CLO20-039: Patient (pt)-Reported Outcomes (PRO) in Patients With HER2-Negative Locally Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer (LA/mBC) and a Germline BRCA1/2 Mutation (gBRCA1/2 mut) Receiving Talazoparib vs. Physician’s Choice of Chemotherapy (PCT): A Focus on EMBRACA Racial Subgroups

Authors:
Sara A. HurvitzUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

Search for other papers by Sara A. Hurvitz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Ruben G. W. QuekPfizer, Inc., San Francisco, CA

Search for other papers by Ruben G. W. Quek in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Helen BhattacharyyaPfizer, Inc., San Francisco, CA

Search for other papers by Helen Bhattacharyya in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Johannes EttlTechnische Universität München, Munich, Germany

Search for other papers by Johannes Ettl in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Anthony GonçalvesAix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France

Search for other papers by Anthony Gonçalves in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
, and
Hope S. RugoUCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA

Search for other papers by Hope S. Rugo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
Full access

Background: Key subgroup analyses of EMBRACA (NCT01945775) demonstrated improvements in progression-free survival for talazoparib vs PCT in white and non-white pts with HER2-negative g BRCA1/2 mut LA/mBC. We present post hoc analyses evaluating PRO in these racial subgroups. Methods: PRO was assessed at baseline, start of treatment cycle (every 3 wks), and end of treatment using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its breast cancer module, QLQ-BR23. Higher scores indicate better functioning/global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QoL) or worse symptom severity. PRO analyses, performed separately in white/non-white pts for GHS/QoL functional and symptom scales, included comparison of overall change from baseline (per longitudinal repeated measures mixed-effects model) and time to definitive clinically meaningful deterioration (TTD; per survival analysis methods) using a Cox proportional hazards model and stratified log-rank test. Results: Baseline PRO scores in the evaluable population were similar between the talazoparib (white/non-white, n=173/89) and PCT (white/non-white, n=84/30) arms. A statistically significant estimated overall change from baseline in GHS/QoL favored talazoparib vs PCT for white (7.4 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 2.6, 12.2]; P =0.003) and non-white (10.1 [95%CI: 3.7, 16.5]; P =0.002) pts. A statistically significant estimated overall change from baseline in pt reported pain symptoms favored talazoparib vs PCT for white ( P <0.001) and non-white ( P =0.02) pts. A statistically significant delay in TTD favoring talazoparib vs PCT was observed in GHS/QoL for both white (median [m]: 21.1 vs 6.3 mos, hazard ratio [HR]=0.38 [95% CI: 0.24, 0.59]; P <0.001]) and non-white (m: [not reached] vs 10.4 mos, HR=0.38 [95% CI: 0.17, 0.83]; P =0.01) pts. A delay in TTD favoring talazoparib was observed in pain symptoms for both white (m: 22.7 vs 10.3 mos, HR=0.29, P <0.001) and non-white (m: 23.0 vs 7.5 mos, HR=0.63, P =0.22) pts. Conclusions: In pts with HER2-negative g BRCA1/2 mut LA/mBC, talozaparib vs PCT resulted in significantly better change from baseline and delayed TTD in GHS/QoL and pt reported pain symptoms in white pts; similar results were observed in non-white pts. Future real-world PRO studies across different racial subgroups are warranted.

Corresponding Author: Sara A. Hurvitz, MD
  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 612 212 8
PDF Downloads 243 45 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0