Disclosures: Dr. Pharoah has disclosed receiving commercial licensing fees from Cambridge Enterprises.
Correspondence: Paul D.P. Pharoah, PhD, Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Pacific Design Center, 700 North San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 540, West Hollywood, CA 90069. Email: paul.pharoah@cshs.org
Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group. Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet2012;379(9814):432–444.
Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group. Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 2012;379(9814):432–444.)| false
StabelliniN, CaoL, ToweCW, Validation of the PREDICT prognostication tool in US breast cancer patients. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023;21:1011–1019.)| false
Candido Dos ReisFJ, WishartGC, DicksEM, et al.An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostication and treatment benefit prediction model with independent validation. Breast Cancer Res2017;19:58.
Candido Dos ReisFJ, WishartGC, DicksEM, An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostication and treatment benefit prediction model with independent validation. Breast Cancer Res 2017;19:58.)| false
WishartGC, AzzatoEM, GreenbergDC, et al.PREDICT: a new UK prognostic model that predicts survival following surgery for invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res2010;12:R1.
WishartGC, AzzatoEM, GreenbergDC, PREDICT: a new UK prognostic model that predicts survival following surgery for invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2010;12:R1.)| false
WishartGC, BajdikCD, AzzatoEM, et al.A population-based validation of the prognostic model PREDICT for early breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol2011;37:411–417.
WishartGC, BajdikCD, AzzatoEM, A population-based validation of the prognostic model PREDICT for early breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011;37:411–417.)| false
ZaguirreK, KaiM, KuboM, et al.Validity of the prognostication tool PREDICT version 2.2 in Japanese breast cancer patients. Cancer Med2021;10:1605–1613.
ZaguirreK, KaiM, KuboM, Validity of the prognostication tool PREDICT version 2.2 in Japanese breast cancer patients. Cancer Med 2021;10:1605–1613.)| false
WongHS, SubramaniamS, AliasZ, et al.The predictive accuracy of PREDICT: a personalized decision-making tool for Southeast Asian women with breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore)2015;94:e593.
WongHS, SubramaniamS, AliasZ, The predictive accuracy of PREDICT: a personalized decision-making tool for Southeast Asian women with breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e593.)| false
de GlasNA, BastiaannetE, EngelsCC, et al.Validity of the online PREDICT tool in older patients with breast cancer: a population-based study. Br J Cancer2016;114:395–400.
de GlasNA, BastiaannetE, EngelsCC, Validity of the online PREDICT tool in older patients with breast cancer: a population-based study. Br J Cancer 2016;114:395–400.)| false
EngelhardtEG, van den BroekAJ, LinnSC, et al.Accuracy of the online prognostication tools PREDICT and Adjuvant! for early-stage breast cancer patients younger than 50 years. Eur J Cancer2017;78:37–44.
EngelhardtEG, van den BroekAJ, LinnSC, Accuracy of the online prognostication tools PREDICT and Adjuvant! for early-stage breast cancer patients younger than 50 years. Eur J Cancer 2017;78:37–44.)| false
van MaarenMC, van SteenbeekCD, PharoahPDP, et al.Validation of the online prediction tool PREDICT v. 2.0 in the Dutch breast cancer population. Eur J Cancer2017;86:364–372.
van MaarenMC, van SteenbeekCD, PharoahPDP, Validation of the online prediction tool PREDICT v. 2.0 in the Dutch breast cancer population. Eur J Cancer 2017;86:364–372.)| false
MaishmanT, CopsonE, StantonL, et al.An evaluation of the prognostic model PREDICT using the POSH cohort of women aged 40 years at breast cancer diagnosis. Br J Cancer2015;112:983–991.
MaishmanT, CopsonE, StantonL, An evaluation of the prognostic model PREDICT using the POSH cohort of women aged 40 years at breast cancer diagnosis. Br J Cancer 2015;112:983–991.)| false
GrayE, MartiJ, BrewsterDH, et al.Independent validation of the PREDICT breast cancer prognosis prediction tool in 45,789 patients using Scottish Cancer Registry data. Br J Cancer2018;119:808–814.
GrayE, MartiJ, BrewsterDH, Independent validation of the PREDICT breast cancer prognosis prediction tool in 45,789 patients using Scottish Cancer Registry data. Br J Cancer 2018;119:808–814.)| false
CliftAK, DodwellD, LordS, et al.Development and internal-external validation of statistical and machine learning models for breast cancer prognostication: cohort study. BMJ2023;381:e073800.
CliftAK, DodwellD, LordS, Development and internal-external validation of statistical and machine learning models for breast cancer prognostication: cohort study. BMJ 2023;381:e073800.)| false
ChowdhuryA, PharoahPD, RuedaOM. Evaluation and comparison of different breast cancer prognosis scores based on gene expression data. Breast Cancer Res2023;25:17.
ChowdhuryA, PharoahPD, RuedaOM. Evaluation and comparison of different breast cancer prognosis scores based on gene expression data. Breast Cancer Res 2023;25:17.)| false
CardosoF, van’t VeerLJ, BogaertsJ, et al.70-gene signature as an aid to treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med2016;375:717–729.
CardosoF, van’t VeerLJ, BogaertsJ, 70-gene signature as an aid to treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2016;375:717–729.)| false