Current and Emerging Biomarkers: Impact on Risk Stratification for Neuroblastoma

Authors:
Meredith S. Irwin Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Search for other papers by Meredith S. Irwin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
and
Kelly C. Goldsmith Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA

Search for other papers by Kelly C. Goldsmith in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
Restricted access

Neuroblastoma has heterogenous clinical presentations that are reflected by several well-defined clinical factors and biomarkers. Combinations of these clinical and biologic prognostic factors have been used for decades to generate classifiers to stratify patients into risk groups (low, intermediate, and high), which in turn are used to inform and tailor treatment as reported in the new NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Neuroblastoma. Risk classification uses clinical features, such as age and tumor stage, along with the most significant prognostic tumor biomarkers, including histologic features (differentiation and mitosis-karyorrhexis index), MYCN amplification status, chromosomal copy number alterations (segmental or numerical), and ploidy (DNA content). Recent next-generation sequencing approaches have identified additional tumor-specific genetic factors that have potential roles as prognostic and predictive biomarkers. These emerging biomarkers include telomerase maintenance mechanisms, such as telomerase reverse transcription (TERT) expression and alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) status. Somatic alterations of genes, including mutations in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene ALK, detected in >10% of patients with newly diagnosed disease, have both prognostic and predictive roles in determining eligibility for targeted therapies (eg, ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors). In addition to diagnostic tumor-derived biomarkers, significant effort is being directed toward identification of markers to predict response to chemotherapy and immunotherapies. With the increasing use of GD2-containing immunotherapy regimens, efforts are aimed at identifying host or tumor microenvironment immune correlatives that can serve as predictive biomarkers. Understanding the potential role of liquid biopsies as biomarkers during and following treatment, including sequential circulating tumor DNA or tumor-specific mRNA transcripts, is expected to enhance the ability to predict recurrences and also inform understanding of tumor evolution and therapy resistance. These and other emerging biomarkers will lead to refinement and optimization of future neuroblastoma risk classification systems.

Submitted March 10, 2024; accepted for publication June 19, 2024.

Disclosures: The authors have disclosed not having any financial interests, arrangements, affiliations, or commercial interests with the manufacturers of any products discussed in this article or their competitors.

Correspondence: Meredith Irwin, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G1X8. Email: meredith.irwin@sickkids.ca
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Liang WH, Federico SM, London WB, et al. Tailoring therapy for children with neuroblastoma on the basis of risk group classification: past, present, and future. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2020;4:895905.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Pinto NR, Applebaum MA, Volchenboum SL, et al. Advances in risk classification and treatment strategies for neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:30083017.

  • 3.

    Irwin MS, Park JR. Neuroblastoma: paradigm for precision medicine. Pediatr Clin North Am 2015;62:225256.

  • 4.

    Monclair T, Brodeur GM, Ambros PF, et al. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) staging system: an INRG Task Force report. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:298303.

  • 5.

    Cohn SL, Pearson AD, London WB, et al. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system: an INRG Task Force report. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:289297.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Irwin MS, Naranjo A, Zhang FF, et al. Revised neuroblastoma risk classification system: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2021;39:32293241.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Bagatell R, Park JR, Acharya S, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Neuroblastoma. Version 1.2024. Accessed June 27, 2024. To view the most recent version, visit https://www.nccn.org

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Brisse HJ, McCarville MB, Granata C, et al. Guidelines for imaging and staging of neuroblastic tumors: consensus report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Project. Radiology 2011;261:243257.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Sokol E, Desai AV, Applebaum MA, et al. Age, diagnostic category, tumor grade, and mitosis-karyorrhexis index are independently prognostic in neuroblastoma: an INRG project. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:19061918.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    London WB, Castleberry RP, Matthay KK, et al. Evidence for an age cutoff greater than 365 days for neuroblastoma risk group stratification in the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:64596465.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Shimada H, Ambros IM, Dehner LP, et al. Terminology and morphologic criteria of neuroblastic tumors: recommendations by the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Committee. Cancer 1999;86:349363.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Ambros PF, Ambros IM, Brodeur GM, et al. International consensus for neuroblastoma molecular diagnostics: report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Biology Committee. Br J Cancer 2009;100:14711482.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Seeger RC, Brodeur GM, Sather H, et al. Association of multiple copies of the N-myc oncogene with rapid progression of neuroblastomas. N Engl J Med 1985;313:11111116.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Campbell K, Gastier-Foster JM, Mann M, et al. Association of MYCN copy number with clinical features, tumor biology, and outcomes in neuroblastoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Cancer 2017;123:42244235.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Campbell K, Naranjo A, Hibbitts E, et al. Association of heterogeneous MYCN amplification with clinical features, biological characteristics and outcomes in neuroblastoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Eur J Cancer 2020;133:112119.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Wang LL, Teshiba R, Ikegaki N, et al. Augmented expression of MYC and/or MYCN protein defines highly aggressive MYC-driven neuroblastoma: a Children’s Oncology Group study. Br J Cancer 2015;113:5763.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Pinto N, Naranjo A, Ding X, et al. Impact of genomic and clinical factors on outcome of children ≥18 months of age with stage 3 neuroblastoma with unfavorable histology and without MYCN amplification: a Children’s Oncology Group (COG) report. Clin Cancer Res 2023;29:15461556.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Pinto N, Naranjo A, Hibbitts E, et al. Predictors of differential response to induction therapy in high-risk neuroblastoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group (COG). Eur J Cancer 2019;112:6679.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Schleiermacher G, Michon J, Ribeiro A, et al. Segmental chromosomal alterations lead to a higher risk of relapse in infants with MYCN-non- amplified localised unresectable/disseminated neuroblastoma (a SIOPEN collaborative study). Br J Cancer 2011;105:19401948.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Janoueix-Lerosey I, Schleiermacher G, Michels E, et al. Overall genomic pattern is a predictor of outcome in neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:10261033.

