssen JW. Recurrent chromosomal translocations and fusion genes in leukemia-lymphoma cell lines. Leukemia 1995;9:480–500.
Vega F, Medeiros LJ. Chromosomal translocations involved in non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003;127:1148–1160.
Faderl S, Kurzrock R, Estrov Z. Minimal residual disease in hematologic disorders. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1999;123:1030–1034.
Corradini P, Ladetto M, Pileri A, Tarella C. Clinical relevance of minimal residual disease monitoring in non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: a critical reappraisal of molecular strategies. Leukemia 1999;13:1691–1695.
Bruggemann M, Pott C, Ritgen M, Kneba M. Significance of minimal residual disease in lymphoid malignancies. Acta Haematol 2004;112:111–119.
Kulasingam V, Diamandis EP. Strategies for discovering novel cancer biomarkers through utilization of emerging technologies. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2008;5:588–599.
Sehn LH. Optimal use of prognostic factors in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2006:295–302.
Faderl SA, Talpaz M, Estrov Z. The biology of chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 1999;341:164–172.
Radich JP, Dai H, Mao M. Gene expression changes associated with progression and response in chronic myeloid leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:2794–2799.
Sawyers CL. Chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1330–1340.
O’Brien SG, Guilhot F, Larson RA. Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2003;348:994–1004.
Jabbour E, Cortes JE, Giles FJ. Current and emerging treatment options in chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer 2007;109:2171–2181.
Hochhaus A, Druker B, Sawyers C. Favorable long-term follow-up results over 6 years for response, survival, and safety with imatinib mesylate therapy in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of interferon-alpha treatment. Blood 2008;111:1039–1043.
O’Brien SG, Guilhot F, Goldman JM. International randomized study of interferon versus STI571 (IRIS) 7-year follow-up: sustained survival, low rate of transformation and increased rate of major molecular response (MMR) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CMLCP) treated with imatinib (IM) [abstract]. Blood 2008;112:Abstract 186.
Kantarjian H, O’Brien S, Talpaz M. Outcome of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia post-imatinib mesylate failure. Cancer 2007;109:1556–1560.
Hochhaus A, Kantarjian HM, Baccarani M. Dasatinib induces notable hematologic and cytogenetic responses in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of imatinib therapy. Blood 2007;109:2303–2309.
Kantarjian HM, Giles F, Gattermann N. Nilotinib (formerly AMN107), a highly selective BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is effective in patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase following imatinib resistance and intolerance. Blood 2007;110:3540–3546.
Martinelli G, Iacobucci I, Soverini S. Monitoring minimal residual disease and controlling drug resistance in chronic myeloid leukaemia patients in treatment with imatinib as a guide to clinical management. Hematol Oncol 2006;24:196–204.
Kantarjian H, Schiffer C, Jones D, Cortes J. Monitoring the response and course of chronic myeloid leukemia in the modern era of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors: practical advice on the use and interpretation of monitoring methods. Blood 2008;111:1774–1780.
Landstrom A, Tefferi A. Fluorescent in situ hybridization in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring of chronic myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 2006;47:397–402.
Douet-Guilbert N, Morel F, Le Charpentier T. Interphase FISH for follow-up of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia treatment. Anticancer Res 2004;24:2535–2539.
Seong DC, Kantarjian HM, Ro JY. Hypermetaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization for quantitative monitoring of Philadelphia chromosome-positive cells in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia during treatment. Blood 1995;86:2343–2349.
Dewald GW, Wyatt WA, Juneau AL. Highly sensitive fluorescence in situ hybridization method to detect double BCR/ABL fusion and monitor response to therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 1998;91:3357–3365.
Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O’Brien SG. Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2408–2417.
Guilhot F, Larson RA, O’Brien SG. Time to complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) does not affect long-term outcomes for patients on imatinib therapy [abstract]. Blood 2007;110:Abstract 27.
de Lavallade H, Apperley JF, Khorashad JS. Imatinib for newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: incidence of sustained responses in an intention-to-treat analysis. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:3358–3363.
Kantarjian HM, Quintas-Cardama A, O’Brien S. Importance of early intervention with dasatinib at cytogenetic rather than hematologic resistance to imatinib [abstract]. Blood 2007;110:Abstract 1036.
Tam CS, Kantarjian H, Garcia-Manero G. Failure to achieve a major cytogenetic response by 12 months defines inadequate response in patients receiving nilotinib or dasatinib as second or subsequent line therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 2008;112:516–518.
Baccarani M, Rosti G, Saglio G. Dasatinib time to and durability of major and complete cytogenetic response (MCyR and CCyR) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) [abstract]. Blood 2008;112:Abstract 450.
Branford S, Hughes TP, Rudzki Z. Monitoring chronic myeloid leukaemia therapy by real-time quantitative PCR in blood is a reliable alternative to bone marrow cytogenetics. Br J Haematol 1999;107:587–599.
Kantarjian H, Talpaz M, Cortes J. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction monitoring of BCR-ABL during therapy with imatinib mesylate (STI571; gleevec) in chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:160–166.
Baccarani M, Saglio G, Goldman J. Evolving concepts in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood 2006;108:1809–1820.
Hughes T, Deininger M, Hochhaus A. Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. Blood 2006;108:28–37.
Jabbour E, Cortes J, Hagop M, Kantarjian H. Molecular monitoring in chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer 2008;112:2112–2118.
Press RD, Love Z, Tronnes AA. BCR-ABL mRNA levels at and after the time of a complete cytogenetic response (CCR) predict the duration of CCR in imatinib mesylate treated patients with CML. Blood 2006;107:4250–4256.
Press RD, Galderisi C, Yang R. A half-log increase in BCR-ABL RNA predicts a higher risk of relapse in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia with an imatinib-induced complete cytogenetic response. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:6136–6143.
Cortes J, Talpaz M, O’Brien S. Molecular responses in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase treated with imatinib mesylate. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:3425–3432.
Iacobucci I, Saglio G, Rosti G. Achieving a major molecular response at the time of a complete cytogenetic response predicts a better duration of CCgR in imatinib-treated chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:3037–3042.
Kantarjian HM, Talpaz M, O’Brien S. Survival benefit with imatinib mesylate versus interferon-alpha-based regimens in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood 2006;108:1835–1840.
