Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Restricted access

Cervical cancer is a malignant epithelial tumor that forms in the uterine cervix. Most cases of cervical cancer are preventable through human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination, routine screening, and treatment of precancerous lesions. However, due to inadequate screening protocols in many regions of the world, cervical cancer remains the fourth-most common cancer in women globally. The complete NCCN Guidelines for Cervical Cancer provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of cervical cancer. This manuscript discusses guiding principles for the workup, staging, and treatment of early stage and locally advanced cervical cancer, as well as evidence for these recommendations. For recommendations regarding treatment of recurrent or metastatic disease, please see the full guidelines on NCCN.org.

Discussion Section Writing Committee.

PLEASE NOTEThe NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) are a statement of evidence and consensus of the authors regarding their views of currently accepted approaches to treatment. Any clinician seeking to apply or consult the NCCN Guidelines is expected to use independent medical judgment in the context of individual clinical circumstances to determine any patient's care or treatment. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) makes no representations or warranties of any kind regarding their content, use, or application and disclaims any responsibility for their applications or use in any way.The complete NCCN Guidelines for Cervical Cancer are not printed in this issue of JNCCN but can be accessed online at NCCN.org.© National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2019. All rights reserved. The NCCN Guidelines and the illustrations herein may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN.
Disclosures for the NCCN Cervical Cancer PanelAt the beginning of each NCCN Guidelines Panel meeting, panel members review all potential conflicts of interest. NCCN, in keeping with its commitment to public transparency, publishes these disclosures for panel members, staff, and NCCN itself.Individual disclosures for the NCCN Cervical Cancer Panel members can be found on page 84. (The most recent version of these guidelines and accompanying disclosures are available on the NCCN website at NCCN.org.)The complete and most recent version of these guidelines are available free of charge at NCCN.org
  • 1.

    AmitASchinkJReissALowensteinL. PET/CT in gynecologic cancer: present applications and future prospects--a clinician's perspective. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am2011;38:121 vii.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    PatelSLiyanageSHSahdevA. Imaging of endometrial and cervical cancer. Insights Imaging2010;1:309328.

  • 3.

    ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and treatment of cervical carcinomas. Number 35, May 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet2002;78:7991.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    GoldMATianCWhitneyCW. Surgical versus radiographic determination of para-aortic lymph node metastases before chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer2008;112:19541963.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    MonkBJTianCRosePGLancianoR. Which clinical/pathologic factors matter in the era of chemoradiation as treatment for locally advanced cervical carcinoma? Analysis of two Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trials. Gynecol Oncol2007;105:427433.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    ShermanMEWangSSCarreonJDevesaSS. Mortality trends for cervical squamous and adenocarcinoma in the United States. Relation to incidence and survival. Cancer2005;103:12581264.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    SasieniPCastanonACuzickJ. Screening and adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Int J Cancer2009;125:525529.

  • 8.

    SiegelCLAndreottiRFCardenesHR. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) pretreatment planning of invasive cancer of the cervix. J Am Coll Radiol2012;9:395402.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    PecorelliSZiglianiLOdicinoF. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet2009;105:107108.

  • 10.

    MooreDH. Surgical staging and cervical cancer: after 30 years, have we reached a conclusion?Cancer2008;112:18741876.

  • 11.

    PecorelliS. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet2009;105:103104.

  • 12.

