National Cancer Institute. Cancer Stat Facts: Female Breast Cancer. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html. Accessed October 23 2018.
HumphreyLLHelfandMChanBKWoolfSH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med2002;137:347–360.
BartonMBElmoreJGFletcherSW. Breast symptoms among women enrolled in a health maintenance organization: frequency, evaluation, and outcome. Ann Intern Med1999;130:651–657.
NoroozianMHadjiiskiLRahnama-MoghadamS. Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization. Radiology2012;262:61–68.
ZuleyMLBandosAIGanottMA. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions. Radiology2013;266:89–95.
WaldherrCCernyPAltermattHJ. Value of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol2013;200:226–231.
Food and Drug Administration. Quality mammography standards; correction—FDA: final rule; correction. Washington, DC: Food and Drug Administration. Federal Register62:60613-60632 (1997).
American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR-BI-RADS®--5th Edition. ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Breast Imaging Atlas; BI-RADS. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2014.
BassettLWinchesterDPCaplanRB. Stereotactic core-needle biopsy of the breast: a report of the Joint Task Force of the American College of Radiology, American College of Surgeons, and College of American Pathologists. CA Cancer J Clin1997;47:171–190.
FlobbeKBoschAMKesselsAG. The additional diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Arch Intern Med2003;163:1194–1199.
BergWABlumeJDCormackJB. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA2008;299:2151–2163.
BuchbergerWDeKoekkoek-DollPSpringerP. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol1999;173:921–927.
CorsettiVHoussamiNFerrariA. Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost. Eur J Cancer2008;44:539–544.
KaplanSS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology2001;221:641–649.
KuhlCKSchradingSLeutnerCC. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol2005;23:8469–8476.
RenzDMBaltzerPATBottcherJ. Inflammatory breast carcinoma in magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison with locally advanced breast cancer. Acad Radiol2008;15:209–221.
BahlMBakerJAGreenupRAGhateSV. Evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge: What is the added diagnostic value of MRI?Ann Surg Oncol2015;22(Suppl 3):S435–441.
LubinaNSchedelbeckURothA. 3.0 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge when mammography and ultrasound fail. Eur Radiol2015;25:1285–1293.
MorroghMMorrisEALibermanL. MRI identifies otherwise occult disease in select patients with Paget disease of the nipple. J Am Coll Surg2008;206:316–321.
AbatiASimsirA. Breast fine needle aspiration biopsy: prevailing recommendations and contemporary practices. Clin Lab Med2005;25:631–654 v.
LevinePSimsirACangiarellaJ. Management issues in breast lesions diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration and percutaneous core breast biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol2006;125Suppl:S124–134.
PijnappelRMvan den DonkMHollandR. Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of nonpalpable breast lesions. Br J Cancer2004;90:595–600.
PisanoEDFajardoLLCaudryDJ. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: results from the radiologic diagnostic oncology group V. Radiology2001;219:785–792.
FishmanJEMilikowskiCRamsinghaniR. US-guided core-needle biopsy of the breast: how many specimens are necessary?Radiology2003;226:779–782.
YeowKMLoYFWangCS. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy as an initial diagnostic test for palpable breast masses. J Vasc Interv Radiol2001;12:1313–1317.
VerkooijenHM. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: results of a multicenter prospective study with 95% surgical confirmation. Int J Cancer2002;99:853–859.
PandelidisSHeilandDJonesD. Accuracy of 11-gauge vacuum-assisted core biopsy of mammographic breast lesions. Ann Surg Oncol2003;10:43–47.
KettritzURotterKSchreerI. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicenter study. Cancer2004;100:245–251.
Sigal-ZafraniBMullerKEl KhouryC. Vacuum-assisted large-core needle biopsy (VLNB) improves the management of patients with breast microcalcifications - analysis of 1009 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol2008;34:377–381.
BurbankFForcierN. Tissue marking clip for stereotactic breast biopsy: initial placement accuracy, long-term stability, and usefulness as a guide for wire localization. Radiology1997;205:407–415.
CangiarellaJGuthAAxelrodD. Is surgical excision necessary for the management of atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ diagnosed on core needle biopsy? A report of 38 cases and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med2008;132:979–983.
ElsheikhTMSilvermanJF. Follow-up surgical excision is indicated when breast core needle biopsies show atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ: a correlative study of 33 patients with review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol2005;29:534–543.
FrougeCTristantHGuinebretiereJM. Mammographic lesions suggestive of radial scars: microscopic findings in 40 cases. Radiology1995;195:623–625.
MargenthalerJADukeDMonseesBS. Correlation between core biopsy and excisional biopsy in breast high-risk lesions. Am J Surg2006;192:534–537.
MiddletonLPGrantSStephensT. Lobular carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core needle biopsy: when should it be excised?Mod Pathol2003;16:120–129.
BowmanKMunozAMahviDMBreslinTM. Lobular neoplasia diagnosed at core biopsy does not mandate surgical excision. J Surg Res2007;142:275–280.
