Loneliness and Mortality Risk Among Cancer Survivors in the United States: A Retrospective, Longitudinal Study

Authors:
Jingxuan Zhao Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA

Search for other papers by Jingxuan Zhao in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MPH
,
Jennifer B. Reese Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

Search for other papers by Jennifer B. Reese in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Xuesong Han Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA

Search for other papers by Xuesong Han in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
K. Robin Yabroff Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA

Search for other papers by K. Robin Yabroff in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD, MBA
Full access

Background: Loneliness, a subjective feeling of being isolated, is a prevalent concern for elderly people and more so among cancer survivors because a cancer diagnosis and its subsequent treatment may result in long-term adverse health effects. This study aimed to examine the association of loneliness and mortality risk among cancer survivors in the United States. Methods: We identified a longitudinal cohort of cancer survivors aged ≥50 years from the nationally representative panel surveys of the 2008–2018 Health and Retirement Study. Follow-up for vital status was through 2020. Loneliness was measured using an 11-item abbreviated version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3), including questions about lacking companionship and feeling isolated from others. A score was assigned according to the responses to each question, with 1 for least lonely, 2 for moderately lonely, and 3 for the loneliest option. Items were summed to create total loneliness scores for each individual, which were categorized into 4 levels: 11–12 (low/no loneliness), 13–15 (mild loneliness), 16–19 (moderate loneliness), and 20–33 (severe loneliness) based on the sample distribution. Time-varying Cox proportional hazard models with age as a time scale were used to examine the association of loneliness and survival among cancer survivors. Results: A total of 3,447 cancer survivors with 5,808 person-years of observation were included, with 1,402 (24.3%), 1,445 (24.5%), 1,418 (23.6%), and 1,543 (27.6%) reporting low/no, mild, moderate, and severe loneliness, respectively. Compared with survivors reporting low/no loneliness, survivors reporting greater loneliness had a higher mortality risk, with the highest adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) among the loneliest group (aHR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.25–2.23]; P=.004) following a dose–response association. Conclusions: Elevated loneliness was associated with a higher mortality risk among cancer survivors. Programs to screen for loneliness among cancer survivors and to provide resources and support are warranted, especially considering the widespread social distancing that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background

In 2022, there were more than 18 million cancer survivors in the United States,1 and this number is expected to increase to 22 million by 2030 due to population aging and improvements in early cancer detection and effective treatments.2 Cancer diagnosis and treatment can have long-term adverse effects, including physical problems, such as cognitive issues and hearing loss,3,4 and emotional difficulties, such as anxiety and depression.57 Collectively, these adverse effects can negatively affect survivors’ social relationships and contribute to loneliness,8,9 a subjective feeling of social isolation.

Loneliness is associated with higher morbidity and mortality risk in the general population1014; its importance as a medical issue was underscored by the widespread social isolation imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.15 A study of healthy individuals in Sweden found that those who self-reported having a high level of loneliness had a 27% higher mortality risk compared with individuals who did not.12 Another study of an elderly population in the United States found that loneliness was associated with higher mortality risks.10 Although informative, most of these studies reported on the associations of loneliness and adverse health outcomes, rather than causality, due to the observational nature of the study designs.

Cancer survivors can experience unique sources of loneliness associated with their diagnosis and treatment history. Families and friends might not understand their disease-related concerns, they may hesitate to share their cancer-related fears and worries, and they may not have received the support they expected and/or needed during their cancer experience, all of which could potentially heighten feelings of social isolation.16,17 Understanding the prevalence and health implications of loneliness among cancer survivors can have important clinical implications for both cancer care and primary care, given that screening and interventions may require coordination between physicians and specialties, and primary care providers can help provide continuity of care, routine screenings, and emotional support to patients.18 Previous studies found that loneliness was associated with adverse health outcomes, such as cognitive problems, mental health problems, and pain,1921 but few studies examined the associations of loneliness and mortality risk among cancer survivors. One study found that socially isolated people (measured by living arrangements) were at a higher risk of cancer-related mortality.22 Although social isolation and loneliness are closely related, they are distinct phenomena—loneliness reflects an individual’s subjective feeling, and people with high levels of social engagement might still feel lonely. Therefore, in this study, we examined whether loneliness was associated with mortality risk in a large, population-based longitudinal cohort of cancer survivors.