    Cervix Uteri Cancer Staging. American Joint Committee on Cancer; Available at: http://cancerstaging.org/references-tools/quickreferences/Documents/CervixMedium.pdf. Accessed July 3 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    How is cervical cancer staged?American Cancer Society; 2014. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/cid/documents/webcontent/003094-pdf.pdf. Accessed July 3 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    HricakHGatsonisCCoakleyFV. Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation—ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability. Radiology2007;245:491498.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    WooSKimHSChungHH. Early stage cervical cancer: role of magnetic resonance imaging after conization in determining residual tumor. Acta Radiol2016;57:12681276.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    MitchellDGSnyderBCoakleyF. Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study. J Clin Oncol2006;24:56875694.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    DowneyKJafarMAttygalleAD. Influencing surgical management in patients with carcinoma of the cervix using a T2- and ZOOM-diffusion-weighted endovaginal MRI technique. Br J Cancer2013;109:615622.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    LakhmanYAkinOParkKJ. Stage IB1 cervical cancer: role of preoperative MR imaging in selection of patients for fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy. Radiology2013;269:149158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    DowneyKShepherdJHAttygalleAD. Preoperative imaging in patients undergoing trachelectomy for cervical cancer: validation of a combined T2- and diffusion-weighted endovaginal MRI technique at 3.0 T. Gynecol Oncol2014;133:326332.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    de BoerPAdamJABuistMR. Role of MRI in detecting involvement of the uterine internal os in uterine cervical cancer: systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy. Eur J Radiol2013;82:e422428.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    ThomeerMGGeresteinCSpronkS. Clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the pretreatment staging of cervical carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol2013;23:20052018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    ParkJYKimENKimDY. Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer. Gynecol Oncol2008;108:486492.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    LinSYTsaiCSChangYC. The role of pretreatment FDG-PET in treating cervical cancer patients with enlarged pelvic lymph node(s) shown on MRI: a phase 3 randomized trial with long-term follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2015;92:577585.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    BoughanimMLeboulleuxSReyA. Histologic results of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients treated for stage IB2/II cervical cancer with negative [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans in the para-aortic area. J Clin Oncol2008;26:25582561.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    ZhaoQFengYMaoXQieM. Prognostic value of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography or PET-computed tomography in cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer2013;23:11841190.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    GeeMSAtriMBandosAI. Identification of distant metastatic disease in uterine cervical and endometrial cancers with FDG PET/CT: analysis from the ACRIN 6671/GOG 0233 Multicenter Trial. Radiology2018;287:176184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    SedlisABundyBNRotmanMZ. A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol1999;73:177183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    RyuSYKimMHNamBH. Intermediate-risk grouping of cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Br J Cancer2014;110:278285.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    NohJMParkWKimYS. Comparison of clinical outcomes of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in uterine cervical cancer patients receiving surgical resection followed by radiotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study (KROG 13–10). Gynecol Oncol2014;132:618623.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    DiazESAoyamaCBaquingMA. Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins. Gynecol Oncol2014;132:7680.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    EstapeREAngioliRMadrigalM. Close vaginal margins as a prognostic factor after radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol1998;68:229232.

  • 32.

    Parra-HerranCTaljaardMDjordjevicB. Pattern-based classification of invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma, depth of invasion measurement and distinction from adenocarcinoma in situ: interobserver variation among gynecologic pathologists. Mod Pathol2016;29:879892.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    RomaAAMistrettaTADiaz De VivarA. New pattern-based personalized risk stratification system for endocervical adenocarcinoma with important clinical implications and surgical outcome. Gynecol Oncol2016;141:3642.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    RutgersJKRomaAAParkKJ. Pattern classification of endocervical adenocarcinoma: reproducibility and review of criteria. Mod Pathol2016;29:10831094.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    BentivegnaEGouySMaulardA. Oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol2016;17:e240253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    UekiMOkamotoYMisakiO. Conservative therapy for microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol1994;53:109113.

  • 37.

    Al-KalbaniMMcVeighGNagarHMcCluggageWG. Do FIGO stage IA and small (</=2 cm) IB1 cervical adenocarcinomas have a good prognosis and warrant less radical surgery?Int J Gynecol Cancer2012;22:291295.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    WebbJCKeyCRQuallsCRSmithHO. Population-based study of microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Obstet Gynecol2001;97:701706.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    SevinBUNadjiMAveretteHE. Microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer1992;70:21212128.

  • 40.