  • 21.

    Bagatell R, DuBois SG, Naranjo A, et al. Children’s Oncology Group’s 2023 blueprint for research: neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023;70(Suppl 6):e30572.

  • 22.

    Chicard M, Boyault S, Colmet Daage L, et al. Genomic copy number profiling using circulating free tumor DNA highlights heterogeneity in neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2016;22:55645573.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Morgenstern DA, Bagatell R, Cohn SL, et al. The challenge of defining “ultra-high-risk” neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019;66:e27556.

  • 24.

    Rosswog C, Fassunke J, Ernst A, et al. Genomic ALK alterations in primary and relapsed neuroblastoma. Br J Cancer 2023;128:15591571.

  • 25.

    Bresler SC, Weiser DA, Huwe PJ, et al. ALK mutations confer differential oncogenic activation and sensitivity to ALK inhibition therapy in neuroblastoma. Cancer Cell 2014;26:682694.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Eleveld TF, Oldridge DA, Bernard V, et al. Relapsed neuroblastomas show frequent RAS-MAPK pathway mutations. Nat Genet 2015;47:864871.

  • 27.

    Bellini A, Pötschger U, Bernard V, et al. Frequency and prognostic impact of ALK amplifications and mutations in the European Neuroblastoma Study Group (SIOPEN) High-Risk Neuroblastoma Trial (HR-NBL1). J Clin Oncol 2021;39:33773390.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Fischer M, Moreno L, Ziegler DS, et al. Ceritinib in paediatric patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive malignancies: an open-label, multicentre, phase 1, dose-escalation and dose-expansion study. Lancet Oncol 2021;22:17641776.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Goldsmith KC, Park JR, Kayser K, et al. Lorlatinib with or without chemotherapy in ALK-driven refractory/relapsed neuroblastoma: phase 1 trial results. Nat Med 2023;29:10921102.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Foster JH, Voss SD, Hall DC, et al. Activity of crizotinib in patients with ALK-aberrant relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma: a Children’s Oncology Group Study (ADVL0912). Clin Cancer Res 2021;27:35433548.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Pugh TJ, Morozova O, Attiyeh EF, et al. The genetic landscape of high-risk neuroblastoma. Nat Genet 2013;45:279284.

  • 32.

    Sausen M, Leary RJ, Jones S, et al. Integrated genomic analyses identify ARID1A and ARID1B alterations in the childhood cancer neuroblastoma. Nat Genet 2013;45:1217.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Bellini A, Bessoltane-Bentahar N, Bhalshankar J, et al. Study of chromatin remodeling genes implicates SMARCA4 as a putative player in oncogenesis in neuroblastoma. Int J Cancer 2019;145:27812791.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Molenaar JJ, Koster J, Zwijnenburg DA, et al. Sequencing of neuroblastoma identifies chromothripsis and defects in neuritogenesis genes. Nature 2012;483:589593.

  • 35.

    Kim J, Vaksman Z, Egolf LE, et al. Germline pathogenic variants in neuroblastoma patients are enriched in BARD1 and predict worse survival. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024;116:149159.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Meeser A, Bartenhagen C, Werr L, et al. Reliable assessment of telomere maintenance mechanisms in neuroblastoma. Cell Biosci 2022;12:160.

  • 37.

    Ackermann S, Cartolano M, Hero B, et al. A mechanistic classification of clinical phenotypes in neuroblastoma. Science 2018;362:11651170.

  • 38.

    Cheung NK, Zhang J, Lu C, et al. Association of age at diagnosis and genetic mutations in patients with neuroblastoma. JAMA 2012;307:10621071.

  • 39.

    Zeineldin M, Federico S, Chen X, et al. MYCN amplification and ATRX mutations are incompatible in neuroblastoma. Nat Commun 2020;11:913.

  • 40.

    Koneru B, Lopez G, Farooqi A, et al. Telomere maintenance mechanisms define clinical outcome in high-risk neuroblastoma. Cancer Res 2020;80:26632675.

  • 41.

