Comparison of Treatment Strategies for Patients With Clinical Stage T1–3/N2 Lung Cancer

Authors:
Ya-Fu ChengDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, and

Search for other papers by Ya-Fu Cheng in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Wei-Heng HungDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, and

Search for other papers by Wei-Heng Hung in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Heng-Chung ChenDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, and

Search for other papers by Heng-Chung Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Ching-Yuan ChengDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, and

Search for other papers by Ching-Yuan Cheng in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Ching-Hsiung LinDivision of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua;

Search for other papers by Ching-Hsiung Lin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Sheng-Hao LinDivision of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua;

Search for other papers by Sheng-Hao Lin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
, and
Bing-Yen WangDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, and
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung;
Institute of Genomics and Bioinformatics, and
National Chung Hsing University, Taichung;
School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung; and
Center for General Education, Ming Dao University, Changhua, Taiwan.

Search for other papers by Bing-Yen Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
Restricted access

Background: The therapeutic strategies for clinical stage T1–3N2 (cT1–3N2) lung cancer are controversial. For operable tumors, treatment can vary by center, region, and continent. This study aimed to identify the optimal therapeutic method and type of surgical strategy for cT1–3N2 lung cancer. Methods: This retrospective evaluation analyzed the records of 17,954 patients with cT1–3N2 lung cancer treated in 2010 through 2015 from the SEER database. The effects of different therapeutic methods and types of surgical strategies on overall survival (OS) were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: The 5-year OS rates were 27.7% for patients with T1N2 disease, 21.8% for those with T2N2 disease, and 19.9% for T3N2 disease. Neoadjuvant therapy plus operation (OP) plus adjuvant therapy, and OP plus adjuvant therapy, provided better 5-year OS rates than OP alone or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (34.1%, 37.7%, 29.3%, and 16.1%, respectively). In the T1N2, T2N2, and T3N2 groups, lobectomy provided better 5-year OS than pneumonectomy, sublobectomy, and no surgery. Both univariate and multivariate analyses showed that young age, female sex, well-differentiated histologic grade, adenocarcinoma cell type, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, lobectomy, and T1 stage were statistically associated with better 5-year OS rates. Conclusions: In cT1–3N2 lung cancer, multimodal treatments tended to provide better 5-year OS than OP alone or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. In addition, lobectomy was associated with better survival than other operative methods.

Submitted May 6, 2019; accepted for publication August 30, 2019.

Author contributions: Study concept and design: Y.F. Cheng, Wang. Technical design and analysis of data: Hung, Chen, C.Y. Cheng. Data acquisition, interpretation, and analysis: C.H. Lin, S.H. Lin.

Disclosures: The authors have not received any financial consideration from any person or organization to support the preparation, analysis, results, or discussion of this article.

Correspondence: Bing-Yen Wang, MD, PhD, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, 135 Nanxiao Street, Changhua City, Changhua County 500, Taiwan. Email: thomas21917@hotmail.com
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al.. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:87108.

  • 2.

    Youlden DR, Cramb SM, Baade PD. The international epidemiology of lung cancer: geographical distribution and secular trends. J Thorac Oncol 2008;3:819831.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:730.

  • 4.

    Farjah F, Flum DR, Varghese TK Jr, et al.. Surgeon specialty and long-term survival after pulmonary resection for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:9951004, discussion 1005–1006.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Rocco G, Nason K, Brunelli A, et al.. Management of stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer: a transatlantic perspective. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;101:12471250.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Roth JA, Fossella F, Komaki R, et al.. A randomized trial comparing perioperative chemotherapy and surgery with surgery alone in resectable stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86:673680.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al., eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2010.

  • 8.

    Nagai K, Tsuchiya R, Mori T, et al.. A randomized trial comparing induction chemotherapy followed by surgery with surgery alone for patients with stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer (JCOG 9209). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:254260.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Evans NR III, Li S, Wright CD, et al.. The impact of induction therapy on morbidity and operative mortality after resection of primary lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:991996.e1–e2.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Spicer JD, Shewale JB, Nelson DB, et al.. Multimodality therapy for N2 non-small cell lung cancer: an evolving paradigm. Ann Thorac Surg 2019;107:277284.