    HuangLWHwangJL. A comparison between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical dysplasia: residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy specimen. Gynecol Oncol1999;73:1215.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    MiroshnichenkoGGParvaMHoltzDO. Interpretability of excisional biopsies of the cervix: cone biopsy and loop excision. J Low Genit Tract Dis2009;13:1012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    GreenspanDLFaubionMCoonrodDV. Compliance after loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife cone biopsy. Obstet Gynecol2007;110:675680.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    FanningJPadratzikJ. Cold knife conization vs. LEEP. Are they the same procedure?J Reprod Med2002;47:3335.

  • 44.

    SimmonsJRAndersonLHernandezEHellerPB. Evaluating cervical neoplasia. LEEP as an alternative to cold knife conization. J Reprod Med1998;43:10071013.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45.

    KimMKKimMAKimJW. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure findings for identification of patients with early-stage cervical cancer suitable for less radical surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer2012;22:12141219.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46.

    Bouchard-FortierGReadeCJCovensA. Non-radical surgery for small early-stage cervical cancer. Is it time?Gynecol Oncol2014;132:624627.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47.

    KatoTTakashimaAKasamatsuT. Clinical tumor diameter and prognosis of patients with FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer (JCOG0806-A). Gynecol Oncol2015;137:3439.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    DiazJPSonodaYLeitaoMM. Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol2008;111:255260.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    Abu-RustumNRTalMNDeLairD. Radical abdominal trachelectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer at 15-week gestation. Gynecol Oncol2010;116:151152.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50.

    RamirezPTParejaRRendonGJ. Management of low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: should conization, simple trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy replace radical surgery as the new standard of care?Gynecol Oncol2014;132:254259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51.

    DargentDMartinXSacchetoniAMathevetP. Laparoscopic vaginal radical trachelectomy: a treatment to preserve the fertility of cervical carcinoma patients. Cancer2000;88:18771882.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52.

    ViswanathanANDeaversMTJhingranA. Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: outcome and patterns of recurrence. Gynecol Oncol2004;93:2733.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53.

    YoungRHClementPB. Endocervical adenocarcinoma and its variants: their morphology and differential diagnosis. Histopathology2002;41:185207.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54.

    CaoDYYangJXWuXH. Comparisons of vaginal and abdominal radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: preliminary results of a multi-center research in China. Br J Cancer2013;109:27782782.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55.

    PlanteMGregoireJRenaudMCRoyM. The vaginal radical trachelectomy: an update of a series of 125 cases and 106 pregnancies. Gynecol Oncol2011;121:290297.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56.

    Abu-RustumNRSonodaYBlackD. Fertility-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy for cervical carcinoma: technique and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol2006;103:807813.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57.

    EinsteinMHParkKJSonodaY. Radical vaginal versus abdominal trachelectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer: a comparison of surgical and pathologic outcomes. Gynecol Oncol2009;112:7377.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 58.

    WethingtonSLCibulaDDuskaLR. An international series on abdominal radical trachelectomy: 101 patients and 28 pregnancies. Int J Gynecol Cancer2012;22:12511257.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 59.

    Abu-RustumNRSonodaY. Fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: indications and applications. J Natl Compr Canc Netw2010;8:14351438.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 60.

    BeinerMECovensA. Surgery insight: radical vaginal trachelectomy as a method of fertility preservation for cervical cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol2007;4:353361.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 61.

    ParejaRRendonGJSanz-LomanaCM. Surgical, oncological, and obstetrical outcomes after abdominal radical trachelectomy—a systematic literature review. Gynecol Oncol2013;131:7782.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 62.

    LintnerBSasoSTarnaiL. Use of abdominal radical trachelectomy to treat cervical cancer greater than 2 cm in diameter. Int J Gynecol Cancer2013;23:10651070.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63.

    WethingtonSLSonodaYParkKJ. Expanding the indications for radical trachelectomy: a report on 29 patients with stage IB1 tumors measuring 2 to 4 centimeters. Int J Gynecol Cancer2013;23:10921098.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 64.

    LanowskaMManglerMSpeiserD. Radical vaginal trachelectomy after laparoscopic staging and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with early-stage cervical cancer over 2 cm: oncologic, fertility, and neonatal outcome in a series of 20 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer2014;24:586593.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65.