Marin D, Milojkovic D, Olavarria E. European LeukemiaNet criteria for failure or suboptimal response reliably identify patients with CML in early chronic phase treated with imatinib whose eventual outcome is poor. Blood 2008;112:4437–4444.
Kantarjian HM, Shan J, Jones D. Significance of rising levels of minimal residual disease in patients with philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia (Ph+ CML) in complete cytogenetic response (CGCR) [abstract]. Blood 2008;112:Abstract 445.
Branford S, Lawrence R, Fletcher L. The initial molecular response of chronic phase CML patients treated with second generation ABL inhibitor therapy after imatinib failure can predict inadequate response and provide indications for rational mutation screening [abstract]. Blood 2008;112:Abstract 331.
Milojkovic D, Bua M, Apperley JF. Prediction of cytogenetic response to second generation TKI therapy in CML chronic phase patients who have failed imatinib therapy and early identification of factors that influence survival [abstract]. Blood 2008;112:Abstract 332.
Radich JP, Gehly G, Gooley T. Polymerase chain reaction detection of the BCR-ABL fusion transcript after allogeneic marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: results and implications in 346 patients. Blood 1995;85:2632–2638.
Radich JP, Gooley T, Bryant E. The significance of bcr-abl molecular detection in chronic myeloid leukemia patients “late,” 18 months or more after transplantation. Blood 2001;98:1701–1707.
Olavarria E, Kanfer E, Szydlo R. Early detection of BCR-ABL transcripts by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction predicts outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 2001;97:1560–1565.
Apperley JF. Part I: mechanisms of resistance to imatinib in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Lancet Oncol 2007;8:1018–1029.
Gambacorti-Passerini C, Zucchetti M, Russo D. Alpha1 acid glycoprotein binds to imatinib (STI571) and substantially alters its pharmacokinetics in chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:625–632.
Larson RA, Druker BJ, Guilhot F. Imatinib pharmacokinetics and its correlation with response and safety in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a subanalysis of the IRIS study. Blood 2008;111:4022–4028.
Picard S, Titier K, Etienne G. Trough imatinib plasma levels are associated with both cytogenetic and molecular responses to standard-dose imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 2007;109:3496–3499.
Ault P, Kantarjian HM, Bryan J. Clinical use of imatinib plasma levels in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) [abstract]. Blood 2008;112:Abstract 4255.
Thomas J, Wang L, Clark RE, Pirmohamed M. Active transport of imatinib into and out of cells: implications for drug resistance. Blood 2004;104:3739–3745.
White DL, Saunders VA, Dang P. Most CML patients who have a suboptimal response to imatinib have low OCT-1 activity: higher doses of imatinib may overcome the negative impact of low OCT-1 activity. Blood 2007;110:4064–4072.
White DL, Saunders VA, Dang P. CML patients with low OCT-1 activity achieve better molecular responses on high dose imatinib than on standard dose. Those with high OCT-1 activity have excellent responses on either dose: a TOPS correlative study [abstract]. Blood 2008;112:Abstract 3187.
Giannoudis A, Davies A, Lucas CM. Effective dasatinib uptake may occur without human organic cation transporter 1 (hOCT1): implications for the treatment of imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 2008;112:3348–3354.
White DL, Saunders VA, Dang P. OCT-1-mediated influx is a key determinant of the intracellular uptake of imatinib but not nilotinib (AMN107): reduced OCT-1 activity is the cause of low in vitro sensitivity to imatinib. Blood 2006;108:697–704.
Deininger MWN, O’Brien SG, Ford JM, Druker BJ. Practical management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia receiving imatinib. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:1637–1647.
Gorre ME, Mohammed M, Ellwood K. Clinical resistance to STI-571 cancer therapy caused by BCR-ABL gene mutation or amplification. Science 2001;293:876–880.
Hochhaus A, Kreil S, Corbin AS. Molecular and chromosomal mechanisms of resistance to imatinib (STI571) therapy. Leukemia 2002;16:2190–2196.
Branford S, Rudzki Z, Parkinson I. Real time quantitative PCR analysis can be used as a primary screen to identify patients with CML treated with imatinib who have BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations. Blood 2004;104:2926–2932.
Khorashad JS, de Lavallade H, Apperley JF. Finding of kinase domain mutations in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia responding to imatinib may identify those at high risk of disease progression. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:4806–4813.
Soverini S, Martinelli G, Rosti G. ABL mutations in late chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients with up-front cytogenetic resistance to imatinib are associated with a greater likelihood of progression to blast crisis and shorter survival: a study by the GIMEMA Working Party on Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:4100–4109.
Nicolini FE, Corm S, Le QH. Mutation status and clinical outcome of 89 imatinib mesylate-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia patients: a retrospective analysis from the French intergroup of CML (Fi(phi)-LMC GROUP). Leukemia 2006;20:1061–1106.
Soverini S, Colarossi S, Gnani A. Contribution of ABL kinase domain mutations to imatinib resistance in different subsets of Philadelphia-positive patients: by the GIMEMA Working Party on Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:7374–7379.
Branford S, Rudzki Z, Walsh S. Detection of BCR-ABL mutations in patients with CML treated with imatinib is virtually always accompanied by clinical resistant and mutation in the ATP phosphate-binding loop are associated with a poor prognosis. Blood 2003;102:276–283.
Jabbour E, Kantarjian H, Jones D. Frequency and clinical significance of BCR-ABL mutations in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib mesylate. Leukemia 2006;20:1767–1773.
Cortes J, Rousselot P, Kim DW. Dasatinib induces complete hematologic and cytogenetic responses in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in blast crisis. Blood 2007;109:3207–3213.
Guilhot F, Apperley J, Kim DW. Dasatinib induces significant hematologic and cytogenetic responses in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in accelerated phase. Blood.2007;109:4143–4150.
Nicolini FE, Hayette S, Corm S. Clinical outcome of 27 imatinib mesylate-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia patients harboring a T315I BCR-ABL mutation. Haematologica 2007;92:1238–1241.
Jabbour E, Kantarjian H, Jones D. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and T315I mutation following failure of imatinib mesylate therapy. Blood 2008;112:53–55.
