Antiemetic Studies on the NK1 Receptor Antagonist Aprepitant

Authors:
John P. Stoutenburg Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York

Search for other papers by John P. Stoutenburg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
and
Harry Raftopoulos Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Harry Raftopoulos in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
Full access

Aprepitant (Emend, Merck Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ), a neurokin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonist, is a first-in-class agent approved for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). It competitively binds to NK1 receptors, blocks the binding of substance P, the natural ligand, and prevents signal transduction. Early clinical trials showed that aprepitant combined with standard therapy (corticosteroids and serotonin receptor antagonists) provided improved antiemetic protection in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. The results of three randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trials that compared aprepitant plus standard therapy with standard therapy plus placebo showed significant improvements in complete response rates (defined as no emesis and no use of rescue medication) with the addition of aprepitant (58.8% to 71% vs. 43.3% to 52.3%; P < .05 for all). Benefits were found in the acute phases, delayed phases, and in the overall study periods. Multiple secondary endpoints also favored the addition of aprepitant, particularly in the delayed phases and overall study periods. In extended trials in which treatment was continued for up to 6 cycles of highly emetogenic chemotherapy, the antiemetic effect was maintained and remained statistically greater for the aprepitant plus standard therapy group compared with standard therapy and placebo. The addition of aprepitant was well tolerated, and common adverse events were similar to those seen with standard therapy plus placebo. A clinically significant drug interaction with CYP3A4-metabolized cytotoxic agents was reported in one trial, but not confirmed in the others. The additional protection confirmed by aprepitant translated into a decreased impact of CINV on patients' daily lives as measured by the Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire. Aprepitant adds additional antiemetic protection to standard therapy and should be considered in all patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

Correspondence: Harry Raftopoulos, MD, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, HIP 9-909, New York, NY 10032. E-mail: hr43@columbia.edu
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1

    Jantunen IT, Kataja VV, Muhonen TT: An overview of randomised studies comparing 5-HT3 receptor antagonists to conventional anti-emetics in the prophylaxis of acute chemotherapy-induced vomiting. Eur J Cancer 1997;33:6674.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Grunberg SM, Hansen M, Deuson R et al.: Incidence and impact of nausea/vomiting with modern antiemetics: perception vs. reality. Cancer 2004;100:22612268.

  • 3

    Roila F, Donati D, Tamberi S et al.: Delayed emesis: incidence, pattern, prognostic factors and optimal treatment. Support Care Cancer 2002;10:8895.

  • 4

    ASHP Therapeutic Guidelines on the Pharmacologic Management of Nausea and Vomiting in Adult and Pediatric Patients Receiving Chemotherapy or Radiation Therapy or Undergoing Surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1999;56:729764.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    ESMO Recommendations for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (NV). Ann Oncol 2001;12:10591060.

  • 6

    Fauser AA, Fellhauer M, Hoffmann M et al.: Guidelines for anti-emetic therapy: acute emesis. Eur J Cancer 1999;35:361370.

  • 7

    Gralla RJ, Osoba D, Kris MG et al.: Recommendations for the use of antiemetics: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:29712994.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Koeller JM, Aapro MS, Gralla RJ et al.: Antiemetic guidelines: creating a more practical treatment approach. Support Care Cancer 2002;10:519522.

  • 9

    NCCN antiemesis practice guidelines. Oncology 1997;11(suppl):5789. Update available at: http://www.nccn.org. Accessed July 2004.

  • 10

    Roila F: Transferring scientific evidence to oncological practice: A trial on the impact of three different implementation strategies on antiemetic prescriptions. Support Care Cancer, 2004;12:446453.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Schnell FM: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: The importance of acute antiemetic control. Oncologist 2003;8:187198.

  • 12

    Grunberg SM, Hesketh PJ: Control of chemotherapy-induced emesis. N Engl J Med 1993;329:17901796.

  • 13

    Andrews PL, Davis CJ, Bingham S et al.: The abdominal visceral innervation and the emetic reflex: pathways, pharmacology, and plasticity. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1990;68:325345.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Saria A: The tachykinin NK1 receptor in the brain: pharmacology and putative functions. Eur J Pharmacol 1999;375:5160.

  • 15

    Otsuka M, Yoshioka K: Neurotransmitter functions of mammalian tachykinins. Physiol Rev 1993;73:229308.