    Fischer-Mertens J, Otte F, Roderwieser A, et al. Telomerase-targeting compounds Imetelstat and 6-thio-dG act synergistically with chemotherapy in high-risk neuroblastoma models. Cell Oncol (Dordr) 2022;45:9911003.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    Koneru B, Farooqi A, Nguyen TH, et al. ALT neuroblastoma chemoresistance due to telomere dysfunction-induced ATM activation is reversible with ATM inhibitor AZD0156. Sci Transl Med 2021;13.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    Asgharzadeh S, Salo JA, Ji L, et al. Clinical significance of tumor-associated inflammatory cells in metastatic neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:35253532.

  • 44.

    Oberthuer A, Juraeva D, Hero B, et al. Revised risk estimation and treatment stratification of low- and intermediate-risk neuroblastoma patients by integrating clinical and molecular prognostic markers. Clin Cancer Res 2015;21:19041915.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45.

    van Groningen T, Koster J, Valentijn LJ, et al. Neuroblastoma is composed of two super-enhancer-associated differentiation states. Nat Genet 2017;49:12611266.

  • 46.

    Westerhout EM, Hamdi M, Stroeken P, et al. Mesenchymal-type neuroblastoma cells escape ALK inhibitors. Cancer Res 2022;82:484496.

  • 47.

    Mabe NW, Huang M, Dalton GN, et al. Transition to a mesenchymal state in neuroblastoma confers resistance to anti-GD2 antibody via reduced expression of ST8SIA1. Nat Cancer 2022;3:976993.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    Vayani OR, Kaufman ME, Moore K, et al. Adrenergic and mesenchymal signatures are identifiable in cell-free DNA and correlate with metastatic disease burden in children with neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2024;71:e30735.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    Park JR, Bagatell R, Cohn SL, et al. Revisions to the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria: a consensus statement from the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:25802587.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50.

    Beiske K, Burchill SA, Cheung IY, et al. Consensus criteria for sensitive detection of minimal neuroblastoma cells in bone marrow, blood and stem cell preparations by immunocytology and QRT-PCR: recommendations by the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Task Force. Br J Cancer 2009;100:16271637.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51.

    Marachelian A, Villablanca JG, Liu CW, et al. Expression of five neuroblastoma genes in bone marrow or blood of patients with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma provides a new biomarker for disease and prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23:53745383.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52.

    Viprey VF, Gregory WM, Corrias MV, et al. Neuroblastoma mRNAs predict outcome in children with stage 4 neuroblastoma: a European HR-NBL1/SIOPEN study. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:10741083.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53.

    Klega K, Imamovic-Tuco A, Ha G, et al. Detection of somatic structural variants enables quantification and characterization of circulating tumor DNA in children with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol Precis Oncol 2018;2018.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54.

    Abbou SD, Shulman DS, DuBois SG, Crompton BD. Assessment of circulating tumor DNA in pediatric solid tumors: the promise of liquid biopsies. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019;66:e27595.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55.

    Bosse KR, Giudice AM, Lane MV, et al. Serial profiling of circulating tumor DNA identifies dynamic evolution of clinically actionable genomic alterations in high-risk neuroblastoma. Cancer Discov 2022;12:28002819.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56.

    Berko ER, Witek G, Matkar S, et al. Circulating tumor DNA reveals mechanisms of lorlatinib resistance in patients with relapsed/refractory ALK driven neuroblastoma. Nat Commun 2023;14:2601.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57.

    Balis FM, Busch CM, Desai AV, et al. The ganglioside G(D2) as a circulating tumor biomarker for neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020;67:e28031.

  • 58.

    Keyel ME, Furr KL, Kang MH, Reynolds CP. A multi-color flow cytometric assay for quantifying dinutuximab binding to neuroblastoma cells in tumor, bone marrow, and blood. J Clin Med 2023;12:6223.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 59.

    Delgado DC, Hank JA, Kolesar J, et al. Genotypes of NK cell KIR receptors, their ligands, and Fcγ receptors in the response of neuroblastoma patients to Hu14.18-IL2 immunotherapy. Cancer Res 2010;70:95549561.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 60.

    Cheung NK, Cheung IY, Kushner BH, et al. Murine anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody 3F8 combined with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and 13-cis-retinoic acid in high-risk patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma in first remission. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:32643270.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 61.

    Venstrom JM, Zheng J, Noor N, et al. KIR and HLA genotypes are associated with disease progression and survival following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for high-risk neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:73307334.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 62.

    Bona K, Li Y, Winestone LE, et al. Poverty and targeted immunotherapy: survival in Children’s Oncology Group clinical trials for high-risk neuroblastoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021;113:282291.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63.

    Bona K, Blonquist TM, Neuberg DS, et al. Impact of socioeconomic status on timing of relapse and overall survival for children treated on Dana-Farber Cancer Institute ALL Consortium protocols (2000–2010). Pediatr Blood Cancer 2016;63:10121018.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 64.

    Bona K, Brazauskas R, He N, et al. Neighborhood poverty and pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes: a CIBMTR analysis. Blood 2021;137:556568.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65.

    Henderson TO, Bhatia S, Pinto N, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in risk and survival in children with neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:7682.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1718 1718 1718
PDF Downloads 998 998 998
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0