O’Dwyer ME, Mauro MJ, Blasdel C. Clonal evolution and lack of cytogenetic response are adverse prognostic factors for hematologic relapse of chronic phase CML patients treated with imatinib mesylate. Blood 2004;103:451–455.
O’Dwyer ME, Mauro MJ, Kurilik G. The impact of clonal evolution on response to imatinib mesylate (STI571) in accelerated phase CML. Blood 2002;100:1628–1633.
Cortes JE, Talpaz M, Giles F. Prognostic significance of cytogenetic clonal evolution in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia on imatinib mesylate therapy. Blood 2003;101:3794–3800.
Fialkow PJ, Jacobson RJ, Papayannopoulou T. Chronic myelocytic leukemia: Clonal origin in a stem cell common to the granulocyte, erythrocyte, platelet and monocyte/macrophage. Am J Med 1977;63:125–130.
Huff CA, Matsui WH, Smith BD, Jones RJ. Strategies to eliminate cancer stem cells: clinical implications. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:1293–1297.
Jiang X, Zhao Y, Forrest D. Stem cell biomarkers in chronic myeloid leukemia. Dis Markers 2008;24:201–216.
Kavalerchik E, Goff D, Jamieson CHM. Chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:2911–2915.
Jamieson CH. Chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2008:436–442.
Holyoake T, Jiang X, Eaves C, Eaves A. Isolation of a highly quiescent subpopulation of primitive leukemic cells in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 1999;94:2056–2064.
Graham SM, Jorgensen HG, Allan E. Primitive, quiescent, Philadelphia-positive stem cells from patients with chronic myeloid leukemia are insensitive to STI571 in vitro. Blood 2002;99:319–325.
Holtz MS, Slovak ML, Zhang F. Imatinib mesylate (STI571) inhibits growth of primitive malignant progenitors in chronic myelogenous leukemia through reversal of abnormally increased proliferation. Blood 2002;99:3792–3800.
Valent P, Deininger M. Clinical perspectives of concepts on neoplastic stem cells and stem cell-resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 2008;49:604–609.
Angstreich G, Matsui W, Huff C. Effects of imatinib and interferon on primitive chronic myeloid leukaemia progenitors. Br J Haematol 2005;130:373–381.
Bedi A, Zehnbauer B, Collector M. BCR-ABL gene rearrangement and expression of primitive hematopoietic progenitors in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 1993;81:2898–2902.
Gerber JM, Qin L, Matsui W. Expression of potential therapeutic targets by leukemic stem cells [abstract]. Proceedings of the 99th Annual Meeting of American Association for Cancer Research; April 12–16, 2008; San Diego, California. Abstract LB-88.
Yong ASM, Szydlo RM, Goldman JM. Molecular profiling of CD34+ cells identifies low expression of CD7, along with high expression of proteinase 3 or elastase, as predictors of longer survival in patients with CML. Blood 2006;107:205–212.
Yong ASM, Rezvani K, Savani BN. High PR3 or ELA2 expression by CD34+ cells in advanced-phase chronic myeloid leukemia is associated with improved outcome following allogeneic stem cell transplantation and may improve PR1 peptide-driven graft-versus-leukemia effects. Blood 2007;110:770–775.
Epping MT, Bernards R. A causal role for the human tumor antigen preferentially expressed antigen of melanoma in cancer. Cancer Res 2006;66:10639–10642.
Paydas S, Tanriverdi K, Yavuz S. PRAME mRNA levels in cases with chronic leukemia: clinical importance and review of the literature. Leuk Res 2007;31:365–369.
Paydas S, Tanriverdi K, Yavuz S. PRAME mRNA levels in cases with acute leukemia: clinical importance and future prospects. Am J Hematol 2005;79:257–261.
Watari K, Tojo A, Nagamura-Inoue T. Identification of a melanoma antigen, PRAME, as a BCR/ABL-inducible gene. FEBS Lett 2000;466:367–371.
Oehler V, Cummings C, Sabo K. Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) expression in normal and CML CD34+ progenitor cells impairs myeloid differentiation [abstract]. Blood 2008;112:Abstract 1071.
Mrozek K, Marcucci G, Paschka P. Clinical relevance of mutations and gene-expression changes in adult acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics: are we ready for a prognostically prioritized molecular classification? Blood 2007;109:431–448.
Tobal K, Johnson PR, Saunders MJ. Detection of CBFB/MYH11 transcripts in patients with inversion and other abnormalities of chromosome 16 at presentation and remission. Br J Haematol 1995;91:104–108.
Marcucci G, Caligiuri MA, Bloomfield CD. Core binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemia: is molecular monitoring by RT-PCR useful clinically? Eur J Haematol 2003;71:143–154.
Schoch C, Schnittger S, Klaus M. AML with 11q23/MLL abnormalities as defined by the WHO classification: incidence, partner chromosomes, FAB subtype, age distribution, and prognostic impact in an unselected series of 1897 cytogenetically analyzed AML cases. Blood 2003;102:2395–2402.
Lo-Coco F, Ammatuna E, Montesinos P, Sanz MA. Acute promyelocytic leukemia: recent advances in diagnosis and management. Semin Oncol 2008;35:401–409.
