Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Prostate Cancer Based on Existence of Cardiovascular Risk

Authors:
Alice DragomirDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada

Search for other papers by Alice Dragomir in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MSc, PhD
,
Nawar ToumaFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Search for other papers by Nawar Touma in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Jason HuFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Search for other papers by Jason Hu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MSc
,
Sylvie PerreaultFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada

Search for other papers by Sylvie Perreault in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Armen G. AprikianDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada

Search for other papers by Armen G. Aprikian in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
View More View Less
Restricted access

Background: Controversy exists regarding the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) associated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with prostate cancer. We sought to evaluate the association between gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists versus GnRH antagonist and the risk of CVD in patients with prostate cancer with or without prior CVD. Patients and Methods: Using administrative databases from Quebec, Canada, we identified first-time GnRH agonists and antagonist (degarelix) users between January 2012 and June 2016. Follow-up ended at the earliest of the following: first CVD event (myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, ischemic heart disease [IHD], arrhythmia, and heart failure [HF]); switch of GnRH group; death; or December 31, 2016. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on the propensity score was used to control for potential confounding. IPTW-Cox proportional hazards model accounting for competing risks was used to evaluate the association of interest. Results: Among 10,785 patients identified, 10,201 and 584 were on GnRH agonists and antagonist, respectively. Median age was 75 years (interquartile range, 69–81 years) for both groups. A total of 4,152 (40.7%) men in the GnRH agonists group and 281 (48.1%) men in the GnRH antagonist group had CVD in the 3-year period prior to ADT initiation. Risk of HF was decreased in the antagonist group compared with the GnRH agonist group among patients with prior CVD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26–0.79). Risk of IHD was decreased in the antagonist group in patients without prior CVD (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.11–0.65). Use of antagonist was associated with an increased risk of arrhythmia among patients with no prior CVD (HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.63–3.36). Conclusions: Compared with GnRH agonists, the GnRH antagonist was found to be associated with a decreased risk of HF, specifically among patients with prior CVD. Among those with no prior CVD, the GnRH antagonist was associated with a decreased risk of IHD but an increased risk of arrhythmia.

Submitted April 5, 2022; final revision received September 28, 2022; accepted for publication September 29, 2022.

Author contributions: Study concept and design: Dragomir, Aprikian. Data collection: Dragomir, Touma. Analysis and interpretation of results: All authors. Manuscript preparation and/or critical revision: All authors.

Disclosures: The authors have disclosed that they have not received any financial consideration from any person or organization to support the preparation, analysis, results, or discussion of this article.

Funding: Alice Dragomir is a recipient of the FRQ-S Chercheur boursier Junior 2 award. Jason Hu is a recipient of the FRQ-S–doctoral program bursary. This study was funded by the Rossy Cancer Network and by the Réseau québécois de recherche sur les médicaments.

Correspondence: Alice Dragomir, MSc, PhD, Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Second Floor, 2B.45, 5252 de Maisonneuve West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4A 3S5. Email: alice.dragomir@mcgill.ca
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Lester JF, Mason MD. Cardiovascular effects of hormone therapy for prostate cancer. Drug Healthc Patient Saf 2015;7:129138.

  • 2.

    Litwin MS, Tan HJ. The diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: a review. JAMA 2017;317:25322542.

  • 3.

    Lomax AJ, Parente P, Gilfillan C, et al. ‘First, do no harm’: managing the metabolic impacts of androgen deprivation in men with advanced prostate cancer. Intern Med J 2016;46:141148.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Nguyen PL, Alibhai SM, Basaria S, et al. Adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy and strategies to mitigate them. Eur Urol 2015;67:825836.

  • 5.

    Perrone V, Degli Esposti L, Giacomini E, et al. Cardiovascular risk profile in prostate cancer patients treated with GnRH agonists versus antagonists: an Italian real-world analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2020;16:393401.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Hu JR, Duncan MS, Morgans AK, et al. Cardiovascular effects of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer: contemporary meta-analyses. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2020;40:e5564.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    US Food & Drug Administration. FDA drug safety communication: ongoing safety review of GnRH agonists and possible increased risk of diabetes and certain cardiovascular diseases. Accessed January 1, 2022. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/fda-drug-safety-communication-ongoing-safety-review-gnrh-agonists-and-possible-increased-risk

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Albertsen PC, Klotz L, Tombal B, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity associated with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists and an antagonist. Eur Urol 2014;65:565573.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    International Classification of Diseases. Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1977.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Statistics Canada. Canadian Classification of Diagnostic, Therapeutic, and Surgical Procedures, 2nd ed. Ottawa, Ontario: Statistics Canada Health Division; 1986.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Dragomir A, Côté R, Roy L, et al. Impact of adherence to antihypertensive agents on clinical outcomes and hospitalization costs. Med Care 2010;48:418425.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Austin PC. The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments. Stat Med 2014;33:12421258.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Austin PC. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios. Stat Med 2013;32:28372849.