    ShepherdJHSpencerCHerodJIndTEJ. Radical vaginal trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing procedure in women with early-stage cervical cancer-cumulative pregnancy rate in a series of 123 women. BJOG2006;113:719724.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 66.

    ParkJYKimDYSuhDS. Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol2014;25:913.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 67.

    GizzoSAnconaESaccardiC. Radical trachelectomy: the first step of fertility preservation in young women with cervical cancer (review). Oncol Rep2013;30:25452554.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 68.

    CibulaDAbu-RustumNRBenedetti-PaniciP. New classification system of radical hysterectomy: emphasis on a three-dimensional anatomic template for parametrial resection. Gynecol Oncol2011;122:264268.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 69.

    QuerleuDMorrowCP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol2008;9:297303.

  • 70.

    PiverMSRutledgeFSmithJP. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol1974;44:265272.

  • 71.

    ChiDSAbu-RustumNRPlanteMRoyM. Cancer of the cervix. In: RockJAJonesHW eds eds. TeLinde's Operative Gynecology10th ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008:1227.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 72.

    WhitneyCWSpirtosNM. Gynecologic Oncology Group Surgical Procedures Manual. Philadelphia: Gynecologic Oncology Group; 2009. Available at: https://gogmember.gog.org/manuals/pdf/surgman.pdf. Accessed April 18 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 73.

    SardainHLavoueVRedpathM. Curative pelvic exenteration for recurrent cervical carcinoma in the era of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol2015;41:975985.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 74.

    ChianteraVRossiMDe IacoP. Morbidity after pelvic exenteration for gynecological malignancies: a retrospective multicentric study of 230 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer2014;24:156164.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 75.

    CormierBDiazJPShihK. Establishing a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm for the treatment of early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol2011;122:275280.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 76.

    LecuruFMathevetPQuerleuD. Bilateral negative sentinel nodes accurately predict absence of lymph node metastasis in early cervical cancer: results of the SENTICOL study. J Clin Oncol2011;29:16861691.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 77.

    AltgassenCHertelHBrandstadtA. Multicenter validation study of the sentinel lymph node concept in cervical cancer: AGO Study Group. J Clin Oncol2008;26:29432951.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 78.

    BatsASBuenerdAQuerleuD. Diagnostic value of intraoperative examination of sentinel lymph node in early cervical cancer: a prospective, multicenter study. Gynecol Oncol2011;123:230235.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 79.

    BatsASMathevetPBuenerdA. The sentinel node technique detects unexpected drainage pathways and allows nodal ultrastaging in early cervical cancer: insights from the multicenter prospective SENTICOL study. Ann Surg Oncol2013;20:413422.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 80.

    CibulaDAbu-RustumNRDusekL. Bilateral ultrastaging of sentinel lymph node in cervical cancer: Lowering the false-negative rate and improving the detection of micrometastasis. Gynecol Oncol2012;127:462466.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 81.

    CibulaDAbu-RustumNRDusekL. Prognostic significance of low volume sentinel lymph node disease in early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol2012;124:496501.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 82.

    FaderANEdwardsRPCostM. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage cervical cancer: utility of intraoperative versus postoperative assessment. Gynecol Oncol2008;111:1317.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 83.

    LecuruFBatsAMathevetP. Impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy on staging of early cervical cancer: Results of a prospective, multicenter study [abstract]. J Clin Oncol2009;27(Suppl 18):Abstract CRA5506.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 84.

    SlamaJDundrPDusekLCibulaD. High false negative rate of frozen section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol2013;129:384388.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 85.

    van de LandeJTorrengaBRaijmakersPGHM. Sentinel lymph node detection in early stage uterine cervix carcinoma: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol2007;106:604613.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 86.

    AndikyanVKhoury-ColladoFDenesopolisJ. Cervical conization and sentinel lymph node mapping in the treatment of stage I cervical cancer: is less enough?Int J Gynecol Cancer2014;24:113117.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 87.

