Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Systemic Therapy With or Without Maximal Tumor Debulking

Authors:
Lotte Bakkerus Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Lotte Bakkerus in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Laurien M. Buffart Department of Physiology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Laurien M. Buffart in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Tineke E. Buffart Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Tineke E. Buffart in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Yannick M. Meyer Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Yannick M. Meyer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Barbara M. Zonderhuis Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Barbara M. Zonderhuis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Cornelis J.A. Haasbeek Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Cornelis J.A. Haasbeek in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Kathelijn S. Versteeg Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Kathelijn S. Versteeg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Olaf J.L. Loosveld Department of Medical Oncology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Olaf J.L. Loosveld in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Jan Willem B. de Groot Oncology Centre Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Jan Willem B. de Groot in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Mathijs P. Hendriks Department of Medical Oncology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Mathijs P. Hendriks in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Cornelis Verhoef Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Cornelis Verhoef in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Hendrik M.W. Verheul Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Hendrik M.W. Verheul in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
, and
Elske C. Gootjes Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Elske C. Gootjes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
Restricted access

Background: Maintaining a sufficient health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is important in the palliative treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The ORCHESTRA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01792934) is designed to prospectively evaluate overall survival benefit and impact on HRQoL of tumor debulking when added to first-line palliative systemic therapy in patients with multiorgan mCRC. In the present study, we report the HRQoL associated with this combination treatment compared with standard systemic therapy. Methods: Patients included in the ORCHESTRA trial with clinical benefit after 3 or 4 cycles of first-line palliative systemic therapy with fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin with or without bevacizumab were randomly assigned to maximal tumor debulking followed by systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone. Patients completed the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory questionnaire at prespecified time points during treatment. Between-group differences in HRQoL over time were evaluated with linear mixed model analyses. A pattern mixture approach was applied to correct for missing questionnaires due to progressive disease. Results: A total of 300 patients were randomized to the intervention arm (n=148) or the standard arm (n=152). No statistically significant or clinically relevant differences in HRQoL and fatigue were observed when tumor debulking was added to systemic therapy. In patients of both study arms, HRQoL after 1 year of treatment was not significantly different from HRQoL at the time of randomization. Patients in the intervention arm experienced serious adverse events (SAEs) twice as often as patients in the standard arm (P≤.001). Conclusions: Maximal tumor debulking in combination with palliative systemic therapy in patients with multiorgan mCRC was significantly associated with more SAEs resulting from local therapy but no difference in HRQoL compared with palliative systemic therapy alone. There is a remarkable lack of association between the occurrence of SAEs and impact on HRQoL.

Submitted October 14, 2022; final revision received June 20, 2023; accepted for publication June 22, 2023.

Author contributions: Study concept or design: Bakkerus, L.M. Buffart, T.E. Buffart, Verhoef, Verheul, Gootjes. Data collection: Bakkerus, T.E. Buffart, Meyer, Zonderhuis, Haasbeek, Versteeg, Loosveld, de Groot, Hendriks, Verhoef, Verheul, Gootjes. Data analysis and interpretation: Bakkerus, L.M. Buffart, Gootjes. Writing—original draft: Bakkerus, Gootjes. Writing—review & editing: All authors.

Disclosures: The authors have disclosed that they have not received any financial consideration from any person or organization to support the preparation, analysis, results, or discussion of this article.

Funding: This work was supported by funding from KWF Kankerbestrijding (ID0E4UAI7464), Roche Nederland (ID0EMVAI7465), and Blokker-Verwer (ID0E2VAI7466).

Correspondence: Elske C. Gootjes, MD, PhD, Radboudumc, PO Box 9101, Department of Medical Oncology, Internal Postal Code 452, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 8, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Email: elske.gootjes@radboudumc.nl

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 453 KB)
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Fiteni F, Pam A, Anota A, et al. Health-related quality-of-life as co-primary endpoint in randomized clinical trials in oncology. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2015;15:885891.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Efficace F, Osoba D, Gotay C, et al. Has the quality of health-related quality of life reporting in cancer clinical trials improved over time? Towards bridging the gap with clinical decision making. Ann Oncol 2007;18:775781.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 2022;72:733.

  • 4.

