NCCN: Continuing Education
Accreditation Statement
This activity has been designated to meet the educational needs of physicians and nurses involved in the management of patients with cancer. There is no fee for this article. No commercial support was received for this article. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
NCCN designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
NCCN is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center‘s Commission on Accreditation.
This activity is approved for 1.0 contact hour. Approval as a provider refers to recognition of educational activities only; accredited status does not imply endorsement by NCCN or ANCC of any commercial products discussed/displayed in conjunction with the educational activity. Kristina M. Gregory, RN, MSN, OCN, is our nurse planner for this educational activity.
All clinicians completing this activity will be issued a certificate of participation. To participate in this journal CE activity: 1) review the learning objectives and author disclosures; 2) study the education content; 3) take the post-test with a 66% minimum passing score and complete the evaluation at http://education.nccn.org/node/28067; and 4) view/print certificate.
Release date: September 19, 2013; Expiration date: September 19, 2014.
Learning Objectives
Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:
Explain a potential resistance mechanism to EGFR-TKI therapy when used to treat adenocarcinoma of the lung
Discuss CNS metastases in patients receiving TKI therapy
Targeted epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have altered the treatment paradigm for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.1,2 Although the initial response to these targeted agents among EGFR-mutated patients is dramatic, the response is often short-lived. Resistance mechanisms have been identified, including the T790M mutation, a point mutation involving a threonine to methionine amino acid change at position 790.3 These secondary mutations are now frequently seen in non-central nervous system (CNS) tissue of patients who have been treated with EGFR-TKIs. However, almost one-third of patients treated with TKIs develop CNS metastases4 without a documented resistance secondary mutation. Progression outside of the CNS is hypothesized to be from drug resistance, whereas CNS metastases are from inadequate penetration of initial drug treatment.5,6
Case Report
A 58-year-old woman with a 5 pack-year smoking history presented with cough and hemoptysis in January 2010. CT revealed a 5.5 × 4.5 × 5.5-cm right upper lobe mass abutting the pleura and superior vena cava without encasement. She was also found to have enlarged right hilar, paratracheal, subcarinal, and subcentimeter supraclavicular lymph nodes. CT-guided biopsy results of the lung mass indicated moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (Table 1). PET scan showed increased fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the right upper lobe mass and the right hilar and subcarinal regions. MRI of the brain in February 2010 was negative. She underwent an endobronchial ultrasound biopsy of a subcarinal node, which was positive for adenocarcinoma. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation with carboplatin and pemetrexed was initiated for her T2b,N2,Mx non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma.
The patient received 1 dose of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation, at which time EGFR mutational status became available, revealing an exon 19 deletion. After extensive discussion with the patient and her informed family, the patient’s neoadjuvant therapy was changed to erlotinib at 150 mg/d in mid-February 2010. She tolerated the therapy well, with minimal rash and fatigue. CT scan after 4 weeks of therapy showed an excellent response, with an approximate 30% reduction of the right upper lobe mass, and a reduction of all previously enlarged lymph nodes. The patient continued on erlotinib therapy for an additional 4 weeks. CT scan after 8 weeks of erlotinib showed continued significant decrease in the right upper lobe mass and mediastinal lymphadenopathy.
Tissue Biopsy Characteristics
In April 2010, the patient underwent right pneumonectomy with lymph node dissection. Pathology results showed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma without evidence of squamous histology in any of the specimens. Margins were focally positive at the hilar and perivascular soft tissue margin. Of the 10 sampled lymph nodes, 5 were involved with adenocarcinoma (3 hilar nodes, 1 level 10 node, and 1 subcarinal node). The tumor size was 4.1 × 2.5 × 1.8 cm; posttreatment staging was ypT2a,N2,M0.
Given the persistence of nodal disease, the patient was reinitiated on concurrent chemotherapy and radiation. She received 3 additional cycles of cisplatin and pemetrexed with 5940 cGy of radiation completed in July 2010. In January 2011, the patient was noted to have prominent left-sided pulmonary nodules, the largest being 8 mm. She was therefore reinitiated on erlotinib therapy at a reduced dose of 100 mg/d to minimize toxicity in the postoperative setting. Repeat imaging in April 2011 showed a decreased size of the 3 pulmonary nodules but a new 1.3 × 2.5-cm osteoblastic lesion in the left iliac bone. This was confirmed through bone scan, which also revealed a new 5-mm lytic lesion in the left L5 lamina. An MRI scan of the brain was negative. Erlotinib was continued and monthly denosumab was started.
