Treating Elderly Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Authors:
Elizabeth R. KesslerDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine;
University of Colorado Cancer Center; and

Search for other papers by Elizabeth R. Kessler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Janet B. KukrejaUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center; and
Department of Urology and

Search for other papers by Janet B. Kukreja in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, MPH
,
Christopher L. GeigerDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine;
University of Colorado Cancer Center; and

Search for other papers by Christopher L. Geiger in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
, and
Stacy M. FischerUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center; and
Division of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.

Search for other papers by Stacy M. Fischer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
Restricted access

Bladder cancer is an extremely common cancer that primarily affects individuals aged >65 years. In caring for patients with bladder cancer, clinicians must also consider care of older persons in general. Management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) involves multidisciplinary treatment planning, because curative-intent therapy includes either surgery or radiation, with consideration of the role of systemic therapy. As clinicians develop a treatment plan, considering a geriatric oncology perspective may enhance patient care and influence outcomes for this large and growing population. Similarly, treatment plan development must also consider aspects unique to an older patient population, such as altered organ function, increased comorbidity, decreased functional reserve, and perhaps altered goals of treatment. Thus a thorough evaluation inclusive of disease assessment and geriatric assessment is essential to care planning. Population-based data show that as patients with MIBC age, use of standard therapies declines. Given the complexities of coordinating a multidisciplinary care plan, as well the complexities of treating a heterogeneous and potentially vulnerable older patient population, clinicians may benefit from upfront assessments to inform and guide the process. This review highlights the unique treatment planning considerations for elderly patients diagnosed with MIBC.

Submitted November 18, 2019; accepted for publication May 4, 2020.

Disclosures: Dr. Kessler has disclosed that she has received research funding from Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer. The remaining authors have disclosed that they have no financial interests, arrangements, or affiliations with the manufacturers of any products discussed in this article or their competitors

Correspondence: Elizabeth R. Kessler, MD, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Mailstop 8117, 12801 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045. Email: Elizabeth.kessler@cuanschutz.edu
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 2019;69:734.

  • 2.

    Cancer Stat Facts: Bladder Cancer. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. Accessed May 4, 2020. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/urinb.html

  • 3.

    Fedeli U, Fedewa SA, Ward EM. Treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer: evidence from the National Cancer Database, 2003 to 2007. J Urol 2011;185:7278.

  • 4.

    Mohile SG, Epstein RM, Hurria A, et al.. Communication with older patients with cancer using geriatric assessment: a cluster-randomized clinical trial from the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program. JAMA Oncol 2020;6:196204.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Repetto L, Fratino L, Audisio RA, et al.. Comprehensive geriatric assessment adds information to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status in elderly cancer patients: an Italian Group for Geriatric Oncology Study. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:494502.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Kenis C, Bron D, Libert Y, et al.. Relevance of a systematic geriatric screening and assessment in older patients with cancer: results of a prospective multicentric study. Ann Oncol 2013;24:13061312.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Mohile SG, Dale W, Somerfield MR, et al.. Practical assessment and management of vulnerabilities in older patients receiving chemotherapy: ASCO guideline for geriatric oncology. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:23262347.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Dotan E, Walter LC, Baumgartner J, et al.. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Older Adult Oncology. Version 1.2020. Accessed May 19, 2020. To view the most recent version, visit NCCN.org.

  • 9.

    Luciani A, Ascione G, Bertuzzi C, et al.. Detecting disabilities in older patients with cancer: comparison between comprehensive geriatric assessment and vulnerable elders survey-13. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:20462050.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Kenis C, Decoster L, Van Puyvelde K, et al.. Performance of two geriatric screening tools in older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:1926.

  • 11.

    Soubeyran P, Fonck M, Blanc-Bisson C, et al.. Predictors of early death risk in older patients treated with first-line chemotherapy for cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:18291834.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Hurria A, Mohile S, Gajra A, et al.. Validation of a prediction tool for chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:23662371.

  • 13.

    Extermann M, Boler I, Reich RR, et al.. Predicting the risk of chemotherapy toxicity in older patients: the Chemotherapy Risk Assessment Scale for High-Age Patients (CRASH) score. Cancer 2012;118:33773386.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Hornor MA, Ma M, Zhou L, et al.. Enhancing the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator to predict geriatric outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2019;229:S121122.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Chang SS, Bochner BH, Chou R, et al.. Treatment of nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer: American Urological Association/American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Society for Radiation Oncology/Society of Urologic Oncology Clinical Practice guideline summary. J Oncol Pract 2017;13:621625.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Froehner M, Brausi MA, Herr HW, et al.. Complications following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the elderly. Eur Urol 2009;56:443454.

