Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis

  • 1

    American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2007-2008. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/BCFF-Final.pdf. Accessed October 29. 2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al.. Cancer Statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59:225-249.

  • 3

    Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:347-360.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Bevers TB. Ultrasound for the screening of breast cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2008;10:527-528.

  • 5

    Barton MB, Harris R, Fletcher SW. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How? JAMA 1999;282:1270-1280.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Bevers TB. Breast self-examination: an optional screening modality in National Comprehensive Cancer Network Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines. Breast Dis 1998;9:230-231.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Thomas DB, Gao DL, Ray RM et al.. Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: final results. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1445-1457.

  • 8

    Moss SM, Cuckle H, Evans A et al.. Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;368:2053-2060.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Armstrong K, Moye E, Williams S et al.. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: a systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:516-526.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    van Schoor G, Broeders MJ, Paap E et al.. A rationale for starting breast cancer screening under age 50. Ann Oncol 2008;19:1208-1209.

  • 11

    Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53:27-43.

  • 12

    Fletcher SW, Elmore JG. Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1672-1680.

  • 13

    Buist DS, Porter PL, Lehman C et al.. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1432-1440.

  • 14

    Gotzsche PC, Nielsen M. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;CD001877.

  • 15

    Berry DA. Benefits and risks of screening mammography for women in their forties: a statistical appraisal. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1431-1439.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    van Dijck J, Verbeek A, Hendriks J et al.. Mammographic screening after the age of 65 years: early outcomes in the Nijmegen programme. Br J Cancer 1996;74:1838-1842.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Badgwell BD, Giordano SH, Duan ZZ et al.. Mammography before diagnosis among women age 80 years and older with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:2482-2488.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Mandelblatt JS, Silliman R. Hanging in the balance: making decisions about the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening among the oldest old without a safety net of scientific evidence. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:487-490.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Yahalom J, Petrek JA, Biddinger PW et al.. Breast cancer in patients irradiated for Hodgkin's disease: a clinical and pathologic analysis of 45 events in 37 patients. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:1674-1681.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Bhatia S, Robison LL, Oberlin O et al.. Breast cancer and other second neoplasms after childhood Hodgkin's disease. N Engl J Med 1996;334:745-751.

  • 21

    Bhatia S, Yasui Y, Robison LL et al.. High risk of subsequent neoplasms continues with extended follow-up of childhood Hodgkin's disease: report from the Late Effects Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:4386-4394.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    van Leeuwen FE, Klokman WJ, Stovall M et al.. Roles of radiation dose, chemotherapy, and hormonal factors in breast cancer following Hodgkin's disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:971-980.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Hancock SL, Tucker MA, Hoppe RT. Breast cancer after treatment of Hodgkin's disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:25-31.

  • 24

    Metayer C, Lynch CF, Clarke EA et al.. Second cancers among long-term survivors of Hodgkin's disease diagnosed in childhood and adolescence. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2435-2443.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Travis LB, Hill D, Dores GM et al.. Cumulative absolute breast cancer risk for young women treated for Hodgkin lymphoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1428-1437.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Oeffinger KC, Ford JS, Moskowitz CS et al.. Breast cancer surveillance practices among women previously treated with chest radiation for a childhood cancer. JAMA 2009;301:404-414.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Children's Oncology Group Long-term Follow-up Guidelines. Version 3, October 2008. Available at: www.survivorshipguidelines.org. Accessed September 3, 2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP et al.. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81:1879-1886.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Gail MH, Costantino JP. Validating and improving models for projecting the absolute risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:334-335.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Rockhill B, Spiegelman D, Byrne C et al.. Validation of the Gail et al. model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:358-366.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Spiegelman D, Colditz GA, Hunter D, Hertzmark E. Validation of the Gail et al. model for predicting individual breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86:600-607.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Costantino JP, Gail MH, Pee D et al.. Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1541-1548.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Gail MH, Costantino JP, Pee D et al.. Projecting individualized absolute invasive breast cancer risk in African American women. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:1782-1792.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W et al.. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:75-89.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Parmigiani G, Berry D, Aguilar O. Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet 1998;62:145-158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Antoniou AC, Cunningham AP, Peto J et al.. The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers: updates and extensions. Br J Cancer 2008;98:1457-1466.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:2397-2406.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    Goldfrank D, Chuai S, Bernstein JL et al.. Effect of mammography on breast cancer risk in women with mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:2311-2313.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Rebbeck TR, Domchek SM. Variation in breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res 2008;10:108.

  • 40

    Dupont WD, Page DL. Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. N Engl J Med 1985;312:146-151.

