Pilot Trial of Streamlined Genetic Education and Traceback Genetic Testing in Prostate Cancer Survivors

Authors:
Marc D. Schwartz Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC

Search for other papers by Marc D. Schwartz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Beth N. Peshkin Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC

Search for other papers by Beth N. Peshkin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Claudine Isaacs Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC

Search for other papers by Claudine Isaacs in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Christopher Grisham Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC

Search for other papers by Christopher Grisham in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BA
,
Nora J. Holmes Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC

Search for other papers by Nora J. Holmes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS
,
Lia J. Sorgen Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC

Search for other papers by Lia J. Sorgen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BA
,
Sean Collins Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC

Search for other papers by Sean Collins in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Nancy Dawson Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC

Search for other papers by Nancy Dawson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Colleen McGuire Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC

Search for other papers by Colleen McGuire in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 RN, MSN
,
Tobechukwu Okobi University of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC

Search for other papers by Tobechukwu Okobi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS, MBBS
,
Kelsey Newell Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC

Search for other papers by Kelsey Newell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Kavitha A. Kolla Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC

Search for other papers by Kavitha A. Kolla in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
, and
Veronique Weinstein Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC

Search for other papers by Veronique Weinstein in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
Restricted access

Background: Germline genetic testing is recommended for men with metastatic or high-risk prostate cancer to inform treatment and risk management for other cancers and inform genetic testing in at-risk relatives. However, relatively few patients with prostate cancer undergo genetic testing. Given the low rate of testing and increasing demands on genetic service providers, strategies are needed that reduce barriers to testing while conserving genetic counseling resources. The primary goal of this study was to determine whether a proactive and streamlined “traceback” approach could yield increased genetic testing participation among prostate cancer survivors. Methods: We randomized 107 survivors of metastatic and high-risk prostate cancer to streamlined testing (ST) versus enhanced usual care (EUC). ST participants were proactively provided with print genetic education materials and the option to proceed to genetic testing without pre-test genetic counseling. EUC participants were sent a letter from their physician advising them of their eligibility for genetic testing and recommending they schedule genetic counseling. The primary outcome was genetic testing participation. Secondary outcomes were distress, knowledge, decision satisfaction, and regret. Results: In the ST group, 41.5% of participants completed genetic testing compared with 27.8% in the EUC group. After adjusting for education and marital status, the odds of testing were more than twice as high for the ST group as for the EUC group (odds ratio, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.05–6.29). The groups did not differ on any of the psychosocial outcomes at the 3-month follow-up. Conclusions: Proactive outreach paired with streamlined genetic testing delivery may be a safe, effective, and resource-efficient approach to facilitate traceback genetic testing in prostate cancer survivors.

Submitted March 2, 2023; final revision received July 26, 2023; accepted for publication August 16, 2023.

Author contributions: Conceptualization: Schwartz, Peshkin, Isaacs, Collins, Dawson, Okobi, Newell, Kolla, Weinstein. Data curation: Schwartz, Grisham, Holmes, Sorgen, Collins, Dawson, McGuire. Formal analysis: Schwartz, Okobi. Funding acquisition: Schwartz. Investigation: Schwartz, Peshkin, Issacs, Holmes, Sorgen, McGuire, Newell, Kolla, Weinstein. Methodology: Schwartz, Peshkin, Isaacs, Okobi, Newell, Kolla. Project administration: Peshkin, Grisham, Holmes, Sorgen, McGuire. Resources: Schwartz, Issacs, Collins, Dawson. Supervision: Schwartz, Peshkin, Sorgen, McGuire. Validation: Holmes, Sorgen. Writing—original draft: Schwartz, Peshkin, Grisham. Writing—review & editing: All authors.

Disclosures: Dr. Isaacs has disclosed receiving institutional funding from GSK, Seagen, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, and Novartis; serving as a consultant for Genentech, Puma Biotechnology, Inc., Seagen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, and Gilead Sciences, Inc.; and serving on a data safety monitoring board for Novartis. The remaining authors have disclosed that they have not received any financial consideration from any person or organization to support the preparation, analysis, results, or discussion of this article.

