’ve lost the ability to listen to patients, to capture the patient voice,” stated Dr. Bekelman, “There’s a serious disconnect.” To enhance providers’ ability to engage in shared decision-making interventions, it is essential that oncology practices make
Search Results
Terrell Johnson, Lindsey A.M. Bandini, Darryl Mitteldorf, Elizabeth Franklin, Justin E. Bekelman, and Robert W. Carlson
Tara M. Mackay, Lennart B. van Rijssen, Jurr O. Andriessen, Mustafa Suker, Geert-Jan Creemers, Ferry A. Eskens, Ignace H. de Hingh, Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse, Mirjam A.G. Sprangers, Olivier R. Busch, Johanna W. Wilmink, Casper H. van Eijck, Marc G. Besselink, Hanneke W. van Laarhoven, and on behalf of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
suggested that improved information provision is important. 31 – 36 In fact, information provision is a prerequisite of shared decision-making, which, in turn, has been related to satisfaction with care. 8 , 28 , 37 Additionally, if patients are well
Matthew J. Ehrhardt, Jamie E. Flerlage, Saro H. Armenian, Sharon M. Castellino, David C. Hodgson, and Melissa M. Hudson
randomized clinical trials given the short duration of follow-up relative to the long latency to incident late effects. Simulation models offer one avenue for estimating an individual’s risk for a given late effect and can be integrated into shared decision-making
Robert B. Hines, Alina Barrett, Philip Twumasi-Ankrah, Dominique Broccoli, Kimberly K. Engelman, Joaquina Baranda, Elizabeth A. Ablah, Lisette Jacobson, Michelle Redmond, Wei Tu, and Tracie C. Collins
highlight the need for improved physician-patient communication during the clinical encounter to inform the treatment plan. A shared decision-making process has been advocated to improve patient perceptions of the quality of the care experience and to
Maxwell T. Vergo and Al B. Benson III
absolute benefits patients may expect from adjuvant therapy in their situation. This can be weighed against known long-term adverse effects from receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, optimizing the shared decision-making process between patient and physician
Julia T. van Groningen, Pieter van Hagen, Rob A.E.M. Tollenaar, Jurriaan B. Tuynman, Perla J. Marang-van de Mheen, Pascal G. Doornebosch, Pieter J. Tanis, Eelco J.R. de Graaf, and on behalf of the Dutch Colorectal Audit
and performance of cTME after neoadjuvant therapy. When discussing treatment options with an individual patient after local excision, shared decision-making may lead to refraining from cTME. Several factors may contribute to this: first, patient
Paul J. Speicher, Lin Gu, Xiaofei Wang, Matthew G. Hartwig, Thomas A. D'Amico, and Mark F. Berry
-negative NSCLC in a nontrial setting, which can improve the shared decision-making process and better inform treatment recommendations. In this study, 900 patients aged 70 years or older were given AC. Although there are no specific guidelines for the treatment
Justin A. Chen, Naseem Esteghamat, Edward J. Kim, Gabriel Garcia, Jun Gong, Marwan G. Fakih, Richard J. Bold, and May T. Cho
-sensitive malignancies. Thus, reports such as this highlight the potential for immunotherapy to be safely and effectively administered in this unique patient population. A thorough discussion of risks and benefits with the patient and shared decision-making are critical
Simon D. Fung-Kee-Fung, Sima P. Porten, Maxwell V. Meng, and Michael Kuettel
expectancy compared with other treatment options in properly selected individuals. The decision by patients to choose AS as the initial management strategy is dependent on individual preferences and plays an important role in shared decision-making. Further
Omar Abdel-Rahman
, a shared decision-making process between physicians and patients was recommended) and because screening practices for this subgroup vary across different Canadian jurisdictions, a sensitivity analysis was conducted, repeating all analyses on women
