National Quality Measure Compliance for Palliative Bone Radiation Among Patients With Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Authors:
Stephen R. Grant Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and

Search for other papers by Stephen R. Grant in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Benjamin D. Smith Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and

Search for other papers by Benjamin D. Smith in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Lauren E. Colbert Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and

Search for other papers by Lauren E. Colbert in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, MSCR
,
Qunyh-Nhu Nguyen Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and

Search for other papers by Qunyh-Nhu Nguyen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
James B. Yu Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Search for other papers by James B. Yu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, MHS
,
Steven H. Lin Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and

Search for other papers by Steven H. Lin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
, and
Aileen B. Chen Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and

Search for other papers by Aileen B. Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, MPP
Restricted access

Background: There exists wide practice variability in palliative treatment schedules for bone metastases. In an effort to reduce variation and promote high-quality, cost-conscious care, the National Quality Forum (NQF) endorsed measure 1822 in 2012. This measure recommends the use of 30 Gy in 10 fractions, 24 Gy in 6 fractions, 20 Gy in 5 fractions, or 8 Gy in a single fraction for palliative radiation for bone metastases. We report on longitudinal compliance with this measure. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, patients with metastatic thoracic non–small cell lung cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 who received radiation therapy for bony sites of metastatic disease were identified. Treatment courses fitting 1 of the 4 recommended schedules under NQF 1822 were coded as compliant. Rates of compliance by patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were analyzed. Results: A total of 42,685 patients met the criteria for inclusion. Among all patients, 60.2% of treatment courses were compliant according to NQF 1822. Compliance increased over time and was highest for treatments to the extremity (69.8%), lowest for treatments to the skull or head (48.8%), and higher for academic practice (67.1%) compared with community (56.0%) or integrated network facilities (61.2%). On multivariable analysis, predictors of NQF 1822 compliance included year of diagnosis after 2011, treatment to an extremity, or treatment at an academic facility. Of noncompliant treatment courses, extended fractionation (≥11 fractions) occurred in 62.6% and was more common before 2012, in community practice, and for treatments of the skull or head. Conclusions: Among patients treated for metastatic non–small cell lung cancer, compliance with NQF 1822 increased over time. Although extended fractionation constituted a majority of noncompliant treatment courses, a substantial proportion also involved shorter courses.

Submitted July 21, 2020; accepted for publication November 17, 2020. Published online May 26, 2021.

Author contributions: Study concept and design: Grant, Lin, Chen. Data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation: Grant, Chen. Manuscript - original draft: Grant. Manuscript - review and editing: All authors.

Disclosures: The authors have disclosed that they have not received any financial consideration from any person or organization to support the preparation, analysis, results, or discussion of this article.

Correspondence: Aileen B. Chen, MD, MPP, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 97, Houston, TX 77030-4009. Email: AChen6@mdanderson.org
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Chen AB, Cronin A, Weeks JC, et al. Palliative radiation therapy practice in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium (CanCORS) study. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:558564.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Fairchild A, Barnes E, Ghosh S, et al. International patterns of practice in palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases: evidence-based practice? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;75:15011510.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Gupta A, Wang P, Sedhom R, et al. Physician practice variability in the use of extended-fraction radiation therapy for bone metastases: are we choosing wisely? JCO Oncol Pract 2020;16:e758769.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Chow E, van der Linden YM, Roos D, et al. Single versus multiple fractions of repeat radiation for painful bone metastases: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:164171.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, et al. Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:798804.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Wegner RE, Matani H, Colonias A, et al. Trends in radiation fractionation for bone metastases: a contemporary nationwide analysis. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020;10:402408.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Bekelman JE, Epstein AJ, Emanuel EJ. Single- vs multiple-fraction radiotherapy for bone metastases from prostate cancer. JAMA 2013;310:15011502.

  • 8.

    National Quality Forum. Quality Positioning System (QPS) measure description display information. Accessed November 20, 2020. Available at: http://www.qualityforum.org/QPS/MeasureDetails.aspx?standardID=1822&print=1&entityTypeID=1

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting Program. Accessed November 20, 2020. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/HospitalOutpatientQualityReportingProgram

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Quality Reporting Center. PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospital Quality Reporting (PCHQR) Program. Accessed November 20, 2020. Available at: https://www.qualityreportingcenter.com/en/inpatient-quality-reporting-programs/pps-exempt-cancer-hospital-quality-reporting-pchqr-program/

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    American Society for Radiation Oncology. Medicare program: proposed changes to hospital outpatient prospective payment and ambulatory surgical center payment systems and quality reporting programs; requests for information on promoting interoperability and electronic health care information, price transparency, and leveraging authority for competitive acquisition program for part b drugs and biologicals for a potential CMS Innovation Center model. Accessed November 20, 2020. Available at: https://www.astro.org/ASTRO/media/ASTRO/Daily%20 Practice/PDFs/2019HOPPSProposedRuleComments.pdf

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Zhang J, Yu KF. What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA 1998;280:16901691.

  • 13.

    Nguyen QN, Chun SG, Chow E, et al. Single-fraction stereotactic vs conventional multifraction radiotherapy for pain relief in patients with predominantly nonspine bone metastases: a randomized phase 2 trial. JAMA Oncol 2019;5:872878.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Ryu S, Deshmukh S, Timmerman RD, et al. Radiosurgery compared to external beam radiotherapy for localized spine metastasis: phase III results of NRG Oncology/RTOG 0631. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019;105(Suppl):S23.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Muller DA, Wages NA, Wilson DD, et al.STAT RAD: a prospective dose escalation clinical trial of single fraction scan-plan-QA-treat stereotactic body radiation therapy for painful osseous metastases. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020;10:e444451.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Gomez DR, Tang C, Zhang J, et al. Local consolidative therapy vs. maintenance therapy or observation for patients with oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: long-term results of a multi-institutional, phase II, randomized study. J Clin Oncol 2019;37:15581565.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus standard of care palliative treatment in patients with oligometastatic cancers (SABR-COMET): a randomised, phase 2, open-label trial. Lancet 2019;393:20512058.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Radiation oncology model. Accessed November 20, 2020. Available at: https://innovation.cms.gov/innovation-models/radiation-oncology-model

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Jacobs CD, Carpenter DJ, Hong JC, et al. Radiation records in the National Cancer Database: variations in coding and/or practice can significantly alter survival results. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2019;3:19.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 997 620 92
PDF Downloads 128 53 6
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0