Developing a Referral System for Fertility Preservation Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cancer

Restricted access

The goal of this project was to develop a referral system to increase the likelihood that patients of childbearing age with newly diagnosed cancer receive timely information about fertility, and reduce the burden oncologists may feel when discussing and exploring fertility preservation options with their patients. The group developed and examined the effectiveness of a fertility preservation referral system through pilot-testing a developed patient education brochure. During the 12-month pilot-testing period, 776 patients of childbearing age (< 40 years) were seen at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and 349 brochures were taken. The reproductive endocrinologist/infertility clinic experienced a 9-fold increase in the number of calls received during the 12-month study period, with 122 calls received compared with 13 the prior year. The large increase in calls illuminates the gap in patient interest and referral, and shows an effective method to transmit this information. Improving the communication of time-sensitive information about fertility and preservation options to patients with cancer is associated with an increased likelihood of improving quality of life, reducing patient distress, and increasing use of ancillary fertility-related health services. Through referring and providing patient information, this referral system allows oncologists to fulfill their obligation and make informed decisions about fertility preservation, thereby improving the full cancer care continuum.

Correspondence: Gwendolyn P. Quinn, PhD, 12902 Magnolia Drive, MRC CANCONT, Tampa, FL 33612. E-mail: gwen.quinn@moffitt.org
  • 1

    WareJEJr. Methodology in behavioral and psychological cancer research. Conceptualizing disease impact and treatment outcomes. Cancer1984;15(Suppl 10):2316-2323.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A national action plan for cancer survivorship: advancing public health strategies. Available at www.cdc.gov/cancer/survivorship/pdf/plan.pdf. Accessed October 13 2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    PadronOFSharmaRKThomasAJJrAgarwalA. Effects of cancer on spermatozoa quality after cryopreservation: a 12-year experience. Fertil Steril1997;67:326-331.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    SonmezerMOktayK. Fertility preservation in female patients. Hum Reprod Update2004;10:251-266.

  • 5

    LeeSJSchoverLRPartridgeAH. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol2006;24:2917-2931.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    AmoryJK. Case 15-2004: cancer therapy and sperm banking. N Engl J Med2004;351:510; author reply 510.

  • 7

    KelleherSWishartSMLiuPY. Long-term outcomes of elective human sperm cryostorage. Hum Reprod2001;16:2632-2639.

  • 8

    LassAAkagbosuFBrinsdenP. Sperm banking and assisted reproduction treatment for couples following cancer treatment of the male partner. Hum Reprod Update2001;7:370-377.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    KnobfMT. The influence of endocrine effects of adjuvant therapy on quality of life outcomes in younger breast cancer survivors. Oncologist2006;11:96-110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    SchoverLR. Motivation for parenthood after cancer: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr2005;2005:2-5.

  • 11

    SurboneAPetrekJA. Childbearing issues in breast carcinoma survivors. Cancer1997;79:1271-1278.

  • 12

    DowKH. Having children after breast cancer. Cancer Pract1994;2:407-413.

  • 13

    SchoverLRRybickiLAMartinBABringelsenKA. Having children after cancer. A pilot survey of survivors' attitudes and experiences. Cancer1999;86:697-709.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    SchoverLRBreyKLichtinA. Knowledge and experience regarding cancer, infertility, and sperm banking in younger male survivors. J Clin Oncol2002;20:1880-1889.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    SchoverLRBreyKLichtinA. Oncologists' attitudes and practices regarding banking sperm before cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol2002;20:1890-1897.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    PartridgeAHGelberSPeppercornJ. Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol2004;22:4174-4183.

  • 17

    BryantCAForthoferMSMcCormackK. A social marketing approach to increasing breast cancer screening. J Health Educ2000;31:320-328.

  • 18

    HammondCAbramsJRSyrjalaKL. Fertility and risk factors for elevated infertility concern in 10-year hematopoietic cell transplant survivors and case-matched controls. J Clin Oncol2007;25:3511-3517.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    GreenDGalvinHHorneB. The psycho-social impact of infertility on young male cancer survivors: a qualitative investigation. Psychooncology2003;12:141-152.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    GanzPAGreendaleGAPetersenL. Breast cancer in younger women: reproductive and late health effects of treatment. J Clin Oncol2003;21:4184-4193.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    GanzPARowlandJHDesmondK. Life after breast cancer: understanding women's health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. J Clin Oncol1998;16:501-514.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    SchoverLR. Psychosocial aspects of infertility and decisions about reproduction in young cancer survivors: a review. Med Pediatr Oncol1999;33:53-59.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    McPhersonCJHigginsonIJHearnJ. Effective methods of giving information in cancer: a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials. J Public Health2001;23:227-234.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    KoithanMBellIRCaspiO. Patients' experiences and perceptions of a consultative model integrative medicine clinic: a qualitative study. Integr Cancer Ther2007;6:174-184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    QuinnGPVadaparampilSTLeeJH. Physician referral for fertility preservation with oncology patients: a national study of practice behaviors. J Clin Oncol2009;27:5952-5957.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    GoodwinTOosterhuisBKiernanM. Attitudes and practices of pediatric oncology providers regarding fertility issues. Pediatr Blood Cancer2007;48:80-85.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    BorgWGallM. Educational Research5th ed.New York, NY: Longman; 1989.

  • 28

    WebbCKevernJ. Focus groups as a research method: a critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research. J Adv Nurs2001;33:798-805.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    MorganD. The Focus Group Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1988.

  • 30

    McGrathPHolewaH. Missed opportunities: nursing insights on end-of-life care for haematology patients. Int J Nurs Pract2006;12:295-301.

  • 31

    LorenzKALynnJDySM. Evidence for improving palliative care at the end of life: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med2008;148:147-159.

  • 32

    Fertile Hope. Statistics. Available at www.fertilehope.org.

  • 33

    AndersenMRBowenDJMoreaJ. Involvement in decision-making and breast cancer survivor quality of life. Health Psychol2009;28:29-37.

  • 34

    KlockSZhangJKazerR. Fertility preservation for female cancer patients: early clinical experience. Fertil Steril2010;94:149-155.

  • 35

    RowanK. Fertility preservation during treatment is a growing issue for women. J Natl Cancer Inst2010;102:294-296.

  • 36

    QuinnGPVadaparampilSTGwedeCK. Discussion of fertility preservation with newly diagnosed patients: oncologists' views. J Cancer Survivorship2007;1:146-155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    WallaceWHAndersonRAIrvineDS. Fertility preservation for young patients with cancer: who is at risk and what can be offered?Lancet Oncol2005;6:209-218.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 70 66 4
PDF Downloads 33 29 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0