Funding: Research reported in this publication was supported by the Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research (M.D. Schwartz), and the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number P30CA051008.

Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Correspondence: Marc D. Schwartz, PhD, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20007. Email: schwartm@georgetown.edu

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 3.70 MB)
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 2023;73:1748.

  • 2.

    Pritchard CC, Mateo J, Walsh MF, et al. Inherited DNA-repair gene mutations in men with metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2016;375:443453.

  • 3.

    Kwon DH, Borno HT, Cheng HH, et al. Ethnic disparities among men with prostate cancer undergoing germline testing. Urol Oncol 2020;38:80.e1e7.

  • 4.

    Castro E, Romero-Laorden N, Del Pozo A, et al. PROREPAIR-B: a prospective cohort study of the impact of germline DNA repair mutations on the outcomes of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2019;37:490503.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Nicolosi P, Ledet E, Yang S, et al. Prevalence of germline variants in prostate cancer and implications for current genetic testing guidelines. JAMA Oncol 2019;5:523528.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Tryggvadóttir L, Vidarsdóttir L, Thorgeirsson T, et al. Prostate cancer progression and survival in BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:929935.

  • 7.

    Castro E, Goh C, Olmos D, et al. Germline BRCA mutations are associated with higher risk of nodal involvement, distant metastasis, and poor survival outcomes in prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:17481757.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Agalliu I, Gern R, Leanza S, et al. Associations of high-grade prostate cancer with BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder mutations. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:11121120.

  • 9.

    Gallagher DJ, Gaudet MM, Pal P, et al. Germline BRCA mutations denote a clinicopathologic subset of prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2010;16:21152121.

  • 10.

    Zhen JT, Syed J, Nguyen KA, et al. Genetic testing for hereditary prostate cancer: current status and limitations. Cancer 2018;124:31053117.

  • 11.

    Das S, Salami SS, Spratt DE, et al. Bringing prostate cancer germline genetics into clinical practice. J Urol 2019;202:223230.

  • 12.

    Schaeffer EM, Srinivas S, Adra N, et al. NCCN Clinical Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer. Version 4.2023. Accessed October 2, 2023. To view the most recent version, visit https://www.nccn.org

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Moses KA, Sprenkle PC, Bahler C, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer Early Detection. Version 2.2023. Accessed October 2, 2023. To view the most recent version, visit https://www.nccn.org

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Daly MB, Pal T, Arun B, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic. Version 2.2024. Accessed October 2, 2023. To view the most recent version, visit https://www.nccn.org

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Mateo J, Carreira S, Sandhu S, et al. DNA-repair defects and olaparib in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;373:16971708.

  • 16.

    Febbraro T, Robison K, Wilbur JS, et al. Adherence patterns to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for referral to cancer genetic professionals. Gynecol Oncol 2015;138:109114.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Ramakrishnan Geethakumari P, Schiewer MJ, Knudsen KE, et al. PARP inhibitors in prostate cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2017;18:37.

  • 18.

    The ASCO Post. FDA grants breakthrough therapy designation to rucaparib in BRCA1/2-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Accessed November 3, 2021. Available at: https://ascopost.com/News/59340

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Giri VN, Hegarty SE, Hyatt C, et al. Germline genetic testing for inherited prostate cancer in practice: implications for genetic testing, precision therapy, and cascade testing. Prostate 2019;79:333339.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Suri Y, Yasmeh JP, Basu A. Understanding the uptake and challenges of genetic testing guidelines for prostate cancer patients. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2022;32:100588.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Aguiar JA, Li EV, Siddiqui MR, et al. Utilization of genetic testing in men with advanced prostate cancer. Prostate 2023;83:516523.

  • 22.

    Greenberg S, Slager S, Neil BO, et al. What men want: qualitative analysis of what men with prostate cancer (PCa) want to learn regarding genetic referral, counseling, and testing. Prostate 2020;80:441450.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Smith W, Smith K, Sessions W, et al. An evaluation of gender discrepancies in genetic referrals for BRCA testing for indicated malignancies. J Clin Oncol 2021;39(Suppl):Abstract 10584.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Daly MB. The impact of social roles on the experience of men in BRCA1/2 families: implications for counseling. J Genet Couns 2009;18:4248.

