Evaluation of NCI-Designated Cancer Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center Survivorship-Focused Websites: Information Provided and Accessibility

Authors:
Rachel T. Kurtzman NORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, MD

Search for other papers by Rachel T. Kurtzman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Lisa Mikesell School of Communication and Information, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ

Search for other papers by Lisa Mikesell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Benjamin F. Crabtree Family Medicine and Community Health, Research Division, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ

Search for other papers by Benjamin F. Crabtree in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
Restricted access

Background: Individuals with a history of cancer increasingly seek health information from online resources, including NCI-designated Cancer Center websites. Centers receive NCI designation because they provide excellent care and engage in cutting-edge research. However, the information presented on these webpages and their accessibility is unknown. An evaluation of the survivorship-focused webpages from NCI-designated Cancer Centers is needed to assess survivorship information and accessibility of these webpages. Methods: We conducted an evaluation of the survivorship-focused webpages from 64 NCI-designated Cancer Centers. We evaluated where survivorship-focused webpages were housed, if there was a survivorship clinic or program, target audience of the webpage, how cancer survivor was defined, contact methods, and available resources. Accessibility outcomes included readability, font type, font size, color scheme, and alternative text (alt text) descriptors. An artificial intelligence (AI) audit was conducted to assess if the webpage was compliant with national accessibility guidelines. Results: Most cancer centers had a survivorship-focused webpage, with 72% located on the cancer center’s website and 28% on a health system website. Survivorship information available varied considerably and was often lacking in detail. Although three-quarters of webpages targeted patients only, variable definitions of cancer survivor were observed. Accessibility issues identified included inconsistent use of alt text descriptors, font size smaller than 15 points, and color schemes without adequate contrast. The average reading-level of information presented was above 12th grade. Only 9% of webpages were compliant with online accessibility guidelines; 72% semicompliant and 21% were noncompliant. Conclusions: Information presented on NCI-designated Cancer Center survivorship-focused webpages was inconsistent, often lacking, and inaccessible. NCI-designated Cancer Centers are role models for cancer research in the United States and have an obligation to provide survivorship information. Changes to content and website design are needed to provide better information for individuals seeking resources and health information relative to their cancer and care.

Submitted July 21, 2023; final revision received January 23, 2024; accepted for publication February 1, 2024. Published online August 16, 2024.

Author contributions: Conceptualization: All authors. Data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation: All authors. Supervision: Mikesell, Crabtree. Writing—original draft: All authors. Writing—review & editing: All authors.

Data availability statement: All data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (R.T.K.) upon reasonable request.

Disclosures: The authors have disclosed that they have not received any financial consideration from any person or organization to support the preparation, analysis, results, or discussion of this article.

Funding: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01 CA257197.

Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Supplementary material: Supplementary material associated with this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7017. The supplementary material has been supplied by the author(s) and appears in its originally submitted form. It has not been edited or vetted by JNCCN. All contents and opinions are solely those of the author. Any comments or questions related to the supplementary materials should be directed to the corresponding author.

Correspondence: Rachel T. Kurtzman, PhD, NORC at the University of Chicago, 55 East Monroe Street, 30th Floor, Chicago, IL 60603. Email: Rachelkurtzman@gmail.com

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 545 KB)
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Jia X, Pang Y, Liu LS. Online health information seeking behavior: a systematic review. Healthcare (Basel) 2021;9:1740.

  • 2.

