Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), diagnosed primarily in the elderly white population, is an uncommon, clinically aggressive cutaneous malignancy with a high rate of local, regional, and distant recurrence. During the last 2 decades of the 20th century, the incidence of MCC more than tripled, a trend that is expected to continue with an increasingly aging population.1
Despite its rarity, the increasing incidence and aggressive nature of MCC have brought attention on this disease and revealed a wide variability in the treatment and management of patients diagnosed with this malignancy. Patients with MCC may have very different work-up, treatment, and follow-up depending on the institution, physician, and specialty providing their care. These inconsistencies highlight the importance of having best evidence-based treatment guidelines. Unfortunately, prospective randomized clinical trials are extremely limited because of the rarity of the disease, necessitating that guidelines be based on best available evidence and expert consensus opinion. Multidisciplinary management to establish consensus recommendations for individualizing patient care within the framework of evidence-based guidelines constitutes the optimal treatment model within the existing limitations. This article discusses the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for MCC, including the importance of multidisciplinary management, and highlights the implementation of these guidelines in the multidisciplinary MCC program at the University of Michigan (UM).
HeathMJaimesNLemosB. Clinical characteristics of Merkel cell carcinoma at diagnosis in 195 patients: the AEIOU features. J Am Acad Dermatol2008;58:375–381.
Medina-FrancoHUristMMFiveashJ. Multimodality treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma: case series and literature review of 1024 cases. Ann Surg Oncol2001;8:204–208.
AllenPJBowneWBJaquesDP. Merkel cell carcinoma: prognosis and treatment of patients from a single institution. J Clin Oncol2005;23:2300–2309.
SchwartzJLBichakjianCKLoweL. Clinicopathologic features of primary Merkel cell carcinoma: a detailed descriptive analysis of a large contemporary cohort. Dermatol Surg2013;39:1009–1016.
7.TadmorTAvivAPolliackA. Merkel cell carcinoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and other lymphoproliferative disorders: an old bond with possible new viral ties. Ann Oncol2011;22:250–256.
LemosBDStorerBEIyerJG. Pathologic nodal evaluation improves prognostic accuracy in Merkel cell carcinoma: analysis of 5823 cases as the basis of the first consensus staging system. J Am Acad Dermatol2010;63:751–761.
GillenwaterAMHesselACMorrisonWH. Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck: effect of surgical excision and radiation on recurrence and survival. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2001;127:149–154.
MessinaJLReintgenDSCruseCW. Selective lymphadenectomy in patients with Merkel cell (cutaneous neuroendocrine) carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol1997;4:389–395.
MehranyKOtleyCCWeenigRH. A meta-analysis of the prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node status in Merkel cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg2002;28:113–117; discussion 117.
GuptaSGWangLCPenasPF. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for evaluation and treatment of patients with Merkel cell carcinoma: the Dana-Farber experience and meta-analysis of the literature. Arch Dermatol2006;142:685–690.
LlombartBMonteagudoCLopez-GuerreroJA. Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of 20 cases of Merkel cell carcinoma in search of prognostic markers. Histopathology2005;46:622–634.
SandelHD4thDayTRichardsonMS. Merkel cell carcinoma: does tumor size or depth of invasion correlate with recurrence, metastasis, or patient survival?Laryngoscope2006;116:791–795.
BichakjianCKLoweLLaoCD. Merkel cell carcinoma: critical review with guidelines for multidisciplinary management. Cancer2007;110:1–12.
FieldsRCBusamKJChouJF. Recurrence and survival in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy for merkel cell carcinoma: analysis of 153 patients from a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol2011;18:2529–2537.
FieldsRCBusamKJChouJF. Five hundred patients with Merkel cell carcinoma evaluated at a single institution. Ann Surg2011;254:465–473.
Aiello BowlesEJTuzzioLWieseCJ. Understanding high-quality cancer care: a summary of expert perspectives. Cancer2008;112:934–942.
SarnaikAALienMHNghiemPBichakjianCK. Clinical recognition, diagnosis, and staging of merkel cell carcinoma, and the role of the multidisciplinary management team. Curr Probl Cancer2010;34:38–46.
StephensMRLewisWGBrewsterAE. Multidisciplinary team management is associated with improved outcomes after surgery for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus2006;19:164–171.
FaderDJWiseCGNormolleDPJohnsonTM. The multidisciplinary melanoma clinic: a cost outcomes analysis of specialty care. J Am Acad Dermatol1998;38:742–751.
ErmanABCollarRMGriffithKA. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is accurate and prognostic in head and neck melanoma. Cancer2012;118:1040–1047.