MM , Faghri A , Jacobs EA , Communication and shared decision making in the breast cancer treatment consultation: a comparative analysis of English- and Spanish-speaking patients . MDM Policy Pract 2019 ; 4 : 2381468319881651 . 31696154
Search Results
Katy E. Balazy, Cecil M. Benitez, Paulina M. Gutkin, Clare E. Jacobson, Rie von Eyben, and Kathleen C. Horst
Therese B. Bevers, Deborah K. Armstrong, Banu Arun, Robert W. Carlson, Kenneth H. Cowan, Mary B. Daly, Irvin Fleming, Judy E. Garber, Mary Gemignani, William J. Gradishar, Helen Krontiras, Swati Kulkarni, Christine Laronga, Loretta Loftus, Deborah J. MacDonald, Martin C. Mahoney, Sofia D. Merajver, Ingrid Meszoely, Lisa Newman, Elizabeth Pritchard, Victoria Seewaldt, Rena V. Sellin, Charles L. Shapiro, and John H. Ward
-reduction interventions, and the age of the women at intervention. 61 Survival estimates generated from this model can facilitate shared decision-making regarding choice of a risk reduction approach (see Table 1, available online, in these guidelines, at www
Jordan K. Schaefer, Amro Elshoury, Victoria R. Nachar, Michael B. Streiff, and Ming Y. Lim
providers are adequately trained on anticoagulant options to provide informed recommendations when engaging in shared decision-making. Warfarin adherence can be assessed through INR monitoring. There have been concerns about adherence with LMWH given that
Matthew E. Nielsen, Bruce J. Trock, and Patrick C. Walsh
pathological features alone or initial observation with salvage RT in the event of biochemical recurrence remains a complex and controversial question that should be addressed with shared decision-making. The authors have disclosed that they have no
Emma Gargus, Rebecca Deans, Antoinette Anazodo, and Teresa K. Woodruff
lower breast cancer risk than premenopausal survivors (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23–0.94), indicating that exogenous hormones do not fully mirror the role of endogenous hormones in the development of breast cancer. 83 Using shared decision-making, providers
Elizabeth A. Nardi, Lisa Korin Lentz, Katherine Winckworth-Prejsnar, Amy P. Abernethy, and Robert W. Carlson
not acting in isolation. 22 In turn, this can help with shared decision-making, leading to patients making informed choices. Technology, it seems, should be a trust broker and accelerator. 23 Disparate data sources, such as EHRs, administrative and
Leslie A. Fecher, Shrinivas Bishu, Robert J. Fontana, Salim S. Hayek, and Bryan J. Schneider
are generally low and include significant bleeding in 1% to 2.8% of cases, pneumothorax in 4%, and hypoxia/bronchospasm in 9%. 27 Shared decision-making with patients is essential to review the risks/benefits value of this procedure for pulmonary
Therese B. Bevers, John H. Ward, Banu K. Arun, Graham A. Colditz, Kenneth H. Cowan, Mary B. Daly, Judy E. Garber, Mary L. Gemignani, William J. Gradishar, Judith A. Jordan, Larissa A. Korde, Nicole Kounalakis, Helen Krontiras, Shicha Kumar, Allison Kurian, Christine Laronga, Rachel M. Layman, Loretta S. Loftus, Martin C. Mahoney, Sofia D. Merajver, Ingrid M. Meszoely, Joanne Mortimer, Lisa Newman, Elizabeth Pritchard, Sandhya Pruthi, Victoria Seewaldt, Michelle C. Specht, Kala Visvanathan, Anne Wallace, Mary Ann Bergman, and Rashmi Kumar
Survival estimates generated from this model can facilitate shared decision-making regarding choice of a risk reduction approach (see Table 2; available online, in these guidelines, at NCCN.org ). A prospective multicenter study reported the benefit of
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Older Adult Oncology, Version 1.2021
Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines
Efrat Dotan, Louise C. Walter, Ilene S. Browner, Katherine Clifton, Harvey Jay Cohen, Martine Extermann, Cary Gross, Sumati Gupta, Genevieve Hollis, Joleen Hubbard, Reshma Jagsi, Nancy L. Keating, Elizabeth Kessler, Thuy Koll, Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki, June M. McKoy, Sumi Misra, Dominic Moon, Tracey O’Connor, Cynthia Owusu, Ashley Rosko, Marcia Russell, Mina Sedrak, Fareeha Siddiqui, Amy Stella, Derek L. Stirewalt, Ishwaria M. Subbiah, William P. Tew, Grant R. Williams, Liz Hollinger, Giby V. George, and Hema Sundar
, and allowing for a shared decision-making with the patient and/or caregiver. Although typically a thorough CGA is performed by a geriatric trained clinician, many of the tools can be applied to routine practice and conducted by providers without any
Timothy J. Wilt and Philipp Dahm
decision making on cancer screening—a systematic review . Washington, DC : Department of Veterans Affairs (US) ; 2014 . 34. Carlsson S Assel M Sjoberg D . Influence of blood prostate specific antigen levels at age 60 on benefits and harms of
