A cancer diagnosis is associated with a range of physical, psychological, social, and existential challenges. For some individuals, their personal or situational resources are not sufficient to manage these challenges, which in turn contribute to an array of adverse effects, including psychological distress.1 Psychological distress is a generic term that encompasses the spectrum of feelings from worry, vulnerability, and sadness, to depression, anxiety, and panic.2 Between 20% and 66% of patients with cancer report high levels of distress.3,4 Early identification and treatment of emotional distress are important given its potential negative effects on patients’ short- and long-term illness adjustment.5,6 Although distress is recognized internationally as the sixth vital sign, it often goes unrecognized because of health care professionals’ lack of time and confidence in assessing distress.2
Throughout the past decade, much attention has been given to implementing routine distress screening programs in cancer care as a way of improving the management of distress. Routine distress screening at periods of increased vulnerability is now an integral part of international cancer control plans7,8 and best practice guidelines in psychosocial cancer care.2,4 Research increasingly supports the effectiveness of distress screening programs in identifying patients with adjustment disorders5,7,8 and of follow-up psychosocial care in improving psychological and physical functioning.7,9,10 However, despite the availability of psychosocial services, many patients who screen positive for distress do not accept referrals for further assessment or psychosocial services.3,5,8 These low rates of referral uptake often raise concerns among health care professionals that patients are not receiving optimal cancer care.
To inform the development and implementation of potentially successful models of distress screening, a qualitative study was undertaken to better understand the preferences for psychosocial care of distressed women diagnosed with a gynecologic cancer, including perceptions of distress screening and women’s motives for accepting (or refusing) subsequent referrals to available psychosocial services.
The authors have disclosed that they have no financial interests, arrangements, affiliations, or commercial interests with the manufacturers of any products discussed in this article or their competitors. This study was funded by the Psycho-oncology Cooperative Research Group.
CarlsonLEWallerAMitchellAJ. Screening for distress and unmet needs in patients with cancer: review and recommendations. J Clin Oncol2012;30:1160–1177.
National Breast Cancer Centre NCCI. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Psychosocial Care of Adults with Cancer. Camperdown, NSW: National Breast Cancer Centre; 2003.
ShimizuKIshibashiYUmezawaS. Feasibility and usefulness of the ‘Distress Screening Program in Ambulatory Care’ in clinical oncology practice. Psychooncology2010;19:718–725.
SollnerWMaislingerSKonigA. Providing psychosocial support for breast cancer patients based on screening for distress within a consultation-liaison service. Psychooncology2004;13:893–897.
TuinmanMAGazendam-DonofrioSHoekstra-WeebersJ. Screening and referral for psychosocial distress in oncologic practice: use of the Distress Thermometer. Cancer2008;113:870–878.
StrongVWatersRHibberdC. Management of depression for people with cancer (SMaRT oncology 1): a randomised trial. Lancet2008;372:40–48.
GesslerSLowJDaniellsE. Screening for distress in cancer patients: is the distress thermometer a valid measure in the UK and does it measure change over time? A prospective validation study. Psychooncology2008;17:538–547.
LowJGesslerSWilliamsR. Screening for distress and depression in cancer catients: is ultrashort depression screening a valid measure in the UK? A prospective validation study. J Pain Symptom Manage2009;38:234–243.
BoyesAD’EsteCCareyMetal. How does the Distress Thermometer compare to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for detecting possible cases of psychological morbidity among cancer survivors?Support Care Cancer2012:1–9.
GilFGrassiLTravadoL. Use of distress and depression thermometers to measure psychosocial morbidity among southern European cancer patients. Support Care Cancer2005;13:600–606.
BakenDMWoolleyC. Validation of the Distress Thermometer, Impact Thermometer and combinations of these in screening for distress. Psychooncology2011;20:609–614.
GrassiLJohansenCAnnunziataMA. Screening for distress in cancer patients: a multicenter, nationwide study in Italy. Cancer2013;119:1714–1721.
BultzBDGroffSLFitchM. Implementing screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: a Canadian strategy for changing practice. Psychooncology2011;20:463–469.
ReganTLambertSDGirgisA. Do couple-based interventions make a difference for couples affected by cancer? A systematic review. BMC Cancer2012;12:279.
MoyerAKnapp-OliverSKSohlSJ. Lessons to be learned from 25 years of research investigating psychosocial interventions for cancer patients. Cancer J2009;15:345–351.
MitchellAJKaarSCogganC. Acceptability of common screening methods used to detect distress and related mood disorders—preferences of cancer specialists and non-specialists. Psychooncology2008;17:226–236.
LambertSDPallantJFCloverK. Using Rasch analysis to examine the Distress Thermometer’s cut-off scores among a mixed group of patients with cancer. Qual Life Resin press.
HoffmanBMZevonMAD’ArrigoMC. Screening for distress in cancer patients: the NCCN rapid-screening measure. Psychooncology2004;13:792–799.
CurryCCossichTMatthewsJ. Uptake of psychosocial referrals in an outpatient cancer setting: improving service accessibility via the referral process. Support Care Cancer2002;10:549–555.
BeattyLLambertS. A systematic review of internet-based self-help therapeutic interventions to improve distress and disease-control among adults with chronic health conditions. Clin Psychol Rev2013;33:609–622.
HollandJCKellyBJWeinbergerMI. Why psychosocial care is difficult to integrate into routine cancer care: stigma is the elephant in the room. J Natl Compr Canc Netw2010;8:362–366.
QianHYuanC. Factors associated with self-care self-efficacy among gastric and colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Nurs2012;35:E22–31.
LambertSGirgisALecathelinaisC. Walking a mile in their shoes: anxiety and depression among caregivers of cancer survivors at six and 12 months post-diagnosis. Support Care Cancer2013;21:75–85.
BauseweinCCalanzaniNDavesonB. ‘Burden to others’ as a public concern in advanced cancer: a comparative survey in seven European countries. BMC Cancer2013;13:1–11.