Navigating Nodal Metrics for Node-Positive Gastric Cancer in the United States: An NCDB-Based Study and Validation of AJCC Guidelines

Authors:
Derek J. Erstad Department of Surgical Oncology,

Search for other papers by Derek J. Erstad in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Mariela Blum Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology,

Search for other papers by Mariela Blum in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Jeannelyn S. Estrella Department of Pathology, and

Search for other papers by Jeannelyn S. Estrella in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Prajnan Das Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Search for other papers by Prajnan Das in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Bruce D. Minsky Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Search for other papers by Bruce D. Minsky in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Jaffer A. Ajani Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology,

Search for other papers by Jaffer A. Ajani in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Paul F. Mansfield Department of Surgical Oncology,

Search for other papers by Paul F. Mansfield in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Naruhiko Ikoma Department of Surgical Oncology,

Search for other papers by Naruhiko Ikoma in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
, and
Brian D. Badgwell Department of Surgical Oncology,

Search for other papers by Brian D. Badgwell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
Restricted access

Background: The optimal number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) and the positive lymph node ratio (LNR) for potentially curable gastric cancer are not established. We sought to determine clinical benchmarks for these values using a large national database. Methods: Demographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment-related data from patients treated using an R0, curative-intent gastrectomy registered in the National Cancer Database during 2004 to 2016 were evaluated. Patients with node-positive (pTxN+M0) disease were considered for analysis. Results: A total of 22,018 patients met the inclusion criteria, with a median follow-up of 2.2 years. Mean age at diagnosis was 65.6 years, 66% were male, 68% were White, 33% of tumors were located near the gastroesophageal junction, and 29% of patients had undergone preoperative therapy. Most primary tumors (62%) were category pT3–4, 67% had a poor or anaplastic grade, and 19% had signet features. Clinical nodal staging was inaccurate compared with staging at final pathology. The mean [SD] number of nodes examined was 19 [11]. On multivariable analysis, the pN category, ELNs, and LNR were independently associated with survival (all P<.0001). Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, an optimal ELN threshold of ≥30 was established for patients with pN3b disease and was applied to the entire cohort. Node positivity and LNR had minimal change beyond 30 examined nodes. Stage-specific LNR thresholds calculated by ROC analysis were 11% for pN1, 28% for pN2, 58% for pN3a, 64% for pN3b, 30% for total combined. By using an ELN threshold of ≥30, prognostically advantageous stage-specific LNR values could be determined for 96% of evaluated patients. Conclusions: Using a large national cancer registry, we determined that an ELN threshold of ≥30 allowed for prognostically advantageous LNRs to be achieved in 96% of patients. Therefore, ≥30 examined nodes should be considered a clinical benchmark for practice in the United States.

Submitted December 15, 2020; final revision received March 24, 2021; accepted for publication March 25, 2021. Published online October 22, 2021.

Author contributions: Data acquisition: Erstad, Blum, Das, Minsky, Ajani, Mansfield, Ikoma, Badgwell. Data analysis: Erstad, Blum, Das, Minsky, Ajani, Mansfield, Ikoma, Badgwell. Data interpretation: Erstad, Estrella. Expert clinical opinion: Blum, Estrella, Das, Minsky, Ajani, Mansfield, Ikoma, Badgwell. Manuscript Preparataion: All authors.

Disclosures: The authors have disclosed that they have not received any financial consideration from any person or organization to support the preparation, analysis, results, or discussion of this article.

Correspondence: Brian D. Badgwell, MD, Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard/Unit 1484, Houston, TX 77030-4009. Email: bbadgwell@mdanderson.org

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 431 KB)
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Anderson WF, Camargo MC, Fraumeni JF Jr, et al. Age-specific trends in incidence of noncardiac gastric cancer in US adults. JAMA 2010;303:17231728.

  • 2.

    Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394424.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Thrift AP, El-Serag HB. Burden of gastric cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;18:534542.

  • 4.

    Seevaratnam R, Bocicariu A, Cardoso R, et al. How many lymph nodes should be assessed in patients with gastric cancer? A systematic review. Gastric Cancer 2012;15(Suppl 1):S7088.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Songun I, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, et al. Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11: 439449.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Seevaratnam R, Bocicariu A, Cardoso R, et al. A meta-analysis of D1 versus D2 lymph node dissection. Gastric Cancer 2012;15(Suppl 1):S6069.

  • 7.

    Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Bentrm DJ, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Gastric Cancer. Version 1.2021. Accessed February 22, 2021. To view the most recent version, visit NCCN.org

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A, et al. The ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer regardless of the type of lymphadenectomy: results from an Italian multicentric study in 1853 patients. Ann Surg 2007;245:543552.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:9399.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Gu P, Deng J, Wang W, et al. Impact of the number of examined lymph nodes on stage migration in node-negative gastric cancer patients: a Chinese multi-institutional analysis with propensity score matching. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:938.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Allen CJ, Vreeland TJ, Newhook TE, et al. Prognostic value of lymph node yield after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2020;27:534542.

  • 12.

    Deng J, Yamashita H, Seto Y, et al. Increasing the number of examined lymph nodes is a prerequisite for improvement in the accurate evaluation of overall survival of node-negative gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2017;24:745753.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Bunt AM, Hermans J, Smit VT, et al. Surgical/pathologic-stage migration confounds comparisons of gastric cancer survival rates between Japan and Western countries. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:1925.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Vuong B, Graff-Baker AN, Dehal A, et al. Survival analysis with extended lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: removing stage migration from the equation. Am Surg 2017;83:10741079.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Seeruttun SR, Xu L, Wang F, et al. A homogenized approach to classify advanced gastric cancer patients with limited and adequate number of pathologically examined lymph nodes. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2019;39:111.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Wang PL, Xiao FT, Gong BC, et al. A nomogram for predicting overall survival of gastric cancer patients with insufficient lymph nodes examined. J Gastrointest Surg 2017;21:947956.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    MingHua Z, KeCheng Z, ZhenYu C, et al. Impact of lymph nodes examined on survival in ypN0 gastric cancer patients: a population-based study. J Gastrointest Surg 2021;25:919925.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Li SS, Costantino CL, Rattner DW, et al. Outcomes of extended lymphadenectomy for gastroesophageal carcinoma: a large Western series. J Am Coll Surg 2019;228:879891.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Siewert JR, Böttcher K, Stein HJ, et al. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg 1998;228:449461.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Brenkman HJF, Goense L, Brosens LA, et al. A high lymph node yield is associated with prolonged survival in elderly patients undergoing curative gastrectomy for cancer: a Dutch population-based cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 2017;24:22132223.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Smith DD, Schwarz RR, Schwarz RE. Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a large US-population database. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:71147124.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Schwarz RE, Smith DD. Clinical impact of lymphadenectomy extent in resectable gastric cancer of advanced stage. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14: 317328.

  • 23.

    Ichikura T, Ogawa T, Chochi K, et al. Minimum number of lymph nodes that should be examined for the International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification of gastric carcinoma. World J Surg 2003;27:330333.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Mirkin KA, Hollenbeak CS, Wong J. Greater lymph node retrieval improves survival in node-negative resected gastric cancer in the United States. J Gastric Cancer 2017;17:306318.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Macalindong SS, Kim KH, Nam BH, et al. Effect of total number of harvested lymph nodes on survival outcomes after curative resection for gastric adenocarcinoma: findings from an Eastern high-volume gastric cancer center. BMC Cancer 2018;18:73.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1120.

  • 27.

    Al-Batran SE, Hofheinz RD, Pauligk C, et al. Histopathological regression after neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4-AIO): results from the phase 2 part of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:16971708.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet 2019;393:19481957.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 2012;366:20742084.

  • 30.

    Ramdas S, Lowe K. Trends in perioperative treatment of gastric cancer 2004–2017: an NCDB analysis. Accessed April 5, 2021. Available at: https://bulletin.facs.org/2020/10/trends-in-perioperative-treatment-of-gastric-cancer-2004-2017-an-ncdb-analysis/

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Lin GT, Chen QY, Zhong Q, et al. Intraoperative surrogate indicators of gastric cancer patients’ long-term prognosis: the number of lymph nodes examined relates to the lymph node noncompliance rate. Ann Surg Oncol 2020;27:32813293.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Ikoma N, Estrella JS, Hofstetter WL, et al. Surgeon assessment of gastric cancer lymph node specimens with a video of technique. J Gastrointest Surg 2018;22:20132019.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Morgan JW, Ji L, Friedman G, et al. The role of the cancer center when using lymph node count as a quality measure for gastric cancer surgery. JAMA Surg 2015;150:3743.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1338 896 143
PDF Downloads 412 214 13
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0