NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Multiple Myeloma, Version 1.2025

Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines®

Authors:
Shaji K. Kumar Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Shaji K. Kumar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Natalie S. Callander University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Natalie S. Callander in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Kehinde Adekola Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University

Search for other papers by Kehinde Adekola in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, MSCI
,
Larry D. Anderson Jr UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Larry D. Anderson Jr in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Muhamed Baljevic Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Muhamed Baljevic in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Rachid Baz Moffitt Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Rachid Baz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Erica Campagnaro University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Erica Campagnaro in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Caitlin Costello UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Caitlin Costello in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Christopher D’Angelo Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Christopher D’Angelo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Benjamin Derman The UChicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Benjamin Derman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Srinivas Devarakonda The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center–James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute

Search for other papers by Srinivas Devarakonda in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Noura Elsedawy St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center

Search for other papers by Noura Elsedawy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Amandeep Godara Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah

Search for other papers by Amandeep Godara in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Kelly Godby O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB

Search for other papers by Kelly Godby in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Jens Hillengass Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Jens Hillengass in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Leona Holmberg Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Leona Holmberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Myo Htut City of Hope National Medical Center

Search for other papers by Myo Htut in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Carol Ann Huff Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Carol Ann Huff in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Malin Hultcrantz Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Malin Hultcrantz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Yubin Kang Duke Cancer Institute

Search for other papers by Yubin Kang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Sarah Larson UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Sarah Larson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Hans C. Lee The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Hans C. Lee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Michaela Liedtke Stanford Cancer Institute

Search for other papers by Michaela Liedtke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Thomas Martin UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Thomas Martin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
James Omel Patient Advocate

Search for other papers by James Omel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Timothy Robinson Yale Cancer Center/Smilow Cancer Hospital

Search for other papers by Timothy Robinson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Aaron Rosenberg UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Aaron Rosenberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Mark A. Schroeder Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine

Search for other papers by Mark A. Schroeder in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Daniel Sherbenou University of Colorado Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Daniel Sherbenou in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Attaya Suvannasankha Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Attaya Suvannasankha in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Jason Valent Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute

Search for other papers by Jason Valent in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Asya Nina Varshavsky-Yanovsky Fox Chase Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Asya Nina Varshavsky-Yanovsky in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Dan Vogl Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Dan Vogl in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Emily Kovach National Comprehensive Cancer Network

Search for other papers by Emily Kovach in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Rashmi Kumar National Comprehensive Cancer Network

Search for other papers by Rashmi Kumar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
Restricted access

The NCCN Guidelines for Multiple Myeloma (MM) provide recommendations for diagnosis, initial workup, treatment, follow-up, and supportive care for patients with MM. These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight the important updates and changes specific to systemic therapy for patients with newly diagnosed as well as previously treated MM included in Version 1.2025 of the NCCN Guidelines for MM.

Provided content development and/or authorship assistance.

Shaji K. Kumar, Natalie S. Callander, Muhamed Baljevic, Emily Kovach, and Rashmi Kumar

The full and most current version of these NCCN Guidelines is available at NCCN.org.

NCCN CATEGORIES OF EVIDENCE AND CONSENSUS

Category 1: Based upon high-level evidence (≥1 randomized phase 3 trials or high-quality, robust meta-analyses), there is uniform NCCN consensus (≥85% support of the Panel) that the intervention is appropriate.

Category 2A: Based upon lower-level evidence, there is uniform NCCN consensus (≥85% support of the Panel) that the intervention is appropriate.

Category 2B: Based upon lower-level evidence, there is NCCN consensus (≥50%, but <85% support of the Panel) that the intervention is appropriate.

Category 3: Based upon any level of evidence, there is major NCCN disagreement that the intervention is appropriate.

All recommendations are category 2A unless otherwise indicated.

NCCN CATEGORIES OF PREFERENCE

Preferred intervention: Interventions that are based on superior efficacy, safety, and evidence; and, when appropriate, affordability.

Other recommended intervention: Other interventions that may be somewhat less efficacious, more toxic, or based on less mature data; or significantly less affordable for similar outcomes.

Useful in certain circumstances: Other interventions that may be used for selected patient populations (defined with recommendation).

All recommendations are considered appropriate.

NCCN recognizes the importance of clinical trials and encourages participation when applicable and available. Trials should be designed to maximize inclusiveness and broad representative enrollment.

PLEASE NOTE

The NCCN Guidelines® are a statement of evidence and consensus of the authors regarding their views of currently accepted approaches to treatment.

The NCCN Guidelines® Insights highlight important changes in the NCCN Guidelines® recommendations from previous versions. Colored markings in the algorithm show changes and the discussion aims to further understanding of these changes by summarizing salient portions of the panel’s discussion, including the literature reviewed.

The NCCN Guidelines Insights do not represent the full NCCN Guidelines; further, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) makes no representations or warranties of any kind regarding the content, use, or application of the NCCN Guidelines and NCCN Guidelines Insights and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    National Cancer Institute. SEER cancer stat facts: myeloma. Accessed March 31, 2025. Available at https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/mulmy.html

  • 2.

    Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, et al. Cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin 2025;75:1045.

  • 3.

    Diao X, Ben T, Cheng S, et al. Global, regional, and national multiple myeloma burden from 1990 to 2021: a systematic analysis for of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. BMC Public Health 2025;25:1054.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Sonneveld P, Dimopoulos MA, Boccadoro M, et al. Daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2024;390:301313.

  • 5.

