Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), diagnosed primarily in the elderly white population, is an uncommon, clinically aggressive cutaneous malignancy with a high rate of local, regional, and distant recurrence. During the last 2 decades of the 20th century, the incidence of MCC more than tripled, a trend that is expected to continue with an increasingly aging population.1
Despite its rarity, the increasing incidence and aggressive nature of MCC have brought attention on this disease and revealed a wide variability in the treatment and management of patients diagnosed with this malignancy. Patients with MCC may have very different work-up, treatment, and follow-up depending on the institution, physician, and specialty providing their care. These inconsistencies highlight the importance of having best evidence-based treatment guidelines. Unfortunately, prospective randomized clinical trials are extremely limited because of the rarity of the disease, necessitating that guidelines be based on best available evidence and expert consensus opinion. Multidisciplinary management to establish consensus recommendations for individualizing patient care within the framework of evidence-based guidelines constitutes the optimal treatment model within the existing limitations. This article discusses the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for MCC, including the importance of multidisciplinary management, and highlights the implementation of these guidelines in the multidisciplinary MCC program at the University of Michigan (UM).
Heath M, Jaimes N, Lemos B. Clinical characteristics of Merkel cell carcinoma at diagnosis in 195 patients: the AEIOU features. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008;58:375–381.
Medina-Franco H, Urist MM, Fiveash J. Multimodality treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma: case series and literature review of 1024 cases. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:204–208.
Allen PJ, Bowne WB, Jaques DP. Merkel cell carcinoma: prognosis and treatment of patients from a single institution. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2300–2309.
Schwartz JL, Bichakjian CK, Lowe L. Clinicopathologic features of primary Merkel cell carcinoma: a detailed descriptive analysis of a large contemporary cohort. Dermatol Surg 2013;39:1009–1016.
7. Tadmor T, Aviv A, Polliack A. Merkel cell carcinoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and other lymphoproliferative disorders: an old bond with possible new viral ties. Ann Oncol 2011;22:250–256.
Agelli M, Clegg LX, Becker JC, Rollison DE. The etiology and epidemiology of merkel cell carcinoma. Curr Probl Cancer 2010;34:14–37.
Lemos BD, Storer BE, Iyer JG. Pathologic nodal evaluation improves prognostic accuracy in Merkel cell carcinoma: analysis of 5823 cases as the basis of the first consensus staging system. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010;63:751–761.
Gillenwater AM, Hessel AC, Morrison WH. Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck: effect of surgical excision and radiation on recurrence and survival. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:149–154.
Eng TY, Naguib M, Fuller CD. Treatment of recurrent Merkel cell carcinoma: an analysis of 46 cases. Am J Clin Oncol 2004;27:576–583.
Messina JL, Reintgen DS, Cruse CW. Selective lymphadenectomy in patients with Merkel cell (cutaneous neuroendocrine) carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 1997;4:389–395.
Mehrany K, Otley CC, Weenig RH. A meta-analysis of the prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node status in Merkel cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg 2002;28:113–117; discussion 117.
Gupta SG, Wang LC, Penas PF. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for evaluation and treatment of patients with Merkel cell carcinoma: the Dana-Farber experience and meta-analysis of the literature. Arch Dermatol 2006;142:685–690.
Llombart B, Monteagudo C, Lopez-Guerrero JA. Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of 20 cases of Merkel cell carcinoma in search of prognostic markers. Histopathology 2005;46:622–634.
Sandel HD 4th, Day T, Richardson MS. Merkel cell carcinoma: does tumor size or depth of invasion correlate with recurrence, metastasis, or patient survival? Laryngoscope 2006;116:791–795.
Bichakjian CK, Lowe L, Lao CD. Merkel cell carcinoma: critical review with guidelines for multidisciplinary management. Cancer 2007;110:1–12.
Fields RC, Busam KJ, Chou JF. Recurrence and survival in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy for merkel cell carcinoma: analysis of 153 patients from a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:2529–2537.
Fields RC, Busam KJ, Chou JF. Five hundred patients with Merkel cell carcinoma evaluated at a single institution. Ann Surg 2011;254:465–473.
Feng H, Shuda M, Chang Y, Moore PS. Clonal integration of a polyomavirus in human Merkel cell carcinoma. Science 2008;319:1096–1100.
Aiello Bowles EJ, Tuzzio L, Wiese CJ. Understanding high-quality cancer care: a summary of expert perspectives. Cancer 2008;112:934–942.
Bichakjian CK, Olencki T, Alam M. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Merkel Cell Carcinoma. Version 1, 2014. Available at: NCCN.org. Accessed February 10, 2014.
Sarnaik AA, Lien MH, Nghiem P, Bichakjian CK. Clinical recognition, diagnosis, and staging of merkel cell carcinoma, and the role of the multidisciplinary management team. Curr Probl Cancer 2010;34:38–46.
Schneider S, Thurnher D, Erovic BM. Merkel cell carcinoma: interdisciplinary management of a rare disease. J Skin Cancer 2013;2013:189342.
Junor EJ, Hole DJ, Gillis CR. Management of ovarian cancer: referral to a multidisciplinary team matters. Br J Cancer 1994;70:363–370.
Stephens MR, Lewis WG, Brewster AE. Multidisciplinary team management is associated with improved outcomes after surgery for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2006;19:164–171.
Johnson TM, Chang A, Redman B. Management of melanoma with a multidisciplinary melanoma clinic model. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;42:820–826.
Fader DJ, Wise CG, Normolle DP, Johnson TM. The multidisciplinary melanoma clinic: a cost outcomes analysis of specialty care. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;38:742–751.
Erman AB, Collar RM, Griffith KA. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is accurate and prognostic in head and neck melanoma. Cancer 2012;118:1040–1047.