    WuYLiZWuHYuJ. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. Mol Clin Oncol2013;1:10251030.

  • 88.

    KadkhodayanSHasanzadehMTregliaG. Sentinel node biopsy for lymph nodal staging of uterine cervix cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the pertinent literature. Eur J Surg Oncol2015;41:120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 89.

    RuscitoIGasparriMLBraicuEI. Sentinel node mapping in cervical and endometrial cancer: indocyanine green versus other conventional dyes—a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol2016;23:37493756.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 90.

    FrumovitzMPlanteMLeePS. The FILM Trial: a randomized phase III multicenter study assessing near infrared fluorescence in the identification of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) [Abstract]. Gynecologic Oncology2018;149:7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 91.

    EirikssonLRCovensA. Sentinel lymph node mapping in cervical cancer: the future?BJOG2012;119:129133.

  • 92.

    BatsASFratiAMathevetP. Contribution of lymphoscintigraphy to intraoperative sentinel lymph node detection in early cervical cancer: analysis of the prospective multicenter SENTICOL cohort. Gynecol Oncol2015;137:264269.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 93.

    DarlinLPerssonJBossmarT. The sentinel node concept in early cervical cancer performs well in tumors smaller than 2 cm. Gynecol Oncol2010;117:266269.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 94.

    SakuragiNSatohCTakedaN. Incidence and distribution pattern of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with stages IB, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy. Cancer1999;85:15471554.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 95.

    HuangHLiuJLiY. Metastasis to deep obturator and para-aortic lymph nodes in 649 patients with cervical carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol2011;37:978983.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 96.

    GouySMoricePNarducciF. Prospective multicenter study evaluating the survival of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy before chemoradiotherapy in the era of positron emission tomography imaging. J Clin Oncol2013;31:30263033.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 97.

    FrumovitzMQuerleuDGil-MorenoA. Lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer study (LiLACS): Phase III clinical trial comparing surgical with radiologic staging in patients with stages IB2IVA cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol2014;21:38.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 98.

    ChenYXuHLiY. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients. Ann Surg Oncol2008;15:28472855.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 99.

    PuntambekarSPPalepRJPuntambekarSS. Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol2007;14:682689.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 100.

    NamJHParkJYKimDY. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study. Ann Oncol2012;23:903911.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 101.

    WangYZDengLXuHC. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer. BMC Cancer2015;15:928.

  • 102.

    SertBMBoggessJFAhmadS. Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: a multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol2016;42:513522.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 103.

    MendivilAARettenmaierMAAbaidLN. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a five year experience. Surg Oncol2016;25:6671.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 104.

    ParkDAYunJEKimSWLeeSH. Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol2017;43:9941002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 105.

    ShazlySAMuradMHDowdySC. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol2015;138:457471.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 106.

    RamirezPTFrumovitzMParejaR. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med2018;379:18951904.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 107.

    MelamedAMargulDJChenL. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. N Engl J Med2018;379:19051914.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 108.

    MargulDJYangJSeagleBL. Outcomes and costs of open, robotic, and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol2018;36:5502.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 109.

    NevisIFValiBHigginsC. Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial and cervical cancers: a systematic review. J Robot Surg2016.

  • 110.

    LoweMPChamberlainDHKamelleSA. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol2009;113:191194.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 111.

    NezhatFRDattaMSLiuC. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS2008;12:227237.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 112.

    CantrellLAMendivilAGehrigPABoggessJF. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience. Gynecol Oncol2010;117:260265.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 113.

    GaffneyDKErickson-WittmannBAJhingranA. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) on advanced cervical cancer expert panel on radiation oncology-gynecology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2011;81:609614.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 114.

    MonkBJTewariKSKohW-J. Multimodality therapy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma: state of the art and future directions. J Clin Oncol2007;25:29522965.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 115.

    GienLTBeaucheminMCThomasG. Adenocarcinoma: a unique cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol2010;116:140146.

