Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for

  • Author: Joseph H. Antin x
  • Refine by Access: All x
Clear All Modify Search
Full access

The Utility of Routine Chest Radiography in the Initial Evaluation of Adult Patients With Febrile Neutropenia Patients Undergoing HSCT

Deborah S. Yolin-Raley, Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, Heidi B. Niell, Robert J. Soiffer, Joseph H. Antin, Edwin P. Alyea III, and Brett E. Glotzbecker

Background: The routine use of chest radiographs (CXRs) in the initial evaluation of asymptomatic patients with febrile neutropenia undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is controversial. Objective: The goal of this study was to document the incidence of pneumonia demonstrated on CXR during an initial febrile neutropenic episode in adult patients undergoing HSCT. Materials and Methods: Clinical records of 1083 adult patients undergoing autologous (n=766), allogeneic (n=269), or umbilical cord blood HSCT (n=48) between October 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012, were retrospectively reviewed. CXRs obtained at the initial febrile neutropenic episode were evaluated for radiologic features of pneumonia. The presence of clinical symptoms, length of stay (LOS), and readmission rates were assessed. Results: A total of 817 (75%) febrile neutropenic episodes were noted. Of the patients with neutropenic fevers, 455 (55%) had CXRs. Of the 76 patients with respiratory symptoms at the time of CXR, 24 (31.6%) had findings suggestive of pneumonia. None of the 379 CXRs performed in the absence of symptoms revealed an infectious process (P=.0001). Moreover, the mean LOS was 23.8 days for patients receiving a CXR compared with 22.2 days (P=.04) in patients without a CXR. Additionally, in patients who had CXRs, 15.7% were readmitted within 30 days compared with 7.4% in those without CXRs (P=.0004). Conclusions: Indiscriminate routine CXR at the time of first neutropenic fever in asymptomatic adults undergoing HSCT is unlikely to reveal an infectious process or change clinical practice, and may be associated with increased LOS and readmission rates.

Full access

A Positive Psychology Intervention in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Survivors (PATH): A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

Hermioni L. Amonoo, Elizabeth Daskalakis, Emma D. Wolfe, Michelle Guo, Christopher M. Celano, Brian C. Healy, Corey S. Cutler, Joseph H. Antin, William F. Pirl, Elyse R. Park, Heather S.L. Jim, Stephanie J. Lee, Thomas W. LeBlanc, Areej El-Jawahri, and Jeff C. Huffman

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) survivors experience significant psychological distress and low levels of positive psychological well-being, which can undermine patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as quality of life (QoL). Hence, we conducted a pilot randomized clinical trial to assess the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a telephone-delivered positive psychology intervention (Positive Affect for the Transplantation of Hematopoietic stem cells intervention [PATH]) for improving well-being in HSCT survivors. Methods: HSCT survivors who were 100 days post-HSCT for hematologic malignancy at an academic institution were randomly assigned to either PATH or usual care. PATH, delivered by a behavioral health expert, entailed 9 weekly phone sessions on gratitude, personal strengths, and meaning. We defined feasibility a priori as >60% of eligible participants enrolling in the study and >75% of PATH participants completing ≥6 of 9 sessions. At baseline and 9 and 18 weeks, patients self-reported gratitude, positive affect, life satisfaction, optimism, anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), QoL, physical function, and fatigue. We used repeated measures regression models and estimates of effect size (Cohen’s d) to explore the preliminary effects of PATH on outcomes. Results: We enrolled 68.6% (72/105) of eligible patients (mean age, 57 years; 50% female). Of those randomized to PATH, 91% completed all sessions and reported positive psychology exercises as easy to complete and subjectively useful. Compared with usual care, PATH participants reported greater improvements in gratitude (β = 1.38; d = 0.32), anxiety (β = −1.43; d = −0.40), and physical function (β = 2.15; d = 0.23) at 9 weeks and gratitude (β = 0.97; d = 0.22), positive affect (β = 2.02; d = 0.27), life satisfaction (β = 1.82; d = 0.24), optimism (β = 2.70; d = 0.49), anxiety (β = −1.62; d = −0.46), depression (β = −1.04; d = −0.33), PTSD (β = −2.50; d = −0.29), QoL (β = 7.70; d = 0.41), physical function (β = 5.21; d = 0.56), and fatigue (β = −2.54; d = −0.33) at 18 weeks. Conclusions: PATH is feasible, with promising signals for improving psychological well-being, QoL, physical function, and fatigue in HSCT survivors. Future multisite trials that investigate PATH’s efficacy are needed to establish its effects on PROs in this population.