Marcucci G, Caligiuri MA, Dohner H. Quantification of CBFbeta/MYH11 fusion transcript by real time RT-PCR in patients with INV(16) acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2001;15:1072–1080
Lane S, Saal R, Mollee P. A > or = 1 log rise in RQ-PCR transcript levels defines molecular relapse in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia and predicts subsequent morphologic relapse. Leuk Lymphoma 2008;49:517–523
Stentoft J, Hokland P, Ostergaard M. Minimal residual core binding factor AMLs by real time quantitative PCR—initial response to chemotherapy predicts event free survival and close monitoring of peripheral blood unravels the kinetics of relapse. Leuk Res 2006;30:389–395
Paschka P, Marcucci G, Ruppert AS. Adverse prognostic significance of KIT mutations in adult acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16) and t(8;21): a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:3904–3911
Cairoli R, Beghini A, Grillo G. Prognostic impact of c-KIT mutations in core binding factor leukemias: an Italian retrospective study. Blood 2006;107:3463–3468
Marcucci G, Livak KJ, Bi W. Detection of minimal residual disease in patients with AML1/ETO-associated acute myeloid leukemia using a novel quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay. Leukemia 1998;12:1482–1489
Weisser M, Kern W, Schoch C. Risk assessment by monitoring expression levels of partial tandem duplications in the MLL gene in acute myeloid leukemia during therapy. Haematologica 2005;90:881–889
Mitterbauer G, Zimmer C, Pirc-Danoewinata H. Monitoring of minimal residual disease in patients with MLL-AF6-positive acute myeloid leukaemia by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Br J Haematol 2000;109:622–628
Takatsuki H, Yufu Y, Tachikawa Y, Uike N. Monitoring minimal residual disease in patients with MLL-AF6 fusion transcript-positive acute myeloid leukemia following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Int J Hematol 2002;75:298–301
Scholl C, Schlenk RF, Eiwen K. The prognostic value of MLL-AF9 detection in patients with t(9;11)(p22;q23)-positive acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2005;90:1626–1634
Stirewalt DL, Radich JP. The role of FLT3 in haematopoietic malignancies. Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:650–665
Ferrara F, Palmieri S, Leoni F. Clinically useful prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2008;66:181–193
Schnittger S, Schoch C, Dugas M. Analysis of FLT3 length mutations in 1003 patients with acute myeloid leukemia: correlation to cytogenetics, FAB subtype, and prognosis in the AMLCG study and usefulness as a marker for the detection of minimal residual disease. Blood 2002;100:59–66
Shih LY, Huang CF, Wu JH. Internal tandem duplication of FLT3 in relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: a comparative analysis of bone marrow samples from 108 adult patients at diagnosis and relapse. Blood 2002;100:2387–2392
Kottaridis PD, Gale RE, Langabeer SE. Studies of FLT3 mutations in paired presentation and relapse samples from patients with acute myeloid leukemia: implications for the role of FLT3 mutations in leukemogenesis, minimal residual disease detection, and possible therapy with FLT3 inhibitors. Blood 2002;100:2393–2398
Cloos J, Goemans BF, Hess CJ. Stability and prognostic influence of FLT3 mutations in paired initial and relapsed AML samples. Leukemia 2006;20:1217–1220
Dohner K, Schlenk RF, Habdank M. Mutant nucleophosmin (NPM1) predicts favorable prognosis in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia and normal cytogenetics: interaction with other gene mutations. Blood 2005;106:3740–3746
Thiede C, Koch S, Creutzig E. Prevalence and prognostic impact of NPM1 mutations in 1485 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Blood 2006;107:4011–4020
Gorello P, Cazzaniga G, Alberti F. Quantitative assessment of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia carrying nucleophosmin (NPM1) gene mutations. Leukemia 2006;20:1103–1108
Chou WC, Tang JL, Wu SJ. Clinical implications of minimal residual disease monitoring by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in acute myeloid leukemia patients bearing nucleophosmin (NPM1) mutations. Leukemia 2007;21:998–1004
Palmisano M, Grafone T, Ottaviani E. NPM1 mutations are more stable than FLT3 mutations during the course of disease in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2007;92:1268–1269
Inoue K, Ogawa H, Yamagami T. Long-term follow-up of minimal residual disease in leukemia patients by monitoring WT1 (Wilms tumor gene) expression levels. Blood 1996;88:2267–2278
Cilloni D, Gottardi E, De Micheli D. Quantitative assessment of WT1 expression by real time quantitative PCR may be a useful tool for monitoring minimal residual disease in acute leukemia patients. Leukemia 2002;16:2115–2121
Ogawa H, Tamaki H, Ikegame K. The usefulness of monitoring WT1 gene transcripts for the prediction and management of relapse following allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute type leukemia. Blood 2003;101:1698–1704
Garg M, Moore H, Tobal K, Liu Yin JA. Prognostic significance of quantitative analysis of WT1 gene transcripts by competitive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in acute leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2003;123:49–59
Ostergaard M, Olesen LH, Hasle H. WT1 gene expression: an excellent tool for monitoring minimal residual disease in 70% of acute myeloid leukaemia patients - results from a single-centre study. Br J Haematol 2004;125:590–600.
Barragan E, Cervera J, Bolufer P. Prognostic implications of Wilms’ tumor gene (WT1) expression in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2004;89:926–933
Weisser M, Kern W, Rauhut S. Prognostic impact of RT-PCR-based quantification of WT1 gene expression during MRD monitoring of acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2005;19:1416–1423
Hamalainen MM, Kairisto V, Juvonen V. Wilms tumour gene 1 overexpression in bone marrow as a marker for minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukaemia. Eur J Haematol 2008;80:201–207
Candoni A, Tiribelli M, Toffoletti E. Quantitative assessment of WT1 gene expression after allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a useful tool for monitoring minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. Eur J Haematol 2009;82:61–68
Gaiger A, Schmid D, Heinze G. Detection of the WT1 transcript by RT-PCR in complete remission has no prognostic relevance in de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 1998;12:1886–1894
Barragan E, Pajuelo JC, Ballester S. Minimal residual disease detection in acute myeloid leukemia by mutant nucleophosmin (NPM1): comparison with WT1 gene expression. Clin Chim Acta 2008;395:120–123
Larson RA. Management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in older patients. Semin Hematol 2006;43:126–133
van der Velden VH, Cazzaniga G, Schrauder A. Analysis of minimal residual disease by Ig/TCR gene rearrangements: guidelines for interpretation of real-time quantitative PCR data. Leukemia 2007;21:604–611
van Dongen JJ, Wolvers-Tettero IL. Analysis of immunoglobulin and T cell receptor genes. Part II: possibilities and limitations in the diagnosis and management of lymphoproliferative diseases and related disorders. Clin Chim Acta 1991;198:93–174
Beishuizen A, Verhoeven MA, Mol EJ. Detection of immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene rearrangements by Southern blot analysis: recommendations for optimal results. Leukemia 1993;7:2045–2053
Szczepanski T, Beishuizen A, Pongers-Willemse MJ. Cross-lineage T cell receptor gene rearrangements occur in more than ninety percent of childhood precursor-B acute lymphoblastic leukemias: alternative PCR targets for detection of minimal residual disease. Leukemia 1999;13:196–205
Breit TM, Wolvers-Tettero IL, Beishuizen A. Southern blot patterns, frequencies, and junctional diversity of T-cell receptor-delta gene rearrangements in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 1993;82:3063–3074
