HSR24-134: Perceptions of CARTITUDE-4 for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Authors:
Brooke Dulka Cardinal Health, Inc., Dublin, OH

Search for other papers by Brooke Dulka in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Luke Jennings-Zhang Cardinal Health, Inc., Dublin, OH

Search for other papers by Luke Jennings-Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PharmD
,
Samuel Baird Cardinal Health, Inc., Dublin, OH

Search for other papers by Samuel Baird in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MPH
,
Robert N. Bone Cardinal Health, Inc., Dublin, OH

Search for other papers by Robert N. Bone in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Yolaine Jeune-Smith Cardinal Health, Inc., Dublin, OH

Search for other papers by Yolaine Jeune-Smith in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Muhamed Baljević Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN

Search for other papers by Muhamed Baljević in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
, and
Bruce Feinberg Cardinal Health, Inc., Dublin, OH

Search for other papers by Bruce Feinberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DO
Full access

Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T) agents have been commercially available since 2017 but have only just become available for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Although idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) are recommended in the fifth-line, there is data to support the use of CAR T agents in earlier lines. These data include the CARTITUDE-4 trial evaluating cilta-cel in patients with RRMM who have received 1-3 prior lines of therapy. The present study investigated the impact of CARTITUDE-4 among practicing oncologists/hematologists as it relates to use of CAR T therapies for patients with RRMM. Methods: In September 2023, US-based oncologists/hematologists (N=50) were invited to attend a live meeting to discuss abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2023 conference. Demographics were collected in a premeeting survey. Participant perceptions of CARTITUDE-4 were captured via audience response system technology. Not all participants answered every question; responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The factors that most impact respondents’ decision to refer/prescribe CAR T therapy include availability of spots at a CAR T center (23%) and patient comorbidities (20%). Respondents reported that their current treatment preference for a hypothetical 66-year-old male patient with triple-class refractory multiple myeloma in the fourth-line include cilta-cel (48%) and ide-cel (22%). However, after reviewing CARTITUDE-4, 88% of respondents indicated they would use cilta-cel to treat this same patient. Viewing CARTITUDE-4 also increased the number of respondents who indicated that they favor using CAR T agents in earlier lines of therapy for patients with RRMM. Interestingly, the majority of respondents indicated that they would sequence CAR T agents before a bispecific antibody (55%) after viewing CARTITUDE-4. Discussion: Overall, these data show that reviewing findings from CARTITUDE-4 had an impact on the perceptions and prescribing preferences of oncologists/hematologists. As interest in the use of CAR T agents in earlier lines grows, sequencing strategies for CAR T agents with other emerging treatment options―such as bispecific antibodies―becomes a critical topic. Future research at Cardinal Health aims to address the hurdles that hematologists face when making decisions for patients with RRMM within this rapidly evolving landscape.

Corresponding Author: Brooke Dulka, PhD
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1075 724 185
PDF Downloads 138 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0