Delays in Care Associated With Non–English-Speaking Patients With Breast Cancer

Authors:
Katy E. Balazy Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California;

Search for other papers by Katy E. Balazy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, MPH
,
Cecil M. Benitez Highland Hospital, Oakland, California;

Search for other papers by Cecil M. Benitez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Paulina M. Gutkin Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; and

Search for other papers by Paulina M. Gutkin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS
,
Clare E. Jacobson University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Search for other papers by Clare E. Jacobson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BA
,
Rie von Eyben Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California;

Search for other papers by Rie von Eyben in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
, and
Kathleen C. Horst Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California;

Search for other papers by Kathleen C. Horst in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
Restricted access

Background: Breast cancer care requires coordination between multiple diagnostic and treatment modalities. Disparities such as age, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status are associated with delays in care. This study investigates whether primary language is associated with delays in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment before and through radiotherapy (RT). Patients and Methods: This study was an institutional retrospective matched-cohort analysis of women treated with breast RT over 2 years. A total of 65 non–English-speaking (NES) patients were matched with 195 English-speaking (ES) patients according to stage, age, and chemotherapy delivery. Key time intervals along the breast cancer care path from initial findings through RT were recorded. Data were analyzed in a mixed model with matching as the random effect. The impact of race and insurance status was analyzed in addition to language. Results: Significant delays were found for NES patients, which varied by race. NES Latina patients experienced the longest delay, with a mean total care-path time of 13.53 months (from initial findings to end of RT) versus 8.18 months for all ES patients (P<.0001). Specifically, their mean total care-path time was 5.97 months longer than that of ES Latina patients (P=.001) and 5.80 months longer than that of ES White patients (P<.0001). In addition, NES Latina patients had a significantly longer total care-path time than NES patients of other races/ethnicities (P=.001). Delays were specifically seen between initial clinical or radiographic findings and diagnostic mammogram (P=.001) and between biopsy and resection (P=.044). Beyond language, race/ethnicity was itself associated with delays between resection and start of RT (P=.032) and between start and end of RT (P=.022). Conclusions: Language is associated with pre-RT delays in breast cancer care, especially for NES Latina patients. Delays are most pronounced before diagnostic mammograms, but they also exist before resection and RT. Future work should target NES patients to assist their progress along the care path.

Submitted September 1, 2020; final revision received November 20, 2020; accepted for publication December 14, 2020. Published online August 10, 2021.

Author contributions: Study concept: Balazy, Benitez, Horst. Data curation: Balazy, Benitez, Gutkin, Jacobson, von Eyben. Investigation: Balazy, Benitez, von Eyben, Horst. Methodology: Balazy, Benitez, von Eyben, Horst. Formal analysis: von Eyben. Project administration: Balazy, Benitez, Gutkin, Jacobson, Horst. Resources: All authors. Software: von Eyben. Validation: Balazy, von Eyben, Horst. Visualization: Balazy, Benitez, von Eyben, Horst. Supervision: Horst. Writing—original draft: Balazy. Writing—review and editing: Balazy, Benitez, Gutkin, von Eyben, Horst.

Disclosures: The authors have disclosed that they have not received any financial consideration from any person or organization to support the preparation, analysis, results, or discussion of this article.

Funding: Cecil M. Benitez, MD, PhD, was supported by Medical Scholars funding through the Stanford School of Medicine.

Correspondence: Kathleen C. Horst, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5847. Email: kateh@stanford.edu

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 427 KB)
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2020. Accessed December 23, 2020. Available at: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2020/cancer-facts-and-figures-2020.pdf

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Buja A, Lago L, Lago S, et al. Marital status and stage of cancer at diagnosis: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2018;27:e12755.

  • 3.

    Du Xianglin L, Gor BJ. Racial disparities and trends in radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer in women, 1992 to 2002. Ethn Dis 2007;17:122128.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Ellis L, Canchola AJ, Spiegel D, et al. Trends in cancer survival by health insurance status in California from 1997 to 2014. JAMA Oncol 2018;4:317323.

  • 5.

    Mobley LR, Kuo TMM, Watson L, et al. Geographic disparities in late-stage cancer diagnosis: multilevel factors and spatial interactions. Health Place 2012;18:978990.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Thomson GE, Mitchell F, Williams M. Examining the Health Disparities Research Plan of the National Institutes of Health: Unfinished Business. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Silber JH, Rosenbaum PR, Ross RN, et al. Disparities in breast cancer survival by socioeconomic status despite Medicare and Medicaid insurance. Milbank Q 2018;96:706754.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Yedjou CG, Tchounwou PB, Payton M, et al. Assessing the racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer mortality in the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14:486.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Newman LA. Breast cancer disparities: socioeconomic factors versus biology. Ann Surg Oncol 2017;24:28692875.

  • 10.

    Warner ET, Tamimi RM, Hughes ME, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer survival: mediating effect of tumor characteristics and sociodemographic and treatment factors. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:22542261.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Vona-Davis L, Rose DP. The influence of socioeconomic disparities on breast cancer tumor biology and prognosis: a review. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009;18:883893.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Nonzee NJ, Ragas DM, Ha Luu T, et al. Delays in cancer care among low-income minorities despite access. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2015;24:506514.

  • 13.

