NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Head and Neck Cancers, Version 2.2025

Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines

Authors:
A. Dimitrios Colevas Stanford Cancer Institute

Search for other papers by A. Dimitrios Colevas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Anthony J. Cmelak Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Anthony J. Cmelak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
David G. Pfister Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Search for other papers by David G. Pfister in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Sharon Spencer O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB

Search for other papers by Sharon Spencer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Douglas Adkins Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine

Search for other papers by Douglas Adkins in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Andrew C. Birkeland UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Andrew C. Birkeland in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
David M. Brizel Duke Cancer Institute

Search for other papers by David M. Brizel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Paul M. Busse Mass General Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Paul M. Busse in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Jimmy J. Caudell Moffitt Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Jimmy J. Caudell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Greg Durm Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Greg Durm in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, MS
,
Carole Fakhry Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Carole Fakhry in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, MPH
,
Thomas Galloway Fox Chase Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Thomas Galloway in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Jessica L. Geiger Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute

Search for other papers by Jessica L. Geiger in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Maura L. Gillison The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Maura L. Gillison in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Christine Glastonbury UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Christine Glastonbury in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Robert I. Haddad Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Robert I. Haddad in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Wesley L. Hicks Jr Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Wesley L. Hicks Jr in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Ying J. Hitchcock Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah

Search for other papers by Ying J. Hitchcock in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Antonio Jimeno University of Colorado Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Antonio Jimeno in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Aditya Juloori The UChicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Aditya Juloori in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Michael Kase O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB

Search for other papers by Michael Kase in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DMD
,
Debra Leizman Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute

Search for other papers by Debra Leizman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Ellie Maghami City of Hope National Medical Center

Search for other papers by Ellie Maghami in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Loren K. Mell UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Loren K. Mell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Bharat B. Mittal Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University

Search for other papers by Bharat B. Mittal in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Harlan A. Pinto Stanford Cancer Institute

Search for other papers by Harlan A. Pinto in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Katharine Price Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Katharine Price in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
James W. Rocco The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute

Search for other papers by James W. Rocco in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Cristina P. Rodriguez Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Cristina P. Rodriguez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
David Schwartz The University of Tennessee Health Science Center

Search for other papers by David Schwartz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Jatin P. Shah Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Jatin P. Shah in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
David Sher UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center

Search for other papers by David Sher in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, MPH
,
Maie St. John UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Maie St. John in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
He Wang Yale Cancer Center Smilow Cancer Hospital

Search for other papers by He Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Gregory Weinstein Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Gregory Weinstein in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Francis Worden University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Francis Worden in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Justine Yang Bruce University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Justine Yang Bruce in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Sue S. Yom UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Sue S. Yom in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Weining Zhen Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center

Search for other papers by Weining Zhen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Sarah Montgomery National Comprehensive Cancer Network

Search for other papers by Sarah Montgomery in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BA
, and
Susan D. Darlow National Comprehensive Cancer Network

Search for other papers by Susan D. Darlow in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
Restricted access

The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers address tumors arising in the oral cavity (including mucosal lip), pharynx, larynx, and paranasal sinuses, as well as occult primary cancer, salivary gland cancer, and mucosal melanoma (MM). The specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guide treatment (eg, the appropriate surgical procedure, radiation targets, dose and fractionation of radiation, indications for systemic therapy). The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding management of nasopharynx cancer and ongoing research in this area.

Provided content development and/or authorship assistance

A. Dimitrios Colevas, Anthony J. Cmelak, David G. Pfister, Sharon Spencer, Sarah Montgomery, and Susan D. Darlow

The full and most current version of these NCCN Guidelines is available at NCCN.org.

NCCN CATEGORIES OF EVIDENCE AND CONSENSUS

Category 1: Based upon high-level evidence (≥1 randomized phase 3 trials or high-quality, robust meta-analyses), there is uniform NCCN consensus (≥85% support of the Panel) that the intervention is appropriate.

Category 2A: Based upon lower-level evidence, there is uniform NCCN consensus (≥85% support of the Panel) that the intervention is appropriate.

Category 2B: Based upon lower-level evidence, there is NCCN consensus (≥50%, but <85% support of the Panel) that the intervention is appropriate.

Category 3: Based upon any level of evidence, there is major NCCN disagreement that the intervention is appropriate.

All recommendations are category 2A unless otherwise indicated.

NCCN CATEGORIES OF PREFERENCE

Preferred intervention: Interventions that are based on superior efficacy, safety, and evidence; and, when appropriate, affordability.

Other recommended intervention: Other interventions that may be somewhat less efficacious, more toxic, or based on less mature data; or significantly less affordable for similar outcomes.