In September 2011, the patient experienced acute nausea, malaise, and loss of balance. MRI scan of the brain revealed a 2.9 × 2.4 × 2.4-cm enhancing cerebellar mass with surrounding vasogenic edema. Erlotinib was held and the patient underwent surgical resection of the mass followed by stereotactic radiosurgery. Pathology results were consistent with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. EGFR mutation analysis of the resected cerebellar lesion showed a heterozygous deletion in exon 19 of the EGFR gene and a T790M mutation in exon 20 of the EGFR gene, consistent with acquired resistance.
In October 2011, the patient underwent repeat CT imaging of the chest, revealing slightly increased nodules in the left lung: a 7-mm nodule in the anterior lateral lingula abutting the pleural surface, a 3-mm nodule in the lateral left lower lobe, and a previously noted 5-mm pleural-based nodule, which was unchanged. Biopsy results of the anterior lingula nodule showed p63-positive, CK5/6-positive, and TTF-1-negative squamous cell carcinoma (Figure 1). EGFR mutational analysis showed an exon 19 deletion, consistent with her previous lung pathology results, without evidence of a T790M mutation.
Discussion
This case describes a CNS parenchymal metastasis from a lung adenocarcinoma expressing the T790M resistance mutation. Only 3 cases of a T790M mutation seem to have been reported in the CNS.7,8 Jackman et al5 and Ruppert et al6 previously described patients with CNS metastatic disease found to have T790M mutations in peripheral tissues but absent in the CNS. With decreased bioavailability of EGFR-TKIs in the CNS, the development of resistance in the brain was previously thought to be unlikely. This patient received approximately 2 months of standard-dose TKI therapy followed by withdrawal of the drug for 8 months before it was resumed at a reduced dose. Documented resistance developed 9 months after reinitiation of TKI therapy. The time to resistance is consistent with previous analyses documenting non-CNS resistance.5,9,10
Because of the efficacy of TKIs in the metastatic setting, studies are being performed to understand the role of TKIs in adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment.11-13 A prospective trial evaluating EGFR-TKIs delivered to unselected patients in the adjuvant settings has led to disappointing results.12 However, a retrospective analysis of adjuvant TKI use in patients with an EGFR mutation has shown an improved 2-year disease-free survival.13 Several case reports have described the use of erlotinib in neoadjuvant therapy with limited success.14,15 Larger prospective studies are underway to evaluate the adjuvant and neoadjuvant use of TKIs in lung cancer treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01410214 and NCT01407822).
This patient’s course was unique in that she received interrupted TKI therapy: neoadjuvant for 2 months and then 8 months later for metastatic disease. Intermittent use of TKI therapy in mouse models has been hypothesized to lead to increased tumor resistance.16 Evolutionary mathematical models reveal that dosing strategies contribute to resistance patterns.17 Factors contributing to decreased time to secondary resistance have been studied in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Although imatinib interruption has been shown to lead to rapid progression in GIST, the data are inconclusive regarding the impact of treatment interruption on time to secondary resistance.18,19 The authors question whether the interrupted use of erlotinib may have altered selection pressure and led to this unique situation of a central T790M mutation. The unique properties of the blood-brain barrier combined with intermittent TKI use (both leading to inconsistent drug levels in the CNS) may explain the central T790M mutation without acquired resistance in the lung.
The evolution of the patient’s lung tumor histology from adenocarcinoma to squamous cell carcinoma is also of interest. Tumor heterogeneity leading to cancer evolution is a complex process, as shown in renal cell carcinoma,20 and this case highlights a divergent process of adaptation to therapy at separate metastatic sites. Sequist et al21 previously described the evolution in histology from adenocarcinoma to small cell lung cancer. They hypothesized the existence of a pluripotent population of EGFR-mutant cancer stem cells. The transformation in histology with maintenance of EGFR mutation may be a consequence of TKI treatment. This alteration in the biology of the disease may complicate the use of TKIs in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings.
This patient highlights the complexities of using TKI therapy in the nonmetastatic setting. Although the use of induction TKIs may result in downstaging or eradiation of N2 disease, this is at the expense of increased TKI use and the potential for earlier development of resistance. With SWOG S0023 showing a potential harm in using consolidation TKI versus placebo after definitive chemoradiotherapy, one must question whether TKIs alter the biology of the disease (as evidenced by histology transformation) and even subsequent response to chemotherapy.22 This patient’s case underscores the need for further studies examining the neoadjuvant and adjuvant roles for TKIs. Elucidating mechanisms of tumor transformation and resistance will provide better data on how to use TKIs in a multimodality setting incorporating surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy.