  • 41

    Dupont WD, Parl FF, Hartmann WH et al.. Breast cancer risk associated with proliferative breast disease and atypical hyperplasia. Cancer 1993;71:1258-1265.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    Arpino G, Laucirica R, Elledge RM. Premalignant and in situ breast disease: biology and clinical implications. Ann Intern Med 2005;143:446-457.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    Lakhani SR. In-situ lobular neoplasia: time for an awakening. Lancet 2003;361:96.

  • 44

    Nemec CF, Listinsky J, Rim A. How should we screen for breast cancer? Mammography, ultrasonography, MRI. Cleve Clin J Med 2007;74:897-904.

  • 45

    Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC et al.. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:168-175.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46

    Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB et al.. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299:2151-2163.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47

    Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al.. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:8469-8476.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48

    Tilanus-Linthorst M, Verhoog L, Obdeijn IM et al.. A BRCA1/2 mutation, high breast density and prominent pushing margins of a tumor independently contribute to a frequent false-negative mammography. Int J Cancer 2002;102:91-95.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49

    Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A. Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading—Oslo I study. Radiology 2003;229:877-884.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50

    Skaane P, Skjennald A. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program—the Oslo II Study. Radiology 2004;232:197-204.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51

    Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald A. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Radiology 2007;244:708-717.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52

    Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D'Orsi CJ et al.. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology 2001;218:873-880.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53

    Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al.. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1773-1783.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54

    Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ et al.. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology 2008;246:376-383.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55

    Quality Mammography Standards: Final Rule. Federal Register 1997;62:55988.

  • 56

    D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA et al.. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS-Mammography, ed. 4. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57

    Lord SJ, Lei W, Craft P et al.. A systematic review of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an addition to mammography and ultrasound in screening young women at high risk of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2007;43:1905-1917.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 58

    Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K, Boetes C. Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol 2008;18:1307-1318.

  • 59

    Schnall M, Orel S. Breast MR imaging in the diagnostic setting. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006;14:329-337, vi.

  • 60

    Robson ME, Offit K. Breast MRI for women with hereditary cancer risk. JAMA 2004;292:1368-1370.

  • 61

    Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA et al.. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004;292:1317-1325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 62

    Warner E. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in screening women at high risk of breast cancer. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2008;19:163-169.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63

    Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P et al.. Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 2008;148:671-679.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 64

    Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C et al.. Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition. Cancer 2006;106:2318-2326.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65

    Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Obdeijn IM et al.. Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography and MRI in women with an inherited risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006;100:109-119.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 66

    Lehman CD, Smith RA. The role of MRI in breast cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2009;7:1109-1115.

  • 67

    Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK et al.. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 2005;365:1769-1778.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 68

    Port ER, Park A, Borgen PI et al.. Results of MRI screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:1051-1057.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 69

    Kuhl CK. The “coming of age” of nonmammographic screening for breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299:2203-2205.

  • 70

    Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001;221:641-649.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 71

    Buchberger W, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P et al.. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:921-927.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 72

    Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ferrari A et al.. Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost. Eur J Cancer 2008;44:539-544.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 73

    American College of Radiology Ultrasound BI-RADS Final Assessment Categories. Available at: http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/BIRADSAtlas/BIRADSAtlasexcerptedtext/BIRADSUltrasoundFirstEdition/AssessmentCategoriesDoc2.aspx. Accessed October 29, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 74

    Berg WA, Campassi CI, Ioffe OB. Cystic lesions of the breast: sonographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 2003;227:183-191.

  • 75

    Booi RC, Carson PL, O'Donnell M et al.. Characterization of cysts using differential correlation coefficient values from two dimensional breast elastography: preliminary study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008;34:12-21.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 76

    Huff JM. The differing clinical implications of simple, complicated and complex breast cysts. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2009;7:1101-1105.

  • 77

    Venta LA, Kim JP, Pelloski CE, Morrow M. Management of complex breast cysts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:1331-1336.

  • 78

    Daly CP, Bailey JE, Klein KA, Helvie MA. Complicated breast cysts on sonography: is aspiration necessary to exclude malignancy? Acad Radiol 2008;15:610-617.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 79

    Tea MK, Grimm C, Fink-Retter A et al.. The validity of complex breast cysts after surgery. Am J Surg 2009;197:199-202.

