Neutrophil Biology and the Next Generation of Myeloid Growth Factors

Author:
David C. Dale Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by David C. Dale in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
Full access

Neutrophils are the body's critical phagocytic cells for defense against bacterial and fungal infections; bone marrow must produce approximately 10 x 109 neutrophils/kg/d to maintain normal blood neutrophil counts. Production of neutrophils depends on myeloid growth factors, particularly granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). After the original phase of development, researchers modified these growth factors to increase their size and delay renal clearance, increase their biologic potency, and create unique molecules for business purposes. Pegylated G-CSF is a successful product of these efforts. Researchers have also tried to identify small molecules to serve as oral agents that mimic the parent molecules, but these programs have been less successful. In 2006, the European Medicines Agency established guidelines for the introduction of new biologic medicinal products claimed to be similar to reference products that had previously been granted marketing authorization in the European community, called bio-similars. Globally, new and copied versions of G-CSF and other myeloid growth factors are now appearing. Some properties of the myeloid growth factors are similar to other agents, offering opportunities for the development of alternative drugs and treatments. For example, recent research shows that hematopoietic progenitor cells can be mobilized with a chemokine receptor antagonist, chemotherapy, G-CSF, and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Advances in neutrophil biology coupled with better understanding and development of myeloid growth factors offer great promise for improving the care of patients with cancer and many other disorders.

Dr. Dale is a consultant for Amgen Inc.; Caremark LLC; Cellerant Therapeutics, Inc.; Merck & Co., Inc.; Maxygen, Inc.; Schering-Plough Corporation; and Telik, Inc. He receives research support from Amgen Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., The Barth Syndrome Foundation, Inc., Genzyme Corporation, and National Institutes of Health; and is a speaker for Amgen Inc.

Correspondence: David C. Dale, MD, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Room AA522, Box 356422, Seattle, WA 98195-6422.E-mail: dcdale@u.washington.edu
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1

    Dale DC. Nonmalignant disorders of leukocytes. In: Dale DC, Federman DD, eds. ACP Medicine 2006. New York: WebMD, Inc.; 2006:10301037.

  • 2

    Dale DC, Boxer LA, Liles WC. The phagocytes: neutrophils and monocytes. Blood 2008;112:935945.

  • 3

    Cartwright GE, Athens JW, Wintrobe MM. The kinetics of granulopoiesis in normal man. Blood 1964;24:780803.

  • 4

    Dancey JT, Deubelbeiss KA, Harker LA, Finch CA. Neutrophil kinetics in man. J Clin Invest 1976;58:705715.

  • 5

    Metcalf D. Hematopoietic cytokines. Blood 2008;111:485491.

  • 6

    Chatta GS, Price TH, Allen RC, Dale DC. Effects of in vivo recombinant methionyl human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on the neutrophil response and peripheral blood colony-forming cells in healthy young and elderly adult volunteers. Blood 1994;84:29232929.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Price TH, Chatta GS, Dale DC. Effect of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on neutrophil kinetics in normal young and elderly humans. Blood 1996;88:335340.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Anderlini P, Champlin RE. Biologic and molecular effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in healthy individuals: recent findings and current challenges. Blood 2008;111:17671772.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Hübel K, Dale DC, Liles WC. Therapeutic use of cytokines to modulate phagocyte function for the treatment of infectious diseases: current status of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and interferon-gamma. J Infect Dis 2002;185:14901501.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Christopher MJ, Link DC. Regulation of neutrophil homeostasis. Curr Opin Hematol 2007;14:38.

  • 11

    Lieschke GJ, Burgess AW. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (2). N Engl J Med 1992;327:99106.

  • 12

    Crawford J, Ozer H, Stoller R et al.. Reduction by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor of fever and neutropenia induced by chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 1991;325:164170.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Pettengell R, Gurney H, Radford JA et al.. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to prevent dose-limiting neutropenia in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a randomized controlled trial. Blood 1992;80:14301436.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Applebaum FR. The clinical use of hematopoietic growth factors. Semin Hematol 1989;26:714.