van der Velden VH, Hochhaus A, Cazzaniga G. Detection of minimal residual disease in hematologic malignancies by real-time quantitative PCR: principles, approaches, and laboratory aspects. Leukemia 2003;17:1013–1034
Mortuza FY, Papaioannou M, Moreira IM. Minimal residual disease tests provide an independent predictor of clinical outcome in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1094–1104
Bruggemann M, Raff T, Flohr T. Clinical significance of minimal residual disease quantification in adult patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2006;107:1116–1123
Lee S, Kim DW, Cho B. Risk factors for adults with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in remission treated with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: the potential of real-time quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Br J Haematol 2003;120:145–153
Gleissner B, Rieder H, Thiel E. Prospective BCR-ABL analysis by polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in adult acute B-lineage lymphoblastic leukemia: reliability of RT-nested-PCR and comparison to cytogenetic data. Leukemia 2001;15:1834–1840
Radich JP. Molecular measurement of minimal residual disease in Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2002;15:91–103
Stirewalt DL, Guthrie KA, Beppu L. Predictors of relapse and overall survival in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia after transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2003;9:206–212
Yanada M, Sugiura I, Takeuchi J. Prospective monitoring of BCR-ABL1 transcript levels in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia undergoing imatinib-combined chemotherapy. Br J Haematol 2008;143:503–510
Olivero S, Maroc C, Beillard E. Detection of different Ikaros isoforms in human leukaemias using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Br J Haematol 2000;110:826–830
Paulsson K, Cazier JB, MacDougall F. Microdeletions are a general feature of adult and adolescent acute lymphoblastic leukemia: unexpected similarities with pediatric disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:6708–6713
Mullighan CG, Miller CB, Radtke I. BCR-ABL1 lymphoblastic leukaemia is characterized by the deletion of Ikaros. Nature 2008;453:110–114
Iacobucci I, Lonetti A, Cilloni D. Identification of different Ikaros cDNA transcripts in Philadelphia-positive adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia by a high-throughput capillary electrophoresis sizing method. Haematologica 2008;93:1814–1821
Iacobucci I, Lonetti A, Messa F. Expression of spliced oncogenic Ikaros isoforms in Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: implications for a new mechanism of resistance. Blood 2008;112:3847–3855
The International Non Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project. A predictive model for aggressive non Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1993;329:987–994
Solal Celigny P, Pascal R, Colombat P. Follicular lymphoma international prognostic index. Blood 2004;104:1258–1265
Hoster E, Dreyling M, Klapper W. A new prognostic index (MIPI) for patients with advanced-stage mantle cell lymphoma. Blood 2008;111:558–56
Dunphy CH. Applications of flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry to diagnostic hematopathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004;128:1004–1022
de Jong D, Rosenwald A, Chhanabhai M. Immunohistochemical prognostic markers in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: validation of tissue microarray as a prerequisite for broad clinical applications—a study from the Lunenburg Lymphoma Biomarker Consortium. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:805–812.
Kaleem Z. Flow cytometric analysis of lymphomas: current status and usefulness. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;130:1850–1858
Craig FE, Foon KA. Flow cytometric immunophenotyping for hematologic neoplasms. Blood 2008;111;3941–3967
Douglas VK, Gordon LI, Goolsby CL. Lymphoid aggregates in bone marrow mimic residual lymphoma after rituximab therapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Am J Clin Pathol 1999;112:844–853
Campbell LJ. Cytogenetics of lymphomas. Pathology 2005;37:493–507
Ventura RA, Martin-Subero JI, Jones M. FISH analysis for the detection of lymphoma-associated chromosomal abnormalities in routine paraffin-embedded tissue. J Mol Diagn 2006;8:141–151
Sreekantaish C. FISH panels for hematologic malignancies. Cytogenet Genome Res 2007;118:284–296
Poetsch M, Weber-Matthiesen K, Plendl HJ. Detection of the t(14;18) chromosomal translocation by interphase cytogenetics with yeast-artificial-chromosome probes in follicular lymphoma and nonneoplastic lymphoproliferation. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:963–969
Sanchez-Izquierdo D, Siebert R, Harder L. Detection of translocations affecting the BCL6 locus in B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. Leukemia 2001;15:1475–1484
Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 1992;258:818–821
Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet 1998;20:207–211
Drexler HG, Borkhardt A, Janssen JW. Detection of chromosomal translocations in leukemia-lymphoma cells by polymerase chain reaction. Leuk Lymphoma 1995;19:359–380
Gu K, Chan WC, Hawley RC. Practical detection of t(14;18) (IgH/BCL2) in follicular lymphoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008;132:1355–1361
Mocellin S, Rossi CR, Pilati P. Quantitative real-time PCR: a powerful ally in cancer research. Trends Mol Med 2003;9:189–195
Leich E, Hartmann EM, Burek C. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of gene expression profiling in lymphomas. APMIS 2007;115:1135–1146
Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet 2001;29;365–371
MAQC Consortium Shi L, Reid LH. The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements. Nat Biotechnol 2006;24:1151–1161
Shi L, Jones W, Jensen R. The balance of reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of lists of differentially expressed genes in microarray studies. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9(Suppl 9):S10
Ebert BL, Golub TR. Genomic approaches to hematologic malignancies. Blood 2004;104:923–932
Lossos IS, Morgensztern D. Prognostic biomarkers in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:995–1007
Abramson JS, Shipp MA. Advances in the biology and therapy of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: moving toward a molecularly targeted approach. Blood 2005;106:1164–1174
Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature 2000;403:503–511
Wright G, Tan B, Rosenwald A. A gene expression-based method to diagnose clinically distinct subgroups of diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:9991–9996
Lenz G, Wright GW, Emre NC. Molecular subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma arise by distinct genetic pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:13520–13525
Rosenwald A, Wright G, Chan WC. The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1937–1947
Rimsza LM, Roberts RA, Miller TP. Loss of MHC class II gene and protein expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is related to decreased tumor immunosurveillance and poor patient survival regardless of other prognostic factors: a follow-up study from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Molecular Profiling Project. Blood 2004;103:4251–4258
Lenz G, Wright G, Dave SS. Stromal gene signatures in large-B-cell lymphomas. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2313–2323
Lenz G, Wright G, Dave S. Molecular signatures implicate iImmune cells, fibrosis, and angiogenesis in survival following R-CHOP treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma [abstract]. Blood 2008;112:Abstract 475
Hans CP, Weisenburger DD, Greiner TC. Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. Blood 2004;103:275–282
Lossos IS, Czerwinski DK, Alizadeh AA. Prediction of survival in diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma based on the expression of six genes. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1828–1837
Rimsza LM, LeBlanc ML, Unger JM. Gene expression predicts overall survival in paraffin-embedded tissues of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP. Blood 2008;112:3425–3433
