Predictors and Temporal Trends of Adjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Use in Breast Cancer

Authors:
Tiffany H. Svahn From the Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Biostatistics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Breast Medical Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Search for other papers by Tiffany H. Svahn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Joyce C. Niland From the Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Biostatistics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Breast Medical Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Search for other papers by Joyce C. Niland in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Robert W. Carlson From the Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Biostatistics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Breast Medical Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Search for other papers by Robert W. Carlson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Melissa E. Hughes From the Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Biostatistics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Breast Medical Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Search for other papers by Melissa E. Hughes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MSc
,
Rebecca A. Ottesen From the Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Biostatistics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Breast Medical Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Search for other papers by Rebecca A. Ottesen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Richard L. Theriault From the Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Biostatistics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Breast Medical Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Search for other papers by Richard L. Theriault in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DO
,
Stephen B. Edge From the Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Biostatistics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Breast Medical Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Search for other papers by Stephen B. Edge in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Anne F. Schott From the Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Biostatistics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Breast Medical Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Search for other papers by Anne F. Schott in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Michael A. Bookman From the Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Biostatistics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Breast Medical Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Search for other papers by Michael A. Bookman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
, and
Jane C. Weeks From the Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Biostatistics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Breast Medical Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Search for other papers by Jane C. Weeks in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
Full access

After the first report of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) trial, adjuvant aromatase inhibitor use increased rapidly among National Comprehensive Cancer Network member institutions. Increased aromatase inhibitor use was associated with older age, vascular disease, overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), or more advanced stage, and substantial variation was seen among institutions. This article examines adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women after the first report of the trial, identifies temporal relationships in aromatase inhibitor use, and examines characteristics associated with choice of endocrine therapy among 4044 postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive nonmetastatic breast cancer presenting from July 1997 to December 2004. Multivariable logistic regression analysis examined temporal associations and characteristics associated with aromatase inhibitor use. Time-trend analysis showed increased aromatase inhibitor and decreased tamoxifen use after release of ATAC results (P < .0001). In multivariable regression analysis, institution (P <. 0001), vascular disease (P <. 0001), age (P = .0002), stage (P = .0002), and HER2 status (P = .0009) independently predicted aromatase inhibitor use. Institutional rates of use ranged from 15% to 66%. Adjuvant aromatase inhibitor use increased after the first report of ATAC, with this increase associated with older age, vascular disease, overexpression of HER2, or more advanced stage. Substantial variation was seen among institutions.

Correspondence to: Robert W. Carlson, MD, Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305. E-mail: rcarlson@stanford.edu
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1

    Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2005;365:16871717.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Baum M. The ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) adjuvant breast cancer trial in postmenopausal (PM) women [abstract]. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001;69:Abstract 210.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Baum M, Budzar AU, Cuzick J et al.. Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: first results of the ATAC randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:21312139.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Howell A, Cuzick J, Baum M et al.. Results of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) trial after completion of 5 years’ adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. Lancet 2005;365:6062.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Coates AS, Keshaviah A, Thurlimann B et al.. Five years of letrozole compared with tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: update of study BIG 1-98. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:486492.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Goss PE, Ingle JN, Martino S et al.. Randomized trial of letrozole following tamoxifen as extended adjuvant therapy in receptor-positive breast cancer: updated findings from NCIC CTG MA.17. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:12621271.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Coombes RC, Hall E, Gibson LJ et al.. A randomized trial of exemestane after two to three years of tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:10811092.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Boccardo F, Rubagotti A, Puntoni M et al.. Switching to anastrozole versus continued tamoxifen treatment of early breast cancer: preliminary results of the Italian Tamoxifen Anastrozole Trial. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:51385147.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Jakesz R, Jonat W, Gnant M et al.. Switching of postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer to anastrozole after 2 years’ adjuvant tamoxifen: combined results of ABCSG trial 8 and ARNO 95 trial. Lancet 2005;366:455462.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Carlson RW, Anderson BO, Bensinger W et al.. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast Cancer, version 2, 2002.

  • 11

    Niland JC. NCCN Outcomes Research Database: the first two years of data collection and analysis. Oncology 1999;13:575578.

  • 12

    Katz JN, Chang LC, Sangha O et al.. Can comorbidity be measured by questionnaire rather than medical record review? Med Care 1996;34:7384.

  • 13

    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373383.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Winer EP, Hudis C, Burstein HJ et al.. American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: status report 2002. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:33173327.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Carlson RW, Anderson BO, Burstein HJ et al.. Breast cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2005;3:238289.

  • 16

    Winer EP, Hudis C, Burstein HJ et al.. American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: status report 2004. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:619629.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Carlson RW, Hudis CA, Pritchard KI. Adjuvant endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancer: evolution of NCCN, ASCO, and St Gallen recommendations. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2006;4:971979.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Buzdar A, Macahilig C. How rapidly do oncologists respond to clinical trial data? Oncologist 2005;10:1521.

  • 19

    Aiello EJ, Buist DS, Wagner EH et al.. Diffusion of aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer therapy between 1996 and 2003 in the Cancer Research Network. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008;107:397403.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Fisher B, Dignam J, Bryant J et al.. Five versus more than five years of tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes and estrogen receptor-positive tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:15291542.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Wale C et al.. Retrospective analysis of time to recurrence in the ATAC trial according to hormone receptor status: an hypothesis-generating study. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:75127517.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 540 56 1
PDF Downloads 129 23 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0