Useful in certain circumstances: Other interventions that may be used for selected patient populations (defined with recommendation).

All recommendations are considered appropriate.

NCCN recognizes the importance of clinical trials and encourages participation when applicable and available. Trials should be designed to maximize inclusiveness and broad representative enrollment.

PLEASE NOTE

The NCCN Guidelines® are a statement of evidence and consensus of the authors regarding their views of currently accepted approaches to treatment.

The NCCN Guidelines® Insights highlight important changes in the NCCN Guidelines® recommendations from previous versions. Colored markings in the algorithm show changes and the discussion aims to further understanding of these changes by summarizing salient portions of the panel’s discussion, including the literature reviewed.

The NCCN Guidelines Insights do not represent the full NCCN Guidelines; further, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN® ) makes no representations or warranties of any kind regarding the content, use, or application of the NCCN Guidelines and NCCN Guidelines Insights and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2024. Accessed December 20, 2024. Available at: https://gco.iarc.who.int/today/en

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:115132.

  • 3.

    Chua MLK, Wee JTS, Hui EP, Chan ATC. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet 2016;387:10121024.

  • 4.

    Pathmanathan R, Prasad U, Sadler R, et al. Clonal proliferations of cells infected with Epstein-Barr virus in preinvasive lesions related to nasopharyngeal carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1995;333:693698.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Chen YP, Chan ATC, Le QT, et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet 2019;394:6480.

  • 6.

    Lee AW, Ma BB, Ng WT, Chan AT. Management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: current practice and future perspective. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:33563364.

  • 7.

    Al-Sarraf M, Pajak TF, Cooper JS, et al. Chemo-radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a radiation therapy oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 1990;8:13421351.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Al-Sarraf M, LeBlanc M, Giri PG, et al. Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: phase III randomized Intergroup study 0099. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:13101317.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Chan AT, Leung SF, Ngan RK, et al. Overall survival after concurrent cisplatin-radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:536539.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Lin JC, Jan JS, Hsu CY, et al. Phase III study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: positive effect on overall and progression-free survival. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:631637.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Wee J, Tan EH, Tai BC, et al. Randomized trial of radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer stage III and IV nasopharyngeal cancer of the endemic variety. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:67306738.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Lee AWM, Tung SY, Ng WT, et al. A multicenter, phase 3, randomized trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: 10-year outcomes for efficacy and toxicity. Cancer 2017;123:41474157.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Chen L, Hu CS, Chen XZ, et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:163171.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Wang S, Li S, Shen L. Combined chemoradiation vs radiation therapy alone in stage-II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis of the published literature. Curr Probl Cancer 2018;42:302318.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Liu F, Jin T, Liu L, et al. The role of concurrent chemotherapy for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2018;13:e0194733.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Xu C, Zhang LH, Chen YP, et al. Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systemic review and meta-analysis of 2138 patients. J Cancer 2017;8:287297.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Huang X, Chen X, Zhao C, et al. Adding concurrent chemotherapy to intensity-modulated radiotherapy does not improve treatment outcomes for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 2 multicenter clinical trial. Front Oncol 2020;10:1314.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Tang LL, Guo R, Zhang N, et al. Effect of radiotherapy alone vs radiotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy on survival without disease relapse in patients with low-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2022;328:728736.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Blanchard P, Lee A, Marguet S, et al. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update of the MAC-NPC meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:645655.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Yang Q, Cao SM, Guo L, et al. Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: long-term results of a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 2019;119:8796.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Zhang Y, Chen L, Hu GQ, et al. Gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2019;381:11241135.

  • 22.