Methods

Data were obtained from the 2008–2018 Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative longitudinal panel survey conducted biennially with questions about health, employment, and psychosocial well-being among individuals aged ≥50 years.23 Each respondent was surveyed multiple times, and loneliness and other time-varying variables were measured repeatedly throughout the years. Follow-up for vital status was obtained through December 31, 2020. Cause of death was not available in this dataset, and thus all-cause mortality, which reflects mortality related to overall health status and access to all aspects of care, was used as the outcome in this analysis. All-cause mortality is an especially relevant outcome for long-term cancer survivors24 because cancer and its treatment can increase the risk of other chronic conditions (eg, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure) that can also affect their mortality risk.25

Loneliness measures were collected by the HRS since 2008,26 and subsequently measured in surveys every 4 years. Cancer survivors were identified by an affirmative response to a question about prior cancer or malignant tumor diagnosis, excluding minor skin cancer (person-years, 6,306). We excluded cancer survivors with missing information on any loneliness measure and with missing data on race/ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, or depression status (9.4% of the sample). A total of 3,371 cancer survivors with 5,711 person-years of observation were included in the final analytic sample (see Table S1 in the supplementary materials, available online with this article).

Loneliness was measured using an 11-item abbreviated version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3), a validated and widely used loneliness measure27 (see Supplementary Table S2 for the exact wording of questions). Example items include lacking companionship and feeling isolated from others. Response options were “often,” “some of the time,” and “hardly ever or never.” The Cronbach’s alpha for loneliness measure was 0.88 in our sample, indicating relatively high reliability of these measures. For each question, scores were assigned based on loneliness level: 1 for least lonely, 2 for moderately lonely, and 3 for the loneliest option. Items were summed to create total loneliness scores for each individual, which were then categorized into 4 levels: 11–12 (low/no loneliness), 13–15 (mild loneliness), 16–19 (moderate loneliness), and 20–33 (severe loneliness) based on sample distribution and results from spline analyses (Supplementary Table S3 and Figure S1). Respondent demographic characteristics included sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, educational attainment, number of health conditions other than cancer, years since cancer diagnosis, and depression status measured by whether the person felt depressed in the past year.

Distributions of loneliness scores were compared by sociodemographic characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to visualize survival rates by loneliness level. To examine the association of loneliness and survival among cancer survivors while accounting for any changes in loneliness during the follow-up period, we used time-varying univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models with age as the time scale28 after confirming proportional hazards with log-log Kaplan-Meier curves. Sex, marital status, educational attainment, number of health conditions other than cancer, years since cancer diagnosis, and depression status were included as covariates in the multivariable models because earlier studies showed that these variables were linked with both loneliness level and mortality risk.2938 Because there is little consensus on the best approach for measuring loneliness, we conducted a sensitivity analysis with the loneliness score as a continuous variable rather than categorized as quartiles.39,40 To address concerns about biases introduced by missing data on our exposure measure, we used the average loneliness score to approximate total score for survivors who answered some, but not all, loneliness questions in another sensitivity analysis. This approach reduced the percentage of respondents excluded due to missing data from 9.4% to 4.8%. We explored effect modification of the association of loneliness and survival by key factors, including sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, educational attainment, number of health conditions other than cancer, years since cancer diagnosis, and depression status, with an interaction term of loneliness score in separate multivariable models. We also performed a sensitivity analysis where we censored follow-up time on February 29, 2020, to exclude the potential effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the study findings. Statistical analysis was performed in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.). All analyses used sample weights to account for the complex HRS design. Statistical comparisons were 2-sided, and significance was defined as P<.05.

Results

A total of 3,371 cancer survivors with 5,711 person-years of observation were included in this study. Most of them were long-term survivors, diagnosed >2 years prior to the survey. Of them, 1,382 (weighted percentage: 24.5%), 1,428 (24.6%), 1,391 (23.5%), and 1,510 (27.4%) reported a loneliness score of 11–12 (low/no loneliness), 13–15 (mild loneliness), 16–19 (moderate loneliness), and 20–33 (severe loneliness), respectively. The variables of male sex, non-White race/ethnicity, unmarried status, less education, more health conditions (other than cancer), and feeling depressed in the past year were linked to a higher probability of being lonelier (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of Cancer Survivors by Loneliness Score

Table 1.

