Updates to the Management of Endometrial Cancer

Presented by:
Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum
Search for other papers by Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
Restricted access

Endometrial cancer has moved from being a histologic diagnosis alone to one that also considers the molecular classification of the tumor. Molecular classification is not only feasible but highly recommended because it improves the diagnostic classification and provides prognostic information that may guide treatment. The NCCN Cervical/Uterine Cancers Guidelines recognize the novel approach proposed by FIGO, but has concerns about the 2023 FIGO staging system and therefore does not recommend its use by clinicians. Advances in systemic treatment, particularly the introduction of immunotherapy, has greatly improved outcomes in endometrial cancer, especially for patients with mismatch repair–deficient tumors.

Disclosures: Dr. Abu-Rustum has disclosed receiving grant/research support from GRAIL.

Correspondence: Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum, MD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, H 1305, New York, NY 10065. Email: abu-rusn@mskcc.org
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Bosse T, Nout RA, McAlpine JN, et al. Molecular classification of grade 3 endometrioid endometrial cancers identifies distinct prognostic subgroups. Am J Surg Pathol 2018;42:561568.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Rios-Doria E, Momeni-Boroujeni A, Friedman CF, et al. Integration of clinical sequencing and immunohistochemistry for the molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2023;174:262272.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Berek JS, Matias-Guiu X, Creutzberg C, et al. FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2023;162:383394.

  • 4.

    Dagher C, Mueller JJ, Sonoda Y, et al. Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for the treatment of 2009 FIGO stage II endometrial cancer. Presented at the SGO 2024 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer; March 16, 2024; San Diego, California.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Dagher C, Alwaqfi R, Ellenson LH, et al. Effect of substantial lymphovascular space invasion on patterns of first recurrence in FIGO 2009 surgical stage I endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024;34(Suppl 1):Abstract 587.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Praiss AM, Huang Y, St Clair CM, et al. A modern assessment of the surgical pathologic spread and nodal dissemination of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2020;157:329334.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Abu-Rustum NR. Sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer: a modern approach to surgical staging. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2014;12:288297.

  • 8.

    Makker V, Taylor MH, Aghajanian C, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:29812992.

  • 9.

    Eskander RN, Sill MW, Beffa L, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med 2023;388:21592170.

  • 10.

    Mirza MR, Chase DM, Slomovitz BM, et al. Dostarlimab for primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med 2023;388:21452158.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2527 2528 186
PDF Downloads 1563 1563 128
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0