    Ribassin-Majed L, Marguet S, Lee AWM, et al. What is the best treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma? An individual patient data network meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:498505.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Chen YP, Tang LL, Yang Q, et al. Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: individual patient data pooled analysis of four randomized trials. Clin Cancer Res 2018;24:18241833.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Tan TH, Soon YY, Cheo T, et al. Induction chemotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2018;129:1017.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Wang P, Zhang M, Ke C, Cai C. The efficacy and toxicity of induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e19360.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Chen YP, Ismaila N, Chua MLK, et al. Chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy for definitive-intent treatment of stage II-IVA nasopharyngeal carcinoma: CSCO and ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol 2021;39:840859.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Petit C, Lee A, Ma J, et al. Role of chemotherapy in patients with nasopharynx carcinoma treated with radiotherapy (MAC-NPC): an updated individual patient data network meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2023;24:611623.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    You R, Cao YS, Huang PY, et al. The changing therapeutic role of chemo-radiotherapy for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma from two/three-dimensional radiotherapy to intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a network meta-analysis. Theranostics 2017;7:48254835.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Lee AWM, Ngan RKC, Ng WT, et al. NPC-0501 trial on the value of changing chemoradiotherapy sequence, replacing 5-fluorouracil with capecitabine, and altering fractionation for patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 2020;126:36743688.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Dai J, Zhang B, Su Y, et al. Induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2024;10:456463.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Miao J, Wang L, Tan SH, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine following concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2022;8:17761785.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Liu GY, Li WZ, Wang DS, et al. Effect of capecitabine maintenance therapy plus best supportive care vs best supportive care alone on progression-free survival among patients with newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma who had received induction chemotherapy: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2022;8:553561.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Chen YP, Liu X, Zhou Q, et al. Metronomic capecitabine as adjuvant therapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2021;398:303313.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Yang Y, Pan J, Wang H, et al. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer: a multicenter phase 3 trial (RATIONALE-309). Cancer Cell 2023;41:10611072.e4.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Liu X, Zhang Y, Yang KY, et al. Induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without sintilimab in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China (CONTINUUM): a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2024;403:27202731.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Tang LL, Chen YP, Mao YP, et al. Validation of the 8th edition of the UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma from endemic areas in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017;15:913919.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Guo R, Tang LL, Mao YP, et al. Proposed modifications and incorporation of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA improve the TNM staging system for Epstein-Barr virus-related nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 2019;125:7989.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Sun Y, Li WF, Chen NY, et al. Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:15091520.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Zhang Y, Chen L, Hu GQ, et al. Final overall survival analysis of gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter, randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2022;40:24202425.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Dechaphunkul T, Pruegsanusak K, Sangthawan D, Sunpaweravong P. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with carboplatin followed by carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck Oncol 2011;3:30.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Songthong A, Chakkabat C, Kannarunimit D, Lertbutsayanukul C. Efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent carboplatin in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiol Oncol 2015;49:155162.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    Chitapanarux I, Lorvidhaya V, Kamnerdsupaphon P, et al. Chemoradiation comparing cisplatin versus carboplatin in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: randomised, non-inferiority, open trial. Eur J Cancer 2007;43:13991406.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    Rusthoven CG, Lanning RM, Jones BL, et al. Metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Patterns of care and survival for patients receiving chemotherapy with and without local radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2017;124:139146.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44.

    Chua GWY, Chua ET. Long-term disease-free survival of a patient with oligometastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy alone. Case Rep Oncol 2018;11:392398.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45.

    Ma J, Wen ZS, Lin P, et al. The results and prognosis of different treatment modalities for solitary metastatic lung tumor from nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 105 cases. Chin J Cancer 2010;29:787795.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46.

    You R, Liu YP, Huang PY, et al. Efficacy and safety of locoregional radiotherapy with chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone in de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2020;6:13451352.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47.

    Zhang L, Huang Y, Hong S, et al. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016;388:18831892.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    Hong S, Zhang Y, Yu G, et al. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin as first-line therapy for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: final overall survival analysis of GEM20110714 phase III study. J Clin Oncol 2021;39:32733282.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    Samlowski WE, Moon J, Kuebler JP, et al. Evaluation of the combination of docetaxel/carboplatin in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN): a Southwest Oncology Group phase II study. Cancer Invest 2007;25:182188.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50.

    Gibson MK, Li Y, Murphy B, et al. Randomized phase III evaluation of cisplatin plus fluorouracil versus cisplatin plus paclitaxel in advanced head and neck cancer (E1395): an intergroup trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:35623567.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51.

    Forastiere AA, Metch B, Schuller DE, et al. Randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil and carboplatin plus fluorouracil versus methotrexate in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:12451251.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52.

    Chan ATC, Hsu MM, Goh BC, et al. Multicenter, phase II study of cetuximab in combination with carboplatin in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:35683576.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53.

    Jin Y, Cai XY, Shi YX, et al. Comparison of five cisplatin-based regimens frequently used as the first-line protocols in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2012;138:17171725.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54.

    Jacobs C, Lyman G, Velez-Garcia E, et al. A phase III randomized study comparing cisplatin and fluorouracil as single agents and in combination for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:257263.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55.

    Burtness B, Goldwasser MA, Flood W, et al. Phase III randomized trial of cisplatin plus placebo compared with cisplatin plus cetuximab in metastatic/recurrent head and neck cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:86468654.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56.

    Grau JJ, Caballero M, Verger E, et al. Weekly paclitaxel for platin-resistant stage IV head and neck cancer patients. Acta Otolaryngol 2009;129:12941299.

  • 57.

    Guardiola E, Peyrade F, Chaigneau L, et al. Results of a randomised phase II study comparing docetaxel with methotrexate in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer. Eur J Cancer 2004;40:20712076.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 58.