  • 15

    Dale DC, Bonilla MA, Davis MW et al.. A randomized controlled phase III trial of recombinant human G-CSF for treatment of severe chronic neutropenia. Blood 1993;181:24962502.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH et al.. 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:31873205.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Lyman GH, Kleiner JM. Summary and comparison of myeloid growth factor guidelines in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2007;5:217228.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Gaberc-Porekar V, Zore I, Podobnik B, Menart V. Obstacles and pitfalls in the PEGylation of therapeutic proteins. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 2008;11:242250.

  • 19

    Molineux G. Pegylation: engineering improved biopharmaceuticals for oncology. Pharmacotherapy 2003;23:3S8S.

  • 20

    Holmes FA, O’Shaughnessy JA, Vukelja S et al.. Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:727731.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Green MD, Koelbl H, Baselga J et al.. A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2003;14:2935.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Kubista E, Glaspy J, Holmes FA et al.. Bone pain associated with once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim is similar to daily filgrastim in patients with breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2003;3:391398.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Medical News Today. Maxygen announces positive progress in phase IIa clinical trial of novel PEG-G-CSF. Available at: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/93201.php. Accessed July 15, 2008.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Neose. Presentation of Glycopeg-G-CSF phase I data (conference call and webcast (November 7, 2007). Available at: http://www.neose.com/pages.htmlMENUS/techMENU/htm. Accessed July 16, 2008.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    DeFrees S, Wang ZG, Xing R et al.. GlycoPEGylation of recombinant therapeutic proteins produced in Escherichia coli. Glycobiology 2006;16:833843.

  • 26

    Doherty DH, Rosendahl MS, Smith DJ et al.. Site-specific PEGylation of engineered cysteine analogues of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Bioconjug Chem 2005;16:12911298.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Robinson SN, Chavez JM, Blonder JM et al.. Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization in mice by sustained delivery of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. J Interferon Cytokine Res 2005;25:490500.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Blonder JM, Robinson SN, Chavez JM et al.. G-CSF for formulated in a pluronic-based matrix shows extended pharmacokinetics and enhanced hematopoietic activity. Blood 2001;98:1251.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Cox GN, Smith DJ, Carlson SJ et al.. Enhanced circulating half-life and hematopoietic properties of a human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor/immunoglobulin fusion protein. Exp Hematol 2004;32:441449.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Halpern W, Riccobene TA, Agostini H et al.. Albugranin, a recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) genetically fused to recombinant human albumin induces prolonged myelopoietic effects in mice and monkeys. Pharm Res 2002;19:17201729.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Erben U, Thiel E, Notter M. Differential effects of a stem cell factor-immunoglobulin fusion protein on malignant and normal hematopoietic cells. Cancer Res 1999;59:29242930.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Chadwick DE, Williams DP, Niho Y et al.. Cytotoxicity of a recombinant diphtheria toxin-granulocyte colony-stimulating factor fusion protein on human leukemic blast cells. Leuk Lymphoma 1993;11:249262.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Asano Y, Yokoyama T, Shibata S et al.. Effect of the chimeric soluble granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor on the proliferation of leukemic blast cells from patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia. Cancer Res 1997;57:33953397.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    MacVittie TJ, Farese AM, Smith WG et al.. Myelopoietin, an engineered chimeric IL-3 and G-CSF receptor agonist, stimulates multilineage hematopoietic recovery in a nonhuman primate model of radiation-induced myelosuppression. Blood 2000;95:837845.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Williams DE, Park LS. Hematopoietic effects of a granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor/interleukin-3 fusion protein. Cancer 1991;67(10 Suppl):27052707.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Vadhan-Raj S, Broxmeyer HE, Andreeff M et al.. In vivo biologic effects of PIXY321, a synthetic hybrid protein of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-3 in cancer patients with normal hematopoiesis: a phase I study. Blood 1995;86:20982105.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Lee AY, Chung HK, Bae EK et al.. A recombinant human G-CSF/GM-CSF fusion protein from E. coli showing colony stimulating activity on human bone marrow cells. Biotechnol Lett 2003;25:205211.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    Miller SG. Discovery of cytokine mimics using cell-based systems. Drug Discov Today 2000:5(Suppl 1):7783.