  • 25.

    Fehniger J, Lin F, Beattie MS, et al. Family communication of BRCA1/2 results and family uptake of BRCA1/2 testing in a diverse population of BRCA1/2 carriers. J Genet Couns 2013;22:603612.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Heisey RE, Carroll JC, Warner E, et al. Hereditary breast cancer. Identifying and managing BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Can Fam Physician 1999;45:114124.

  • 27.

    Hardy MW, Peshkin BN, Rose E, et al. Attitudes and interest in incorporating BRCA1/2 cancer susceptibility testing into reproductive carrier screening for Ashkenazi Jewish men and women. J Community Genet 2022;13:281292.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Graves KD, Gatammah R, Peshkin BN, et al. BRCA1/2 genetic testing uptake and psychosocial outcomes in men. Fam Cancer 2011;10:213223.

  • 29.

    Scheinberg T, Goodwin A, Ip E, et al. Evaluation of a mainstream model of genetic testing for men with prostate cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2021;17:e204216.

  • 30.

    Cheng HH, Sokolova AO, Gulati R, et al. Internet-based germline genetic testing for men with metastatic prostate cancer. JCO Precis Oncol 2023;7:e2200104.

  • 31.

    Colombo N, Huang G, Scambia G, et al. Evaluation of a streamlined oncologist-led BRCA mutation testing and counseling model for patients with ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:13001307.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Madlensky L, Trepanier AM, Cragun D, et al. A rapid systematic review of outcomes studies in genetic counseling. J Genet Couns 2017;26:361378.

  • 33.

    Joseph G, Pasick RJ, Schillinger D, et al. Information mismatch: cancer risk counseling with diverse underserved patients. J Genet Couns 2017;26:10901104.

  • 34.

    Joseph G, Lee R, Pasick RJ, et al. Effective communication in the era of precision medicine: a pilot intervention with low health literacy patients to improve genetic counseling communication. Eur J Med Genet 2019;62:357367.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Biesecker BB. Genetic counselors as social and behavioral scientists in the era of precision medicine. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2018;178:1014.

  • 36.

    Cheng JKY, Guerra C, Pasick RJ, et al. Cancer genetic counseling communication with low-income Chinese immigrants. J Community Genet 2018;9:263276.

  • 37.

    Augustinsson A, Nilsson MP, Ellberg C, et al. Genetic testing in women with early-onset breast cancer: a Traceback pilot study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021;190:307315.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Samimi G, Bernardini MQ, Brody LC, et al. Traceback: a proposed framework to increase identification and genetic counseling of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers through family-based outreach. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:23292337.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Mohler JL, Lee RJ, Antonarakis ES, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer. Version 1.2018. To view the most recent version, visit https://www.nccn.org

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Vilar E, Stoffel EM. Universal genetic testing for younger patients with colorectal cancer. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:448449.

  • 41.

    Pearlman R, Frankel WL, Swanson B, et al. Prevalence and spectrum of germline cancer susceptibility gene mutations among patients with early-onset colorectal cancer. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:464471.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    Invitae. Invitae launches detect programs to make it easier for patients to get genetic testing for prostate cancer, muscular dystrophy and heart conditions. Accessed January 27, 2023. Available at: https://ir.invitae.com/news-and-events/press-releases/press-release-details/2019/Invitae-Launches-Detect-Programs-to-Make-it-Easier-for-Patients-to-Get-Genetic-Testing-for-Prostate-Cancer-Muscular-Dystrophy-and-Heart-Conditions/default.aspx

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    Underhill-Blazey M, Stopfer J, Chittenden A, et al. Development and testing of the KnowGene scale to assess general cancer genetic knowledge related to multigene panel testing. Patient Educ Couns 2019;102:15581564.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44.

    Pilkonis PA, Choi SW, Reise SP, et al. Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment 2011;18:263283.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45.

