Modern Approaches to Localized Cancer of the Esophagus

Restricted access

The clinical spectrum of esophageal cancer has changed dramatically over the past couple of decades. Most notably, a profound rise in esophageal adenocarcinoma and decrease in the incidence of squamous carcinomas have occurred. An understanding of the factors that influence survival for patients with localized esophageal cancer has evolved concomitantly with these changes in epidemiology. Significant advancement in endoscopic and radiographic staging allows for more selective use of treatment modalities. The treatment of localized esophageal cancer mandates a multidisciplinary approach, with treatment tailored to disease extent, location, histology, and an accurate assessment of pretreatment staging. Despite these improvements in the staging and use of multimodality therapy, only modest improvements in patient survival have been observed. This article summarizes these modern approaches to localized cancer of the esophagus.

Correspondence: Robert E. Glasgow, MD, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84132. E-mail: robert.glasgow@hsc.utah.edu
  • 1

    JemalASiegelRXuJWardE. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin2010;60:277300. Erratum in CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:133–134.

  • 2

    BollschweilerEWolfgartenEGutschowCHolscherAH. Demographic variations in the rising incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in white males. Cancer2001;92:549555.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    BrownLDewesaSChowW. Incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus among white Americans by sex, stage, and age. J Natl Cancer Inst2008;100:12231232.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    EdgeSBByrdDRComptomCC. eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual7th ed.New York, NY: Springer; 2010:103115.

  • 5

    AjaniJABarthelJSBekaii-SaabT. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for esophageal cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw2008;6:818849.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    WijnhovenBPTranKTEstermanA. An evaluation of prognostic factors and tumor staging of resected carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg2007;245:717725.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    LundOHasenkamJMAagaardMTKimoseHH. Time-related changes in characteristics of prognostic significance in carcinomas of the oesophagus and cardia. Br J Surg1989;76:13011307.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    SEER: Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; April152011. Available at http://www.seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/esoph.html. Accessed March 13 2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    CenPHofstetterWLCorreaAM. Lymphovascular invasion as a tool to further subclassify T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer2008;112:10201027.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    BarbourAPRizkNPGonenM. Lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ): impact of adequate staging on outcome. Ann Surg Oncol2007;14:306316.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    SepesiBWatsonTJZhouD. Are endoscopic therapies appropriate for superficial submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma? An analysis of esophagectomy specimens. J Am Coll Surg2010;210:418427.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    O'RiordanJMRowleySMurphyJO. Impact of solitary involved lymph node on outcome in localized cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction. J Gastrointest Surg2007;11:493499.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    ThompsonSKRuszkiewiczARJamiesonGG. Improving the accuracy of TNM staging in esophageal cancer: a pathological review of resected specimens. Ann Surg Oncol2008;15:34473458.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    SchomasDAQuevedoJFDonahueJM. The prognostic importance of pathologically involved celiac node metastases in node-positive patients with carcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction: a surgical series from the Mayo Clinic. Dis Esophagus2010;23:232239.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    RasanenJVSihvoEIKnuutiMJ. Prospective analysis of accuracy of positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and endoscopic ultrasonography in staging of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction. Ann Surg Oncol2003;10:954960.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    LoweVJBooyaFFletcherJG. Comparison of positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound in the initial staging of patients with esophageal cancer. Mol Imaging Biol2005;7:422430.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    FeithMSteinHJSiewertJR. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: surgical therapy based on 1602 consecutive resected patients. Surg Oncol Clin N Am2006;15:751764.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    DowneyRJAkhurstTIlsonD. Whole body 18FDG-PET and the response of esophageal cancer to induction therapy: results of a prospective trial. J Clin Oncol2003;21:428432.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    YuanSYuYChaoKS. Additional value of PET/CT over PET in assessment of locoregional lymph nodes in thoracic esophageal squamous cell cancer. J Nucl Med2006;47:12551259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    ShimpiRAGeorgeJJowellPGressFG. Staging of esophageal cancer by EUS: staging accuracy revisited. Gastrointest Endosc2007;66:475482.

  • 21

    PechOGunterEDusemundF. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in preoperative staging of esophageal cancer: results from a referral center for early esophageal cancer. Endoscopy2010;42:456461.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    SmithBRChangKJLeeJGNguyenNT. Staging accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound based on pathologic analysis after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Am Surg2010;76:12281231.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    CenPHofstetterWLLeeJH. Value of endoscopic ultrasound staging in conjunction with the evaluation of lymphovascular invasion in identifying low-risk esophageal carcinoma. Cancer2008;112:503510.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    RampadoSBocusPBattagliaG. Endoscopic ultrasound: accuracy in staging superficial carcinomas of the esophagus. Ann Thorac Surg2008;85:251256.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    ChoiJKimSGKimJS. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), positron emission tomography (PET), and computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative locoregional staging of resectable esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc2010;24:13801386.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    WalkerAJSpierBJPerlmanSB. Integrated PET/CT fusion imaging and endoscopic ultrasound in the pre-operative staging and evaluation of esophageal cancer. Mol Imaging Biol2011;13:166171.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Vazquez-SequeirosENortonIDClainJE. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration on lymph node staging in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc2001;53:751757.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    BirkmeyerJDSiewersAEFinlaysonEV. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med2002;346:11281137.