There were 686 deaths among the sample during the study period. Higher loneliness was associated with worse survival among cancer survivors (Figure 1). In adjusted analysis (weighted), compared with the low/no loneliness group, survivors with higher loneliness scores had higher mortality risk, with the highest adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) observed among the group with severe loneliness (aHR, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.86–1.63] for mild loneliness; 1.41 [95% CI, 1.01–1.96] for moderate loneliness; and 1.67 [95% CI, 1.25–2.23] for severe loneliness), following a dose–response association (P=.004) (Table 2). The aHR was 1.03 (95% CI, 1.01–1.06) when loneliness score was included in multivariable models as a continuous variable.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier survival curve by loneliness score among cancer survivors.

Citation: Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 22, 4; 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7114

Table 2.

Association of Loneliness and Survival Among Cancer Survivorsa

Table 2.

Missing data were nonrandom (see Supplementary Table S4), but findings were largely unchanged when we used the average loneliness score to approximate the total score for survivors responding to some, but not all, of the loneliness questions (Supplementary Table S5). We observed similar patterns of loneliness and mortality risk when stratifying the analysis by key factors, such as race/ethnicity, years since cancer diagnosis, and depression status (Supplementary Table S6). The findings were unchanged after censoring follow-up time before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States (Supplementary Table S7).

Discussion

In this nationally representative cohort of cancer survivors in the United States, higher levels of loneliness were associated with higher mortality risk, with the highest mortality risk observed among the loneliest group, following a dose–response pattern. Overall, these findings extend the growing body of research linking loneliness to important health outcomes, including morbidity and mortality, in the context of cancer. Our findings suggest that screening patients for loneliness should be a component of survivorship care, and of concern to primary care and cancer clinicians in light of the potential adverse associations of loneliness and mortality risk. This study is especially timely given the recent Advisory on the Healing Effects of Social Connection and Community by the US Surgeon General, which highlighted the adverse effects of loneliness for individuals and for public health,41 and the increased loneliness among people with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.42 Ongoing evaluations of any lasting effects of the widespread social isolation that occurred during the pandemic are warranted.

This study expanded on previous studies reporting negative associations of loneliness and health outcomes, such as cognitive problems, mental health problems, and pain,1921 and found that loneliness was also associated with higher mortality risks among cancer survivors. As described in the Surgeon General’s Advisory, prior research has suggested that loneliness may be linked to worse survival through multiple mechanisms or pathways, such as increased risk of experiencing negative emotions (eg, hostility, stress, anxiety), increased engagement in unhealthy behaviors (eg, smoking, alcohol abuse, less physical activity), and/or through physiologic pathways (eg, immune system disorders).43 For instance, people with cancer might feel their families and friends did not support or share their cancer-related concerns, and/or may have unrealistic expectations of emotional and instrumental support from other people,17 which can add to negative emotions. Additionally, lonelier cancer survivors might not receive the practical and emotional support they need for their symptoms, which could then impose greater health burdens, with earlier studies finding that loneliness was associated with symptoms such as fatigue, pain, and low sleep quality among cancer survivors, even many years after diagnosis.21,44 Some cancer survivors may experience socially constraining behaviors, such as criticism, when sharing their feelings, which has been associated with poor health.16 Unfortunately, we were not able to examine these specific potential mechanisms in the present analysis, but this avenue of research will be important for future studies.

Our study findings have clear clinical implications. For instance, our findings underscore the importance of incorporating loneliness screening as a routine part of cancer survivorship care. Health care providers should consider adding loneliness assessment tools to their standard practice, and these tools should be employed at multiple time points, from initial diagnosis throughout survivorship care, because loneliness may change throughout the cancer journey. Early detection of loneliness is crucial because it may prevent the escalation and complications of loneliness among cancer survivors. In addition, identification of survivors experiencing loneliness can inform needs for intervention, such as mental health counseling, community support, social network involvement, and integrating loneliness intervention into cancer treatment and cancer survivorship care. Future studies should focus on the optimal screening tools for loneliness and examine the effectiveness of loneliness screening and interventions.