  • 80

    Doshi DJ, March DE, Crisi GM, Coughlin BF. Complex cystic breast masses: diagnostic approach and imaging-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2007;27(Suppl 1):S53-64.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 81

    Renz DM, Baltzer PA, Bottcher J et al.. Inflammatory breast carcinoma in magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison with locally advanced breast cancer. Acad Radiol 2008;15:209-221.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 82

    Abati A, Simsir A. Breast fine needle aspiration biopsy: prevailing recommendations and contemporary practices. Clin Lab Med 2005;25:631-654, v.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 83

    Levine P, Simsir A, Cangiarella J. Management issues in breast lesions diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration and percutaneous core breast biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol 2006;125(Suppl):S124-134.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 84

    Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Caudry DJ et al.. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: results from the radiologic diagnostic oncology group V. Radiology 2001;219:785-792.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 85

    Pijnappel RM, van den Donk M, Holland R et al.. Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of nonpalpable breast lesions. Br J Cancer 2004;90:595-600.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 86

    Verkooijen HM. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: results of a multicenter prospective study with 95% surgical confirmation. Int J Cancer 2002;99:853-859.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 87

    Pandelidis S, Heiland D, Jones D et al.. Accuracy of 11-gauge vacuum-assisted core biopsy of mammographic breast lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:43-47.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 88

    Sigal-Zafrani B, Muller K, El Khoury C et al.. Vacuum-assisted large-core needle biopsy (VLNB) improves the management of patients with breast microcalcifications—analysis of 1009 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008;34:377-381.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 89

    Burbank F, Forcier N. Tissue marking clip for stereotactic breast biopsy: initial placement accuracy, long-term stability, and usefulness as a guide for wire localization. Radiology 1997;205:407-415.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 90

    Egyed Z, Pentek Z, Jaray B et al.. Radial scar-significant diagnostic challenge. Pathol Oncol Res 2008;14:123-129.

  • 91

    Cangiarella J, Guth A, Axelrod D et al.. Is surgical excision necessary for the management of atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ diagnosed on core needle biopsy?: a report of 38 cases and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008;132:979-983.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 92

    Elsheikh TM, Silverman JF. Follow-up surgical excision is indicated when breast core needle biopsies show atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ: a correlative study of 33 patients with review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:534-543.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 93

    Margenthaler JA, Duke D, Monsees BS et al.. Correlation between core biopsy and excisional biopsy in breast high-risk lesions. Am J Surg 2006;192:534-537.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 94

    Linell F. Precursor lesions of breast carcinoma. Breast 1993;2:202-223.

  • 95

    Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ et al.. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology. 1994;193:359-364.

  • 96

    Frouge C, Tristant H, Guinebretiere JM et al.. Mammographic lesions suggestive of radial scars: microscopic findings in 40 cases. Radiology 1995;195:623-625.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 97

    Nagi CS, O'Donnell JE, Tismenetsky M et al.. Lobular neoplasia on core needle biopsy does not require excision. Cancer 2008;112:2152-2158.

  • 98

    Middleton LP, Grant S, Stephens T et al.. Lobular carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core needle biopsy: when should it be excised? Mod Pathol 2003;16:120-129.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 99

    Sohn VY, Arthurs ZM, Kim FS, Brown TA. Lobular neoplasia: is surgical excision warranted? Am Surg 2008;74:172-177.

  • 100

    Hussain AN, Policarpio C, Vincent MT. Evaluating nipple discharge. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2006;61:278-283.

  • 101

    Leis HP Jr. Management of nipple discharge. World J Surg 1989;13:736-742.

  • 102

    Slawson SH, Johnson BA. Ductography: how to and what if? Radiographics 2001;21:133-150.

  • 103

    Hirose M, Nobusawa H, Gokan T. MR ductography: comparison with conventional ductography as a diagnostic method in patients with nipple discharge. Radiographics 2007;27(Suppl 1):S183-196.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 104

    Orel SG, Dougherty CS, Reynolds C et al.. MR imaging in patients with nipple discharge: initial experience. Radiology 2000;216:248-254.

  • 105

    Bassett L, Winchester DP, Caplan RB et al.. Stereotactic core-needle biopsy of the breast: a report of the Joint Task Force of the American College of Radiology, American College of Surgeons, and College of American Pathologists. CA Cancer J Clin 1997;47:171-190.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 106

    Dawood S, Cristofanilli M. What progress have we made in managing inflammatory breast cancer? Oncology 2007;21:673-687.

  • 107

    Haagensen CD. Diseases of the Breast. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1956.

  • 108

    Sakorafas GH, Blanchard K, Sarr MG, Farley DR. Paget's disease of the breast. Cancer Treat Rev 2001;27:9-18.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 7418 2767 254
PDF Downloads 3241 2049 169
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0