  • 29

    BirkmeyerNJGoodneyPPStukelTA. Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes?Cancer2005;103:435441.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    AnconaERampadoSCassaroM. Prediction of lymph node status in superficial esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol2008;15:32783288.

  • 31

    EllCMayAPechO. Curative endoscopic resection of early esophageal adenocarcinomas (Barrett's cancer). Gastrointest Endosc2007;65:310.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    PechOMayAGossnerL. Curative endoscopic therapy in patients with early esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Endoscopy2007;39:3035.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    PetersFPKaraMARosmolenWD. Endoscopic treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early stage cancer in Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc2005;61:506514.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    PouwREPetersFPSempouxC. Stepwise radical endoscopic resection for Barrett's esophagus with early neoplasia: report on a Brussels' cohort. Endoscopy2008;40:892898.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    DimickJBWainessRMUpchurchGRJr. National trends in outcomes for esophageal resection. Ann Thorac Surg2005;79:212216; discussion 217–218.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    EnzingerPCMayerRJ. Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med2003;349:22412252.

  • 37

    WrightCDKucharczukJCO'BrienSM. Predictors of major morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database risk adjustment model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2009;137:587595; discussion 596.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    WongJ. Esophageal resection for cancer: the rationale of current practice. Am J Surg1987;153:1824.

  • 39

    BarbourAPRizkNPGonenM. Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: influence of esophageal resection margin and operative approach on outcome. Ann Surg2007;246:18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    GrothSSVirnigBAWhitsonBA. Determination of the minimum number of lymph nodes to examine to maximize survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma: data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2010;139:612620.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    RizkNPIshwaranHRiceTW. Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg2010;251:4650.

  • 42

    FioricaFDi BonaDSchepisF. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut2004;53:925930.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    GebskiVBurmeisterBSmithersBM. Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol2007;8:226234.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44

    JinHLZhuHLingTS. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol2009;15:59835991.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45

    GaastAVvan HagenPHulshofM. Effect of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy on survival of patients with resectable esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancer: results from a multicenter randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol2010;28:15s.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46

    StahlMStuschkeMLehmannN. Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol2005;23:23102317.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47

    BedenneLMichelPBoucheO. Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. J Clin Oncol2007;25:11601168.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48

    MinskyBDPajakTFGinsbergRJ. INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol2002;20:11671174.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49

    CunninghamDAllumWHStenningSP. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med2006;355:1120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50

    OkinesAFNormanARMcCloudP. Meta-analysis of the REAL-2 and ML17032 trials: evaluating capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy and infused 5-fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced oesophago-gastric cancer. Ann Oncol2009;20:15291534.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51

    AllumWHStenningSPBancewiczJ. Long-term results of a randomized trial of surgery with or without preoperative chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol2009;27:50625067.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52

    KelsenDPWinterKAGundersonLL. Long-term results of RTOG trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113): a random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol2007;25:37193725.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53

    RiceTWAdelsteinDJChidelMA. Benefit of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced esophageal carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2003;126:15901596.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54

    KleinbergLPowellMEForastiereAA. Survival outcome of E1201: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant preoperative paclitaxel/cisplatin/radiotherapy (RT) or irinotecan/cisplatin/RT in endoscopy with ultrasound (EUS) staged esophageal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. J Clin Oncol2008;26:Abstract 4532.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55

    UrbaSGOrringerMBIanettonniM. Concurrent cisplatin, paclitaxel, and radiotherapy as preoperative treatment for patients with locoregional esophageal carcinoma. Cancer2003;98:21772183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56

    van MeertenEMullerKTilanusHW. Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation with weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin for patients with oesophageal cancer: a phase II study. Br J Cancer2006;94:13891394.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57

    KleinbergLKniselyJPHeitmillerR. Mature survival results with preoperative cisplatin, protracted infusion 5-fluorouracil, and 44-Gy radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2003;56:328334.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 58

    KhushalaniNILeichmanCGProulxG. Oxaliplatin in combination with protracted-infusion fluorouracil and radiation: report of a clinical trial for patients with esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol2002;20:28442850.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 59

    SharmaRYangGYNavaHR. A single institution experience with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) with irinotecan (I) and cisplatin (C) in locally advanced esophageal carcinoma (LAEC) [abstract]. J Clin Oncol2009;27(Suppl 1):Abstract e15619.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 60

    SchnirerIIKomakiRYaoJC. Pilot study of concurrent 5-fluorouracil/paclitaxel plus radiotherapy in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Am J Clin Oncol2001;24:9195.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 61

    CooperJSGuoMDHerskovicA. Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. JAMA1999;281:16231627.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 62

    ConroyTYatagheneYEtiennePL. Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with folfox 4 or 5FU-cisplatin as first line treatment for patients (pts) with inoperable esophageal cancer (IEC): final results of a randomized phase II study [abstract]. J Clin Oncol2007;25(Suppl 1):Abstract 4532.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63

    MacdonaldJSSmalleySRBenedettiJ. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med2001;345:725730.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 64

    AjaniJAWinterKOkawaraGS. Phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiation in patients with localized gastric adenocarcinoma (RTOG 9904): quality of combined modality therapy and pathologic response. J Clin Oncol2006;24:39533958.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1 0 0
Full Text Views 85 79 10
PDF Downloads 25 25 15
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0