  • 116.

    BaalbergenAVeenstraYStalpersLLAnsinkAC. Primary surgery versus primary radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy for early adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2010:CD006248.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 117.

    ParkJYKimDYKimJH. Outcomes after radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix. Br J Cancer2010;102:16921698.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 118.

    WoJYViswanathanAN. Impact of radiotherapy on fertility, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes in female cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2009;73:13041312.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 119.

    PahisaJMartinez-RomanSMartinez-ZamoraMA. Laparoscopic ovarian transposition in patients with early cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer2008;18:584589.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 120.

    MoricePJunckerLReyA. Ovarian transposition for patients with cervical carcinoma treated by radiosurgical combination. Fertil Steril2000;74:743748.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 121.

    LandoniFManeoAColomboA. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet1997;350:535540.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 122.

    KeysHMBundyBNStehmanFB. Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med1999;340:11541161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 123.

    MorrisMEifelPJLuJ. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med1999;340:11371143.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 124.

    PetersWALiuPYBarrettRJ. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol2000;18:16061613.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 125.

    WhitneyCWSauseWBundyBN. Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol1999;17:13391348.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 126.

    RosePGBundyBNWatkinsEB. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med1999;340:11441153.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 127.

    ThomasGM. Improved treatment for cervical cancer—concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. N Engl J Med1999;340:11981200.

  • 128.

    RosePGAliSWatkinsE. Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing concurrent single agent cisplatin, cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy, or hydroxyurea during pelvic irradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol2007;25:28042810.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 129.

    EifelPJWinterKMorrisM. Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01. J Clin Oncol2004;22:872880.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 130.

    StehmanFBAliSKeysHM. Radiation therapy with or without weekly cisplatin for bulky stage 1B cervical carcinoma: follow-up of a Gynecologic Oncology Group trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol2007;197:16.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 131.

    Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis C. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol2008;26:58025812.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 132.

    PearceyRMiaoQKongW. Impact of adoption of chemoradiotherapy on the outcome of cervical cancer in Ontario: results of a population-based cohort study. J Clin Oncol2007;25:23832388.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 133.

    KingMMcConkeyCLatiefTN. Improved survival after concurrent weekly cisplatin and radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma with assessment of acute and late side-effects. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)2006;18:3845.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 134.

    TanLTZahraM. Long-term survival and late toxicity after chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer—the Addenbrooke's experience. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)2008;20:358364.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 135.

    GaffneyDKDu BoisANarayanK. Practice patterns of radiotherapy in cervical cancer among member groups of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2007;68:485490.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 136.

    CetinaLGarcia-AriasAUribeMdJ. Concurrent chemoradiation with carboplatin for elderly, diabetic and hypertensive patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol2008;29:608612.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 137.

    DubayRARosePGO'MalleyDM. Evaluation of concurrent and adjuvant carboplatin with radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol2004;94:121124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 138.

    HigginsRVNaumannWRHallJBHaakeM. Concurrent carboplatin with pelvic radiation therapy in the primary treatment of cervix cancer. Gynecol Oncol2003;89:499503.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 139.

    LorvidhayaVChitapanaruxISangruchiS. Concurrent mitomycin C, 5-fluorouracil, and radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix: a randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2003;55:12261232.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 140.

    WongLCNganHYCheungAN. Chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy in cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol1999;17:20552060.

  • 141.

    TharavichitkulELorvidhayaVKamnerdsupaphonP. Combined chemoradiation of cisplatin versus carboplatin in cervical carcinoma: a single institution experience from Thailand. BMC Cancer2016;16:501.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 142.

    MileshkinLRNarayanKMooreKN. A phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiation as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer compared to chemoradiation alone: Outback (ANZGOG0902/GOG0274/RTOG1174) [abstract]. J Clin Oncol201432:abstract TPS5632.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 143.