  • 16

    Rupniak NM, Kramer MS: Discovery of the antidepressant and anti-emetic efficacy of substance P receptor (NK1) antagonists. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1999;20:485490.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Santarelli L, Gobbi G, Debs PC et al.: Genetic and pharmacological disruption of neurokinin 1 receptor function decreases anxiety-related behaviors and increases serotonergic function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98: 19121917.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Yoshikawa T, Yoshida N, Oka M: The broad-spectrum antiemetic activity of AS-8112, a novel dopamine D2, D3 and 5-HT3 receptors antagonist. Br J Pharmacol 2001;133:253260.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Gralla RJ, Navari RM, Hesketh PJ et al.: Single-dose oral granisetron has equivalent antiemetic efficacy to intravenous ondansetron for highly emetogenic cisplatin-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:15681573.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Rudd JA, Naylor RJ: Effects of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists on models of acute and delayed emesis induced by cisplatin in the ferret. Neuropharmacology 1994;33:16071608.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Tattersall FD, Rycroft W, Cumberbatch M et al.: The novel NK1 receptor antagonist MK-0869 (L-754,030) and its water soluble phosphoryl prodrug, L-758,298, inhibit acute and delayed cisplatin-induced emesis in ferrets. Neuropharmacology 2000;39:652663.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Harrison T, Owens AP, Williams BJ et al.: An orally active, water-soluble neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist suitable for both intravenous and oral clinical administration. J Med Chem 2001;44:42964299.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Hale JJ, Mills SG, MacCoss M et al.: Structural optimization affording 2-(R)-(1-(R)-3, 5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenylethoxy)-3-(S)-(4-fluoro)phenyl-4- (3-oxo-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)methylmorpholine, a potent, orally active, long-acting morpholine acetal human NK-1 receptor antagonist. J Med Chem 1998;41:46074614.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Blum RA, Majumdar A, McCrea J et al.: Effects of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron and granisetron in healthy subjects. Clin Ther 2003;25:14071419.

  • 25

    McCrea JB, Majumdar AK, Goldberg MR et al.: Effects of the neurokinin1 receptor antagonist aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2003;74:1724.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Navari RM, Reinhardt RR, Gralla RJ et al.: Reduction of cisplatin-induced emesis by a selective neurokinin-1-receptor antagonist. L-754,030 Antiemetic Trials Group. N Engl J Med 1999;340:190195.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Campos D, Pereira JR, Reinhardt RR et al.: Prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis by the oral neurokinin-1 antagonist, MK-869, in combination with granisetron and dexamethasone or with dexamethasone alone. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:17591767.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Cocquyt V, Van Belle S, Reinhardt RR et al.: Comparison of L-758,298, a prodrug for the selective neurokinin-1 antagonist, L-754,030, with ondansetron for the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Eur J Cancer 2001;37:835842.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Van Belle S, Lichinitser MR, Navari RM et al.: Prevention of cisplatin-induced acute and delayed emesis by the selective neurokinin-1 antagonists, L-758,298 and MK-869. Cancer 2002;94:30323041.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Chawla SP, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ et al.: Establishing the dose of the oral NK1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Cancer 2003;97:22902300.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    de Wit R, Herrstedt J, Rapoport B et al.: Addition of the oral NK1 antagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetics provides protection against nausea and vomiting during multiple cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:41054111.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ et al.: The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin—the Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:41124119.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Poli-Bigelli S, Rodrigues-Pereira J, Carides AD et al.: Addition of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy improves control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Latin America. Cancer 2003;97:30903098.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Gralla RJ, Carides AD, Ianus J et al.: The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant added to standard antiemetics provided equal efficacy in female and male patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy: combined data from 2 phase III clinical trials (Abstr #636). San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2003.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Hargreaves R: Imaging substance P receptors (NK1) in the living human brain using positron emission tomography. J Clin Psychiatry 2002;63(suppl 11):1824.

  • 36

    de Wit R, Herrstedt J, Rapoport B et al.: The oral NK(1) antagonist, aprepitant, given with standard antiemetics provides protection against nausea and vomiting over multiple cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a combined analysis of two randomised, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trials. Eur J Cancer 2004;40:403410.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Martin AR, Carides AD, Pearson JD et al.: Functional relevance of antiemetic control. Experience using the FLIE questionnaire in a randomised study of the NK-1 antagonist aprepitant. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:13951401.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 362 69 20
PDF Downloads 271 72 5
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0