Empowering Care Teams: Redefining Message Management to Enhance Care Delivery and Alleviate Oncologist Burnout
Search for other papers by Brandon Anderson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Liisa Lyon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael Lee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Deepika Kumar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elad Neeman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ali Duffens in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dinesh Kotak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hongxin Sun in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mary Reed in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
Search for other papers by Raymond Liu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background: Widespread adoption of secure messaging (SM) provides patients with cancer with unprecedented access to medical providers at the expense of increased workload for oncologists. Herein, we analyze oncology SM clinical content and acuity and translate these to estimated cost savings from reduced appointments. Methods: This population-based retrospective cohort study examined the content of patient-initiated SM threads exchanged through the patient portal website or app over 1 year (June 1, 2021–May 31, 2022) at 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California oncology practices, which typically do not have patient copayments associated with SM. A random sample of 500 SM threads were reviewed and categorized by message content, acuity, and appropriate level of service. Cost and time estimates were used to compare the cost of SM management by oncologists alone versus assisted by medical assistants and nurses. Results: During the study, 41,272 patients initiated 334,053 unique SM threads to 132 oncologists. Of the SM threads reviewed, only 26.8% required oncologist expertise. Based on thread content, the remaining 73.2% may have been better managed by a nurse (38.2%), medical assistant (28.4%), primary care physician (5.4%), or another subspecialty provider (1.2%). Emergency care was recommended in 2.4% of the threads reviewed. Significant medical care was provided to patients in 24.4% of the reviewed threads that would typically require an appointment. We estimate that the SM exchanges provided $11.2 million in care, including $3.6 million in avoided out-of-pocket copayment costs to patients and $7.6 million in missed billing codes. Conclusions: High utilization of SM generates additional workload for oncologists that could mostly be appropriately managed by alternate providers. The magnitude of unreimbursed medical care provided via SM and the use of SM for emergent medical situations creates an urgent need for new practice models. An alternative architecture for triaging, managing, and billing SM could reduce costs and oncologist burnout.
Submitted January 15, 2024; final revision received July 3, 2024; accepted for publication July 8, 2024.
Author contributions: Conceptualization: Anderson, Neeman, Kotak, Liu. Data curation: Anderson, Lyon, Sun. Formal analysis: Anderson, Lyon, Lee, Kumar, Neeman, Sun, Reed, Liu. Investigation: Anderson. Methodology: Anderson, Lee, Kumar, Neeman, Sun, Liu. Project administration: Anderson, Kotak, Reed, Liu. Supervision: Kotak, Liu. Writing—original draft: Anderson, Lyon, Duffens, Sun. Writing—review & editing: All authors.
Disclosures: The authors have disclosed that they have not received any financial considerations from any person or organization to support the preparation, analysis, results, or discussion of this article.
Funding: This work was supported by funding from Kaiser Permanente Division of Research.
© 2019-2024 National Comprehensive Cancer Network