    KoliopoulosGSotiriadisAKyrgiouM. Conservative surgical methods for FIGO stage IA2 squamous cervical carcinoma and their role in preserving women's fertility. Gynecol Oncol2004;93:469473.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 144.

    WrightJDNathavithAranaRLewinSN. Fertility-conserving surgery for young women with stage IA1 cervical cancer: safety and access. Obstet Gynecol2010;115:585590.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 145.

    TierneyKELinPSAmezcuaC. Cervical conization of adenocarcinoma in situ: a predicting model of residual disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol2014;210:366e361–365.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 146.

    YonedaJYBragancaJFSarianLO. Surgical treatment of microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of pathologic features with implications on radicality. Int J Gynecol Cancer2015;25:694698.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 147.

    BernardiniMBarrettJSeawardGCovensA. Pregnancy outcomes in patients after radical trachelectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol2003;189:13781382.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 148.

    BossEAvan GoldeRJTBeerendonkCCMMassugerLFAG. Pregnancy after radical trachelectomy: a real option?Gynecol Oncol2005;99:152156.

  • 149.

    PlanteMRenaudM-CHoskinsIARoyM. Vaginal radical trachelectomy: a valuable fertility-preserving option in the management of early-stage cervical cancer. A series of 50 pregnancies and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol2005;98:310.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 150.

    MarchiolePBenchaibMBuenerdA. Oncological safety of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy (LARVT or Dargent's operation): a comparative study with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy (LARVH). Gynecol Oncol2007;106:132141.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 151.

    LandoniFZanagnoloVLovato-DiazL. Ovarian metastases in early-stage cervical cancer (IA2-IIA): a multicenter retrospective study of 1965 patients (a Cooperative Task Force study). Int J Gynecol Cancer2007;17:623628.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 152.

    ShimadaMKigawaJNishimuraR. Ovarian metastasis in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol2006;101:234237.

  • 153.

    KokkaFBryantABrockbankEJeyarajahA. Surgical treatment of stage IA2 cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2014:CD010870.

  • 154.

    SmallWJr.StraussJBJhingranA. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) definitive therapy for early-stage cervical cancer. Am J Clin Oncol2012;35:399405.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 155.

    RajuSKPapadopoulosAJMontaltoSA. Fertility-sparing surgery for early cervical cancer-approach to less radical surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer2012;22:311317.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 156.

    LiJWuXLiXJuX. Abdominal radical trachelectomy: Is it safe for IB1 cervical cancer with tumors ≥ 2 cm?Gynecol Oncol2013;131:8792.

  • 157.

    LandoniFManeoACormioG. Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol2001;80:312.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 158.

    KeysHMBundyBNStehmanFB. Radiation therapy with and without extrafascial hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma: a randomized trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol2003;89:343353.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 159.

    KokkaFBryantABrockbankE. Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2015;4:CD010260.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 160.

    ColomboPEBertrandMMGutowskiM. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma (stages IIB, IIA and bulky stages IB) after concurrent chemoradiation therapy: surgical morbidity and oncological results. Gynecol Oncol2009;114:404409.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 161.

    TouboulCUzanCMauguenA. Prognostic factors and morbidities after completion surgery in patients undergoing initial chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Oncologist2010;15:405415.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 162.

    HuguetFCojocariuOMLevyP. Preoperative concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy for bulky stage IB2, IIA, and IIB carcinoma of the uterine cervix with proximal parametrial invasion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2008;72:15081515.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 163.

    CetinaLGonzalez-EncisoACantuD. Brachytherapy versus radical hysterectomy after external beam chemoradiation with gemcitabine plus cisplatin: a randomized, phase III study in IB2-IIB cervical cancer patients. Ann Oncol2013;24:20432047.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 164.

    KohlerCMusteaAMarnitzS. Perioperative morbidity and rate of upstaging after laparoscopic staging for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol2015;213:503e501–507.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 165.

    GoffBAMuntzHGPaleyPJ. Impact of surgical staging in women with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol1999;74:436442.

  • 166.

