Opioids are a critical component of pain relief strategies for the management of patients with cancer and sickle cell disease. The escalation of opioid addiction and overdose in the United States has led to increased scrutiny of opioid prescribing practices. Multiple reports have revealed that regulatory and coverage policies, intended to curb inappropriate opioid use, have created significant barriers for many patients. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and American Society of Clinical Oncology each publish clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic pain. A recent JAMA Oncology article highlighted perceived variability in recommendations among these guidelines. In response, leadership from guideline organizations, government representatives, and authors of the original article met to discuss challenges and solutions. The meeting featured remarks by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, presentations on each clinical practice guideline, an overview of the pain management needs of patients with sickle cell disease, an overview of perceived differences among guidelines, and a discussion of differences and commonalities among the guidelines. The meeting revealed that although each guideline varies in the intended patient population, target audience, and methodology, there is no disagreement among recommendations when applied to the appropriate patient and clinical situation. It was determined that clarification and education are needed regarding the intent, patient population, and scope of each clinical practice guideline, rather than harmonization of guideline recommendations. Clinical practice guidelines can serve as a resource for policymakers and payers to inform policy and coverage determinations.
You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for
- Author: Neha Vapiwala x
- Refine by Access: All x
Alyssa A. Schatz, Thomas K. Oliver, Robert A. Swarm, Judith A. Paice, Deepika S. Darbari, Deborah Dowell, Salimah H. Meghani, Katy Winckworth-Prejsnar, Eduardo Bruera, Robert M. Plovnick, Lisa Richardson, Neha Vapiwala, Dana Wollins, Clifford A. Hudis, and Robert W. Carlson
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 1.2023
Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines
Kelvin A. Moses, Preston C. Sprenkle, Clinton Bahler, Geoffrey Box, Sigrid V. Carlsson, William J. Catalona, Douglas M. Dahl, Marc Dall’Era, John W. Davis, Bettina F. Drake, Jonathan I. Epstein, Ruth B. Etzioni, Thomas A. Farrington, Isla P. Garraway, David Jarrard, Eric Kauffman, Deborah Kaye, Adam S. Kibel, Chad A. LaGrange, Paul Maroni, Lee Ponsky, Brian Reys, Simpa S. Salami, Alejandro Sanchez, Tyler M. Seibert, Terrence M. Shaneyfelt, Marc C. Smaldone, Geoffrey Sonn, Mark D. Tyson, Neha Vapiwala, Robert Wake, Samuel Washington, Alice Yu, Bertram Yuh, Ryan A. Berardi, and Deborah A. Freedman-Cass
The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Early Detection provide recommendations for individuals with a prostate who opt to participate in an early detection program after receiving the appropriate counseling on the pros and cons. These NCCN Guidelines Insights provide a summary of recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines with regard to the testing protocol, use of multiparametric MRI, and management of negative biopsy results to optimize the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer and minimize the detection of indolent disease.