Documentation of Pain in Comprehensive Cancer Centers in the United States: A Preliminary Analysis

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), an organization of 19 of the world's leading cancer centers, developed and communicated a cancer pain treatment guideline. NCCN seeks to implement guidelines through performance measurement using a NCCN Oncology Outcomes Database. This is a preliminary report from the NCCN Cancer Pain Management Database Project. The primary objective of this NCCN Cancer Pain Management Database Project study is to evaluate the frequency, methods, and extent of documentation of cancer pain assessment and managementat NCCN institutions. A pain data dictionary and related data collection forms were first developed. The records of 209 breast cancer patients with bone metastases were then studied. The frequency of pain mentions, type of pain assessment tool used, pain characteristics, type of clinician documenting pain, location in the medical record, and pain treatment characteristics were noted. The majority of clinical encounters included pain mentions, although considerable variability was found in pain documentation between providers and between inpatient and outpatient settings. Nurses more frequently recorded pain, usually as a numeric pain intensity score. Pain specialists were more likely to record a complete description of pain. A significant minority of patients experienced moderate to severe pain. In a small subgroup of patients with moderate to severe pain, pain treatment was not recorded. The undertreatment of cancer pain has been a focus of investigation and review for the past two decades. Quality improvement efforts to raise the standard of pain management have been underway. The results of this study highlight the need for standardization of pain documentation in comprehensive cancer centers as a prerequisite for the proper assessment of cancer pain and the improvement of clinical outcomes of pain management.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

Correspondence: Sharon M. Weinstein, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Neurology and Oncology, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112. E-mail:
  • 1

    McGivney WT, Crooks GM. The care of patients with severe chronic pain in terminal illness. JAMA 1984;251:11821188.

  • 2

    Cleeland CS, Gonin R, Hatfield AK. Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer. N Engl J Med 1994;330:592596.

  • 3

    NCCN Cancer Pain Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. In The Complete Library of Practice Guidelines in Oncology [CD-ROM]. Rockledge, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373383.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. XV. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons, 1990;234235.

  • 6

    Weinstein SM, Laux LF, Thornby JI. Physicians' attitudes toward pain and the use of opioid analgesics: results of a survey from the Texas Cancer Pain Initiative. South Med J 2000;93:479487.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Eddy DM. Clinical decision-making: From theory to practice: Broadening the responsibilities of practitioners. JAMA 1993;270:708709.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1 0 0
Full Text Views 232 66 6
PDF Downloads 177 22 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0