Representation of Sexual and Gender Minority People in Patient Nondiscrimination Policies of Cancer Centers in the United States

Authors:
Iman K. Berrahou Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco;

Search for other papers by Iman K. Berrahou in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Ava Snow Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford;

Search for other papers by Ava Snow in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Megan Swanson Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco; and

Search for other papers by Megan Swanson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, MPH
, and
Juno Obedin-Maliver Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Search for other papers by Juno Obedin-Maliver in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, MPH, MAS
Restricted access

Background: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) people are an underserved population who face high rates of discrimination in healthcare, including receipt of cancer treatment. Several national organizations have identified the importance of patient nondiscrimination policies that explicitly recognize SGM people in creating safe healthcare environments. Methods: We performed a web-based analysis of NCI-designated Cancer Centers to evaluate the landscape of patient nondiscrimination policies in major cancer centers with regard to representation of SGM people. Results: We found that 82% of cancer centers had a patient nondiscrimination policy on their website. The most commonly mentioned SGM-related term was “sex” (n=48; 89%), followed by “sexual orientation” (n=37; 69%) and “gender identity” (n=36; 67%). None of the policies included “sex assigned at birth” or “LGBTQ/SGM identity.” Of the policies reviewed, 65% included protections for both sexual orientation and gender identity. Cancer centers with academic affiliations were significantly more likely to have policies that included both of these protections compared with nonacademic institutions (100% vs 79%; P=.005). Conclusions: Our study shows that patient nondiscrimination policies across NCI-designated Cancer Centers are not always accessible to patients and their families online and do not consistently represent SGM people in their content. Because the SGM population is both at higher risk for cancer and for discrimination in the healthcare setting, it is crucial to create inclusive, safe, and equitable cancer care environments for this group. Administrators and clinicians should view the patient nondiscrimination policy as an opportunity to offer expansive protections to SGM people that extend beyond those offered in federal and state laws. Additionally, the patient nondiscrimination policy should be visible and accessible to patients seeking cancer care as a signal of safety and inclusion.

Submitted January 05, 2021; final revision received June 21, 2021; accepted for publication June 21, 2021. Published online February 15, 2022.

Author contributions: Study concept and design: Berrahou, Swanson, Obedin-Maliver. Data acquisition: Berrahou, Snow. Manuscript preparation: Berrahou, Snow. Critical revision: All authors.

Disclosures: Dr. Obedin-Maliver has disclosed serving as a consultant for Sage Therapeutics, Ibis Reproductive Health, Folx Inc, and Hims Inc. The remaining authors have disclosed that they have not received any financial consideration from any person or organization to support the preparation, analysis, results, or discussion of this article.

Correspondence: Iman K. Berrahou, MD, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Services, University of California San Francisco, 480 16th Street, 10th Floor, Box 0132, San Francisco, CA 94158. Email: Iman.berrahou@ucsf.edu

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 432 KB)
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Jones J. LGBT identification rises to 5.6% in latest U.S. estimate. Accessed May 31, 2021. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/329708/lgbt-identification-rises-latest-estimate.aspx

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    National LGBT Cancer Network. Cancer and the LGBT community. Accessed May 31, 2021. Available at: https://cancer-network.org/cancer-information/cancer-and-the-lgbt-community/

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Obedin-Maliver J. Time to change: supporting sexual and gender minority people—an underserved understudied cancer risk population. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017;15:13051308.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Johnson SE, Holder-Hayes E, Tessman GK, et al. Tobacco product use among sexual minority adults: findings from the 2012–2013 National Adult Tobacco Survey. Am J Prev Med 2016;50:e91100.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Lunn MR, Cui W, Zack MM, et al. Sociodemographic characteristics and health outcomes among lesbian, gay, and bisexual U.S. adults using Healthy People 2020 leading health indicators. LGBT Health 2017;4:283294.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Meyer IH. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull 2003;129:674697.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Grant J, Mottet LA, Tanis J, et al. Injustice at Every Turn: A Report of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force; 2011.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Lambda Legal. When health care isn’t caring: Lambda Legal's survey on discrimination against LGBT people and people living with HIV. Accessed May 31, 2021. Available at: https://www.lambdalegal.org/sites/default/files/publications/downloads/whcic-report_when-health-care-isnt-caring.pdf

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    James S, Herman J, Rankin S, et al. The report of the 2015 U.S. transgender survey. Accessed May 31, 2021. Available at: http://www.ustranssurvey.org/reports

  • 10.