Our findings also highlight the importance of care coordination by cancer care clinicians and other specialty and primary care providers to ensure that cancer survivors receive timely screening and effective intervention for loneliness.18 More specifically, primary care providers can provide comprehensive routine assessment of loneliness among cancer survivors and help them manage some of the physical health consequences of loneliness, such as sleep problems and chronic stress, by prescribing appropriate medications or lifestyle modifications. Oncologists can also provide loneliness screening during cancer treatment and provide education about the emotional challenges that often accompany a cancer diagnosis and treatment, and some of the unique needs and challenges of cancer survivors. Referrals to psychologists can provide more specialized assessment and tailored counseling. In addition, a health care coordinator or nurse navigator can help facilitate communication and coordinate care among these specialists to ensure timely surveillance and intervention with regard to the loneliness status among patients with cancer and survivors. In addition to clinical interventions, the Surgeon General’s Advisory highlighted the importance of relevant training for providers and the need for research on loneliness to help increase public awareness.41 Identification of the optimal approaches to coordinate and collaborate among different specialties to address patient loneliness and any adverse health outcomes is needed.

This study has limitations, including the use of an abbreviated measure to assess loneliness and the use of self-reported data. Cancer-related information, such as cancer type and number of diagnoses, stage at diagnosis, and whether respondents were receiving cancer treatment at the time of the survey, was not systematically collected in the HRS, nor did it include cause of death. Furthermore, the sample of cancer survivors was not sufficient to explore the modification effects of all key factors. Meanwhile, approximately 5% of respondents were excluded due to missing key variables, and we did not use multiple imputation to impute the missing values because they were not missing at random. Despite these limitations, this study contributes to the growing literature demonstrating the association of loneliness and compromised health outcomes among cancer survivors, who face unique experiences of loneliness due to the nature of their disease and treatment. Future research should determine the optimal methods for the assessment and management of loneliness in cancer survivors to inform interventions to reduce associations with adverse health outcomes.

Conclusions

Using national longitudinal data, we found that loneliness was associated with higher mortality risks among cancer survivors. Programs to enhance coordination and collaboration among providers across different specialties and integrate loneliness screening into primary care and oncology care are warranted.

References

  • 1.

    Miller KD, Nogueira L, Devasia T, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 2022;72:409436.

  • 2.

    de Moor JS, Mariotto AB, Parry C, et al. Cancer survivors in the United States: prevalence across the survivorship trajectory and implications for care. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013;22:561570.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Sun CL, Tew WP, et al. Association between patient-reported hearing and visual impairments and functional, psychological, and cognitive status among older adults with cancer. Cancer 2018;124:32493256.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Hitchcock YJ, Tward JD, Szabo A, et al. Relative contributions of radiation and cisplatin-based chemotherapy to sensorineural hearing loss in head-and-neck cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;73:779788.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Linden W, Vodermaier A, Mackenzie R, et al. Anxiety and depression after cancer diagnosis: prevalence rates by cancer type, gender, and age. J Affect Disord 2012;141:343351.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Yi JC, Syrjala KL. Anxiety and depression in cancer survivors. Med Clin North Am 2017;101:10991113.

  • 7.

    Tevaarwerk A, Denlinger CS, Sanft T, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Survivorship. Version 1.2021. Accessed May 20, 2023. To view the most recent version, visit https://www.nccn.org

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Ogawa T, Uchida Y, Nishita Y, et al. Hearing-impaired elderly people have smaller social networks: a population-based aging study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2019;83:7580.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Evans IEM, Llewellyn DJ, Matthews FE, et al. Social isolation, cognitive reserve, and cognition in older people with depression and anxiety. Aging Ment Health 2019;23:16911700.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Luo Y, Hawkley LC, Waite LJ, et al. Loneliness, health, and mortality in old age: a national longitudinal study. Soc Sci Med 2012;74:907914.

  • 11.

    Steptoe A, Shankar A, Demakakos P, et al. Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:57975801.

  • 12.

    Henriksen J, Larsen ER, Mattisson C, et al. Loneliness, health and mortality. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2019;28:234239.

  • 13.

    Penninx BW, van Tilburg T, Kriegsman DM, et al. Effects of social support and personal coping resources on mortality in older age: the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146:510519.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Sugisawa H, Liang J, Liu X. Social networks, social support, and mortality among older people in Japan. J Gerontol 1994;49:S313.

  • 15.

    Holt-Lunstad J, Perissinotto C. Social isolation and loneliness as medical issues. N Engl J Med 2023;388:193195.

  • 16.

    Lepore SJ, Revenson TA. Social constraints on disclosure and adjustment to cancer. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2007;1:313333.

  • 17.

