Search Results

You are looking at 41 - 50 of 1,296 items for :

  • "characteristics" x
  • Refine by Access: All x
Clear All
Full access

Mostafa R. Mohamed, Erika Ramsdale, Kah Poh Loh, Huiwen Xu, Amita Patil, Nikesha Gilmore, Spencer Obrecht, Megan Wells, Ginah Nightingale, Katherine M. Juba, Bryan Faller, Adedayo Onitilo, Thomas Bradley, Eva Culakova, Holly Holmes, and Supriya G. Mohile

the potential for collinearity in multivariate analyses, cognitive impairment was not included as a separate variable in our models. Statistical Approach For each of the 3 outcome measures, we used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

Full access

Jeremy D. Kratz, Nataliya V. Uboha, Sam J. Lubner, Daniel L. Mulkerin, Linda Clipson, Yanyao Yi, Menggang Yu, Kristina A. Matkowskyj, Noelle K. LoConte, and Dustin A. Deming

using the Breslow method. Results Sidedness Predicts Outcomes to Anti-EGFR Therapy in the Treatment-Refractory Setting A total of 62 patients were available for analysis, with baseline characteristics stratified by primary tumor sidedness

Full access

Adam J. Olszewski, Kalyan C. Mantripragada, and Jorge J. Castillo

.1 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX) and report estimates with 95% CIs. Results Patient Characteristics Among the 5,530 eligible patients (with a median age of 76 years) treated with outpatient rituximab-based immunochemotherapy in 2003

Full access

Siew Tzuh Tang, Jen-Shi Chen, Wen-Chi Chou, Wen-Cheng Chang, Chiao-En Wu, Chia-Hsun Hsieh, Ming-Chu Chiang, and Mei-Ling Kuo

committee approved the research protocol. All participants signed informed consents. Measures Data were collected on anxiety symptoms and 5 groups of variables (demographics, disease-related characteristics, disease burden, perceived burden to others

Full access

Carme Font, Alberto Carmona-Bayonas, Aranzazu Fernández-Martinez, Carmen Beato, Andrés Vargas, Pere Gascon, and Remedios Otero

negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively); and positive and negative likelihood ratios (pLR and nLR, respectively). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated, and the method proposed by DeLong et al 23 was used to test

Full access

Mary E. Charlton, Amanda R. Kahl, Alissa A. Greenbaum, Jordan J. Karlitz, Chi Lin, Charles F. Lynch, and Vivien W. Chen

, insurance status, marital status, and residence in metropolitan versus nonmetropolitan/rural area. Tumor characteristics included location (right-sided = cecum, ascending colon, hepatic flexure, transverse; vs left-sided = splenic flexure, descending colon

Full access

Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Fernanda Mesa-Chavez, Alejandra Plata de la Mora, Melina Miaja-Avila, Marisol Garcia-Garcia, Alan Fonseca, Sylvia de la Rosa-Pacheco, Marlid Cruz-Ramos, Manuel Rolando García Garza, Alejandro Mohar, and Enrique Bargallo-Rocha

). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the sociodemographic and clinicopathologic characteristics of each group. These variables were then compared between groups using a chi-square test. Simple logistic regression using complete-case analysis was

Full access

Alyson Haslam, Jennifer Gill, and Vinay Prasad

anecdotally described, 5 , 6 but in light of the increasing rate of publication in these types of studies, we seek to describe the characteristics of a systematic sampling of NI studies in oncology from an updated search of recent published oncology trials

Full access

Jason H. Lee, Tariq Mohamed, Celia Ramsey, Jihoon Kim, Shelly Kane, Kathryn A. Gold, Farhoud Faraji, and Joseph A. Califano III

association of patient, provider, and treatment team characteristics, including 1- or 2-month deadline, with the prevalence of and time to staging. Patient characteristics included age, sex, race, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score. Provider

Full access

Mohammed W. Rahman, Niti U. Trivedi, Peter B. Bach, and Aaron P. Mitchell

Characteristics The proportion of oncologists who received any payments within the year increased from 65.1% in 2014 to 68.7% in 2017, and the proportion who received >$10,000 within the year increased from 7.0% to 10.2% ( Table 2 ). In comparison, in 2014, 44