  • 14.

    Austin PC. The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measured covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies. Med Decis Making 2009;29:661677.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Austin PC. The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating differences in proportions (risk differences or absolute risk reductions) in observational studies. Stat Med 2010;29:21372148.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Schoenfeld D. Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model. Biometrika 1982;69:239241.

  • 17.

    Austin PC, Fine JP. Propensity-score matching with competing risks in survival analysis. Stat Med 2019;38:751777.

  • 18.

    Melloni C, Roe MT. Androgen deprivation therapy and cardiovascular disease. Urol Oncol 2020;38:4552.

  • 19.

    Scailteux LM, Vincendeau S, Balusson F, et al. Androgen deprivation therapy and cardiovascular risk: no meaningful difference between GnRH antagonist and agonists-a nationwide population-based cohort study based on 2010-2013 French Health Insurance data. Eur J Cancer 2017;77:99108.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Davey P, Kirby MG. Cardiovascular risk profiles of GnRH agonists and antagonists: real-world analysis from UK general practice. World J Urol 2021;39:307315.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Margel D, Peer A, Ber Y, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity in a randomized trial comparing GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist among patients with advanced prostate cancer and preexisting cardiovascular disease. J Urol 2019;202:11991208.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    George G, Garmo H, Scailteux LM, et al. Risk of cardiovascular disease following gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists vs antagonists in prostate cancer: real-world evidence from five databases. Int J Cancer 2021;148:22032211.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Lopes RD, Higano CS, Slovin SF, et al. Cardiovascular safety of degarelix versus leuprolide in patients with prostate cancer: the primary results of the PRONOUNCE randomized trial. Circulation 2021;144:12951307.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Shore ND, Saad F, Cookson MS, et al. Oral relugolix for androgen- deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2020;382:21872196.

  • 25.

    Herring MJ, Oskui PM, Hale SL, et al. Testosterone and the cardiovascular system: a comprehensive review of the basic science literature. J Am Heart Assoc 2013;2:e000271.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Klotz L, Boccon-Gibod L, Shore ND, et al. The efficacy and safety of degarelix: a 12-month, comparative, randomized, open-label, parallel-group phase III study in patients with prostate cancer. BJU Int 2008;102:15311538.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Liu XM, Chan HC, Ding GL, et al. FSH regulates fat accumulation and redistribution in aging through the Gαi/Ca(2+)/CREB pathway. Aging Cell 2015;14:409420.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Hopmans SN, Duivenvoorden WC, Werstuck GH, et al. GnRH antagonist associates with less adiposity and reduced characteristics of metabolic syndrome and atherosclerosis compared with orchiectomy and GnRH agonist in a preclinical mouse model. Urol Oncol 2014;32:11261134.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Knutsson A, Hsiung S, Celik S, et al. Treatment with a GnRH receptor agonist, but not the GnRH receptor antagonist degarelix, induces atherosclerotic plaque instability in ApoE(-/-) mice. Sci Rep 2016;6:26220.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Haque R, Ulcickas Yood M, Xu X, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk and androgen deprivation therapy in patients with localised prostate cancer: a prospective cohort study. Br J Cancer 2017;117:12331240.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Gheorghe ACD, Ciobanu A, Hodorogea AS, et al. Subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in men under androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer, revealed by speckle-tracking-derived parameters, repolarization, and myocardial injury markers. Echocardiography 2021;38:632640.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Barber M, Nguyen LS, Wassermann J, et al. Cardiac arrhythmia considerations of hormone cancer therapies. Cardiovasc Res 2019;115:878894.

  • 33.

    Gagliano-Jucá T, Travison TG, Kantoff PW, et al. Androgen deprivation therapy is associated with prolongation of QTc interval in men with prostate cancer. J Endocr Soc 2018;2:485496.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Salem JE, Yang T, Moslehi JJ, et al. Androgenic effects on ventricular repolarization: a translational study from the international pharmacovigilance database to iPSC-cardiomyocytes. Circulation 2019;140:10701080.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Salem JE, Waintraub X, Courtillot C, et al. Hypogonadism as a reversible cause of torsades de pointes in men. Circulation 2018;138:110113.

  • 36.

    Smith MR, Klotz L, van der Meulen E, et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone blockers and cardiovascular disease risk: analysis of prospective clinical trials of degarelix. J Urol 2011;186:18351842.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1888 1888 55
PDF Downloads 1474 1474 75
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0