    Kamen CS, Smith-Stoner M, Heckler CE, et al. Social support, self-rated health, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender identity disclosure to cancer care providers. Oncol Nurs Forum 2015;42:4451.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    National LGBT Cancer Network. LGBT patient-centered outcomes. Accessed May 31, 2021. Available at: https://cancer-network.org/resources/lgbt-patient-centered-outcomes/

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Alexander K, Banerjee SC. Older sexual and gender minorities with cancer: a population hidden in the open. Accessed May 31, 2021. Available at: https://ascopost.com/issues/october-10-2019/older-sexual-and-gender-minorities-with-cancer/

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Kamen C, Mustian KM, Dozier A, et al. Disparities in psychological distress impacting lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender cancer survivors. Psychooncology 2015;24:13841391.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Federal Register. Nondiscrimination in health and health education programs or activities, delegation of authority. Accessed May 31, 2021. Available at: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/06/19/2020-11758/nondiscrimination-in-health-and-health-education-programs-or-activities-delegation-of-authority

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Department of Health and Human Services. Notification of interpretation and enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. Accessed June 13, 2021. Available at https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ocr-bostock-notification.pdf

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Human Rights Campaign Foundation. HEI scoring criteria. Accessed May 31, 2021. Available at: https://www.thehrcfoundation.org/professional-resources/hei-scoring-criteria

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    National LGBT Cancer Network. Out and surviving. Accessed May 31, 2021. Available at: https://cancer-network.org/out-and-surviving/

  • 18.

    Griggs J, Maingi S, Blinder V, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology position statement: strategies for reducing cancer health disparities among sexual and gender minority populations. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:22032208.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Crenshaw K. Demarginalising the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of anti-discrimination doctrine, feminist theory and anti-racist politics. Accessed May 31, 2021. Available at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Jabson JM, Patterson JG, Kamen C. Understanding health information seeking on the internet among sexual minority people: cross-sectional analysis from the Health Information National Trends Survey. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2017;3:e39.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    W3C Web Accessibility Initiative. How to meet WCAG (quick reference). Accessed May 31, 2021. Available at: https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/quickref/

  • 22.

    Parr O, Dunmall K. An evaluation of online information available for women with breast implants aged 47–73 who have been invited to attend the NHS Breast Screening Programme. Radiography (Lond) 2018;24:315327.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Streed CG, Lunn MR, Siegel J, et al. Meeting the patient care, education, and research missions: academic medical centers must comprehensively address sexual and gender minority health. Acad Med 2021;96:822827.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Hasenbush A, Flores AR, Kastanis A, et al. The LGBT divide. A data portrait of LGBT people in the Midwest, Mountain, and Southern states. Accessed May 31, 2021. Available at: https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/lgbtdivide/#/cover

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Movement Advancement Project. Nondiscrimination laws. Accessed May 31, 2021. Available at: https://www.lgbtmap.org//equality-maps/non_discrimination_laws

  • 26.

    Bauermeister JA. How statewide LGB policies go from “under our skin” to “into our hearts”: fatherhood aspirations and psychological well-being among emerging adult sexual minority men. J Youth Adolesc 2014;43:12951305.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Bonett S, Meanley S, Elsesser S, et al. State-level discrimination policies and HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis adoption efforts in the US. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020;39:15751582.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Jabson JM, Mitchell JW, Doty SB. Associations between non-discrimination and training policies and physicians’ attitudes and knowledge about sexual and gender minority patients: a comparison of physicians from two hospitals. BMC Public Health 2016;16:256.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Kamen CS, Alpert A, Margolies L, et al. “Treat us with dignity”: a qualitative study of the experiences and recommendations of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer 2019;27:25252532.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Charlton BM, Hatzenbuehler ML, Jun HJ, et al. Structural stigma and sexual orientation-related reproductive health disparities in a longitudinal cohort study of female adolescents. J Adolesc 2019;74:183187.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Casey LS, Reisner SL, Findling MG, et al. Discrimination in the United States: experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Americans. Health Serv Res 2019;54(Suppl 2):14541466.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Alpert A, Kamen C, Schabath MB, et al. What exactly are we measuring? Evaluating sexual and gender minority cultural humility training for oncology care clinicians. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:26052609.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    In H, Neville BA, Lipsitz SR, et al. The role of National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center status: observed variation in surgical care depends on the level of evidence. Ann Surg 2012;255:890895.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 3986 845 181
PDF Downloads 1339 219 25
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0