    Voorhees PM, Sborov DW, Laubach J, et al. Addition of daratumumab to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (GRIFFIN): final analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol 2023;10:e825837.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Souto Filho JTD, Cantadori LO, Crusoe EQ, et al. Daratumumab-based quadruplet versus triplet induction regimens in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Cancer J 2025;15:37.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Kumar SK, Jacobus SJ, Cohen AD, et al. Carfilzomib or bortezomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma without intention for immediate autologous stem-cell transplantation (ENDURANCE): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:13171330.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Goldschmidt H, Mai EK, Bertsch U, et al. Addition of isatuximab to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone as induction therapy for newly diagnosed, transplantation-eligible patients with multiple myeloma (GMMG-HD7): part 1 of an open-label, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol 2022;9:e810821.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Mai EK, Bertsch U, Pozek E, et al. Isatuximab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone induction therapy for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final part 1 analysis of the GMMG-HD7 trial. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2402266.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Leypoldt LB, Tichy D, Besemer B, et al. Isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for the treatment of high-risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2024;42:2637.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Gay F, Roeloffzen W, Dimopoulos MA, et al. Results of the phase III randomized IsKia trial: isatuximab-carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone as pre-transplant induction and post-transplant consolidation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Blood 2023;142(Suppl 1):Abstract 4.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Facon T, Dimopoulos MA, Leleu XP, et al. Isatuximab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2024;391:15971609.

  • 13.

    Leleu X, Hulin C, Lambert J, et al. Isatuximab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone and bortezomib in transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: the randomized phase 3 BENEFIT trial. Nat Med 2024;30:22352241.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Yimer H, Melear J, Faber E, et al. Daratumumab, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma: LYRA study. Br J Haematol 2019;185:492502.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Kim EB, Malespini JE, Lei M, et al. Early daratumumab therapy improves renal outcomes in newly diagnosed myeloma patients admitted with kidney injury. Blood Adv. Published online March 14, 2025. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2025015901

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Rifkin RM, Costello CL, Birhiray RE, et al. In-class transition from bortezomib-based therapy to IRd is an effective approach in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Future Oncol 2024;20:131143.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Rifkin RM, Girnius SK, Noga SJ, et al. In-class transition (iCT) of proteasome inhibitor-based therapy: a community approach to multiple myeloma management. Blood Cancer J 2023;13:147.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Gay F, Musto P, Rota-Scalabrini D, et al. Carfilzomib with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone or lenalidomide and dexamethasone plus autologous transplantation or carfilzomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, followed by maintenance with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide or lenalidomide alone for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (FORTE): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021;22:17051720.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Dytfeld D, Wrobel T, Jamroziak K, et al. ATLAS: a phase 3 randomized trial of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide alone after stem-cell transplant for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2022;40(16 Suppl):Abstract 8001.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Sonneveld P, Schmidt-Wolf IG, van der Holt B, et al. Bortezomib induction and maintenance treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the randomized phase III HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:29462955.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Niesvizky R, Flinn IW, Rifkin R, et al. Community-based phase IIIB trial of three UPFRONT bortezomib-based myeloma regimens. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:39213929.

  • 22.

    Stewart AK, Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, et al. Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2015;372:142152.

  • 23.

    Sonneveld P, Zweegman S, Cavo M, et al. Carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone as second-line therapy for lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma. Hemasphere 2022;6:e786.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Perrot A, Delimpasi S, Spanoudakis E, et al. An open-label phase 2 study treating patients with first or second relapse of multiple myeloma with carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (KPd): SELECT study. Leuk Lymphoma 2024;65:833842.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Richardson PG, Oriol A, Beksac M, et al. Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide (OPTIMISMM): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019;20:781794.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Dimopoulos M, Weisel K, Moreau P, et al. Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide (OPTIMISMM): outcomes by prior treatment at first relapse. Leukemia 2021;35:17221731.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Dimopoulos MA, Dytfeld D, Grosicki S, et al. Elotuzumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2018;379:18111822.

  • 28.

    Dimopoulos MA, Dytfeld D, Grosicki S, et al. Elotuzumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: final overall survival analysis from the randomized phase II ELOQUENT-3 trial. J Clin Oncol 2023;41:568578.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Voorhees PM, Suman VJ, Tuchman SA, et al. A phase I/II study of ixazomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone for lenalidomide and proteasome inhibitor refractory multiple myeloma (Alliance A061202). Am J Hematol 2021;96:15951603.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Krishnan AY, Kapoor P, Palmer J, et al. A phase I/II study of ixazomib (Ix) pomalidomide (POM) dexamethasone (DEX) in relapsed refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma: initial results. J Clin Oncol 2016;34(Suppl):Abstract 8008.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Krishnan A, Kapoor P, Palmer JM, et al. Phase I/II trial of the oral regimen ixazomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2018;32:15671574.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    San-Miguel J, Dhakal B, Yong K, et al. Cilta-cel or standard care in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2023;389:335347.

  • 33.

    Rodriguez-Otero P, Ailawadhi S, Arnulf B, et al. Ide-cel or standard regimens in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2023;388:10021014.

  • 34.

    Mateos MV, San-Migue J, Dhakal B, et al. Overall survival (OS) with ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) versus standard of care (SoC) in lenalidomide (len)-refractory multiple myeloma (MM): phase 3 CARTITUDE-4 study update. Presented at the 2024 International Myeloma Society Annual Meeting; September 25–28, 2024; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics