21-Gene Recurrence Score and Survival Outcomes in the Phase III Multicenter TAILORx Clinical Trial

Authors:
Sherry X. Yang Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

Search for other papers by Sherry X. Yang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
John Yu ELIASSEN Group, Reston, VA

Search for other papers by John Yu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BA
, and
Molin Wang Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard University T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA

Search for other papers by Molin Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
Restricted access

Background: Recurrence score (RS) based on a 21-gene genomic assay is frequently used to estimate risk of distant recurrence for choice of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. It remains unclear whether RS is an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) in the TAILORx trial population. Methods: We evaluated the association of RS with BCSS and OS plus recurrence-free interval (RFI) and invasive disease–free survival (DFS) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, adjusting for clinicopathologic measures, in 8,916 patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer. Likelihood ratio (LR) test was used to assess the relative amount of prognostic information provided by RS to BCSS, OS, RFI, and DFS, comparatively. Results: Event rates for BCSS, OS, RFI, and DFS were 1.7%, 5.2%, 5.6%, and 12.6%, respectively, by up to 11.6 years of follow-up. Compared with low-range RS (0–10), patients with midrange (11–25) and high-range (26–100) RS had inferior BCSS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 5.12 [95% CI, 2.09–16.92] and 8.03 [95% CI, 2.91–28.47], respectively) and RFI (aHR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.23–2.36] and 3.05 [95% CI, 2.02–4.67], respectively), independent of clinicopathologic factors. High-range score was associated with an increased risk of DFS (aHR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.20–2.04]) but not significantly associated with OS (aHR, 1.44 [95% CI, 0.95–2.18]). Midrange score was associated with neither DFS (aHR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.96–1.38]) nor OS (HR 1.14 [95% CI, 0.87–1.52]). LR-χ2 values were 83.0 and 65.1 for RFI and BCSS, respectively, and 17.5 and 33.6 for OS and DFS, respectively (P<.0001). Conclusions: RS is an independent measure for BCSS and recurrence prognoses relative to OS in early-stage breast cancer. It carries more prognostic information for breast cancer–specific outcomes.

Submitted May 1, 2023; final revision received October 18, 2023; accepted for publication January 16, 2024. Published online July 17, 2024.

Author contributions: Study concept and design: Yang. Data analysis and interpretation: All authors. Manuscript preparation: All authors.

Data availability statement: The TAILORx trial Dataset NCT00310180-D1 can be obtained from the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) Data Archive of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) after approval. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Disclosures: The authors have disclosed that they have not received any financial consideration from any person or organization to support the preparation, analysis, results, or discussion of this article.

Funding: This study was supported in part by the Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis at the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (S.X. Yang).

Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The manuscript was prepared using the Dataset NCT00310180-D1 from the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) Data Archive of the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Data were originally collected from clinical trial NCT00310180: Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer. All analyses and conclusions in this manuscript are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of the clinical trial investigators, the NCTN, or the NCI.

Supplementary material: Supplementary material associated with this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7008. The supplementary material has been supplied by the author(s) and appears in its originally submitted form. It has not been edited or vetted by JNCCN. All contents and opinions are solely those of the author. Any comments or questions related to the supplementary materials should be directed to the corresponding author.

Correspondence: Sherry Yang, MD, Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, 4W/426, Rockville, MD 20892. Email: Sherry.Yang@nih.gov

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 649 KB)
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM, et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 2019;69:438451.

  • 2.

    Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;351:28172826.

  • 3.

    Andre F, Ismaila N, Allison KH, et al. Biomarkers for adjuvant endocrine and chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2022;40:18161837.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Sparano JA, Crager MR, Tang G, et al. Development and validation of a tool integrating the 21-gene recurrence score and clinical-pathological features to individualize prognosis and prediction of chemotherapy benefit in early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021;39:557564.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:111121.

  • 6.

    Nguyen D, Yu J, Reinhold WC, et al. Association of independent prognostic factors and treatment modality with survival and recurrence outcomes in breast cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e207213.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Hudis CA, Barlow WE, Costantino JP, et al. Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: the STEEP system. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:21272132.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996;15:361387.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Sparano JA, Wang M, Martino S, et al. Weekly paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2008;358:16631671.

  • 10.

    Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, et al. Prospective validation of a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;373:20052014.

  • 11.

    Dowsett M, Sestak I, Lopez-Knowles E, et al. Comparison of PAM50 risk of recurrence score with oncotype DX and IHC4 for predicting risk of distant recurrence after endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:27832790.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast Cancer. Version 2.2024. Accessed March 20, 2024. To view the most recent version, visit https://www.nccn.org

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Untch M, Pérol D, Mayer EL, et al. Disease-free survival (DFS) as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with HR+/HER2− early breast cancer (EBC): a correlation analysis. J Clin Oncol 2023;41(Suppl):Abstract 535.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Ecker BL, Lee J, Saadat LV, et al. Recurrence-free survival versus overall survival as a primary endpoint for studies of resected colorectal liver metastasis: a retrospective study and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2022;23:13321342.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, et al. Trial assigning individualized options for treatment (TAILORx): an update including 12-year event rates. Cancer Res 2023;83(Suppl 5):Abstract GS1-05.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Paik S, Tang G, Shak S, et al. Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:37263734.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Lafourcade A, His M, Baglietto L, et al. Factors associated with breast cancer recurrences or mortality and dynamic prediction of death using history of cancer recurrences: the French E3N cohort. BMC Cancer 2018;18:171.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    American Cancer Society. Breast cancer: facts & figures 2022–2024. Accessed October 28, 2023. Available at: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/breast-cancer-facts-and-figures/2022-2024-breast-cancer-fact-figures-acs.pdf

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    European Commission. Long term estimates of cancer incidence and mortality, for all countries. Accessed March 8, 2023. Available at: https://ecis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/explorer.php

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Ravdin PM, et al. Clinical and genomic risk to guide the use of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;380:23952405.

  • 21.

    Narod SA. Breast cancer in young women. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2012;9:460470.

  • 22.

    Brandt J, Garne JP, Tengrup I, et al. Age at diagnosis in relation to survival following breast cancer: a cohort study. World J Surg Oncol 2015;13:33.

  • 23.

    Francis PA, Pagani O, Fleming GF, et al. Tailoring adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:122137.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 3193 3193 2210
PDF Downloads 2326 2326 1714
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0