Impact of Surgical Resection on Survival Outcomes After Chemoradiotherapy in Anal Adenocarcinoma
Search for other papers by Richard Li in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ashwin Shinde in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marwan Fakih in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stephen Sentovich in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kurt Melstrom in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rebecca Nelson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Scott Glaser in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yi-Jen Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Karyn Goodman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Arya Amini in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background: Anal adenocarcinoma is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis, and no randomized data are available to guide management. Prior retrospective analyses offer differing conclusions on the benefit of surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in these patients. We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to analyze survival outcomes in patients undergoing CRT with and without subsequent surgical resection. Methods: Patients with adenocarcinoma of the anus diagnosed in 2004 through 2015 were identified using the NCDB. Patients with metastatic disease and survival <90 days were excluded. We analyzed patients receiving CRT and stratified by receipt of surgical resection. Logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of use of surgery and to form a propensity score–matched cohort. Overall survival (OS) was compared between treatment strategies using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: We identified 1,747 patients with anal adenocarcinoma receiving CRT, of whom 1,005 (58%) received surgery. Predictors of increased receipt of surgery included age <65 years, private insurance, overlapping involvement of the anus and rectum, N0 disease, and external-beam radiation dose ≥4,000 cGy. With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, 5-year OS was 61.1% in patients receiving CRT plus surgery compared with 39.8% in patients receiving CRT alone (log-rank P<.001). In multivariate analysis, surgery was associated with significantly improved OS (hazard ratio, −0.59; 95% CI, 0.50–0.68; P<.001). This survival benefit persisted in a propensity score–matched cohort (log-rank P<.001). Conclusions: In the largest series of anal adenocarcinoma cases to date, treatment with CRT followed by surgery was associated with a significant survival benefit compared with CRT alone in propensity score–matching analysis. Our findings support national guideline recommendations of neoadjuvant CRT followed by resection for patients with anal adenocarcinoma.
Submitted February 11, 2019; accepted for publication April 5, 2019.
Author contributions: Study conception and design: Li, Amini. Data collection and analysis: Li, Amini. Manuscript writing and editing: All authors. Study supervision: Amini.
Disclosures: The authors have not received any financial consideration from any person or organization to support the preparation, analysis, results, or discussion of this article.
© 2019-2024 National Comprehensive Cancer Network