Risk Stratification and Selection of Management Strategy for Localized Prostate Cancer

Presented by:
Alice Yu
Search for other papers by Alice Yu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, MPH
Restricted access

Localized prostate cancer presents a wide disease spectrum, ranging from indolent cases suitable for active surveillance to aggressive tumors requiring intensive multimodal treatment. Traditional risk stratification tools, such as the D’Amico risk categories and NCCN risk groups, have limitations because of their heterogeneity within each category. Incorporating novel risk stratification strategies, such as genomic classifiers and multimodal artificial intelligence assays, into clinical practice may help refine treatment decisions and optimize outcomes for patients with localized prostate cancer. However, it is important to recognize the limitations of these tools and to use them judiciously in the appropriate clinical contexts.

Disclosures: Dr. Yu has disclosed serving as a consultant for AngioDynamics; and owning equity interest/stock options in Novo Nordisk.

Correspondence: Alice Yu, MD, MPH, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612. Email: alice.yu@moffitt.org
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Klotz L, Vesprini D, Sethukavalan P, et al. Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:272277.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Reese AC, Pierorazio PM, Han M, et al. Contemporary evaluation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network prostate cancer risk classification system. Urology 2012;80:10751079.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Nguyen PL, Haddad Z, Ross AE, et al. Ability of a genomic classifier to predict metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality after radiation or surgery based on needle biopsy specimens. Eur Urol 2017;72:845852.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Spratt DE, Zhang J, Santiago-Jiménez M, et al. Development and validation of a novel integrated-genomic risk group classification for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:581590.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Vince RA Jr, Jiang R, Qi J, et al. Impact of Decipher Biopsy testing on clinical outcomes in localized prostate cancer in a prospective statewide collaborative. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2022;25:677683.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Klein EA, Cooperberg MR, Magi-Galluzzi C, et al. A 17-gene assay to predict prostate cancer aggressiveness in the context of Gleason grade heterogeneity, tumor multifocality, and biopsy undersampling. Eur Urol 2014;66:550560.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Bishoff JT, Freedland SJ, Gerber L, et al. Prognostic utility of the cell cycle progression score generated from biopsy in men treated with prostatectomy. J Urol 2014;192:409414.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Cooperberg MR, Cowan JE, Lindquist KJ, et al. Multiple tissue biomarkers independently and additively predict prostate cancer pathology outcomes. Eur Urol 2021;79:141149.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Spratt DE, Liu VYT, Michalski J, et al. Genomic classifier performance in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: results from NRG Oncology/RTOG 0126 randomized phase 3 trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023;117:370377.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Nguyen PL, Huang HR, Spratt DE, et al. Analysis of a biopsy-based genomic classifier in high-risk prostate cancer: meta-analysis of the NRG Oncology/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9202, 9413, and 9902 phase 3 randomized trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023;116:521529.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Schaeffer EM, Srinivas S, Adra N, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Prostate Cancer. Version 3.2024. Accessed April 2, 2024. To view the most recent version, visit https://www.nccn.org

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Ross AE, Johnson MH, Yousefi K, et al. Tissue-based genomics augments post-prostatectomy risk stratification in a natural history cohort of intermediate- and high-risk men. Eur Urol 2016;69:157165.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Esteva A, Feng J, van der Wal D, et al. Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phae III clinical trials. NPJ Digit Med 2022;5:71.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Spratt DE, Tang S, Sun Y, et al. Artificial intelligence predictive model for hormone therapy use in prostate cancer. NEJM Evid 2023;2:EVIDoa2300023.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1080 1080 116
PDF Downloads 481 481 9
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0