    Van Cutsem E, Oliveira J. Advanced colorectal cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2009;20(Suppl 4):6163.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Meyer Y, Olthof PB, Grünhagen DJ, et al. Treatment of metachronous colorectal cancer metastases in the Netherlands: a population-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2022;48:11041109.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    van der Pool AE, de Wilt JH, Lalmahomed ZS, et al. Optimizing the outcome of surgery in patients with rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases. Br J Surg 2010;97:383390.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Ruers T, Van Coevorden F, Punt CJ, et al. Local treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases: results of a randomized phase II trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2017;109:djx015.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Primrose JN. Surgery for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Cancer 2010;102:13131318.

  • 9.

    Rees M, Tekkis PP, Welsh FK, et al. Evaluation of long-term survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multifactorial model of 929 patients. Ann Surg 2008;247:125135.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Tomlinson JS, Jarnagin WR, DeMatteo RP, et al. Actual 10-year survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases defines cure. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:45754580.

  • 11.

    Wei AC, Coburn NG, Devitt KS, et al. Survival following resection of intra- and extra-hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: a phase II trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:26442651.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Harrow S, Palma DA, Olson R, et al. Stereotactic radiation for the comprehensive treatment of oligometastases (SABR-COMET): extended long-term outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022;114:611616.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Cherny NI, Dafni U, Bogaerts J, et al. ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1. Ann Oncol 2017;28:23402366.

  • 14.

    Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, et al. Effect of first-line chemotherapy combined with cetuximab or bevacizumab on overall survival in patients with KRAS wild-type advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;317:23922401.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T, et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:10651075.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Diaz LA Jr, Shiu KK, Kim TW, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer (KEYNOTE-177): final analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2022;23:659670.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Schuurhuizen CSEW, Braamse AMJ, Konings IR, et al. Does severe toxicity affect global quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer during palliative systemic treatment? A systematic review. Ann Oncol 2017;28:478486.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Raimondi A, Di Maio M, Morano F, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab-based first-line treatment strategy: a pre-specified secondary analysis of the Valentino study. Eur J Cancer 2020;135:230239.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Andre T, Amonkar M, Norquist JM, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-177): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021;22:665677.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Yamaguchi K, Ando M, Ooki A, et al. Quality of life analysis in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2017;16:e2937.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Simkens LH, van Tinteren H, May A, et al. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAIRO3): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Lancet 2015;385:18431852.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Ilie G, Bradfield J, Moodie L, et al. The role of response-shift in studies assessing quality of life outcomes among cancer patients: a systematic review. Front Oncol 2019;9:783.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Olson R, Senan S, Harrow S, et al. Quality of life outcomes after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) versus standard of care treatments in the oligometastatic setting: a secondary analysis of the SABR-COMET randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019;105:943947.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Treasure T, Farewell V, Macbeth F, et al. Pulmonary metastasectomy versus continued active monitoring in colorectal cancer (PulMiCC): a multicentre randomised clinical trial. Trials 2019;20:718.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Lehtomäki K, Stedt HP, Osterlund E, et al. Health-related quality of life in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with curative resection and/or local ablative therapy or systemic therapy in the Finnish RAXO-Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14:1713.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Cashin PH, Mahteme H, Syk I, et al. Quality of life and cost effectiveness in a randomized trial of patients with colorectal cancer and peritoneal metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018;44:983990.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Gootjes EC, van der Stok EP, Buffart TE, et al. Safety and feasibility of additional tumor debulking to first-line palliative combination chemotherapy for patients with multiorgan metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncologist 2020;25:e11951201.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228247.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:365376.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Wong CK, Guo VY, Chen J, et al. Methodological and reporting quality of comparative studies evaluating health-related quality of life of colorectal cancer patients and controls: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 2016;59:10731086.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, et al. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:139144.

  • 32.

    Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, et al. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res 1995;39:315325.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Kieffer JM, Starreveld DE, Boekhout A, et al. A questionable factor structure of the multidimensional fatigue inventory in the general Dutch population. J Clin Epidemiol 2021;137:266276.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Purcell A, Fleming J, Bennett S, et al. Determining the minimal clinically important difference criteria for the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory in a radiotherapy population. Support Care Cancer 2010;18:307315.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Son H, Friedmann E, Thomas SA. Application of pattern mixture models to address missing data in longitudinal data analysis using SPSS. Nurs Res 2012;61:195203.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Bottomley A, Reijneveld JC, Koller M, et al. Current state of quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research. Eur J Cancer 2019;121:5563.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 3690 3690 91
PDF Downloads 2533 2532 71
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0