Low Molecular Weight Heparins as Extended Prophylaxis Against Recurrent Thrombosis in Cancer Patients

Authors:
Cocav A. EngmanFrom the Section of Hematology/Oncology, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

Search for other papers by Cocav A. Engman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
and
Leo R. ZacharskiFrom the Section of Hematology/Oncology, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

Search for other papers by Leo R. Zacharski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
Full access

Cancer has been shown to be an independent risk factor for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE; deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism). Thromboprophylaxis reduces the incidence of VTE in patients with cancer; however, active cancer places patients at high risk for recurrent VTE, necessitating extended prophylactic regimens. Extended prophylaxis in patients with cancer can be problematic because of increased risk for bleeding. Oral anticoagulants, such as warfarin, have been the standard of care for extended prophylaxis, but maintaining a clinically effective level of anticoagulation can be difficult because of a wide range of drug interactions, a narrow therapeutic window, and an increased risk of bleeding complications, particularly in patients with cancer. Recent evidence indicates that long-term prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) is an effective and safe alternative to oral anticoagulation in patients with VTE and cancer, reducing the risk for recurrent VTE by up to 52%. LMWHs can also be seen as cost-effective for long-term prophylaxis, because higher drug acquisition costs are offset by the potential for reduced hospital stays, reduced need for coagulation monitoring, and fewer bleeding complications. Some studies suggest that LMWHs may also have direct antitumor effects and improve survival rates, most notably in patients with non-metastatic disease. Further clinical research is needed to evaluate the potential survival benefits of LMWH therapy in patients with cancer.

Correspondence: Leo Zacharski, MD, VA Medical and Regional Office Center, 215 North Main Street, White River Junction, VT 05009. E-mail: Leo.R.Zacharski@dartmouth.edu
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN et al.. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:809815.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Donati MB. Cancer and thrombosis. Haemostasis 1994;24:128131.

  • 3.

    Levitan N, Dowlati A, Remick SC et al.. Rates of initial and recurrent thromboembolic disease among patients with malignancy versus those without malignancy. Risk analysis using Medicare claims data. Medicine (Baltimore) 1999;78:285291.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Khorana AA, Francis CW, Culakova E et al.. Thromboembolism is a leading cause of death in cancer patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy. J Thromb Haemost 2007;5:632634.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Shen VS, Pollak EW. Fatal pulmonary embolism in cancer patients: is heparin prophylaxis justified? South Med J 1980;73:841-843.

  • 6.

    Lee AY, Levine MN. Venous thromboembolism and cancer: risks and outcomes. Circulation 2003;107(23 suppl 1):I17I21.

  • 7.

    Caruso V, Iacoviello L, Di Castelnuovo A et al.. Venous thrombotic complications in adults undergoing induction treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from a meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 2007;5:621623.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF et al.. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: american college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, 8th edition. Chest 2008;133:381S453S.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Kearon C, Kahn SR, Agnelli G et al.. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: american college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, 8th edition. Chest 2008;133:454S545S.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Monreal M, Falgá C, Valdés M et al.. Fatal pulmonary embolism and fatal bleeding in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism: findings from the RIETE registry. J Thromb Haemost 2006;4:19501956.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Hutten BA, Prins MH, Gent M et al.. Incidence of recurrent thromboembolic and bleeding complications among patients with venous thromboembolism in relation to both malignancy and achieved international normalized ratio: a retrospective analysis. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:30783083.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Palareti G, Legnani C, Lee A et al.. A comparison of the safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulation for the treatment of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with or without malignancy. Thromb Haemost 2000;84:805810.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Piccioli A et al.. Recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications during anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer and venous thrombosis. Blood 2002;100:34843488.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Cogo A et al.. The long-term clinical course of acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:17.

  • 15.

    Palareti G, Cosmi B. Predicting the risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism. Curr Opin Hematol 2004;11:192197.

  • 16.

    Heit JA, Mohr DN, Silverstein MD et al.. Predictors of recurrence after deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based cohort study. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:761768.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Ansell J, Hirsh J, Hylek E et al.. Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: american college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, 8th edition. Chest 2008;133:160S198S.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Hirsh J, Bauer KA, Donati MB et al.. Parenteral anticoagulants: american college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, 8th edition. Chest 2008;133:141S159S.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Masci G, Magagnoli M, Zucali PA et al.. Minidose warfarin prophylaxis for catheter-associated thrombosis in cancer patients: can it be safely associated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy? J Clin Oncol 2003;21:736739.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Deitcher SR. Dalteparin reduced recurrent venous thromboembolism more than oral anticoagulation in patients with cancer. ACP J Club 2004;140:10.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Lee AY, Levine MN, Baker RI et al.. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;349:146153.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Bona RD, Sivjee KY, Hickey AD et al.. The efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation in patients with cancer. Thromb Haemost 1995;74:10551058.

  • 23.

    Schulman S, Beyth RJ, Kearon C, Levine MN. Hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant and thrombolytic treatment: american college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, 8th edition. Chest 2008;133:257S298S.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Meyer G, Marjanovic Z, Valcke J et al.. Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: a randomized controlled study. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:17291735.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Zacharski LR, Prandoni P, Monreal M. Warfarin versus low-molecular-weight heparin therapy in cancer patients. Oncologist 2005;10:7279.

  • 26.