Malumbres R, Chen J, Tibshirani R. Paraffin-based 6-gene model predicts outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with R-CHOP. Blood 2008;111:5509–5514
Choi WWL, Weisenburger DD, Greiner TC. A new immunostain algorithm classifies diffuse large B-cell lymphoma into molecular subtypes with high accuracy. Clin Cancer Res 2009;in press
Fu K, Weisenburger DD, Choi WWL. Addition of rituximab to standard chemotherapy improves the survival of both the germinal center B-cell-like and non-germinal center B-cell-like subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:4587–4594
Nyman H, Adde M, Karjalainen-Lindsberg ML. Prognostic impact of immunohistochemically defined germinal center phenotype in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with immunochemotherapy. Blood 2007;109:4930–4935
Lenz G, Wright G, Dave S. Gene expression signatures predict overall survival in diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated with rituximab and CHOP-like chemotherapy [abstract]. Blood 2007;110:Abstract 348
Iqbal J, Sanger WG, Horsman DE. BCL2 translocation defines a unique tumor subset within the germinal center B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Am J Pathol 2004;165:159–166
Huang JZ, Sanger WG, Greiner TC. The t(14;18) defines a unique subset of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a germinal center B-cell gene expression profile. Blood 2002;99:2285–2290.
Gascoyne RD, Adomat SA, Krajewski S. Prognostic significance of Bcl-2 protein expression and Bcl-2 gene rearrangement in diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Blood 1997;90:244–251
Iqbal J, Neppalli VT, Wright G. BCL2 expression is a prognostic marker for the activated B-cell-like type of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:961–968
Mounier N, Briere J, Gisselbrecht C. Rituximab plus CHOP (R-CHOP) overcomes bcl-2–associated resistance to chemotherapy in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Blood 2003;101:4279–4284
Wilson KS, Sehn LH, Berry B. CHOP-R therapy overcomes the adverse prognostic influence of BCL-2 expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2007;48:1102–1109
Mounier N, Briere J, Gisselbrecht C. Estimating the impact of rituximab on bcl-2-associated resistance to CHOP in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Haematologica 2006;91:715–716
Lossos IS, Jones CD, Warnke R. Expression of a single gene, BCL-6, strongly predicts survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2001;98:945–951
Winter JN, Zhang L, Li S. P21, BCL-2, and the IPI, but not BCL-6, predict clinical outcome in DLBCL treated with rituximab-CHOP: long-term follow-up from E4494 [abstract]. Ann Oncol 2008;19(Suppl 4):Abstract 51
Winter JN, Weller EA, Horning SJ. Prognostic significance of Bcl-6 protein expression in DLBCL treated with CHOP or R-CHOP: a prospective correlative study. Blood 2006;107:4207–4213
The Lunenburg Lymphoma Biomarker Consortium (LLBC). First results of an international study to establish a new clinico-biological prognostic index for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) [abstract]. Ann Oncol 2008;19(Suppl 4):Abstract 54bis
Young KH, Leroy K, Moller MB. Structural profiles of TP53 gene mutations predict clinical outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: an international collaborative study. Blood 2008;112:3088–3098
Chilosi M, Doglioni C, Magalini A. p21/WAF1 cyclin-kinase inhibitor expression in non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: a potential marker of p53 tumor-suppressor gene function. Blood 1996;88:4012–4020
Young KH, Weisenburger DD, Dave BJ. Mutations in the DNA-binding codons of TP53, which are associated with decreased expression of TRAILreceptor-2, predict for poor survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2007;110:4396–4405
Aurora V, Li S, Horning SJ. Prognostic significance of p53/p21 expression in DLBCL treated with CHOP or R-CHOP: a correlative study of E4494 [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(Suppl 1):Abstract 8038
Natkunam Y, Zhao S, Mason DY. The oncoprotein LMO2 is expressed in normal germinal-center B cells and in human B-cell lymphomas. Blood 2007;109:1636–1642
Natkunam Y, Farinha P, Hsi ED. LMO2 protein expression predicts survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy with and without rituximab. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:447–454
Dave SS, Wright G, Tan B. Prediction of survival in follicular lymphoma based on molecular features of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2159–2169
Glas AM, Kersten MJ, Delahaye LJ. Gene expression profiling in follicular lymphoma to assess clinical aggressiveness and to guide the choice of treatment. Blood 2005;105:301–307
Al-Tourah AJ, Chhanabhai M, Hoskins PJ. Transformed lymphoma: incidence and long-term outcome [abstract]. Blood 2004;104:Abstract 3253
Lossos IS, Alizadeh AA, Diehn M. Transformation of follicular lymphoma to diffuse large-cell lymphoma: alternative patterns with increased or decreased expression of c-myc and its regulated genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:8886–8891
Elenitoba-Johnson KSJ, Jenson SD, Abbott RT. Involvement of multiple signaling pathways in follicular lymphoma transformation: p38-mitogen-activated protein kinase as a target for therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:7259–7264
Martinez-Climent JA, Alizadeh AA, Segraves R. Transformation of follicular lymphoma to diffuse large cell lymphoma is associated with a heterogeneous set of DNA copy number and gene expression alterations. Blood 2003;101:3109–3117
Davies AJ, Rosenwald A, Wright G. Transformation of follicular lymphoma to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma proceeds by distinct oncogenic mechanisms. Br J Haematol 2007;136:286–293
Fernandez V, Hartmann E, Ott G. Pathogenesis of mantle-cell lymphoma: all oncogenic roads lead to dysregulation of cell cycle and DNA damage response pathways. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:6364–6369
Hartmann E, Fernandez V, Moreno V. Five-gene model to predict survival in mantle-cell lymphoma using frozen or formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:4966–4972
Rosenwald A, Wright G, Wiestner A. The proliferation gene expression signature is a quantitative integrator of oncogenic events that predicts survival in mantle cell lymphoma. Cancer Cell 2003;3:185–197
Räty R, Franssila K, Joensuu H. Ki-67 expression level, histological subtype, and the International Prognostic Index as outcome predictors in mantle cell lymphoma. Eur J Haematol 2002;69:11–20
Tiemann M, Schrader C, Klapper W. Histopathology, cell proliferation indices and clinical outcome in 304 patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL): a clinicopathological study from the European MCL Network. Br J Haematol 2005;131:29–38
Katzenberger T, Petzoldt C, Holler S. The Ki67 proliferation index is a quantitative indicator of clinical risk in mantle cell lymphoma. Blood 2006;107:3407
Johnson NA, Gascoyne RD. Gene expression signatures in follicular lymphoma: are they ready for the clinic? Haematologica 2008;93:982–987
van der Velden VH, Hochhaus A, Cazzaniga G. Detection of minimal residual disease in hematologic malignancies by real-time quantitative PCR: principles, approaches, and laboratory aspects. Leukemia 2003;17:1013–1034
Horsman DE, Gascoyne RD, Coupland RW. Comparison of cytogenetic analysis, southern analysis, and polymerase chain reaction for the detection of t(14; 18) in follicular lymphoma. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;103:472–478
Buckstein R, Pennell N, Berinstein NL. What is remission in follicular lymphoma and what is its relevance? Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2005;18:27–56
Akasaka T, Akasaka H, Yonetani N. Refinement of the BCL2/immunoglobulin heavy chain fusion gene in t(14;18) (q32;q21) by polymerase chain reaction amplification for long targets. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1998;21:17–29.