    Khanna S, Kim KN, Qureshi MM, et al. Impact of patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment type on treatment delay throughout breast cancer care at a diverse academic medical center. Int J Womens Health 2017;9:887896.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    McGee SA, Durham DD, Tse CK, et al. Determinants of breast cancer treatment delay differ for African American and White women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013;22:12271238.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Hershman DL, Wang X, McBride R, et al. Delay in initiating adjuvant radiotherapy following breast conservation surgery and its impact on survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;65:13531360.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Punglia RS, Saito AM, Neville BA, et al. Impact of interval from breast conserving surgery to radiotherapy on local recurrence in older women with breast cancer: retrospective cohort analysis. BMJ 2010;340:c845.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Balazy KE, Benitez CM, Gutkin PM, et al. Association between primary language, a lack of mammographic screening, and later stage breast cancer presentation. Cancer 2019;125:20572065.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Ortman JM, Shin HB. Language projections: 2010 to 2020. United States Census Bureau. Accessed December 24, 2020. Available at: https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/2011/demo/2011-Ortman-Shin.html

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Rose DE, Tisnado DM, Malin JL, et al. Use of interpreters by physicians treating limited English proficient women with breast cancer: results from the provider survey of the Los Angeles Women’s Health Study. Health Serv Res 2010;45:172194.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Karliner LS, Hwang ES, Nickleach D, et al. Language barriers and patient-centered breast cancer care. Patient Educ Couns 2011;84:223228.

  • 21.

    Migration Policy Institute. California: language & education. Accessed December 24, 2020. Available at: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/data/state-profiles/state/language/CA

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Center for Immigration Studies. 67.3 million in the United States spoke a foreign language at home in 2018. Accessed October 30, 2020. Available at: https://cis.org/Report/673-Million-United-States-Spoke-Foreign-Language-Home-2018

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    United States Census Bureau. Language spoken at home. Accessed October 30, 2020. Available at: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=language&tid=ACSST1Y2019.S1601&hidePreview=true

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Kaiser Family Foundation. Status of state Medicaid expansion decisions: interactive map. Accessed November 3, 2020. Available at: https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/status-of-state-medicaid-expansion-decisions-interactive-map/

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Kaiser Family Foundation. The California Health Care Landscape. Accessed on November 3, 2020. Available at: https://www.kff.org/health-reform/fact-sheet/the-california-health-care-landscape/

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Dong J, Esham KS, Boehm L, et al. Timeliness of treatment initiation in newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2020;20:e2735.

  • 27.

    Smith EC, Ziogas A, Anton-Culver H. Delay in surgical treatment and survival after breast cancer diagnosis in young women by race/ethnicity. JAMA Surg 2013;148:516523.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Ho PJ, Cook AR, Binte Mohamed Ri NK, et al. Impact of delayed treatment in women diagnosed with breast cancer: a population-based study. Cancer Med 2020;9:24352444.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Polverini AC, Nelson RA, Marcinkowski E, et al. Time to treatment: measuring quality breast cancer care. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:33923402.

  • 30.

    Bleicher RJ, Ruth K, Sigurdson ER, et al. Time to surgery and breast cancer survival in the United States. JAMA Oncol 2016;2:330339.

  • 31.

    Li Y, Zhou Y, Mao F, et al. The influence on survival of delay in the treatment initiation of screening detected non-symptomatic breast cancer. Sci Rep 2019;9:10158.

  • 32.

    Warner ET, Tamimi RM, Hughes ME, et al. Time to diagnosis and breast cancer stage by race/ethnicity. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;136:813821.

  • 33.

    Gorin SS, Heck JE, Cheng B, et al. Delays in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment by racial/ethnic group. Arch Intern Med 2006;166: 22442252.

  • 34.

    Tejeda S, Gallardo RI, Ferrans CE, et al. Breast cancer delay in Latinas: the role of cultural beliefs and acculturation. J Behav Med 2017;40: 343351.

  • 35.

    Tejeda S, Thompson B, Coronado GD, et al. Barriers and facilitators related to mammography use among lower educated Mexican women in the USA. Soc Sci Med 2009;68:832839.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Martínez ME, Gomez SL, Tao L, et al. Contribution of clinical and socioeconomic factors to differences in breast cancer subtype and mortality between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017;166:185193.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Garcia RZ, Carvajal SC, Wilkinson AV, et al. Factors that influence mammography use and breast cancer detection among Mexican-American and African-American women. Cancer Causes Control 2012;23:165173.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Abraído-Lanza AF, Chao MT, Gates CY. Acculturation and cancer screening among Latinas: results from the National Health Interview Survey. Ann Behav Med 2005;29:2228.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Schapira MM, Faghri A, Jacobs EA, et al. Communication and shared decision making in the breast cancer treatment consultation: a comparative analysis of English- and Spanish-speaking patients. MDM Policy Pract 2019;4:2381468319881651.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Ramirez A, Perez-Stable E, Penedo F, et al. Reducing time-to-treatment in underserved Latinas with breast cancer: the Six Cities Study. Cancer 2014;120:752760.

  • 41.

    U.S. News & World Report. Health care rankings. Accessed November 3, 2020. Available at https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/rankings/health-care

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1067 657 34
PDF Downloads 366 177 10
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0