National Cancer Institute. Cancer Stat Facts: Female Breast Cancer. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html. Accessed October 23, 2018.
Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:347–360.
Barton MB, Elmore JG, Fletcher SW. Breast symptoms among women enrolled in a health maintenance organization: frequency, evaluation, and outcome. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:651–657.
Noroozian M, Hadjiiski L, Rahnama-Moghadam S et al.. Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization. Radiology 2012;262:61–68.
Zuley ML, Bandos AI, Ganott MA et al.. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions. Radiology 2013;266:89–95.
Waldherr C, Cerny P, Altermatt HJ et al.. Value of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:226–231.
Food and Drug Administration. Quality mammography standards; correction—FDA: final rule; correction. Washington, DC: Food and Drug Administration. Federal Register 62:60613-60632 (1997).
American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR-BI-RADS®--5th Edition. ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas; BI-RADS. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2014.
Bassett L, Winchester DP, Caplan RB et al.. Stereotactic core-needle biopsy of the breast: a report of the Joint Task Force of the American College of Radiology, American College of Surgeons, and College of American Pathologists. CA Cancer J Clin 1997;47:171–190.
Flobbe K, Bosch AM, Kessels AG et al.. The additional diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1194–1199.
Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB et al.. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299:2151–2163.
Buchberger W, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P et al.. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:921–927.
Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ferrari A et al.. Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost. Eur J Cancer 2008;44:539–544.
Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001;221:641–649.
Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al.. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:8469–8476.
Renz DM, Baltzer PAT, Bottcher J et al.. Inflammatory breast carcinoma in magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison with locally advanced breast cancer. Acad Radiol 2008;15:209–221.
Bahl M, Baker JA, Greenup RA, Ghate SV. Evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge: What is the added diagnostic value of MRI? Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22(Suppl 3):S435–441.
Lubina N, Schedelbeck U, Roth A et al.. 3.0 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge when mammography and ultrasound fail. Eur Radiol 2015;25:1285–1293.
Morrogh M, Morris EA, Liberman L et al.. MRI identifies otherwise occult disease in select patients with Paget disease of the nipple. J Am Coll Surg 2008;206:316–321.
Abati A, Simsir A. Breast fine needle aspiration biopsy: prevailing recommendations and contemporary practices. Clin Lab Med 2005;25:631–654, v.
Levine P, Simsir A, Cangiarella J. Management issues in breast lesions diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration and percutaneous core breast biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol 2006;125 Suppl:S124–134.
Pijnappel RM, van den Donk M, Holland R et al.. Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of nonpalpable breast lesions. Br J Cancer 2004;90:595–600.
Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Caudry DJ et al.. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: results from the radiologic diagnostic oncology group V. Radiology 2001;219:785–792.
Fishman JE, Milikowski C, Ramsinghani R et al.. US-guided core-needle biopsy of the breast: how many specimens are necessary? Radiology 2003;226:779–782.
Yeow KM, Lo YF, Wang CS et al.. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy as an initial diagnostic test for palpable breast masses. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001;12:1313–1317.
Verkooijen HM. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: results of a multicenter prospective study with 95% surgical confirmation. Int J Cancer 2002;99:853–859.
Pandelidis S, Heiland D, Jones D et al.. Accuracy of 11-gauge vacuum-assisted core biopsy of mammographic breast lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:43–47.
Kettritz U, Rotter K, Schreer I et al.. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicenter study. Cancer 2004;100:245–251.
Sigal-Zafrani B, Muller K, El Khoury C et al.. Vacuum-assisted large-core needle biopsy (VLNB) improves the management of patients with breast microcalcifications - analysis of 1009 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008;34:377–381.
Burbank F, Forcier N. Tissue marking clip for stereotactic breast biopsy: initial placement accuracy, long-term stability, and usefulness as a guide for wire localization. Radiology 1997;205:407–415.