    Roach AR, Lykins EL, Gochett CG, et al. Differences in cancer information-seeking behavior, preferences, and awareness between cancer survivors and healthy controls: a national, population-based survey. J Cancer Educ 2009;24:7379.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Lleras de Frutos M, Casellas-Grau A, Sumalla EC, et al. A systematic and comprehensive review of internet use in cancer patients: psychological factors. Psychooncology 2020;29:616.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Davis SN, O’Malley DM, Bator A, et al. Correlates of information seeking behaviors and experiences among adult cancer survivors in the USA. J Cancer Educ 2021;36:12531260.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Jiang S, Liu PL. Digital divide and Internet health information seeking among cancer survivors: a trend analysis from 2011 to 2017. Psychooncology 2020;29:6167.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Rolland B, Eschler J. Searching for survivor-specific services at NCI- designated comprehensive cancer centers: a qualitative assessment. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018;16:839844.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Dolce MC. The internet as a source of health information: experiences of cancer survivors and caregivers with healthcare providers. Oncol Nurs Forum 2011;38:353359.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Budenz A, Sleight AG, Klein WMP. A qualitative study of online information-seeking preferences among cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2022;16:892903.

  • 9.

    Frosch ZAK, Illenberger N, Mitra N, et al. Trends in patient volume by hospital type and the association of these trends with time to cancer treatment initiation. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2115675.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    National Cancer Institute. NCI-designated Cancer Centers. Accessed December 5, 2022. Available at: https://www.cancer.gov/research/infrastructure/cancer-centers

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    National Cancer Institute. Trends in survivorship grant funding. Accessed December 15, 2023. Available at: https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/ocs/funding/trends-survivorship-grant-funding

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Hawkins B, Costello K, Veinot T, et al. Health information behavior research with marginalized populations. Proc Assoc Inf Sci Technol 2017;54:562565.

  • 13.

    Berget G, Herstad J, Sandnes FE. Search, read and write: an inquiry into web accessibility for people with dyslexia. Stud Health Technol Inform 2016;229:450460.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Phan A, Jubril A, Menga E, et al. Readability of the most commonly accessed online patient education materials pertaining to surgical treatments of the spine. World Neurosurg 2021;152:e583588.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    ADA Site Compliance. Is website accessibility a legal requirement? Accessed December 8, 2022. Available at: https://adasitecompliance.com/website-accessibility-legal-requirement/

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Patel CB, Kerr N, Ahmadi O, et al. Evaluation of readability and reliability of online patient information for intracranial aneurysms. ANZ J Surg 2022;92:843847.

  • 17.

    Ahmadi O, Louw J, Leinonen H, et al. Glioblastoma: assessment of the readability and reliability of online information. Br J Neurosurg 2021;35:551554.

  • 18.

    Volsky PG, Baldassari CM, Mushti S, et al. Quality of Internet information in pediatric otolaryngology: a comparison of three most referenced websites. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012;76:13121316.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Skalitzky MK, Gulbrandsen TR, Lorentzen W, et al. Health literacy in clubfoot: a quantitative assessment of the readability, understandability and actionability of online patient education material. Iowa Orthop 2021;41:6167.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Krupa A, Roark JB, Barrett K. The critical role of web accessibility in health information access, understanding, and use. Accessed December 5, 2022. Available at: https://ahimafoundation.org/media/wplbdhso/the-critical-role-of-web-accessibility-in-health-information-access-understanding-and-use.pdf

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    JavaTpoint. Difference between webpage and website. Accessed January 10, 2023. Available at: https://www.javatpoint.com/webpage-vs-website

  • 22.

    Clear Language and Design. Clear language and design. Accessed July 21, 2023. Available at: https://clad.tccld.org/measuring-readability/

  • 23.

    IW3C Web Accessibility Initiative. Introduction to web accessibility. Accessed December 8, 2022. Available at: https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-intro/

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    accessiBe Inc. accessScan overview. Accessed December 9, 2022. Available at: https://accessibe.com/accessscan

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Elstad E, Carpenter DM, Devellis RF, Blalock SJ. Patient decision making in the face of conflicting medication information. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being. Published online August 28, 2012. doi:10.3402/qhw.v7i0.18523

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Yoon H, Sohn M, Choi M, et al. Conflicting online health information and rational decision making: implication for cancer survivors. Health Care Manag (Frederick) 2017;36:184191.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    National Cancer Institute. For survivors and caregivers. Accessed February 14, 2023. Available at: https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/ocs/resources/survivors

  • 28.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cancer survivors. Accessed February 14, 2023. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/survivors/index.htm

  • 29.