    Hull R, Pineo G, Mah AF et al.. Long-term low molecular weight heparin treatment versus usual care in proximal-deep vein thrombosis patients with cancer. Am J Med 2006;119:10621072.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Deitcher SR, Kessler CM, Merli G et al.. Secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic events in patients with active cancer: enoxaparin alone versus initial enoxaparin followed by warfarin for a 180-day period. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2006;12:389396.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Iorio A, Guercini F, Pini M. Low-molecular-weight heparin for the long-term treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism: meta-analysis of the randomized comparisons with oral anticoagulants. J Thromb Haemost 2003;1:19061913.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Ferretti G, Bria E, Giannarelli D et al.. Is recurrent venous thromboembolism after therapy reduced by low-molecular-weight heparin compared with oral anticoagulants? Chest 2006;130:18081816.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Hull R, Pineo GF, Mah AF et al.. A randomized trial evaluating long-term low-molecular-weight heparin therapy for three months vs. intravenous heparin followed by warfarin sodium in patients with current cancer. J Throm Haemost 2003;(1 Suppl):P137a.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Hull R, Pineo G, Mah AF et al.. Long-term low molecular weight heparin treatment versus oral anticoagulant therapy for proximal deep vein thrombosis. Blood 2002;96:148a.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Walsh-McMonagle D, Green D. Low-molecular-weight heparin in the management of Trousseau's syndrome. Cancer 1997;80:649655.

  • 33.

    Eikelboom JW, Baker RI. Low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of venous thrombosis in patients with adenocarcinoma. Am J Hematol 1998;59:260261.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Luk C, Wells PS, Anderson D et al.. Extended outpatient therapy with low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of recurrent venous thromboembolism despite warfarin therapy. Am J Med 2001;111:270273.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Zacharski LR, Henderson WG, Rickles FR et al.. Effect of warfarin anticoagulation on survival in carcinoma of the lung, colon, head and neck, and prostate. Final report of VA Cooperative Study #75. Cancer 1984;53:20462052.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Lee AY, Rickles FR, Julian JA et al.. Randomized comparison of low molecular weight heparin and coumarin derivatives on the survival of patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:21232129.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Kakkar AK, Levine M, Kadziola Z et al.. Low molecular weight heparin, therapy with dalteparin, and survival in advanced cancer: the Fragmin Advanced Malignancy Outcomes Study (FAMOUS). J Clin Oncol 2004;22:19441948.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Klerk CP, Smorenburg SM, Otten HM et al.. The effect of low molecular weight heparin on survival in patients with advanced malignancy. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:21302135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Lazo-Langner A, Goss GD, Spaans JN et al.. The effect of low molecular weight heparin on cancer survival. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Thromb Haemost 2007;5:729737.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Altinbas M, Coskun HS, Er O et al.. A randomized clinical trial of combination chemotherapy with and without low-molecular-weight heparin in small cell lung cancer. J Thromb Haemost 2004;2:12661271.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Robert F, Busby E, Marques MB et al.. Phase II study of docetaxel plus enoxaparin in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: preliminary results. Lung Cancer 2003;42:237245.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    Cosgrove RH, Zacharski LR, Racine E et al.. Improved cancer mortality with low-molecular-weight heparin treatment: a review of the evidence. Semin Thromb Hemost 2002;28:7987.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    Burris HA III. Low-molecular-weight heparins in the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis: a new standard of care? Semin Oncol 2006;33(2 Suppl 4):S3S16.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44.

    Fragmin prescribing information. Available at: http://www.fragmin.com. Accessed November 23, 2007.

  • 45.

    Elting LS, Escalante CP, Cooksley C et al.. Outcomes and cost of deep venous thrombosis among patients with cancer. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:16531661.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46.

    Avritscher EB, Cantor SB, Shih YC et al.. Cost-minimization analysis of low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) compared to unfractionated heparin for inpatient treatment of cancer patients with deep venous thrombosis. Support Care Cancer 2004;12:531536.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47.

    Ageno W, Steidl L, Marchesi C et al.. Selecting patients for home treatment of deep vein thrombosis: the problem of cancer. Haematologica 2002;87:286291.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    Dranitsaris G, Vincent M, Crowther M. Dalteparin versus warfarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolic vents in cancer patients: a pharmacoeconomic analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 2006;24:593607.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    Noble SI, Finlay IG. Is long-term low-molecular-weight heparin acceptable to palliative care patients in the treatment of cancer related venous thromboembolism? A qualitative study. Palliat Med 2005;19:197201.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50.

    Wells PS, Kovacs MJ, Bormanis J et al.. Expanding eligibility for outpatient treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism with low-molecular-weight heparin: a comparison of patient self-injection with homecare injection. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:18091812.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51.

    Wittkowsky AK. Barriers to the long term use of low molecular weight heparins for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 2006;4:20902091.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52.

    Erikkson BI, Borris L, Dahl OE et al.. Oral, direct factor Xa inhibition with BAY 59-7939 for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement. J Thromb Haemost 2006;4:121128.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53.

    Turpie AG. Oral, direct factor Xa inhibitors in development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic diseases. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2007;27:12381247.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54.

    Eriksson BI, Dahl OE, Buller HR et al.. A new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate, compared with enoxaparin for prevention of thromboembolic events following total hip or knee replacement: the BISTRO II randomized trial. J Thromb Haemost 2005;3:103111.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 163 34 5
PDF Downloads 113 37 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0