The Prognostic Role of HPV or p16INK4a Status in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

Authors:
Arfa Mustasam Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

Search for other papers by Arfa Mustasam in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Kevin Parza Department of Hematology Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL

Search for other papers by Kevin Parza in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DO
,
Filip Ionescu Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

Search for other papers by Filip Ionescu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Keerthi Gullapalli Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

Search for other papers by Keerthi Gullapalli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Mahati Paravathaneni Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

Search for other papers by Mahati Paravathaneni in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Youngchul Kim Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

Search for other papers by Youngchul Kim in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Reagan E. Sandstrom University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL

Search for other papers by Reagan E. Sandstrom in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS
,
Majd Al Assaad Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

Search for other papers by Majd Al Assaad in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
G. Daniel Grass Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

Search for other papers by G. Daniel Grass in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Peter Johnstone Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

Search for other papers by Peter Johnstone in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Steven Eschrich Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

Search for other papers by Steven Eschrich in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Houssein Safa Department of Hematology Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX

Search for other papers by Houssein Safa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Juskaran Chadha Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

Search for other papers by Juskaran Chadha in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DO
,
Gabriel Roman Souza Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

Search for other papers by Gabriel Roman Souza in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Jerel David Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

Search for other papers by Jerel David in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Adele Semaan Participant Research, Interventions, and Measurements Core, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

Search for other papers by Adele Semaan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Niki M. Zacharias Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Search for other papers by Niki M. Zacharias in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Curtis Pettaway Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Search for other papers by Curtis Pettaway in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Anna R. Giuliano Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer (CIIRC), Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

Search for other papers by Anna R. Giuliano in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Philippe E. Spiess Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

Search for other papers by Philippe E. Spiess in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
, and
Jad Chahoud Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

Search for other papers by Jad Chahoud in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, MPH
Restricted access

Background: HPV infection is implicated in approximately half of global penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) cases. Previous studies on HPV DNA and p16INK4a status in PSCC have yielded inconclusive prognostic findings. This meta-analysis aims to elucidate the prognostic role of HPV in PSCC by pooling data on disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). Methods: We systematically searched Medline and Embase up to January 2023 for relevant human studies. Data from eligible publications reporting HPV DNA or p16INK4a status, along with and DFS, DSS, or OS outcomes, were extracted. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to synthesize data, with study weights based on size and significance. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019131355). Results: Out of 544 studies screened, 34 publications were included, comprising a pooled sample size of 3,944 patients. p16INK4a-positive status was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39–0.75; I2=31%), DFS (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29–0.94; I2=20%), and DSS (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.23–0.50; I2=18%). HPV DNA positivity was significantly associated with improved DFS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46–0.87; I2=13%) and DSS (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29–0.75; I2=47%) but not OS (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74–1.11; I2=0%). Conclusions: This meta-analysis, comprising the largest number of patients with PSCC to date, shows a notable correlation between p16INK4a immunohistochemistry positivity and survival outcomes. These findings support the understanding that penile cancer cases not associated with HPV tend to behave more aggressively. We support p16INK4a immunohistochemistry testing as part of the initial diagnostic evaluation of patients with PSCC.

Submitted June 21, 2024; final revision received October 4, 2024; accepted for publication October 9, 2024. Published online January 3, 2025.

A. Mustasam and K. Parza contributed equally to this work.

Author contributions: Conceptualization: Semaan, Chahoud. Study design: Chahoud. Literature search: Mustasam, Parza, Sandstrom, Chahoud. Risk of bias assessment: Mustasam, Parza, Sandstrom, Chahoud. Data extraction: Mustasam, Parza, Sandstrom. Data verification: Mustasam, Parza, Sandstrom, Kim, Chahoud. Formal analysis: Mustasam, Parza, Kim. Investigation: Mustasam, Parza, Ionescu, Gullapalli, Paravathaneni, Kim, Sandstrom, Grass, Johnstone, Eschrich, Safa, Chadha, Roman Souza, David, Semaan, Zacharias, Pettaway, Giuliano, Spiess, Chahoud. Writing—original draft: Ionescu, Mustasam, Parza, Sandstrom, Al Assaad, Semaan, Spiess, Chahoud. Writing—review & editing: Mustasam, Parza, Ionescu, Gullapalli, Paravathaneni, Kim, Sandstrom, Grass, Johnstone, Eschrich, Safa, Chadha, Roman Souza, David, Semaan, Zacharias, Pettaway, Giuliano, Spiess, Chahoud.