    American Cancer Society. Tools for cancer survivors and caregivers. Accessed February 14, 2023. Available at: https://www.cancer.org/health-care-professionals/national-cancer-survivorship-resource-center/tools-for-cancer-survivors-and-caregivers.html

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    National Cancer Institute. Definition of survivor. Accessed December 9, 2022. Available at: https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/survivor

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    National Center for Education Statistics Highlights of PIAAC 2017 U.S. results. Accessed February 9, 2023. Available at: https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/piaac/national_results.asp

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD skills outlook 2013: first results from the survey of adult skills. Accessed December 5, 2022. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/oecd-skills-outlook-2013_9789264204256-en

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    National Center for Education Statistics. U.S. skills map: state & county indicators of adult literacy & numeracy (including age and education groups). Accessed December 5, 2022. Available at: https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/piaac/skillsmap/

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    National Institutes of Health. Health literacy. Accessed February 9, 2023. Available at: https://www.nih.gov/institutes-nih/nih-office-director/office-communications-public-liaison/clear-communication/health-literacy

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA, eds. Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Accessed February 9, 2023. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK216035/

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Coughlin SS, Datta B, Vernon M, et al. Health literacy among cancer survivors: results from the 2016 behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022;101:e29010.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Diviani N, van den Putte B, Giani S, et al. Low health literacy and evaluation of online health information: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e112.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Kim K, Lustria MLA, Burke D, et al. Predictors of cancer information overload: findings from a national survey. Inf Res 2007;12:132.

  • 39.

    Utah State University. WAVE web accessibility evaluation tools. Accessed December 6, 2022. Available at: https://wave.webaim.org/

  • 40.

    University of North Coralina at Chapel Hill. Color contrast: what is color contrast? Accessed March 22, 2023. Available at: https://digitalaccessibility.unc.edu/resources/top-10-tips/color-contrast/

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    University of Maine System. Color contrast ratios—accessibility guide. Accessed March 22, 2023. Available at: https://www.maine.edu/content-management/accessibility/color-ratio/

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    World Wide Web Consortium. Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. Accessed March 22, 2023. Available at: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#contrast-minimum

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    Rello L, Baeza-Yates R. Good fonts for dyslexia. A Comput Mach. Published online October 21, 2013. doi:10.1145/2513383.2513447

  • 44.

    Pennsylvania State University. Bold and italic formatting in HTML. Accessed March 22, 2023. Available at: https://accessibility.psu.edu/boldfacehtml/

  • 45.

    Siteimprove. Accessibility: the use of emphasis in text. Accessed March 22, 2023. Available at: https://help.siteimprove.com/support/solutions/articles/80000448460-accessibility-the-use-of-emphasis-in-text

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 46.

    World Wide Web Consortium. Readable: understanding guideline 3.1. Accessed March 22, 2023. Available at: https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/meaning.html

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47.

    WebAIM. Alternative text. Accessed March 22, 2023. Available at: https://webaim.org/techniques/alttext/

  • 48.

    WebAIM. WebAIM’s WCAG 2 checklist. Accessed March 22, 2023. Available at: https://webaim.org/standards/wcag/checklist

  • 49.

    World Wide Web Consortium. Section headings: understanding SC 2.4.10. Accessed March 22, 2023. Available at: https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/navigation-mechanisms-headings.html

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50.

    World Wide Web Consortium. Providing heading elements at the beginning of each section of content. Accessed March 22, 2023. Available at: https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Techniques/html/H69.html

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51.

    US General Services Administration. Accessibility for teams: typography. Accessed March 22, 2023. Available at: https://digital.gov/guides/accessibility-for-teams/visual-design/#typography

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52.

    University of North Carolina Greensboro. Making design elements accessible. Accessed March 22, 2023. Available at: https://accessibility.uncg.edu/getting-started-with-accessibility/accessible-design/

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 951 951 948
PDF Downloads 270 270 270
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0