  • 11.

    Shah AA, Berry MF, Tzao C, et al.. Induction chemoradiation is not superior to induction chemotherapy alone in stage IIIA lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;93:18071812.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Higgins K, Chino JP, Marks LB, et al.. Preoperative chemotherapy versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy for stage III (N2) non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;75:14621467.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Pless M, Stupp R, Ris HB, et al.. Induction chemoradiation in stage IIIA/N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet 2015;386:10491056.

  • 14.

    Katakami N, Tada H, Mitsudomi T, et al.. A phase 3 study of induction treatment with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy before surgery in patients with pathologically confirmed N2 stage IIIA nonsmall cell lung cancer (WJTOG9903). Cancer 2012;118:61266135.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Vansteenkiste J, Betticher D, Eberhardt W, et al.. Randomized controlled trial of resection versus radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy in stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2007;2:684685.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Stephens RJ, Girling DJ, Hopwood P, et al.. A randomised controlled trial of pre-operative chemotherapy followed, if feasible, by resection versus radiotherapy in patients with inoperable stage T3, N1, M0 or T1-3, N2, M0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2005;49:395400.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Albain KS, Swann RS, Rusch VW, et al.. Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy with or without surgical resection for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;374:379386.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Thomas M, Rübe C, Hoffknecht P, et al.. Effect of preoperative chemoradiation in addition to preoperative chemotherapy: a randomised trial in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet Oncol 2008;9:636648.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    NSCLC Meta-analyses Collaborative Group. Adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without postoperative radiotherapy, in operable non-small-cell lung cancer: two meta-analyses of individual patient data. Lancet 2010;375:12671277.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, et al.. Overall survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. N Engl J Med 2018;379:23422350.

  • 21.

    Kelly K, Altorki NK, Eberhardt WE, et al.. Adjuvant erlotinib versus placebo in patients with stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (RADIANT): a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:40074014.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Pennell NA, Neal JW, Chaft JE, et al.. SELECT: a phase II trial of adjuvant erlotinib in patients with resected epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2019;37:97104.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Zhong WZ, Wang Q, Mao WM, et al.. Gefitinib versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin as adjuvant treatment for stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) EGFR-mutant NSCLC (ADJUVANT/CTONG1104): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2018;19:139148.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Edelman MJ, Hu C, Le QT, et al.. Randomized phase II study of preoperative chemoradiotherapy ± panitumumab followed by consolidation chemotherapy in potentially operable locally advanced (stage IIIa, N2+) non-small cell lung cancer: NRG Oncology RTOG 0839. J Thorac Oncol 2017;12:14131420.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Eaton BR, Pugh SL, Bradley JD, et al.. Institutional enrollment and survival among NSCLC patients receiving chemoradiation: NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0617. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016;108:djw034.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Wang EH, Rutter CE, Corso CD, et al.. Patients selected for definitive concurrent chemoradiation at high-volume facilities achieve improved survival in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2015;10:937943.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Samson P, Patel A, Crabtree TD, et al.. Multidisciplinary treatment for stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: does institution type matter? Ann Thorac Surg 2015;100:17731779.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Katsumata S, Aokage K, Ishii G, et al.. Prognostic impact of the number of metastatic lymph nodes on the eighth edition of the TNM classification of NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2019;14:14081418.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Wang L, Zhan C, Gu J, et al.. Role of skip mediastinal lymph node metastasis for patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Clin Lung Cancer 2019;20:e346355.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Hu XF, Duan L, Jiang GN, et al.. Surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer patients with unexpected persistent pathological N2 disease. Mol Clin Oncol 2016;4:261267.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 3011 303 20
PDF Downloads 1469 294 24
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0