BBCIC Research Network Analysis of First-Cycle Prophylactic G-CSF Use in Patients Treated With High–Neutropenia Risk Chemotherapy

Authors:
Pamala A. Pawloski HealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota;

Search for other papers by Pamala A. Pawloski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PharmD, BCOP
,
Cara L. McDermott Biologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium, Alexandria, Virginia;

Search for other papers by Cara L. McDermott in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PharmD, PhD
,
James H. Marshall Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; and

Search for other papers by James H. Marshall in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MPH
,
Vanita Pindolia Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.

Search for other papers by Vanita Pindolia in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PharmD, MBA
,
Catherine M. Lockhart Biologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium, Alexandria, Virginia;

Search for other papers by Catherine M. Lockhart in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PharmD, PhD
,
Catherine A. Panozzo Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; and

Search for other papers by Catherine A. Panozzo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Jeffrey S. Brown Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; and

Search for other papers by Jeffrey S. Brown in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Bernadette Eichelberger Biologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium, Alexandria, Virginia;

Search for other papers by Bernadette Eichelberger in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PharmD
Restricted access

Background: Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) is prevented or minimized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs). Several G-CSF biosimilars are approved in the United States. The Biologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium (BBCIC) is a nonprofit initiative whose objective is to provide scientific evidence on real-world use and comparative safety and effectiveness of biologics and biosimilars using the BBCIC distributed research network (DRN). Patients and Methods: We describe real-world G-CSF use in patients with breast or lung cancer receiving first-cycle chemotherapy associated with high FN risk. We assessed hospitalizations for FN, availability of absolute neutrophil counts, and G-CSF–induced adverse events to inform future observational comparative effectiveness studies of G-CSF reference products and their biosimilars. A descriptive analysis of 5 participating national health insurance plans was conducted within the BBCIC DRN. Results: A total of 57,725 patients who received at least one G-CSF dose were included. Most (92.5%) patients received pegfilgrastim. FN hospitalization rates were evaluated by narrow (<0.5%), intermediate (1.91%), and broad (2.99%) definitions. Anaphylaxis and hyperleukocytosis were identified in 1.15% and 2.28% of patients, respectively. This analysis provides real-world evidence extracted from a large, readily available database of diverse patients, characterizing G-CSF reference product use to inform the feasibility of future observational comparative safety and effectiveness analyses of G-CSF biosimilars. We showed that the rates of FN and adverse events in our research network are consistent with those reported by previous small studies. Conclusions: Readily available BBCIC DRN data can be used to assess G-CSF use with the incidence of FN hospitalizations. Insufficient laboratory result data were available to report absolute neutrophil counts; however, other safety data are available for assessment that provide valuable baseline data regarding the effectiveness and safety of G-CSFs in preparation for comparative effectiveness studies of reference G-CSFs and their biosimilars.

Submitted May 21, 2020; final revision received February 15, 2021; accepted for publication February 16, 2021.

Published online August 16, 2021.

Author contributions: Study concept and design: Pawloski, Marshall, Pindolia, Panozzo, Brown, Eichelberger. Provision of study materials: Marshall, Brown. Acquisition and assembly of data: Marshall, Brown. Data analysis and interpretation: All authors. Manuscript preparation and final approval: All authors.

Disclosures: Dr. Pawloski has disclosed serving as a scientific partner of the Biologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium (BBCIC) and receiving financial support for the conduct of the work described in this article. The remaining authors have disclosed that they have not received any financial consideration from any person or organization to support the preparation, analysis, results, or discussion of this article.

Funding: Support for this work was provided by the BBCIC members.

Data availability statement: The primary data are under the full control of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, and we agree to allow the journal to review the data, if requested.

Correspondence: Pamala A. Pawloski, PharmD, BCOP, HealthPartners Institute Clinical Research, 295 Phalen Boulevard, MS41200F, St. Paul, MN 55130. Email: pamala.a.pawloski@healthpartners.com

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 440 KB)
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Green MD, Koelbl H, Baselga J, et al. A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2003;14:2935.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Chan A, Fu WH, Shih V, et al. Impact of colony-stimulating factors to reduce febrile neutropenic events in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 2011;19:497504.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Elting LS, Xu Y, Chavez-MacGregor M, et al. Granulocyte growth factor use in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in the United States: adherence to guidelines and comparative effectiveness. Support Care Cancer 2016;24:26952706.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Renner P, Milazzo S, Liu JP, et al. Primary prophylactic colony-stimulating factors for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;10:CD007913.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Kuderer NM, Dale DC, Crawford J, et al. Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:31583167.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Smith TJ, Bohlke K, Lyman GH, et al. Recommendations for the use of WBC growth factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:31993212.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Crawford J, Caserta C, Roila F. Hematopoietic growth factors: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for the applications. Ann Oncol 2010;21(Suppl 5):v248251.