Weinberg OK, Ai WZ, Mariappan MR. “Minor” BCL2 breakpoints in follicular lymphoma: frequency and correlation with grade and disease presentation in 236 cases. J Mol Diagn 2007;9:530–537
Albinger-Hegyi A, Hochreutener B, Abdou MT. High frequency of t(14;18)-translocation breakpoints outside of major breakpoint and minor cluster regions in follicular lymphomas: improved polymerase chain reaction protocols for their detection. Am J Pathol 2002;160:823–832
van Dongen JJ, Langerak AW, Bruggemann M. Design and standardization of PCR primers and protocols for detection of clonal immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene recombinations in suspect lymphoproliferations: report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BMH4-CT98-3936. Leukemia 2003;17:2257–2317
Summers KE, Goff LK, Wilson AG. Frequency of the Bcl-2/IgH rearrangement in normal individuals: implications for the monitoring of disease in patients with follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:420–424
Schmitt C, Balogh B, Grundt A. The bcl-2/IgH rearrangement in a population of 204 healthy individuals: occurrence, age and gender distribution, breakpoints, and detection method validity. Leuk Res 2006;30:745–750
Czuczman MS. Controversies in follicular lymphoma: “who, what, when, where, and why?” (not necessarily in that order!). Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2006:303–310
Johnson PW, Swinbank K, MacLennan S. Variability of polymerase chain reaction detection of the bcl-2-IgH translocation in an international multicentre study. Ann Oncol 1999;10:1349–1354
Darby AJ, Lanham S, Soubeyran P, Johnson PW. Variability of quantitative polymerase chain reaction detection of the bcl-2-IgH translocation in an international multicenter study. Haematologica 2005;90:1706–1707
Corradini P, Astolfi M, Cherasco C. Molecular monitoring of minimal residual disease in follicular and mantle cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas treated with high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell autografting. Blood 1997;89:724–731
Leonard BM, Hetu F, Busque L. Lymphoma cell burden in progenitor cell grafts measured by competitive polymerase chain reaction: less than one log difference between bone marrow and peripheral blood sources. Blood 1998;91:331–339
Gribben J, Neuberg D, Barber M. Detection of residual lymphoma cells by polymerase chain reaction in peripheral blood is significantly less predictive for relapse than detection in bone marrow. Blood 1994;83:3800–3807
Gribben J, Freedman A, Woo S. All advanced stage non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas with a polymerase chain reaction amplifiable breakpoint of bcl-2 have residual cells containing the bcl-2 rearrangement at evaluation and after treatment. Blood 1991;78:3275–3280
Lopez-Guillermo A, Cabanillas F, McLaughlin P. The clinical significance of molecular response in indolent follicular lymphomas. Blood 1998;91:2955–2960
Fernandez-Ruiz E, Cabrerizo M, Ortega M. High molecular response rate and clinical correlation in patients with follicular lymphoma treated with cyclophosphamide-vincristine-prednisone plus interferon alpha 2b. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:2497–2503
Lambrechts A, Hupkes P, Dorssers L, van’t Veer M. Clinical significance of t(14; 18)-positive cells in the circulation of patients with stage III or IV follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma during first remission. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:1541–1546
Mandigers CM, Meijerink JP, Mensink EJ. Lack of correlation between numbers of circulating t(14;18)-positive cells and response to first-line treatment in follicular lymphoma. Blood 2001;98:940–944
Czuczman MS, Grillo-Lopez AJ, McLaughlin P. Clearing of cells bearing the bcl-2 [t(14;18)] translocation from blood and marrow of patients treated with rituximab alone or in combination with CHOP chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2001;12:109–114
Schmitt C, Balogh B, Grundt A. The bcl-2/IgH rearrangement in a population of 204 healthy individuals: occurrence, age and gender distribution, breakpoints, and detection method validity. Leuk Res 2006;30:745–750
Colombat P, Salles G, Brousse N. Rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) as single first-line therapy for patients with follicular lymphoma with a low tumor burden: clinical and molecular evaluation. Blood 2001;97:101–106
Ghielmini M, Schmitz SF, Cogliatti SB. Prolonged treatment with rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma significantly increases event-free survival and response duration compared with the standard weekly x 4 schedule. Blood 2004;103:4416–4423
Foran JM, Gupta RK, Cunningham D. A UK multicentre phase II study of rituximab (chimaeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) in patients with follicular lymphoma, with PCR monitoring of molecular response. Br J Haematol 2000;109:81–88
Czuczman MS, Grillo-Lopez AJ, White CA. Treatment of patients with low-grade B-cell lymphoma with the combination of chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and CHOP chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:268–276
Czuczman MS, Weaver R, Alkuzweny B. Prolonged clinical and molecular remission in patients with low-grade or follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma treated with rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy: 9-year follow-up. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:4711–4716
Pott C, Boettcher S, Brueggemann M. Quantitative assessment of circulating t(14;18) positive cells by RQ-PCR at diagnosis and follow-up correspond to clinical characteristics and predicts time to treatment failure in follicular lymphoma [abstract]. Blood 2006;108:Abstact 2414
Ladetto M, De Marco F, Benedetti F. Prospective, multicenter randomized GITMO/IIL trial comparing intensive (R-HDS) versus conventional (CHOP-R) chemoimmunotherapy in high-risk follicular lymphoma at diagnosis: the superior disease control of R-HDS does not translate into an overall survival advantage. Blood 2008;111:4004–4013
Hirt C, Schuler F, Kiefer T. Rapid and sustained clearance of circulating lymphoma cells after chemotherapy plus rituximab: clinical significance of quantitative t(14;18) PCR monitoring in advanced stage follicular lymphoma patients. Br J Haematol 2008;141:631–640
Rambaldi A, Carlotti E, Oldani E. Quantitative PCR of bone marrow BCL2/IgH+ cells at diagnosis predicts treatment response and long-term outcome in follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2005;105:3428–3433
Gribben J, Neuberg D, Freedman A. Detection by polymerase chain reaction of residual cells with the bcl-2 translocation is associated with increased risk of relapse after autologous bone marrow transplantation for B-cell lymphoma. Blood 1993;81:3449–3457.