Data availability statement: All data collected, including the search strategy, the review protocol, and data extraction sheets, are available immediately after publication and are either published as supplementary material or can be accessed through the corresponding author. Protocol link: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=131355

Disclosures: Dr. Chahoud has disclosed receiving grant/research funding from Allogene, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Exelixis, Genentech, Merck, and Pfizer; and serving as a scientific advisor for Merck, Pfizer, Exelixis, Aveo, Eisai, and Mycaregorythm. Dr. Giuliano has disclosed receiving grant/research support from and serving as a scientific advisor for Merck. The remaining authors have disclosed that they have not received any financial consideration from any person or organization to support the preparation, analysis, results, or discussion of this article.

Supplementary material: Supplementary material associated with this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7078. The supplementary material has been supplied by the author(s) and appears in its originally submitted form. It has not been edited or vetted by JNCCN. All contents and opinions are solely those of the author. Any comments or questions related to the supplementary materials should be directed to the corresponding author.

Correspondence: Jad Chahoud, MD, MPH, Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612. Email: Jad.Chahoud@moffitt.org

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 1.87 MB)
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 2023;73:1748.

  • 2.

    Olesen TB, Sand FL, Rasmussen CL, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus DNA and p16(INK4a) in penile cancer and penile intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2019;20:145158.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Thomas A, Necchi A, Muneer A, et al. Penile cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021;7:11.

  • 4.

    Chahoud J, Gleber-Netto FO, McCormick BZ, et al. Whole-exome sequencing in penile squamous cell carcinoma uncovers novel prognostic categorization and drug targets similar to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2021;27:25602570.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Aydin AM, Chahoud J, Adashek JJ, et al. Understanding genomics and the immune environment of penile cancer to improve therapy. Nat Rev Urol 2020;17:555570.

  • 6.

    Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, et al. Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;363:2435.

  • 7.

    Lechner M, Liu J, Masterson L, Fenton TR. HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer: epidemiology, molecular biology and clinical management. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022;19:306327.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    O’Sullivan B, Huang SH, Su J, et al. Development and validation of a staging system for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer by the International Collaboration on Oropharyngeal Cancer Network for Staging (ICON-S): a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:440451.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Chahoud J, Zacharias NM, Pham R, et al. Prognostic significance of p16 and its relationship with human papillomavirus status in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma: results of 5 years follow-up. Cancers 2022;14:6024.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Parza K, Mustasam A, Ionescu F, et al. The prognostic role of human papillomavirus and p16 status in penile squamous cell carcinoma–a systematic review. Cancers (Basel) 2023;15:3713.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Gonzalez SL, Stremlau M, He X, et al. Degradation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor by the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein is important for functional inactivation and is separable from proteasomal degradation of E7. J Virol 2001;75:75837591.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Simoens C, Gheit T, Ridder R, et al. Accuracy of high-risk HPV DNA PCR, p16(INK4a) immunohistochemistry or the combination of both to diagnose HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancer. BMC Infect Dis 2022;22:676.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Mehanna H, Taberna M, von Buchwald C, et al. Prognostic implications of p16 and HPV discordance in oropharyngeal cancer (HNCIG-EPIC-OPC): a multicentre, multinational, individual patient data analysis. Lancet Oncol 2023;24:239251.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Rasmussen JH, Grønhøj C, Håkansson K, et al. Risk profiling based on p16 and HPV DNA more accurately predicts location of disease relapse in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2019;30:629636.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Li Z, Liu P, Wang Z, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus DNA and p16(INK4a) positivity in vulvar cancer and vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2023;24:403414.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Sand FL, Rasmussen CL, Frederiksen MH, et al. Prognostic significance of HPV and p16 status in men diagnosed with penile cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27:11231132.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Ndiaye C, Mena M, Alemany L, et al. HPV DNA, E6/E7 mRNA, and p16INK4a detection in head and neck cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:13191331.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71.

