Search Results

importance of FS in older adults with cancer 16 and the explosion of new cancer treatments, an increasing number of studies have examined characteristics associated with FS change during treatment. Although a prior systematic review examined the prognostic

treatment. 3 – 13 A recent systematic review that sought to define the prevalence of the types of financial hardships among patients with cancer showed that 40% to 50% of US patients experienced material or psychologic stressors related to the cost of

with ICIs reflect a postmarketing experience with commercially available ICIs. Case reports and previous reviews have demonstrated that ICIs retain anticancer activity among SOTRs with cancer despite the concurrent use of chronic immunosuppression, but

adenocarcinoma. The management of his cancer is reviewed. The case is then discussed in the context of prior epidemiologic, genetic, and mechanistic studies, highlighting recent discoveries of the molecular determinants of neoplasia in DS. Case Report A

supportive care needs. In 2005-2006, a progress review group issued “Closing the Gap: Research and Care Imperatives for AYAs With Cancer” with the intent to solicit recommendations for a national agenda to focus efforts on this demographic. 2 Years later

systematic review of 34 exercise interventions for patients with cancer during and after treatments, 6 report that exercise in survivors improves strength, endurance, and cardiopulmonary function, thereby resulting in improved physical and mental health and

noncompliance are discussed and then categorized as a quality concern or not. Action plans are generated based on this review. In addition, compliance to NCCN Guidelines for each patient is discussed at a weekly interdisciplinary tumor board in which all members

journal CE activity: 1) review the learning objectives and author disclosures; 2) study the education content; 3) take the posttest with a 66% minimum passing score and complete the evaluation at http://education.nccn.org/node/54139 ; and 4) view

Cancer Screening Panel, reviewed current evidence for and preferred modalities of lung cancer screening and identified patients at high risk who would be appropriate for such screening. The presenters also discussed current challenges regarding the use of

continue to evolve, particularly with the use of genomic assays. Our single institution review confirms the utility of our reflex Oncotype DX protocol with a decreased time to result with reflex testing of patients in the appropriate clinical setting