Hirt C, Dolken G. Quantitative detection of t(14;18)-positive cells in patients with follicular lymphoma before and after autologous bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000;25:419–426
Freedman A, Gribben J, Neuberg D. High-dose therapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with follicular lymphoma during first remission. Blood 1996;88:2780–2786
Freedman AS, Neuberg D, Mauch P. Long-term follow-up of autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma. Blood 1999;94:3325–3333
Brown JR, Feng Y, Gribben JG. Long-term survival after autologous bone marrow transplantation for follicular lymphoma in first remission. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007;13:1057–1065
Gribben JG, Freedman AS, Neuberg D. Immunologic purging of marrow assessed by PCR before autologous bone marrow transplantation for B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1525–1533
Berinstein NL, Buckstein R, Imrie K. Bcl-2 clearance: optimising outcomes in follicular non-Hodgkin‘s lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002;29(Suppl 1):S14–S17
Galimberti S, Guerrini F, Morabito F. Quantitative molecular evaluation in autotransplant programs for follicular lymphoma: efficacy of in vivo purging by Rituximab. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003;32:57–63
Arcaini L, Montanari F, Alessandrino EP. Immunochemotherapy with in vivo purging and autotransplant induces long clinical and molecular remission in advanced relapsed and refractory follicular lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2008;19:1331–1335
Bottcher S, Ritgen M, Buske S. Minimal residual disease detection in mantle cell lymphoma: methods and significance of four-color flow cytometry compared to consensus IGH-polymerase chain reaction at initial staging and for follow-up examinations. Haematologica 2008;93:551–559
Andersen NS, Donovan JW, Zuckerman A. Real-time polymerase chain reaction estimation of bone marrow tumor burden using clonal immunoglobulin heavy chain gene and bcl-1/JH rearrangements in mantle cell lymphoma. Exp Hematol 2002;30:703–710
Brizova H, Kalinova M, Krskova L. Quantitative monitoring of cyclin D1 expression: a molecular marker for minimal residual disease monitoring and a predictor of the disease outcome in patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Int J Cancer 2008;123:2865–2870
Howard OM, Gribben JG, Neuberg DS. Rituximab and CHOP induction therapy for newly diagnosed mantle-cell lymphoma: molecular complete responses are not predictive of progression-free survival. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1288–1294
Pott C, Hoster E, Böttcher S. Molecular remission after combined immunochemotherapy is of prognostic relevance in patients with MCL: results of the randomized Intergroup trials of the European MCL Network [abstract]. Blood 2008;112:Abstract 582
Pott C, Schrader C, Gesk S. Quantitative assessment of molecular remission after high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation predicts long-term remission in mantle cell lymphoma. Blood 2006;107:2271–2278
Ladetto M, Magni M, Pagliano G. Rituximab induces effective clearance of minimal residual disease in molecular relapses of mantle cell lymphoma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006;12:1270–1276
Gianni AM, Magni M, Martelli M. Long-term remission in mantle cell lymphoma following high-dose sequential chemotherapy and in vivo rituximab-purged stem cell autografting (R-HDS regimen). Blood 2003;102:749–755
Geisler CH, Kolstad A, Laurell A. Long-term progression-free survival of mantle cell lymphoma after intensive front-line immunochemotherapy with in vivo-purged stem cell rescue: a nonrandomized phase 2 multicenter study by the Nordic Lymphoma Group. Blood 2008;112:2687–2693
van der Velden VH, Hoogeveen PG, Pieters R, van Dongen JJ. Impact of two independent bone marrow samples on minimal residual disease monitoring in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2006;133:382–388
Jones D, Kamel-Reid S, Bahler D. Laboratory practice guidelines for detecting and reporting BCR-ABL drug resistance mutations in chronic myelogenous leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report of the Association for Molecular Pathology. J Mol Diagn 2009;11:4–11
Lucio P, Gaipa G, van Lochem EG. BIOMED-I concerted action report: flow cytometric immunophenotyping of precursor B-ALL with standardized triple-stainings. BIOMED-1 Concerted Action Investigation of Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Leukemia: International Standardization and Clinical Evaluation. Leukemia 2001;15:1185–1192
Rawstron AC, Villamor N, Ritgen M. International standardized approach for flow cytometric residual disease monitoring in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Leukemia 2007;21:956–964
Gabert J, Beillard E, van der Velden VH. Standardization and quality control studies of ‘real-time’ quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction of fusion gene transcripts for residual disease detection in leukemia—a Europe Against Cancer program. Leukemia 2003;17:2318–2357