Mandelblatt JS, Cronin K, de Koning H et al.. Collaborative modeling of U.S. breast cancer screening strategies. AHRQ Publication No. 14–05201-EF-4. 2015
Cangiarella J, Guth A, Axelrod D et al.. Is surgical excision necessary for the management of atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ diagnosed on core needle biopsy? A report of 38 cases and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008;132:979–983.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
. Cangiarella J Guth A Axelrod D Is surgical excision necessary for the management of atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ diagnosed on core needle biopsy? A report of 38 cases and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008; 132: 979– 983.
Elsheikh TM, Silverman JF. Follow-up surgical excision is indicated when breast core needle biopsies show atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ: a correlative study of 33 patients with review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:534–543.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
. Elsheikh TM Silverman JF Follow-up surgical excision is indicated when breast core needle biopsies show atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ: a correlative study of 33 patients with review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29: 534– 543.
Frouge C, Tristant H, Guinebretiere JM et al.. Mammographic lesions suggestive of radial scars: microscopic findings in 40 cases. Radiology 1995;195:623–625.
Margenthaler JA, Duke D, Monsees BS et al.. Correlation between core biopsy and excisional biopsy in breast high-risk lesions. Am J Surg 2006;192:534–537.
Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ et al.. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994;193:359–364.
Middleton LP, Grant S, Stephens T et al.. Lobular carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core needle biopsy: when should it be excised? Mod Pathol 2003;16:120–129.
Bowman K, Munoz A, Mahvi DM, Breslin TM. Lobular neoplasia diagnosed at core biopsy does not mandate surgical excision. J Surg Res 2007;142:275–280.
Kopans DB. LCIS found at core needle biopsy may not need surgical excision. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:W152; author reply W153.
O'Neil M, Madan R, Tawfik OW et al.. Lobular carcinoma in situ/atypical lobular hyperplasia on breast needle biopsies: does it warrant surgical excisional biopsy? A study of 27 cases. Ann Diagn Pathol 2010;14:251–255.
Rendi MH, Dintzis SM, Lehman CD et al.. Lobular in-situ neoplasia on breast core needle biopsy: imaging indication and pathologic extent can identify which patients require excisional biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:914–921.
Nagi CS, O'Donnell JE, Tismenetsky M et al.. Lobular neoplasia on core needle biopsy does not require excision. Cancer 2008;112:2152–2158.
Nakhlis F, Gilmore L, Gelman R et al.. Incidence of adjacent synchronous invasive carcinoma and/or ductal carcinoma in-situ in patients with lobular neoplasia on core biopsy: results from a prospective multi-institutional registry (TBCRC 020). Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:722–728.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
. Nakhlis F Gilmore L Gelman R Incidence of adjacent synchronous invasive carcinoma and/or ductal carcinoma in-situ in patients with lobular neoplasia on core biopsy: results from a prospective multi-institutional registry (TBCRC 020). Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23: 722– 728.
Kaiser JS, Helvie MA, Blacklaw RL, Roubidoux MA. Palpable breast thickening: role of mammography and US in cancer detection. Radiology 2002;223:839–844.
Loving VA, DeMartini WB, Eby PR et al.. Targeted ultrasound in women younger than 30 years with focal breast signs or symptoms: outcomes analyses and management implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:1472–1477.
Robbins J, Jeffries D, Roubidoux M, Helvie M. Accuracy of diagnostic mammography and breast ultrasound during pregnancy and lactation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:716–722.
Lehman CD, Lee CI, Loving VA et al.. Accuracy and value of breast ultrasound for primary imaging evaluation of symptomatic women 30-39 years of age. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:1169–1177.
Soo MS, Rosen EL, Baker JA et al.. Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:1167–1170.
Shetty MK, Shah YP. Prospective evaluation of the value of negative sonographic and mammographic findings in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast. J Ultrasound Med 2002;21:1211–1216; quiz 1217–1219.
Moy L, Slanetz PJ, Moore R et al.. Specificity of mammography and US in the evaluation of a palpable abnormality: retrospective review. Radiology 2002;225:176–181.
Leung SE, Ben-Nachum I, Kornecki A. New palpable breast lump with recent negative mammogram: is repeat mammography necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016;207:200–204.
Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL et al.. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196:123–134.
Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjaeger MH et al.. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? Radiology 2004;233:850–856.
Harvey JA, Nicholson BT, Lorusso AP et al.. Short-term follow-up of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features: evaluation of 375 lesions in 320 women. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:1723–1730.
Shin JH, Han BK, Ko EY et al.. Probably benign breast masses diagnosed by sonography: is there a difference in the cancer rate according to palpability? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:W187–191.
Patterson SK, Neal CH, Jeffries DO et al.. Outcomes of solid palpable masses assessed as BI-RADS 3 or 4A: a retrospective review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014;147:311–316.
Booi RC, Carson PL, O'Donnell M et al.. Characterization of cysts using differential correlation coefficient values from two dimensional breast elastography: preliminary study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008;34:12–21.
Ashbeck EL, Rosenberg RD, Stauber PM, Key CR. Benign breast biopsy diagnosis and subsequent risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:467–472.
Daly CP, Bailey JE, Klein KA, Helvie MA. Complicated breast cysts on sonography: is aspiration necessary to exclude malignancy? Acad Radiol 2008;15:610–617.
Huff JG. The sonographic findings and differing clinical implications of simple, complicated, and complex breast cysts. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2009;7:1101–1104; quiz 1105.
Doshi DJ, March DE, Crisi GM, Coughlin BF. Complex cystic breast masses: diagnostic approach and imaging-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2007;27(Suppl 1):53–64.
Fuchsjager MH, Philipp MO, Loewe C, Helbich TH. [Diagnostic management of nipple discharge]. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2003;115(Suppl 2):33–39.
Ohuchi N, Furuta A, Mori S. Management of ductal carcinoma in situ with nipple discharge: intraductal spreading of carcinoma is an unfavorable pathologic factor for breast-conserving surgery. Cancer 1994;74:1294–1302.
Sabel MS, Helvie MA, Breslin T et al.. Is duct excision still necessary for all cases of suspicious nipple discharge? Breast J 2012;18:157–162.
Ashfaq A, Senior D, Pockaj BA et al.. Validation study of a modern treatment algorithm for nipple discharge. Am J Surg 2014;208:222–227.
Tokuda Y, Kuriyama K, Nakamoto A et al.. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009;33:58–62. 10.1097/RCT.1090b1013e3181671ad3181672.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
. Tokuda Y Kuriyama K Nakamoto A Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009; 33: 58– 62. 10.1097/RCT.1090b1013e3181671ad3181672.
Ballesio L, Maggi C, Savelli S et al.. Role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with unilateral nipple discharge: preliminary study. Radiol Med 2008;113:249–264.
Foulkes RE, Heard G, Boyce T et al.. Duct excision is still necessary to rule out breast cancer in patients presenting with spontaneous bloodstained nipple discharge. Int J Breast Cancer 2011;2011:495315.
Dawood S, Cristofanilli M. What progress have we made in managing inflammatory breast cancer? Oncology (Williston Park) 2007;21:673–679.
Sakorafas GH, Blanchard DK, Sarr MG, Farley DR. Paget's disease of the breast: a clinical perspective. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2001;386:444–450.
Noroozian M, Stein LF, Gaetke-Udager K, Helvie MA. Long-term clinical outcomes in women with breast pain in the absence of additional clinical findings: mammography remains indicated. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015;149:417–424.
Barton MB, Harris R, Fletcher SW. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How? JAMA 1999;282:1270–1280.
Walsh R, Kornguth PJ, Soo MS et al.. Axillary lymph nodes: mammographic, pathologic, and clinical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:33–38.
Shipchandler TZ, Lorenz RR, McMahon J, Tubbs R. Supraclavicular lymphadenopathy due to silicone breast implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:830–832.