  • 17.

    Tan HJ, Saliba D, Kwan L, et al.. Burden of geriatric events among older adults undergoing major cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:12311238.

  • 18.

    Fonteyne V, Ost P, Bellmunt J, et al.. Curative treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2018;73:4050.

  • 19.

    VanderWalde NA, Chi MT, Hurria A, et al.. Treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer in the elderly: navigating the trade-offs of risk and benefit. World J Urol 2016;34:311.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Sikic D, Wach S, Taubert H, et al.. How octogenarians with bladder cancer are treated in a maximum-care hospital: the real-life experience. Urol Int 2017;98:262267.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Caillet P, Canoui-Poitrine F, Vouriot J, et al.. Comprehensive geriatric assessment in the decision-making process in elderly patients with cancer: ELCAPA study. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:36363642.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Chang SS, Bochner BH, Chou R, et al.. Treatment of non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer: AUA/ASCO/ASTRO/SUO guideline. J Urol 2017;198:552559.

  • 23.

    Gupta NP, Goel R, Hemal AK, et al.. Radical cystectomy in septuagenarian patients with bladder cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 2004;36:353358.

  • 24.

    Zebic N, Weinknecht S, Kroepfl D. Radical cystectomy in patients aged > or = 75 years: an updated review of patients treated with curative and palliative intent. BJU Int 2005;95:12111214.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Elting LS, Pettaway C, Bekele BN, et al.. Correlation between annual volume of cystectomy, professional staffing, and outcomes: a statewide, population-based study. Cancer 2005;104:975984.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Baack Kukreja JE, Kiernan M, Schempp B, et al.. Quality Improvement in Cystectomy Care With Enhanced Recovery (QUICCER) study. BJU Int 2017;119:3849.

  • 27.

    Erlich A, Zlotta AR. Treatment of bladder cancer in the elderly. Investig Clin Urol 2016;57(Suppl 1):S2635.

  • 28.

    Yasui T, Tozawa K, Ando R, et al.. Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy for patients older than 75 years: a single-center comparative analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16:63536358.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Parekh DJ, Reis IM, Castle EP, et al.. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2018;391:25252536.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Bochner BH, Sjoberg DD, Laudone VP. A randomized trial of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy. N Engl J Med 2014;371:389390.

  • 31.

    Winters BR, Bremjit PJ, Gore JL, et al.. Preliminary comparative effectiveness of robotic versus open radical cystectomy in elderly patients. J Endourol 2016;30:212217.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Hussein AA, May PR, Jing Z, et al.. Outcomes of intracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. J Urol 2018;199:13021311.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Tzelves L, Skolarikos A, Mourmouris P, et al.. Does the use of a robot decrease the complication rate adherent to radical cystectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing open with robotic counterparts. J Endourol 2019;33:971984.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Tyson MD, Chang SS. Enhanced recovery pathways versus standard care after cystectomy: a meta-analysis of the effect on perioperative outcomes. Eur Urol 2016;70:9951003.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Flaig TW. NCCN Guidelines updates: management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019;17:591593.

  • 36.

    Porter MP, Kerrigan MC, Donato BMK, et al.. Patterns of use of systemic chemotherapy for Medicare beneficiaries with urothelial bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2011;29:252258.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Chau C, Wheater M, Geldart T, et al.. Clinical outcomes following neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy for bladder cancer in elderly compared with younger patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2015;24:155162.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Grossman HB, Natale RB, Tangen CM, et al.. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;349:859866.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Sternberg CN, de Mulder PH, Schornagel JH, et al.. Randomized phase III trial of high-dose-intensity methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) chemotherapy and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus classic MVAC in advanced urothelial tract tumors: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Protocol no. 30924. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:26382646.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Galsky MD, Pal SK, Chowdhury S, et al.. Comparative effectiveness of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cancer 2015;121:25862593.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Galsky MD, Hahn NM, Rosenberg J, et al.. A consensus definition of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who are unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:211214.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    Gray PJ, Fedewa SA, Shipley WU, et al.. Use of potentially curative therapies for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the United States: results from the National Cancer Data Base. Eur Urol 2013;63:823829.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    Leow JJ, Martin-Doyle W, Rajagopal PS, et al.. Adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer: a 2013 updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Urol 2014;66:4254.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44.