O'NeilMMadanRTawfikOW. Lobular carcinoma in situ/atypical lobular hyperplasia on breast needle biopsies: does it warrant surgical excisional biopsy? A study of 27 cases. Ann Diagn Pathol2010;14:251–255.
RendiMHDintzisSMLehmanCD. Lobular in-situ neoplasia on breast core needle biopsy: imaging indication and pathologic extent can identify which patients require excisional biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol2012;19:914–921.
NakhlisFGilmoreLGelmanR. Incidence of adjacent synchronous invasive carcinoma and/or ductal carcinoma in-situ in patients with lobular neoplasia on core biopsy: results from a prospective multi-institutional registry (TBCRC 020). Ann Surg Oncol2016;23:722–728.
KaiserJSHelvieMABlacklawRLRoubidouxMA. Palpable breast thickening: role of mammography and US in cancer detection. Radiology2002;223:839–844.
LovingVADeMartiniWBEbyPR. Targeted ultrasound in women younger than 30 years with focal breast signs or symptoms: outcomes analyses and management implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol2010;195:1472–1477.
RobbinsJJeffriesDRoubidouxMHelvieM. Accuracy of diagnostic mammography and breast ultrasound during pregnancy and lactation. AJR Am J Roentgenol2011;196:716–722.
LehmanCDLeeCILovingVA. Accuracy and value of breast ultrasound for primary imaging evaluation of symptomatic women 30-39 years of age. AJR Am J Roentgenol2012;199:1169–1177.
SooMSRosenELBakerJA. Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol2001;177:1167–1170.
ShettyMKShahYP. Prospective evaluation of the value of negative sonographic and mammographic findings in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast. J Ultrasound Med2002;21:1211–1216; quiz 1217–1219.
MoyLSlanetzPJMooreR. Specificity of mammography and US in the evaluation of a palpable abnormality: retrospective review. Radiology2002;225:176–181.
LeungSEBen-NachumIKorneckiA. New palpable breast lump with recent negative mammogram: is repeat mammography necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol2016;207:200–204.
StavrosATThickmanDRappCL. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology1995;196:123–134.
GrafOHelbichTHFuchsjaegerMH. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?Radiology2004;233:850–856.
HarveyJANicholsonBTLorussoAP. Short-term follow-up of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features: evaluation of 375 lesions in 320 women. AJR Am J Roentgenol2009;193:1723–1730.
ShinJHHanBKKoEY. Probably benign breast masses diagnosed by sonography: is there a difference in the cancer rate according to palpability?AJR Am J Roentgenol2009;192:W187–191.
PattersonSKNealCHJeffriesDO. Outcomes of solid palpable masses assessed as BI-RADS 3 or 4A: a retrospective review. Breast Cancer Res Treat2014;147:311–316.
BooiRCCarsonPLO'DonnellM. Characterization of cysts using differential correlation coefficient values from two dimensional breast elastography: preliminary study. Ultrasound Med Biol2008;34:12–21.
AshbeckELRosenbergRDStauberPMKeyCR. Benign breast biopsy diagnosis and subsequent risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev2007;16:467–472.
DalyCPBaileyJEKleinKAHelvieMA. Complicated breast cysts on sonography: is aspiration necessary to exclude malignancy? Acad Radiol2008;15:610–617.
HuffJG. The sonographic findings and differing clinical implications of simple, complicated, and complex breast cysts. J Natl Compr Canc Netw2009;7:1101–1104; quiz 1105.
DoshiDJMarchDECrisiGMCoughlinBF. Complex cystic breast masses: diagnostic approach and imaging-pathologic correlation. Radiographics2007;27(Suppl 1):53–64.
OhuchiNFurutaAMoriS. Management of ductal carcinoma in situ with nipple discharge: intraductal spreading of carcinoma is an unfavorable pathologic factor for breast-conserving surgery. Cancer1994;74:1294–1302.
TokudaYKuriyamaKNakamotoA. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors. J Comput Assist Tomogr2009;33:58–62. 10.1097/RCT.1090b1013e3181671ad3181672.
BallesioLMaggiCSavelliS. Role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with unilateral nipple discharge: preliminary study. Radiol Med2008;113:249–264.
FoulkesREHeardGBoyceT. Duct excision is still necessary to rule out breast cancer in patients presenting with spontaneous bloodstained nipple discharge. Int J Breast Cancer2011;2011:495315.
NoroozianMSteinLFGaetke-UdagerKHelvieMA. Long-term clinical outcomes in women with breast pain in the absence of additional clinical findings: mammography remains indicated. Breast Cancer Res Treat2015;149:417–424.
BartonMBHarrisRFletcherSW. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How?JAMA1999;282:1270–1280.
ShipchandlerTZLorenzRRMcMahonJTubbsR. Supraclavicular lymphadenopathy due to silicone breast implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2007;133:830–832.