Specialized Cancer Care for Adolescent and Young Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Barriers and Opportunities

Authors:
Lori Muffly Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

Search for other papers by Lori Muffly in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, MS
,
Theresa H.M. Keegan Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA

Search for other papers by Theresa H.M. Keegan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD, MS
,
Heather Z. Mui Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

Search for other papers by Heather Z. Mui in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MPH
,
Elysia M. Alvarez Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA

Search for other papers by Elysia M. Alvarez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, MPH
,
Rachel Siden Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

Search for other papers by Rachel Siden in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Laura M. Holdsworth Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

Search for other papers by Laura M. Holdsworth in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD, MSc
, and
Helen M. Parsons Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN

Search for other papers by Helen M. Parsons in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD, MPH
Restricted access

Background: Research has demonstrated that survival of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is superior following treatment at specialized cancer centers (SCCs), such as NCI-designated Cancer Centers or Children’s Oncology Group sites. However, a minority of newly diagnosed AYAs with ALL receive care at SCCs. We conducted a qualitative study to better understand provider and policy expert perspectives on this discrepancy and to identify barriers and potential solutions to improving access to SCCs for AYAs with ALL. Methods: We performed in-depth, semistructured interviews with pediatric and adult hematology/oncology clinicians and policy experts across the United States. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and uploaded into NVivo for analysis. We used the Expanded Chronic Care Model as a conceptual framework for analysis and interpretation. Results: We interviewed 16 clinicians and policy experts (56% health policy experts, 75% male, 75% White) from 8 states. Thematic analysis identified organizational infrastructure, institutional expertise, and ALL clinician specialization as potential contributors to improved outcomes at SCCs. Barriers to receiving care at SCCs included incompatible health insurance, transportation/lodging costs, patient preference, limited health literacy, and variable provider knowledge. Suggested solutions for improving access and outcomes included developing AYA-focused legislative policies, strengthening ALL clinical guidelines, expanding health care delivery models and partnerships, educating and empowering patient advocacy groups, and enhancing self-advocacy and care management skills. Conclusions: This study highlights barriers associated with low rates of treatment at SCCs and identifies opportunities for intervention to improve access and outcomes for AYAs with ALL.

Submitted September 29, 2024; final revision received November 22, 2024; accepted for publication December 9, 2024. Published online March 11, 2025.

Author contributions: Conceptualization: Muffly, Keegan, Parsons. Conducted interviews: Mui, Siden. Data analysis: Mui, Holdsworth. Writing—original draft: All authors. Writing—review & editing: All authors.

Disclosures: Dr. Muffly has disclosed receiving grant/research support from Adaptive and Kite Pharma; and serving as a scientific advisor for Kite Pharma, Autolus, and Pfizer. The remaining authors have disclosed that they have not received any financial consideration from any person or organization to support the preparation, analysis, results, or discussion of this article.

Funding: This work was supported by funding from Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (Equity in Access Award; L. Muffly, T.H.M. Keegan, H.M. Parsons).

Supplementary material: Supplementary material associated with this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7097. The supplementary material has been supplied by the author(s) and appears in its originally submitted form. It has not been edited or vetted by JNCCN. All contents and opinions are solely those of the author. Any comments or questions related to the supplementary materials should be directed to the corresponding author.

Correspondence: Lori Muffly, MD, MS, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, 780 Welch Road CJ250B, Stanford, CA 94305-5623. Email: lmuffly@stanford.edu

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 3.43 MB)
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program. Cancer stat facts: leukemia – acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). Accessed January 14, 2023. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/alyl.html

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Coccia PF. Overview of adolescent and young adult oncology. J Oncol Pract 2019;15:235237.

  • 3.

    Miller KD, Fidler-Benaoudia M, Keegan TH, et al. Cancer statistics for adolescents and young adults, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020;70:443459.

  • 4.

    Wolfson JA, Kenzik KM, Foxworthy B, et al. Understanding causes of inferior outcomes in adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023;21:881888.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Muffly LS, Parsons HM, Miller K, et al. Impact of specialized treatment setting on survival in adolescent and young adult ALL. JCO Oncol Pract 2023;19:11901198.

  • 6.

    Parsons HM, Muffly LS, Garcia A, et al. Travel-time barriers to specialized cancer care for adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024;8:pkae046.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Shah B, Abboud R, Advani A, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Version 1.2022. Accessed January 2, 2023. To view the most recent version, visit https://www.nccn.org/

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Muffly LS, Reizine N, Stock W. Management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in young adults. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2018;16:138146.

  • 9.

