Search Results

You are looking at 51 - 60 of 68 items for :

  • "temsirolimus" x
  • Refine by Access: All x
Clear All
Full access

Diane L. Reidy-Lagunes

have been implicated as critical pathways in NET growth. In a phase II trial, 36 heavily pretreated patients with disease progression (21 carcinoid, 15 pancNET) were treated with 25 mg intravenous weekly doses of the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus, with an

Full access

Margaret von Mehren, R. Lor Randall, Robert S. Benjamin, Sarah Boles, Marilyn M. Bui, Ernest U. Conrad III, Kristen N. Ganjoo, Suzanne George, Ricardo J. Gonzalez, Martin J. Heslin, John M. Kane III, Henry Koon, Joel Mayerson, Martin McCarter, Sean V. McGarry, Christian Meyer, Richard J. O'Donnell, Alberto S. Pappo, I. Benjamin Paz, Ivy A. Petersen, John D. Pfeifer, Richard F. Riedel, Scott Schuetze, Karen D. Schupak, Herbert S. Schwartz, William D. Tap, Jeffrey D. Wayne, Mary Anne Bergman, and Jillian Scavone

-inhibitor that has been successful in treating ALK-rearranged non–small cell lung cancer. 126 mTOR inhibitors such as sirolimus, temsirolimus, and everolimus have also shown promising results in patients with metastatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumors and

Full access

Sumanta K. Pal, Matthew I. Milowsky, and Elizabeth R. Plimack

refractory metastatic bladder cancer were treated with weekly temsirolimus, a potent intravenously administered mTOR inhibitor approved for advanced RCC. 91 , 92 The study was stopped because of a lack of observed efficacy; PFS and OS of 2.5 and 3.5 months

Full access

David M. Thomas and Andrew J. Wagner

survival signals, inhibitors of mTOR have been studied for efficacy in the treatment of malignancies, and 3 are currently available commercially: sirolimus (approved for post-renal transplant immunosuppression), temsirolimus, and everolimus (CCI-779 and RAD

Full access

Amelia B. Zelnak and Ruth M. O'Regan

setting, given available preclinical data it seems likely that mTOR inhibition may be more effective in the endocrine-resistant setting. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that the addition of temsirolimus to letrozole did not improve outcomes in the

Full access

Katy K. Tsai, Neharika Khurana, Timothy McCalmont, Adil Daud, Boris Bastian, and Iwei Yeh

off-label use of mTOR inhibitors currently approved for other indications (eg, everolimus in renal cell carcinoma, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and breast cancer; temsirolimus in renal cell carcinoma) may have been a viable option. The splice site

Full access

Arti Hurria, Ilene S. Browner, Harvey Jay Cohen, Crystal S. Denlinger, Mollie deShazo, Martine Extermann, Apar Kishor P. Ganti, Jimmie C. Holland, Holly M. Holmes, Mohana B. Karlekar, Nancy L. Keating, June McKoy, Bruno C. Medeiros, Ewa Mrozek, Tracey O’Connor, Stephen H. Petersdorf, Hope S. Rugo, Rebecca A. Silliman, William P. Tew, Louise C. Walter, Alva B. Weir III, and Tanya Wildes

(sorafenib 294 , 295 and sunitinib 296 , 297 ), and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors (everolimus 298 and temsirolimus 299 ) have been evaluated in elderly patients with metastatic RCC. Sorafenib, sunitinib, and everolimus have similar

Full access

A. Scott Paulson and Emily K. Bergsland

II consortium (P2C) study [abstract] . J Clin Oncol 2007 ; 25 ( Suppl ): Abstract 4504 . 51 Duran I Kortmansky J Singh D . A phase II clinical and pharmacodynamic study of temsirolimus in advanced neuroendocrine carcinomas . Br J

Full access

Matthew Zibelman and Elizabeth R. Plimack

/pazopanib) or an mTOR inhibitor (everolimus or temsirolimus). A third mechanistic option, interferon alfa plus bevacizumab, was rarely used. 10 Due to its durability of benefit, nivolumab became the de facto second-line option for most patients with mRCC after

Full access

Dong Ding, Huabin Hu, Shuosha Li, Youwen Zhu, Yin Shi, Mengting Liao, Jin Liu, Xu Tian, Aiting Liu, and Jin Huang

– 844 . 10.1007/s40273-017-0527-z 28620848 29. Hoyle M , Green C , Thompson-Coon J , Cost-effectiveness of temsirolimus for first line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma . Value Health 2010 ; 13 : 61 – 68 . 19804430 10