    Brehaut JC, O’Connor AM, Wood TJ, et al. Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Making 2003;23:281292.

  • 46.

    Holmes-Rovner M, Kroll J, Schmitt N, et al. Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the Satisfaction With Decision scale. Med Decis Making 1996;16:5864.

  • 47.

    Matro JM, Ruth KJ, Wong YN, et al. Cost sharing and hereditary cancer risk: predictors of willingness-to-pay for genetic testing. J Genet Couns 2014;23:10021011.

  • 48.

    Mayer M, Selig K, Tüttelmann F, et al. Interest in, willingness-to-pay for and willingness-to-recommend genetic testing for prostate cancer among affected men after radical prostatectomy. Fam Cancer 2019;18:221230.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    Willis AM, Smith SK, Meiser B, et al. Sociodemographic, psychosocial and clinical factors associated with uptake of genetic counselling for hereditary cancer: a systematic review. Clin Genet 2017;92:121133.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50.

    Sutton AL, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Quillin J, et al. Reducing disparities in receipt of genetic counseling for underserved women at risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2020;29:11311135.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51.

    Holmberg MJ, Andersen LW. Adjustment for baseline characteristics in randomized clinical trials. JAMA 2022;328:21552156.

  • 52.

    Russo J, McDougall C, Bowler N, et al. Pretest genetic education video versus genetic counseling for men considering prostate cancer germline testing: a patient-choice study to address urgent practice needs. JCO Precis Oncol 2021;5:13771386.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53.

    Feigelson HS, Prado YK, Kauffman T, et al. Feasibility of a traceback approach to facilitate genetic testing in the Genetic Risk Analysis in Ovarian Cancer (GRACE) study. Cancer Res 2022;82(12 Suppl):Abstract 1447.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54.

    Weinmann S, Phillips S, Sweet K, et al. Hospital-based ovarian cancer patient traceback program results in minimal genetic testing uptake. Gynecol Oncol 2022;164:615621.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55.

    Khan HM, Cheng HH. Germline genetics of prostate cancer. Prostate 2022;82(Suppl 1):S312.

  • 56.

    Vietri MT, D’Elia G, Caliendo G, et al. Hereditary prostate cancer: genes related, target therapy and prevention. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:3753.

  • 57.

    Cheng HH, Sokolova AO, Schaeffer EM, et al. Germline and somatic mutations in prostate cancer for the clinician. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019;17:515521.

  • 58.

    Wokołorczyk D, Kluźniak W, Stempa K, et al. PALB2 mutations and prostate cancer risk and survival. Br J Cancer 2021;125:569575.

  • 59.

    de Bono J, Mateo J, Fizazi K, et al. Olaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2020;382:20912102.

  • 60.

    Na R, Zheng SL, Han M, et al. Germline mutations in ATM and BRCA1/2 distinguish risk for lethal and indolent prostate cancer and are associated with early age at death. Eur Urol 2017;71:740747.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 61.

    Karlsson Q, Brook MN, Dadaev T, et al. Rare germline variants in ATM predispose to prostate cancer: a PRACTICAL Consortium study. Eur Urol Oncol 2021;4:570579.

  • 62.

    Kimura H, Mizuno K, Shiota M, et al. Prognostic significance of pathogenic variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM and PALB2 genes in men undergoing hormonal therapy for advanced prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 2022;127:16801690.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63.

    Valle L, Katz LH, Latchford A, et al. Position statement of the International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT) on APC I1307K and cancer risk. J Med Genet. Published online April 19, 2023. doi:10.1136/jmg-2022-108984

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 64.

    Henkel J, Laner A, Locher M, et al. Diagnostic yield and clinical relevance of expanded germline genetic testing for nearly 7000 suspected HBOC patients. Eur J Hum Genet 2023;31:925930.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65.

    Kwon DH, Gordon KM, Tong B, et al. Implementation of a telehealth genetic testing station to deliver germline testing for men with prostate cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2023;19:e773783.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2687 2687 39
PDF Downloads 1349 1349 41
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0