Pathology of Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Authors: Brian P. Rubin MD, PhDa and John R. Goldblum MDa
View More View Less
  • a From the Departments of Anatomic Pathology and Molecular Genetics, Lerner Research Institute and Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

The evaluation and treatment of soft tissue sarcomas has never been more demanding than it is today. The pathologist plays a central role in this process and is an integral member of the multidisciplinary sarcoma treatment team. This article provides a brief summary of the role of the soft tissue pathologist and includes sections on methods of diagnosis, frozen section, classification of sarcomas, expert consultation, molecular pathology, grading, assessment of treatment response, and tumor banking.

Correspondence: Brian P. Rubin, MD, PhD, Departments of Anatomic Pathology and Molecular Genetics, Lerner Research Institute and Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, L25, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail: rubinb2@ccf.org
  • 1.

    Singh HK, Kilpatrick SE, Silverman JF. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of soft tissue sarcomas: utility and diagnostic challenges. Adv Anat Pathol 2004;11:2437.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Yang YJ, Damron TA. Comparison of needle core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration for diagnostic accuracy in musculoskeletal lesions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004;128:759764.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Hoeber I, Spillane AJ, Fisher C, Thomas JM. Accuracy of biopsy techniques for limb and limb girdle soft tissue tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:8087.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    WHO classification of tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. Lyon: IARC Press; 2002.

  • 5.

    Ladanyi M, Bridge JA. Contribution of molecular genetic data to the classification of sarcomas. Hum Pathol 2000;31:532538.

  • 6.

    Tomescu O, Barr FG. Chromosomal translocations in sarcomas: prospects for therapy. Trends Mol Med 2001;7:554559.

  • 7.

    Barr FG, Zhang PJ. The impact of genetics on sarcoma diagnosis: an evolving science. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:52565257.

  • 8.

    Arbiser ZK, Folpe AL, Weiss SW. Consultative (expert) second opinions in soft tissue pathology. Analysis of problem-prone diagnostic situations. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;116:473476.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Borden EC, Baker LH, Bell RS et al. . Soft tissue sarcomas of adults: state of the translational science. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:19411956.

  • 10.

    Antonescu CR. The role of genetic testing in soft tissue sarcoma. Histopathology 2006;48:1321.

  • 11.

    Binh MB, Sastre-Garau X, Guillou L et al. . MDM2 and CDK4 immunostainings are useful adjuncts in diagnosing well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma subtypes: a comparative analysis of 559 soft tissue neoplasms with genetic data. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:13401347.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Jacob EK, Erickson-Johnson M, Wang X et al. . Assessment of MDM2 amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization on paraffin embedded tissues discriminates atypical lipomatous tumor from lipomas. Mod Pathol 2006;19:13A.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Rubin BP. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an update. Histopathology 2006;48:8396.

  • 14.

    Ottaiano A, De Chiara A, Fazioli F et al. . Biological prognostic factors in adult soft tissue sarcomas. Anticancer Res 2005;25:45194526.

  • 15.

    Nielsen TO. Microarray analysis of sarcomas. Adv Anat Pathol 2006;13:166173.

  • 16.

    West RB, Corless CL, Chen X et al. . The novel marker, DOG1, is expressed ubiquitously in gastrointestinal stromal tumors irrespective of KIT and PDGFRA mutation status. Am J Pathol 2004;165:107113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Duensing A, Joseph NE, Medeiros F et al. . Protein kinase C theta (PKCtheta) expression and constitutive activation in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Cancer Res 2004;64:51275131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Terry J, Saito T, Subramanian S et al. . TLE1 as a diagnostic immunohistochemical marker for synovial sarcoma emerging from gene expression profiling studies. Am J Surg Pathol 2007;31:240246.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Oliveira AM, Nascimento AG. Grading in soft tissue tumors: principles and problems. Skeletal Radiol 2001;30:543559.

  • 20.

    Deyrup AT, Weiss SW. Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: the challenge of providing precise information in an imprecise world. Histopathology 2006:48;4250.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Coindre JM, Trojani M, Contesso G et al. . Reproducibility of a histopathologic grading system for adult soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer 1986;58:306309.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Costa J, Wesley RA, Glatstein E, Rosenberg SA. The grading of soft tissue sarcomas. Results of a clinicohistopathologic correlation in a series of 163 cases. Cancer 1984;53:530541.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Guillou L, Coindre JM, Bonichon F et al. . Comparative study of the National Cancer Institute and French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group grading systems in a population of 410 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:350362.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Rubin BP, Fletcher CD, Inwards C et al. . Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with soft tissue tumors of intermediate malignant potential, malignant soft tissue tumors, and benign/locally aggressive and malignant bone tumors. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;130:16161629.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Coindre JM. Grading of soft tissue sarcomas. Review and update. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;130:14481453.

  • 26.

    Hasegawa T, Yamamoto S, Yokoyama R et al. . Prognostic significance of grading and staging systems using MIB-1 score in adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk. Cancer 2002;95:843851.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Coindre JM, Terrier P, Guillou L et al. . Predictive value of grade for metastasis development in the main histologic types of adult soft tissue sarcomas: a study of 1240 patients from the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group. Cancer 2001;91:19141926.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Farshid G, Pradham M, Goldblum J, Weiss SW. Leiomyosarcoma of soft tissues: a tumor of vascular origin with multivariate analysis of outcome in 42 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:1424.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 360 108 12
PDF Downloads 234 103 7
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0