    Galsky MD, Stensland KD, Moshier E, et al.. Effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:825832.

  • 45.

    Longo N, Imbimbo C, Fusco F, et al.. Complications and quality of life in elderly patients with several comorbidities undergoing cutaneous ureterostomy with single stoma or ileal conduit after radical cystectomy. BJU Int 2016;118:521526.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46.

    Novotny V, Hakenberg OW, Wiessner D, et al.. Perioperative complications of radical cystectomy in a contemporary series. Eur Urol 2007;51:397401; discussion 401–402.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47.

    Mak RH, Hunt D, Shipley WU, et al.. Long-term outcomes in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer after selective bladder-preserving combined-modality therapy: a pooled analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocols 8802, 8903, 9506, 9706, 9906, and 0233. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:38013809.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    Efstathiou JA, Shipley WU, Zietman AL. Reply to Neeraj Kumar Goyal, Manish Garg, and Apul Goel’s Letter to the Editor re: Re: Jason A. Efstathiou, Daphna Y. Spiegel, William U. Shipley, et al. Long-term outcomes of selective bladder preservation by combined-modality therapy for invasive bladder cancer: the MGH experience. Eur Urol 2012;61:705-11. Eur Urol 2012;62:E42.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    Boustani J, Bertaut A, Galsky MD, et al.. Radical cystectomy or bladder preservation with radiochemotherapy in elderly patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Retrospective International Study of Cancers of the Urothelial Tract (RISC) Investigators. Acta Oncol 2018;57:491497.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50.

    Giacalone NJ, Shipley WU, Clayman RH, et al.. Long-term outcomes after bladder-preserving tri-modality therapy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an updated analysis of the Massachusetts General Hospital experience. Eur Urol 2017;71:952960.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51.

    Graham K, Williamson A, Lamb C, et al.. Comparison of two palliative radiotherapy regimens in poor prognosis patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Neuro-oncol 2012;14:6162.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52.

    Choudhury A, Swindell R, Logue JP, et al.. Phase II study of conformal hypofractionated radiotherapy with concurrent gemcitabine in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:733738.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53.

    Lichtman SM. Geriatric oncology and clinical trials. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2015;35:e127131.

  • 54.

    Hamaker ME, Te Molder M, Thielen N, et al.. The effect of a geriatric evaluation on treatment decisions and outcome for older cancer patients – a systematic review. J Geriatr Oncol 2018;9:430440.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55.

    Puts MT, Santos B, Hardt J, et al.. An update on a systematic review of the use of geriatric assessment for older adults in oncology. Ann Oncol 2014;25:307315.

  • 56.

    Caillet P, Laurent M, Bastuji-Garin S, et al.. Optimal management of elderly cancer patients: usefulness of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. Clin Interv Aging 2014;9:16451660.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57.

    Bellmunt J, de Wit R, Vaughn DJ, et al.. Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2017;376:10151026.

  • 58.

    Necchi A, Anichini A, Raggi D, et al.. Pembrolizumab as neoadjuvant therapy before radical cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (PURE-01): an open-label, single-arm, phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:33533360.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 59.

    Bohannon RW. Reference values for the timed up and go test: a descriptive meta-analysis. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2006;29:6468.

  • 60.

    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373383.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 61.

    Miller MD, Paradis CF, Houck PR, et al.. Rating chronic medical illness burden in geropsychiatric practice and research: application of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale. Psychiatry Res 1992;41:237248.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 62.

    Pangman VC, Sloan J, Guse L. An examination of psychometric properties of the Mini-Mental State Examination and the standardized Mini-Mental State Examination: implications for clinical practice. Appl Nurs Res 2000;13:209213.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63.

    Katzman R, Brown T, Fuld P, et al.. Validation of a short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test of cognitive impairment. Am J Psychiatry 1983;140:734739.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 64.

    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606613.

  • 65.

    Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Ramsch C, et al.. Validation of the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form (MNA-SF): a practical tool for identification of nutritional status. J Nutr Health Aging 2009;13:782788.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 66.

    Wilson MM, Thomas DR, Rubenstein LZ, et al.. Appetite assessment: simple appetite questionnaire predicts weight loss in community-dwelling adults and nursing home residents. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:10741081.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 67.

    Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473483.

  • 68.

    By the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2019 Updated AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019;67:674694.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 69.

    Mahony DO, Sullivan DO, Byrne S, et al.. Corrigendum: STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2. Age Ageing 2018;47:489.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 9498 1720 165
PDF Downloads 3813 1083 101
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0