  • 39

    Tian S, Lamb P, King AG et al.. A small, nonpeptidyl mimic of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor. Science 1998;281:257259.

  • 40

    Barinaga M. Small molecular fills hormone’s shoes. Science 1998;281:149150.

  • 41

    Shibata K, Maruyama-Takahashi K, Yamasaki M, Hirayama N. G-CSF receptor-binding cyclic peptides designed with artificial amino-acid linkers. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006;341:483488.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: non-clinical and clinical issues. London: European Medicines Agency (EMEA);2006.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    Draft guidance for sponsors: information and submission requirements for subsequent entry biologics (SEBs). Ottowa: Health Canada; 2008.

  • 44

    Dudzinski DM, Kesselheim AS. Scientific and legal viability of follow-on protein drugs. N Engl J Med 2008;358:843849.

  • 45

    Pollock C, Johnson DW, Hörl WH et al.. Pure red cell aplasia induced by erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3:1939.

  • 46

    Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Annex to guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: non-clinical and clinical issues. Guidance on similar medicinal products containing recombinant granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. London: European Medicines Agency (EMEA);2006.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47

    Pavlovic M, Girardin E, Kapetanovic L et al.. Similar biological medicinal products containing recombinant human growth hormone: European regulation. Horm Res 2008;69:1421.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48

    Reuters. Teva’s developed G-CSF is the first biosimilar to receive positive opinion from European Medicines Agency (EMEA). Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS196489+21-Feb-2008+BW20080221. Accessed July 17, 2008.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49

    Woodcock J, Griffin J, Behrman R et al.. The FDA’s assessment of follow-on protein products: a historical perspective. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2007;6:437442.

  • 50

    Papayannopoulou T. Current mechanistic scenarios in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell mobilization. Blood 2004;103:15801585.

  • 51

    Winkler IG, Lévesque JP. Mechanisms of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization: when innate immunity assails the cells that make blood and bone. Exp Hematol 2006;34:9961009.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52

    Semerad CL, Christopher MJ, Liu F et al.. G-CSF potently inhibits osteoblast activity and CXCL12 mRNA expression in the bone marrow. Blood 2005;106:30203027.

  • 53

    Broxmeyer HE, Orschell CM, Clapp DW et al.. Rapid mobilization of murine and human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells with AMD3100, a CXCR4 antagonist. J Exp Med 2005;201:13071318.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54

    Liles WC, Rodger E, Broxmeyer HE et al.. Augmented mobilization and collection of CD34+ hematopoietic cells from normal human volunteers stimulated with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor by single-dose administration of AMD3100, a CXCR4 antagonist. Transfusion 2005;45:295300.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55

    Calandra G, McCarty J, McGuirk J et al.. AMD3100 plus G-CSF can successfully mobilize CD34+ cells from non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Hodgkin’s disease and multiple myeloma patients previously failing mobilization with chemotherapy and/or cytokine treatment: compassionate use data. Bone Marrow Transplant 2008;41:331338.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56

    Hübel K, Carter RA, Liles WC et al.. Granulocyte transfusion therapy for infections in candidates and recipients of HPC transplantation: a comparative analysis of feasibility and outcome for community donors versus related donors. Transfusion 2002;42:14141421.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57

    Ofran Y, Avivi I, Oliven A et al.. Granulocyte transfusions for neutropenic patients with life-threatening infections: a single centre experience in 47 patients, who received 348 granulocyte transfusions. Vox Sang 2007;93:363369.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 58

    Boiron JM, Dazey B, Cailliot C et al.. Large-scale expansion and transplantation of CD34+ hematopoietic cells: in vitro and in vivo confirmation of neutropenia abrogation related to the expansion process without impairment of the long-term engraftment capacity. Transfusion 2006;46:19341942.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1 0 0
Full Text Views 1067 297 93
PDF Downloads 273 77 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0