  • 8.

    Becker PS, Griffiths EA, Alwan L, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Hematopoietic Growth Factors. Version 2.2020. Accessed May 8, 2020. To view the most recent version, visit NCCN.org

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Bacrie J, Laurans M, Iorio P, et al. Febrile neutropenia in adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a retrospective study in routine clinical practice from a single institution. Support Care Cancer 2018;26:40974103.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Pawloski PA, Thomas AJ, Kane S, et al. Predicting neutropenia risk in patients with cancer using electronic data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017;24:e129135.

  • 11.

    The value of granulocyte colony stimulating factors in managing febrile neutropenia. Accessed May 8, 2020. Available at: https://www.ajmc.com/view/the-value-of-granulocyte-colony-stimulating-factors-in-managing-febrile-neutropenia

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Koyfman H. Biosimilarity and interchangeability in the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 and FDA’s 2012 Draft Guidance for Industry. Biotechnol Law Rep 2013;32:238251.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Biosimilar product information. Accessed May 8, 2020. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/biosimilars/biosimilar-product-information

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Hirsch BR, Lyman GH. Biosimilars: are they ready for primetime in the United States? J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2011;9:934943.

  • 15.

    Hirsch BR, Lyman GH. Will biosimilars gain momentum? J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2013;11:12911297.

  • 16.

    Winckworth-Prejsnar K, Nardi EA, McCanney J, et al. Ensuring patient safety and access in cancer care. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017;15:14601464.

  • 17.

    Roger SD, Mikhail A. Biosimilars: opportunity or cause for concern? J Pharm Pharm Sci 2007;10:405410.

  • 18.

    Zelenetz AD, Ahmed I, Braud EL, et al. NCCN Biosimilars White Paper: regulatory, scientific, and patient safety perspectives. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2011;9(Suppl 4):S122.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    McKinnon R, Ward M. Safety considerations of biosimilars. Aust Prescr 2016;39:188189.

  • 20.

    Skingle D. Biosimilars: what do patients need to consider? RMD Open 2015;1:e000141.

  • 21.

    Leonard E, Wascovich M, Oskouei S, et al. Factors affecting health care provider knowledge and acceptance of biosimilar medicines: a systematic review. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2019;25:102112.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Greener M. Biosimilars: ensuring safety in the search for savings. Accessed May 8, 2020. Available at: https://wchh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/psb.1560

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Tabernero J, Vyas M, Giuliani R, et al. Biosimilars: a position paper of the European Society for Medical Oncology, with particular reference to oncology prescribers. ESMO Open 2016;1:e000142.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Lyman GH, Balaban E, Diaz M, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology statement: biosimilars in oncology. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:12601265.

  • 25.

    Blackwell K, Semiglazov V, Krasnozhon D, et al. Comparison of EP2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, to the reference: a phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2015;26:19481953.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Harbeck N, Gascón P, Krendyukov A, et al. Safety profile of biosimilar filgrastim (Zarzio/Zarxio): a combined analysis of phase III studies. Oncologist 2018;23:403409.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Yao HM, Ottery FD, Borema T, et al. PF-06881893 (Nivestym™), a filgrastim biosimilar, versus US-licensed filgrastim reference product (US-Neupogen®): pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and safety of single or multiple subcutaneous doses in healthy volunteers. BioDrugs 2019;33:207220.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Waller CF, Ranganna GM, Pennella EJ, et al. Randomized phase 3 efficacy and safety trial of proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar MYL-1401H in the prophylactic treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Ann Hematol 2019;98:12171224.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Botteri E, Krendyukov A, Curigliano G. Comparing granulocyte colony-stimulating factor filgrastim and pegfilgrastim to its biosimilars in terms of efficacy and safety: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 2018;89:4955.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Schwartzberg LS, Lal LS, Balu S, et al. Clinical outcomes of treatment with filgrastim versus a filgrastim biosimilar and febrile neutropenia-associated costs among patients with nonmyeloid cancer undergoing chemotherapy. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2018;24:976984.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Douglas AG, Schwab P, Lane D, et al. A comparison of brand and biosimilar granulocyte-colony stimulating factors for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2017;23:12211226.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Gascón P, Aapro M, Ludwig H, et al. Treatment patterns and outcomes in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia with biosimilar filgrastim (the MONITOR-GCSF study). Support Care Cancer 2016;24:911925.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Ludwig H, Gascón P, Bokemeyer C, et al. Outcomes of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia prophylaxis with biosimilar filgrastim (Zarzio®) initiated “same-day” (< 24 h), “per-guidelines” (24-72 h), and “late” (> 72 h): findings from the MONITOR-GCSF study. Support Care Cancer 2019;27:23012312.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Kamioner D, Fruehauf S, Maloisel F, et al. Study design: two long-term observational studies of the biosimilar filgrastim Nivestim™ (Hospira filgrastim) in the treatment and prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. BMC Cancer 2013;13:547.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Biologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium (BBCIC). Accessed May 9, 2020. Available at: https://www.bbcic.org/

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Platt R, Brown JS, Robb M, et al. The FDA Sentinel Initiative—an evolving national resource. N Engl J Med 2018;379:20912093.