  • 19.

    Liu N, Zhou Y, Lee JJ. IPDfromKM: reconstruct individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021;21:111.

  • 20.

    Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629634.

  • 21.

    Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000;56:455463.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Viechtbauer W, Cheung MWL. Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 2010;1:112125.

  • 23.

    Wiener JS, Effert PJ, Humphrey PA, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in squamous-cell carcinoma of the penis: a retrospective analysis of primary and metastatic lesions by differential polymerase chain reaction. Int J Cancer 1992;50:694701.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Bezerra ALR, Lopes A, Santiago GH, et al. Human papillomavirus as a prognostic factor in carcinoma of the penis: analysis of 82 patients treated with amputation and bilateral lymphadenectomy. Cancer 2001;91:23152321.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Lont AP, Kroon BK, Horenblas S, et al. Presence of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA in penile carcinoma predicts favorable outcome in survival. Int J Cancer 2006;119:10781081.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Guerrero D, Guarch R, Ojer A, et al. Hypermethylation of the thrombospondin-1 gene is associated with poor prognosis in penile squamous cell carcinoma. BJU Int 2008;102:747755.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Scheiner MA, Campos MM, Ornellas AA, et al. Human papillomavirus and penile cancers in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: HPV typing and clinical features. Int Braz J Urol 2008;34:467474.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Ferrándiz-Pulido C, Masferrer E, de Torres I, et al. Identification and genotyping of human papillomavirus in a Spanish cohort of penile squamous cell carcinomas: Correlation with pathologic subtypes, p16(INK4a) expression, and prognosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2013;68:7382.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Gunia S, Erbersdobler A, Hakenberg OW, et al. p16(INK4a) is a marker of good prognosis for primary invasive penile squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional study. J Urol 2012;187:899907.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Bethune G, Campbell J, Rocker A, et al. Clinical and pathologic factors of prognostic significance in penile squamous cell carcinoma in a North American population. Urology 2012;79:10921097.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Di Lorenzo G, Perdonà S, Buonerba C, et al. Cytosolic phosphorylated EGFR is predictive of recurrence in early stage penile cancer patients: a retropective study. J Transl Med 2013;11:161167.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    da Fonseca AG, Soares FA, Burbano RR, et al. Human papilloma virus: prevalence, distribution and predictive value to lymphatic metastasis in penile carcinoma. Int Braz J Urol 2013;39:542550.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Hernandez BY, Goodman MT, Unger ER, et al. Human papillomavirus genotype prevalence in invasive penile cancers from a registry-based United States population. Front Oncol 2014;4:9.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Bezerra SM, Chaux A, Ball MW, et al. Human papillomavirus infection and immunohistochemical p16(INK4a) expression as predictors of outcome in penile squamous cell carcinomas. Hum Pathol 2015;46:532540.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Djajadiningrat RS, Jordanova ES, Kroon BK, et al. Human papillomavirus prevalence in invasive penile cancer and association with clinical outcome. J Urol 2015;193:526531.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    McDaniel AS, Hovelson DH, Cani AK, et al. Genomic profiling of penile squamous cell carcinoma reveals new opportunities for targeted therapy. Cancer Res 2015;75:52195227.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Steinestel J, Al Ghazal A, Arndt A, et al. The role of histologic subtype, p16(INK4a) expression, and presence of human papillomavirus DNA in penile squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2015;15:220.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Tang DH, Clark PE, Giannico G, et al. Lack of P16ink4a over expression in penile squamous cell carcinoma is associated with recurrence after lymph node dissection. J Urol 2015;193:519525.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Zargar-Shoshtari K, Spiess PE, Berglund AE, et al. Clinical significance of p53 and p16(ink4a) status in a contemporary North American penile carcinoma cohort. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2016;14:346351.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Afonso LA, Carestiato FN, Ornellas AA, et al. Human papillomavirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and methylation status of p16ink4a in penile cancer. J Med Virol 2017;89:18371843.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    de Araújo LA, De Paula AAP, de Paula HDSC, et al. Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype distribution in penile carcinoma: association with clinic pathological factors. PLoS One 2018;13:e0199557.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    Ottenhof SR, Djajadiningrat RS, Thygesen HH, et al. The prognostic value of immune factors in the tumor microenvironment of penile squamous cell carcinoma. Front Immunol 2018;9:1253.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    Martins VDA, Pinho JD, Teixeira Júnior AAL, et al. P16INK4a expression in patients with penile cancer. PLoS One 2018;13:e0205350.