EDITOR
Kerrin M. Green, MA, Assistant Managing Editor, JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Ms. Green has disclosed that she has no relevant financial relationships.
CE AUTHORS
Deborah J. Moonan, RN, BSN, Manager, CE Supporter Outreach
Ms. Moonan has disclosed the following relationship with commercial interests: AstraZeneca: Stockholder/Former Employee.
Kristina M. Gregory, RN, MSN, OCN, Vice President, Clinical Information Operations
Ms. Gregory has disclosed that she has no relevant financial relationships.
References
- 1.↑
Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S et al.. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 2009;361:947–957.
- 2.↑
Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T et al.. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353:123–132.
- 3.↑
Kobayashi S, Boggon TJ, Dayaram T et al.. EGFR mutation and resistance of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2005;352:786–792.
- 4.↑
Omuro AM, Kris MG, Miller VA et al.. High incidence of disease recurrence in the brain and leptomeninges in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma after response to gefitinib. Cancer 2005;103:2344–2348.
- 5.↑
Jackman DM, Holmes AJ, Lindeman N et al.. Response and resistance in a non-small-cell lung cancer patient with an epidermal growth factor receptor mutation and leptomeningeal metastases treated with high-dose gefitinib. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4517–4520.
- 6.↑
Ruppert AM, Beau-Faller M, Neuville A et al.. EGFR-TKI and lung adenocarcinoma with CNS relapse: interest of molecular follow-up. Eur Respir J 2008:33:436–440.
- 7.↑
Kawahara A, Azuma K, Sumi A et al.. Identification of non-small-cell lung cancer with activating EGFR mutations in malignant effusion and cerebrospinal fluid: rapid and sensitive detection of exon 19 deletion E746-A750 and exon 21 L858R mutations by immunocytochemistry. Lung Cancer 2011;74:35–40.
- 8.↑
Hata A, Katakami N, Yoshioka H et al.. Rebiopsy of non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI: comparison between T790M mutation-positive and -negative populations [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2012;30(Suppl):Abstract 7528.
- 9.↑
Oxnard GR, Arcila M, Sima C et al.. Acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutant lung cancer: distinct natural history of patients with tumors harboring the T790M mutation. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:1616–1622.
- 10.↑
Riley GJ, Pao W, Pham D et al.. Clinical course of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 and exon 21 mutations treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:839–844.
- 11.↑
Schaake EE, Kappers I, Codrington HE et al.. Tumor response and toxicity of neoadjuvant erlotinib in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:2731–2738.
- 12.↑
Goss GD, Lorimer I, Tsao MS et al.. A phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor gefitinib in completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer: NCIC CTG BR.19 [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2010;28(Suppl):Abstract LBA7005.
- 13.↑
Janjigian YY, Park BJ, Zakowski MF et al.. Impact on disease-free survival of adjuvant erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma that harbor EGFR mutations. J Thorac Oncol 2011;6:569–575.
- 14.↑
Kappers I, Klomp HM, Burgers JA et al.. Neoadjuvant (induction) erlotinib response in stage IIIa non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:4205–4211.
- 15.↑
Takamochi K, Suzuki K, Sugimura H et al.. Surgical resection after gefitinib treatment in patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation. Lung Cancer 2007;58:149–155.
- 16.↑
Politi K, Fan PD, Shen R et al.. Erlotinib resistance in mouse models of epidermal growth factor receptor-induced lung adenocarcinoma. Dis Model Mech 2010;3(1-2):111–119.
- 17.↑
Chmielecki J, Foo J, Oxnard GR et al.. Optimization of dosing for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with evolutionary cancer modeling. Sci Transl Med 2011;3:90ra59.
- 18.↑
Blay VJ, Le Cesne A, Ray-Coquard I et al.. Prospective multicentric randomized phase III study of imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors comparing interruption versus continuation of treatment beyond 1 year: the French sarcoma group. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:1107–1113.
- 19.↑
Le Cesne A, Ray-Coquard I, Bui BN et al.. Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors after 3 years of treatment: an open-label multicentre randomized phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:942–949.
- 20.↑
Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S et al.. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 2012;366:883–892.
- 21.↑
Sequist LV, Waltman BA, Dias-Santagata D et al.. Genotypic and histological evolution of lung cancers acquiring resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Sci Transl Med 2011;23;3:75ra26.
- 22.↑
Kelly K, Chansky K, Gaspar LE et al.. Phase III trial of maintenance gefitinib or placebo after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and docetaxel consolidation in inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: SWOG S0023. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:2450–2456.