Search Results

You are looking at 81 - 90 of 128 items for :

  • "shared decision-making" x
  • Refine by Access: All x
Clear All
Full access

Terrell Johnson, Lindsey A.M. Bandini, Darryl Mitteldorf, Elizabeth Franklin, Justin E. Bekelman, and Robert W. Carlson

’ve lost the ability to listen to patients, to capture the patient voice,” stated Dr. Bekelman, “There’s a serious disconnect.” To enhance providers’ ability to engage in shared decision-making interventions, it is essential that oncology practices make

Full access

Tara M. Mackay, Lennart B. van Rijssen, Jurr O. Andriessen, Mustafa Suker, Geert-Jan Creemers, Ferry A. Eskens, Ignace H. de Hingh, Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse, Mirjam A.G. Sprangers, Olivier R. Busch, Johanna W. Wilmink, Casper H. van Eijck, Marc G. Besselink, Hanneke W. van Laarhoven, and on behalf of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group

suggested that improved information provision is important. 31 – 36 In fact, information provision is a prerequisite of shared decision-making, which, in turn, has been related to satisfaction with care. 8 , 28 , 37 Additionally, if patients are well

Full access

Matthew J. Ehrhardt, Jamie E. Flerlage, Saro H. Armenian, Sharon M. Castellino, David C. Hodgson, and Melissa M. Hudson

randomized clinical trials given the short duration of follow-up relative to the long latency to incident late effects. Simulation models offer one avenue for estimating an individual’s risk for a given late effect and can be integrated into shared decision-making

Full access

Robert B. Hines, Alina Barrett, Philip Twumasi-Ankrah, Dominique Broccoli, Kimberly K. Engelman, Joaquina Baranda, Elizabeth A. Ablah, Lisette Jacobson, Michelle Redmond, Wei Tu, and Tracie C. Collins

highlight the need for improved physician-patient communication during the clinical encounter to inform the treatment plan. A shared decision-making process has been advocated to improve patient perceptions of the quality of the care experience and to

Full access

Maxwell T. Vergo and Al B. Benson III

absolute benefits patients may expect from adjuvant therapy in their situation. This can be weighed against known long-term adverse effects from receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, optimizing the shared decision-making process between patient and physician

Full access

Julia T. van Groningen, Pieter van Hagen, Rob A.E.M. Tollenaar, Jurriaan B. Tuynman, Perla J. Marang-van de Mheen, Pascal G. Doornebosch, Pieter J. Tanis, Eelco J.R. de Graaf, and on behalf of the Dutch Colorectal Audit

and performance of cTME after neoadjuvant therapy. When discussing treatment options with an individual patient after local excision, shared decision-making may lead to refraining from cTME. Several factors may contribute to this: first, patient

Full access

Paul J. Speicher, Lin Gu, Xiaofei Wang, Matthew G. Hartwig, Thomas A. D'Amico, and Mark F. Berry

-negative NSCLC in a nontrial setting, which can improve the shared decision-making process and better inform treatment recommendations. In this study, 900 patients aged 70 years or older were given AC. Although there are no specific guidelines for the treatment

Full access

Justin A. Chen, Naseem Esteghamat, Edward J. Kim, Gabriel Garcia, Jun Gong, Marwan G. Fakih, Richard J. Bold, and May T. Cho

-sensitive malignancies. Thus, reports such as this highlight the potential for immunotherapy to be safely and effectively administered in this unique patient population. A thorough discussion of risks and benefits with the patient and shared decision-making are critical

Full access

Simon D. Fung-Kee-Fung, Sima P. Porten, Maxwell V. Meng, and Michael Kuettel

expectancy compared with other treatment options in properly selected individuals. The decision by patients to choose AS as the initial management strategy is dependent on individual preferences and plays an important role in shared decision-making. Further

Full access

Omar Abdel-Rahman

, a shared decision-making process between physicians and patients was recommended) and because screening practices for this subgroup vary across different Canadian jurisdictions, a sensitivity analysis was conducted, repeating all analyses on women