    Wolfson J, Sun CL, Wyatt L, et al. Adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia: impact of care at specialized cancer centers on survival outcome. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26:312320.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Muffly L, Alvarez E, Lichtensztajn D, et al. Patterns of care and outcomes in adolescent and young adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a population-based study. Blood Adv 2018;2:895903.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Parsons HM, Harlan LC, Seibel NL, et al. Clinical trial participation and time to treatment among adolescents and young adults with cancer: does age at diagnosis or insurance make a difference? J Clin Oncol 2011;29:40454053.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Muffly L, Lichtensztajn D, Shiraz P, et al. Adoption of pediatric-inspired acute lymphoblastic leukemia regimens by adult oncologists treating adolescents and young adults: a population-based study. Cancer 2017;123:122130.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Muffly L, Bhatt VR. Access to specialized care and outcomes in adults with acute leukemias. Blood Adv 2020;4:1538.

  • 14.

    Barr VJ, Robinson S, Marin-Link B, et al. The expanded Chronic Care Model: an integration of concepts and strategies from population health promotion and the Chronic Care Model. Hosp Q 2003;7:7382.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract 1998;1:24.

  • 16.

    Lawn S, Battersby M. Chronic condition management models for cancer care and survivorship. In: Koczwara B, ed. Cancer and Chronic Conditions: Addressing the Problem of Multimorbidity in Cancer Patients and Survivors. Springer; 2016:241259.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Manca DP, Fernandes C, Grunfeld E, et al. The BETTER WISE protocol: building on existing tools to improve cancer and chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care for wellness of cancer survivors and patients – a cluster randomized controlled trial embedded in a mixed methods design. BMC Cancer 2018;18:927.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health 2019;11:589597.

  • 19.

    Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry G. Thematic analysis. In: Liamputtong P, ed. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer Singapore; 2019:843860.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Health literacy in Healthy People 2030. Accessed January 3, 2025. Available at: https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/health-literacy-healthy-people-2030

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    National Institutes of Health. Health literacy. Accessed January 3, 2025. Available at: https://www.nih.gov/institutes-nih/nih-office-director/office-communications-public-liaison/clear-communication/health-literacy

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Alvarez EM, Keegan TH, Johnston EE, et al.. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act dependent coverage expansion: disparities in impact among young adult oncology patients. Cancer 2018;124:110117.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Roth M, Berkman A, Andersen CR, et al. Improved survival of young adults with cancer following the passage of the Affordable Care Act. Oncologist 2022;27:135143.

  • 24.

    Park JK, Reyes-Becerra C, Makhlouf MD. State flexibility in Emergency Medicaid to care for uninsured noncitizens. JAMA Health Forum 2023;4:e231997.

  • 25.

    Diaz A, Loehrer A, Pawlik TM. Expanding access to high-quality cancer care through policy–California Cancer Care Equity Act. JAMA Oncol 2024;10:2728.

  • 26.

    Greene LJ, Carter B, Loehrer AP. Examining Medicaid waivers–an opportunity to promote equity in cancer care. JAMA Oncol 2024;10:291292.

  • 27.

    World Health Organization. Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013–2020. Accessed June 9, 2024. Available at: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/94384/9789241506236_eng.pdf?sequence=1

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Jackson GL, Powers BJ, Chatterjee R, et al. The patient-centered medical home. A systematic review. Ann Inter Med 2013;158:169178.

  • 29.

    Gajewski JL, McClellan MB, Majhail NS, et al. Payment and care for hematopoietic cell transplantation patients: toward a specialized medical home for complex care patients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2018;24:412.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Ghebre RG, Jones LA, Wenzel JA, et al. State-of-the-science of patient navigation as a strategy for enhancing minority clinical trial accrual. Cancer 2014;120(Suppl 7):11221130.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Natale-Pereira A, Enard KR, Nevarez L, Jones LA. The role of patient navigators in eliminating health disparities. Cancer 2011;117(Suppl 15):35433552.

  • 32.

    Chen M, Wu VS, Falk D, et al. Patient navigation in cancer treatment: a systematic review. Curr Oncol Rep 2024;26:504537.

  • 33.

    Goldberg P, Cobb J. CMS starts paying for patient navigation; ACS offers navigation credentialing program. Accessed January 6, 2025. Available at: https://cancerletter.com/conversation-with-the-cancer-letter/20240105_1/

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Warner EL, Fowler B, Pannier ST, et al. Patient navigation preferences for adolescent and young adult cancer services by distance to treatment location. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2018;7:438444.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Haines E, Asad S, Lux L, et al. Guidance to support the implementation of specialized adolescent and young adult cancer care: a qualitative analysis of cancer programs. JCO Oncol Pract 2022;18:e15131521.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Siembida EJ, Loomans-Kropp HA, Trivedi N, et al. Systematic review of barriers and facilitators to clinical trial enrollment among adolescents and young adults with cancer: identifying opportunities for intervention. Cancer 2020;126:949957.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Abrahao R, Alvarez EM, Waters AR, et al. A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to adolescents and young adults’ participation in cancer clinical trials: oncologist and patient perspectives. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022;69:e29479.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res 2016;26:17531760.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 3328 3327 1320
PDF Downloads 534 533 292
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0