    Mosher CE, Lepore SJ, Wu L, et al. Social correlates of distress following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: exploring the role of loneliness and cognitive processing. J Health Psychol 2012;17:10221032.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Lonergan-Cullum M, Hooker SA, Levy R, et al. A new pandemic of loneliness. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:593596.

  • 19.

    Jaremka LM, Peng J, Bornstein R, et al. Cognitive problems among breast cancer survivors: loneliness enhances risk. Psychooncology 2014;23:13561364.

  • 20.

    Islam JY, Vidot DC, Camacho-Rivera M. Evaluating mental health-related symptoms among cancer survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of the COVID Impact Survey. JCO Oncol Pract 2021;17:e12581269.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Jaremka LM, Fagundes CP, Glaser R, et al. Loneliness predicts pain, depression, and fatigue: understanding the role of immune dysregulation. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2013;38:13101317.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Lee H, Singh GK, Jemal A, et al. Living alone and cancer mortality by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status among US working-age adults. Cancer. Published online October 19, 2023. doi:10.1002/cncr.35042

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Health and Retirement Study. Validating mortality ascertainment in the Health and Retirement Study. Accessed November 22, 2022. Available at: https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/publications/biblio/9022

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Zheng Z, Han X, Zhao J, et al. Financial hardship, healthcare utilization, and health among U.S. cancer survivors. Am J Prev Med 2020;59:6878.

  • 25.

    Sanft T, Day A, Ansbaugh S, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Survivorship. Version 1.2023. Accessed August 24, 2023. To view the most recent version, visit https://www.nccn.org

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Smith J, Ryan L, Larkina M, et al. Psychosocial and lifestyle questionnaire 2006-2016: user guide, core section LB. Accessed March 1, 2023. Available at: https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/sites/default/files/biblio/HRS%202006-2022%20SAQ%20User%20Guide.pdf

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Russell DW. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess 1996;66:2040.

  • 28.

    Korn EL, Graubard BI, Midthune D. Time-to-event analysis of longitudinal follow-up of a survey: choice of the time-scale. Am J Epidemiol 1997;145:7280.

  • 29.

    Barreto M, Victor C, Hammond C, et al. Loneliness around the world: age, gender, and cultural differences in loneliness. Pers Individ Dif 2021;169:110066.

  • 30.

    Page RM, Cole GE. Demographic predictors of self-reported loneliness in adults. Psychol Rep 1991;68:939945.

  • 31.

    Barg FK, Huss-Ashmore R, Wittink MN, et al. A mixed-methods approach to understanding loneliness and depression in older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2006;61:S329339.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Paúl C, Ribeiro O. Predicting loneliness in old people living in the community. Rev Clin Gerontol 2009;19:5360.

  • 33.

    Deckx L, van den Akker M, Buntinx F. Risk factors for loneliness in patients with cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2014;18:466477.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Manzoli L, Villari P, GM Pirone, et al. Marital status and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 2007;64:7794.

  • 35.

    McDonough P, Williams DR, House JS, et al. Gender and the socioeconomic gradient in mortality. J Health Soc Behav 1999;40:1731.

  • 36.

    Lager AC, Torssander J. Causal effect of education on mortality in a quasi-experiment on 1.2 million Swedes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:84618466.

  • 37.

    Gilman SE, Sucha E, Kingsbury M, et al. Depression and mortality in a longitudinal study: 1952–2011. CMAJ 2017;189:E13041310.

  • 38.

    Colzani E, Liljegren A, Johansson AL, et al. Prognosis of patients with breast cancer: causes of death and effects of time since diagnosis, age, and tumor characteristics. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:40144021.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Crowe CL, Domingue BW, Graf GH, et al. Associations of loneliness and social isolation with health span and life span in the U.S. health and retirement study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2021;76:19972006.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Gum AM, Shiovitz-Ezra S, Ayalon L. Longitudinal associations of hopelessness and loneliness in older adults: results from the US health and retirement study. Int Psychogeriatr 2017;29:14511459.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Office of U.S. Surgeon General. Our epidemic of loneliness and isolation: the U.S. Surgeon General’s advisory on the healing effects of social connection and community. Accessed June 22, 2023. Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-general-social-connection-advisory.pdf

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    Miaskowski C, Paul SM, Snowberg K, et al. Loneliness and symptom burden in oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cancer 2021;127:32463253.

  • 43.

    Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Ann Behave Med 2010;40:218227.

  • 44.

    Adams RN, Mosher CE, Winger JG, et al. Cancer-related loneliness mediates the relationships between social constraints and symptoms among cancer patients. J Behav Med 2018;41:243252.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Submitted September 5, 2023; final revision received November 1, 2023; accepted for publication November 21, 2023. Published online April 25, 2024.

Author contributions: Conceptualization: All authors. Data analysis: Zhao. Supervision: Yabroff. Writing—original draft: Zhao. Writing—review & editing: All authors.

Data availability statement: The data used in this study are publicly available on the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) website. Researchers can access to the data after signing the data use agreement. The link to access the HRS data is: https://hrsdata.isr.umich.edu/data-products/public-survey-data

Disclosures: The authors have disclosed that they have not received any financial consideration from any person or organization to support the preparation, analysis, results, or discussion of this article.

Supplementary material: Supplementary material associated with this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2023.7114. The supplementary material has been supplied by the author(s) and appears in its originally submitted form. It has not been edited or vetted by JNCCN. All contents and opinions are solely those of the author. Any comments or questions related to the supplementary materials should be directed to the corresponding author.

Correspondence: Jingxuan Zhao, MPH, Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, 3380 Chastain Meadows Parkway Northwest, Kennesaw, GA 30144. Email: jingxuan.zhao@cancer.org

Supplementary Materials

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Figure 1.

    Kaplan-Meier survival curve by loneliness score among cancer survivors.

  • 1.

    Miller KD, Nogueira L, Devasia T, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 2022;72:409436.

  • 2.

    de Moor JS, Mariotto AB, Parry C, et al. Cancer survivors in the United States: prevalence across the survivorship trajectory and implications for care. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013;22:561570.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Sun CL, Tew WP, et al. Association between patient-reported hearing and visual impairments and functional, psychological, and cognitive status among older adults with cancer. Cancer 2018;124:32493256.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Hitchcock YJ, Tward JD, Szabo A, et al. Relative contributions of radiation and cisplatin-based chemotherapy to sensorineural hearing loss in head-and-neck cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;73:779788.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Linden W, Vodermaier A, Mackenzie R, et al. Anxiety and depression after cancer diagnosis: prevalence rates by cancer type, gender, and age. J Affect Disord 2012;141:343351.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Yi JC, Syrjala KL. Anxiety and depression in cancer survivors. Med Clin North Am 2017;101:10991113.

  • 7.

    Tevaarwerk A, Denlinger CS, Sanft T, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Survivorship. Version 1.2021. Accessed May 20, 2023. To view the most recent version, visit https://www.nccn.org

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Ogawa T, Uchida Y, Nishita Y, et al. Hearing-impaired elderly people have smaller social networks: a population-based aging study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2019;83:7580.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Evans IEM, Llewellyn DJ, Matthews FE, et al. Social isolation, cognitive reserve, and cognition in older people with depression and anxiety. Aging Ment Health 2019;23:16911700.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Luo Y, Hawkley LC, Waite LJ, et al. Loneliness, health, and mortality in old age: a national longitudinal study. Soc Sci Med 2012;74:907914.

  • 11.

    Steptoe A, Shankar A, Demakakos P, et al. Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:57975801.

  • 12.

    Henriksen J, Larsen ER, Mattisson C, et al. Loneliness, health and mortality. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2019;28:234239.

  • 13.

    Penninx BW, van Tilburg T, Kriegsman DM, et al. Effects of social support and personal coping resources on mortality in older age: the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146:510519.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Sugisawa H, Liang J, Liu X. Social networks, social support, and mortality among older people in Japan. J Gerontol 1994;49:S313.

  • 15.

    Holt-Lunstad J, Perissinotto C. Social isolation and loneliness as medical issues. N Engl J Med 2023;388:193195.

  • 16.

    Lepore SJ, Revenson TA. Social constraints on disclosure and adjustment to cancer. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2007;1:313333.

  • 17.

    Mosher CE, Lepore SJ, Wu L, et al. Social correlates of distress following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: exploring the role of loneliness and cognitive processing. J Health Psychol 2012;17:10221032.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Lonergan-Cullum M, Hooker SA, Levy R, et al. A new pandemic of loneliness. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:593596.

  • 19.

    Jaremka LM, Peng J, Bornstein R, et al. Cognitive problems among breast cancer survivors: loneliness enhances risk. Psychooncology 2014;23:13561364.

  • 20.

    Islam JY, Vidot DC, Camacho-Rivera M. Evaluating mental health-related symptoms among cancer survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of the COVID Impact Survey. JCO Oncol Pract 2021;17:e12581269.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Jaremka LM, Fagundes CP, Glaser R, et al. Loneliness predicts pain, depression, and fatigue: understanding the role of immune dysregulation. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2013;38:13101317.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Lee H, Singh GK, Jemal A, et al. Living alone and cancer mortality by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status among US working-age adults. Cancer. Published online October 19, 2023. doi:10.1002/cncr.35042

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Health and Retirement Study. Validating mortality ascertainment in the Health and Retirement Study. Accessed November 22, 2022. Available at: https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/publications/biblio/9022

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Zheng Z, Han X, Zhao J, et al. Financial hardship, healthcare utilization, and health among U.S. cancer survivors. Am J Prev Med 2020;59:6878.

  • 25.

    Sanft T, Day A, Ansbaugh S, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Survivorship. Version 1.2023. Accessed August 24, 2023. To view the most recent version, visit https://www.nccn.org

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Smith J, Ryan L, Larkina M, et al. Psychosocial and lifestyle questionnaire 2006-2016: user guide, core section LB. Accessed March 1, 2023. Available at: https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/sites/default/files/biblio/HRS%202006-2022%20SAQ%20User%20Guide.pdf

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Russell DW. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess 1996;66:2040.

  • 28.

    Korn EL, Graubard BI, Midthune D. Time-to-event analysis of longitudinal follow-up of a survey: choice of the time-scale. Am J Epidemiol 1997;145:7280.

  • 29.

    Barreto M, Victor C, Hammond C, et al. Loneliness around the world: age, gender, and cultural differences in loneliness. Pers Individ Dif 2021;169:110066.

  • 30.

    Page RM, Cole GE. Demographic predictors of self-reported loneliness in adults. Psychol Rep 1991;68:939945.

  • 31.

    Barg FK, Huss-Ashmore R, Wittink MN, et al. A mixed-methods approach to understanding loneliness and depression in older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2006;61:S329339.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Paúl C, Ribeiro O. Predicting loneliness in old people living in the community. Rev Clin Gerontol 2009;19:5360.

  • 33.

    Deckx L, van den Akker M, Buntinx F. Risk factors for loneliness in patients with cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2014;18:466477.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Manzoli L, Villari P, GM Pirone, et al. Marital status and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 2007;64:7794.

  • 35.

    McDonough P, Williams DR, House JS, et al. Gender and the socioeconomic gradient in mortality. J Health Soc Behav 1999;40:1731.

  • 36.

    Lager AC, Torssander J. Causal effect of education on mortality in a quasi-experiment on 1.2 million Swedes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:84618466.

  • 37.

    Gilman SE, Sucha E, Kingsbury M, et al. Depression and mortality in a longitudinal study: 1952–2011. CMAJ 2017;189:E13041310.

  • 38.

    Colzani E, Liljegren A, Johansson AL, et al. Prognosis of patients with breast cancer: causes of death and effects of time since diagnosis, age, and tumor characteristics. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:40144021.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Crowe CL, Domingue BW, Graf GH, et al. Associations of loneliness and social isolation with health span and life span in the U.S. health and retirement study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2021;76:19972006.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Gum AM, Shiovitz-Ezra S, Ayalon L. Longitudinal associations of hopelessness and loneliness in older adults: results from the US health and retirement study. Int Psychogeriatr 2017;29:14511459.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Office of U.S. Surgeon General. Our epidemic of loneliness and isolation: the U.S. Surgeon General’s advisory on the healing effects of social connection and community. Accessed June 22, 2023. Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-general-social-connection-advisory.pdf

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    Miaskowski C, Paul SM, Snowberg K, et al. Loneliness and symptom burden in oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cancer 2021;127:32463253.

  • 43.

    Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Ann Behave Med 2010;40:218227.

  • 44.

    Adams RN, Mosher CE, Winger JG, et al. Cancer-related loneliness mediates the relationships between social constraints and symptoms among cancer patients. J Behav Med 2018;41:243252.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 5292 5292 525
PDF Downloads 3072 3072 164
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0