  • 37.

    Ganti AKP, Loo BW Jr, Akerley W, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Small Cell Lung Cancer. Version 3.2020. Accessed May 9, 2020. To view the most recent version, visit NCCN.org

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer. Version 3.2020. Accessed May 9, 2020. To view the most recent version, visit NCCN.org

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Naeim A, Henk HJ, Becker L, et al. Pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization of cancer patients than filgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective United States claims analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF). BMC Cancer 2013;13:11.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Weycker D, Sofrygin O, Seefeld K, et al. Technical evaluation of methods for identifying chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in healthcare claims databases. BMC Health Serv Res 2013;13:60.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Gagne JJ, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, et al. A combined comorbidity score predicted mortality in elderly patients better than existing scores. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:749759.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    FDA Sentinel Initiative. The Sentinel routine querying system. Accessed May 9, 2020. Available at: https://www.sentinelinitiative.org/methods-data-tools/routine-querying-tools/routine-querying-system

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    FDA Sentinel Initiative. The Sentinel routine querying system modification history. Accessed May 9, 2020. Available at: https://dev.sentinelsystem.org/projects/SENTINEL/repos/sentinel-routine-querying-tool-documentation/browse/files/file019-typeall-modification.md

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 44.

    FDA Sentinel Initiative. Sentinel Initiative data quality review and characterization. Accessed May 9, 2020. Available at: https://www.sentinelinitiative.org/sentinel/data-quality-review-and-characterization

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 45.

    FDA Sentinel Initiative. Sentinel data quality assurance practices. Accessed May 9, 2020. Available at: https://www.sentinelinitiative.org/sentinel/data/distributed-database-common-data-model/sentinel-data-quality-assurance-practices

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 46.

    Pawloski PA, Larsen M, Thoresen A, et al. Pegfilgrastim use and bone pain: a cohort study of community-based cancer patients. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2016;22:423429.

  • 47.

    Henk HJ, Li X, Becker LK, et al. Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prophylaxis: how results are affected by research design. J Comp Eff Res 2015;4:3750.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    Tan H, Cai Q, Agarwal S, et al. Impact of adherence to disease-modifying therapies on clinical and economic outcomes among patients with multiple sclerosis. Adv Ther 2011;28:5161.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    Baig H, Somlo B, Eisen M, et al. Appropriateness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients receiving chemotherapy by febrile neutropenia risk level. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2019;25:15761585.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50.

    Lyman GH, Lyman CH, Agboola O. Risk models for predicting chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Oncologist 2005;10:427437.

  • 51.

    Lyman GH, Morrison VA, Dale DC, et al. Risk of febrile neutropenia among patients with intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma receiving CHOP chemotherapy. Leuk Lymphoma 2003;44:20692076.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52.

    Shayne M, Crawford J, Dale DC, et al. Predictors of reduced dose intensity in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006;100:255262.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53.

    Ruiz J, Miller AA, Tooze JA, et al. Frailty assessment predicts toxicity during first cycle chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer regardless of chronologic age. J Geriatr Oncol 2019;10:4854.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54.

    Salloum RG, Smith TJ, Jensen GA, et al. Using claims-based measures to predict performance status score in patients with lung cancer. Cancer 2011;117:10381048.

  • 55.

    Kim DH, Schneeweiss S. Measuring frailty using claims data for pharmacoepidemiologic studies of mortality in older adults: evidence and recommendations. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2014;23:891901.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56.

    Kim DH, Schneeweiss S, Glynn RJ, et al. Measuring frailty in Medicare data: development and validation of a claims-based frailty index. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2018;73:980987.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57.

    Cuthbertson CC, Kucharska-Newton A, Faurot KR, et al. Controlling for frailty in pharmacoepidemiologic studies of older adults: validation of an existing Medicare claims-based algorithm. Epidemiology 2018;29:556561.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 58.

    Shashikumar SA, Huang K, Konetzka RT, et al. Claims-based frailty indices: a systematic review. Med Care 2020;58:815825.

  • 59.

    Kim DH, Patorno E, Pawar A, et al. Measuring frailty in administrative claims data: comparative performance of four claims-based frailty measures in the U.S. Medicare data. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2020;75:11201125.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1449 949 195
PDF Downloads 295 142 25
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0