    RosePG. Combination therapy: New treatment paradigm for locally advanced cervical cancer?Nat Rev Clin Oncol2011;8:388390.

  • 167.

    Duenas-GonzalezAZarbaJJPatelF. Phase III, open-label, randomized study comparing concurrent gemcitabine plus cisplatin and radiation followed by adjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin versus concurrent cisplatin and radiation in patients with stage IIB to IVA carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol2011;29:16781685.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 168.

    ThomasG. Are we making progress in curing advanced cervical cancer?J Clin Oncol2011;29:16541656.

  • 169.

    SwisherEMSwensenREGreerB. Weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin in combination with pelvic radiation in the primary therapy of cervical cancer: a phase I trial of the Puget Sound Oncology Consortium. Gynecol Oncol2006;101:429435.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 170.

    RosePGDegeestKMcMeekinSFuscoN. A phase I study of gemcitabine followed by cisplatin concurrent with whole pelvic radiation therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol2007;107:274279.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 171.

    LutzSTChowELHartsellWFKonskiAA. A review of hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy. Cancer2007;109:14621470.

  • 172.

    RotmanMSedlisAPiedmonteMR. A phase III randomized trial of postoperative pelvic irradiation in stage IB cervical carcinoma with poor prognostic features: follow-up of a gynecologic oncology group study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2006;65:169176.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 173.

    MonkBJWangJImS. Rethinking the use of radiation and chemotherapy after radical hysterectomy: a clinical-pathologic analysis of a Gynecologic Oncology Group/Southwest Oncology Group/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial. Gynecol Oncol2005;96:721728.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 174.

    ChernofskyMRFelixJCMuderspachLI. Influence of quantity of lymph vascular space invasion on time to recurrence in women with early-stage squamous cancer of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol2006;100:288293.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 175.

    MarchiolePBuenerdABenchaibM. Clinical significance of lympho vascular space involvement and lymph node micrometastases in early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective case-control surgico-pathological study. Gynecol Oncol2005;97:727732.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 176.

    TrifilettiDMSwisher-McClureSShowalterTN. Postoperative chemoradiation therapy in high-risk cervical cancer: re-evaluating the findings of Gynecologic Oncology Group study 109 in a large, population-based cohort. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2015;93:10321044.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 177.

    GongLLouJYWangP. Clinical evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery in the management of stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet2012;117:2326.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 178.

    EddyGLBundyBNCreasmanWT. Treatment of (“bulky”) stage IB cervical cancer with or without neoadjuvant vincristine and cisplatin prior to radical hysterectomy and pelvic/para-aortic lymphadenectomy: a phase III trial of the gynecologic oncology group. Gynecol Oncol2007;106:362369.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 179.

    RydzewskaLTierneyJValeCLSymondsPR. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery versus surgery for cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2010:CD007406.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 180.

    KatsumataNYoshikawaHKobayashiH. Phase III randomised controlled trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgery vs radical surgery alone for stages IB2, IIA2, and IIB cervical cancer: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG 0102). Br J Cancer2013;108:19571963.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 181.

    KimHSSardiJEKatsumataN. Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with FIGO stage IB1 to IIA cervical cancer: an international collaborative meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol2013;39:115124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 182.

    LandoniFSartoriEMagginoT. Is there a role for postoperative treatment in patients with stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery? An Italian multicenter retrospective study. Gynecol Oncol2014;132:611617.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 183.

    YeQYuanHXChenHL. Responsiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery predicts favorable prognosis for cervical cancer patients: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol2013;139:18871898.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 184.

    ArbynMDillnerJ. Review of current knowledge on HPV vaccination: an appendix to the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. J Clin Virol2007;38:189197.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 185.

    RamboutLHopkinsLHuttonBFergussonD. Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomavirus infection and disease in women: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ2007;177:469479.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 186.

    ChanJKBerekJS. Impact of the human papilloma vaccine on cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol2007;25:29752982.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1 1 0
Full Text Views 11615 11616 949
PDF Downloads 3643 3643 320
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0