  • 44.

    Takamoto D, Kawahara T, Kasuga J, et al. The analysis of human papillomavirus DNA in penile cancer tissue by in situ hybridization. Oncol Lett 2018;15:81028106.

  • 45.

    De Bacco MW, Carvalhal GF, MacGregor B, et al. PD-L1 and p16 expression in penile squamous cell carcinoma from an endemic region. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020;18:e254259.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46.

    Wang B, Gu W, Wan F, et al. Prognosis of the 8th TNM staging system for penile cancer and refinement of prognostication by incorporating high risk human papillomavirus status. J Urol 2020;203:562569.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47.

    Ashley S, Shanks JH, Oliveira P, et al. Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) status may impact treatment outcomes in patients with pre-cancerous penile lesions (an eUROGEN Study). Int J Impot Res 2021;33:620626.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    Pereira-Lourenço M, Vieira E Brito D, Eliseu M, et al. Prognostic value of p16INK4a overexpression in penile cancer. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2020;92:1116.

  • 49.

    Martins VDCA, Cunha IW, Figliuolo G, et al. Presence of HPV with overexpression of p16INK4a protein and EBV infection in penile cancer—a series of cases from Brazil Amazon. PLoS One 2020;15:e0232474.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50.

    Muresu N, Sotgiu G, Saderi L, et al. Italian observational study on HPV infection, E6, and p16 expression in men with penile cancer. Virol J 2020;17:161.

  • 51.

    Chu C, Chen K, Tan X, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus and implication on survival in Chinese penile cancer. Virchows Arch 2020;477:667675.

  • 52.

    Chipollini J, Pollock G, Hsu CH, et al. National trends and survival outcomes of penile squamous cell carcinoma based on human papillomavirus status. Cancer Med 2021;10:74667474.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53.

    Mohanty SK, Mishra SK, Bhardwaj N, et al. p53 and p16ink4a as predictive and prognostic biomarkers for nodal metastasis and survival in a contemporary cohort of penile squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021;19:510520.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54.

    Browne E, Power Foley M, O’Kelly J, et al. The relationship of human papillomavirus positivity with tumor characteristics in an Irish penile cancer population. Can Urol Assoc J 2022;16:435438.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55.

    Chahoud J, Pham R, Sonpavde G. Innovative systemic therapies for penile cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2022;32:816.

  • 56.

    Müller T, Demes M, Lehn A, et al. The peri- and intratumoral immune cell infiltrate and PD-L1 status in invasive squamous cell carcinomas of the penis. Clin Transl Oncol 2022;24:331341.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57.

    Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014;14:135.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 58.

    Philippou P, Shabbir M, Malone P, et al. Conservative surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: resection margins and long-term oncological control. J Urol 2012;188:803808.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 59.

    Hernandez BY, Barnholtz-Sloan J, German RR, et al. Burden of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis in the United States, 1998–2003. Cancer 2008;113(Suppl 10):28832891.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 60.

    Han G, Yang G, Hao D, et al. 9p21 loss confers a cold tumor immune microenvironment and primary resistance to immune checkpoint therapy. Nat Commun 2021;12:5606.

  • 61.

    Flaig TW, Spiess PE, Abern M, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Penile Cancer. Version 1.2025. To view the most recent version, visit https://www.nccn.org

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 62.

    Brouwer OR, Albersen M, Parnham A, et al. European Association of Urology-American Society of Clinical Oncology collaborative guideline on penile cancer: 2023 update. Eur Urol 2023;83:548560.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 31397 31397 1883
PDF Downloads 1900 1900 98
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0