    Catimel G, Verweij J, Mattijssen V, et al. Docetaxel (Taxotere): an active drug for the treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. EORTC Early Clinical Trials Group. Ann Oncol 1994;5:533537.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 59.

    Stewart JS, Cohen EE, Licitra L, et al. Phase III study of gefitinib compared with intravenous methotrexate for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck [corrected]. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:18641871.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 60.

    Fury MG, Pfister DG. Current recommendations for systemic therapy of recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2011;9:681689.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 61.

    Price KA, Cohen EE. Current treatment options for metastatic head and neck cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2012;13:3546.

  • 62.

    Martinez-Trufero J, Isla D, Adansa JC, et al. Phase II study of capecitabine as palliative treatment for patients with recurrent and metastatic squamous head and neck cancer after previous platinum-based treatment. Br J Cancer 2010;102:16871691.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63.

    Zhang L, Zhang Y, Huang PY, et al. Phase II clinical study of gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2008;61:3338.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 64.

    Colevas AD. Chemotherapy options for patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:26442652.

  • 65.

    Forastiere AA, Shank D, Neuberg D, et al. Final report of a phase II evaluation of paclitaxel in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial (PA390). Cancer 1998;82:22702274.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 66.

    Mai HQ, Chen QY, Chen D, et al. Toripalimab plus chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the JUPITER-02 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2023;330:19611970.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 67.

    Wang FH, Wei XL, Feng J, et al. Efficacy, safety, and correlative biomarkers of toripalimab in previously treated recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase II clinical trial (POLARIS-02). J Clin Oncol 2021;39:704712.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 68.

    Shen L, Guo J, Zhang Q, et al. Tislelizumab in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors: an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 study. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8:e000437.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 69.

    Yang Y, Qu S, Li J, et al. Camrelizumab versus placebo in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (CAPTAIN-1st): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021;22:11621174.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 70.

    Hsu C, Lee SH, Ejadi S, et al. Safety and antitumor activity of pembrolizumab in patients with programmed death-ligand 1-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma: results of the KEYNOTE-028 study. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:40504056.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 71.

    Marabelle A, Fakih M, Lopez J, et al. Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:13531365.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 72.

    Delord JP, Hollebecque A, De Boer JP, et al. An open-label, multicohort, phase I/II study to evaluate nivolumab in patients with virus-associated tumors (CheckMate 358): efficacy and safety in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). J Clin Oncol 2017;35(Suppl):Abstract 6025.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 73.

    Sato H, Fushimi C, Okada T, et al. Investigation of the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. In Vivo 2020;34:29672972.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 74.

    Ma BBY, Lim WT, Goh BC, et al. Antitumor activity of nivolumab in recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an international, multicenter study of the Mayo Clinic Phase 2 Consortium (NCI-9742). J Clin Oncol 2018;36:14121418.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 75.

    Lee NY, Zhang Q, Pfister DG, et al. Addition of bevacizumab to standard chemoradiation for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RTOG 0615): a phase 2 multi-institutional trial. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:172180.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 76.

    Huang CL, Zhang N, Jiang W, et al. Reduced-volume irradiation of uninvolved neck in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer: updated results from an open-label, noninferiority, multicenter, randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2024;42:20212025.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 77.

    Tang LL, Huang CL, Zhang N, et al. Elective upper-neck versus whole-neck irradiation of the uninvolved neck in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022;23:479490.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 78.

    Salama JK, Haddad RI, Kies MS, et al. Clinical practice guidance for radiotherapy planning after induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;75:725733.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 79.

    Liu YP, Wen YH, Tang J, et al. Endoscopic surgery compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in resectable locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021;22:381390.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 80.

    You R, Liu YP, Xie YL, et al. Hyperfractionation compared with standard fractionation in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023;401:917927.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 81.

    Ng WT, Soong YL, Ahn YC, et al. International recommendations on reirradiation by intensity modulated radiation therapy for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021;110:682695.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 82.

    Takiar V, Garden AS, Ma D, et al. Reirradiation of head and neck cancers with intensity modulated radiation therapy: outcomes and analyses. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016;95:11171131.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 83.

    Yamazaki H, Ogita M, Himei K, et al. Reirradiation using robotic image-guided stereotactic radiotherapy of recurrent head and neck cancer. J Radiat Res 2016;57:288293.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 84.

    Koutcher L, Lee N, Zelefsky M, et al. Reirradiation of locally recurrent nasopharynx cancer with external beam radiotherapy with or without brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:130137.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 12343 12343 2064
PDF Downloads 5096 5096 795
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0