a Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center; Parkland Health & Hospital System; Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center; Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center; and Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; and Department of Internal Medicine, UC San Diego, San Diego, California.
Background: Surveillance colonoscopy is required in patients with polyps due to an elevated colorectal cancer (CRC) risk; however, studies suggest substantial overuse and underuse of surveillance colonoscopy. The goal of this study was to characterize guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations after implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR)–based Colonoscopy Pathology Reporting and Clinical Decision Support System (CoRS). Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent colonoscopy with polypectomy at a safety-net healthcare system before (n=1,822) and after (n=1,320) implementation of CoRS in December 2013. Recommendations were classified as guideline-adherent or nonadherent according to the US Multi-Society Task Force on CRC. We defined surveillance recommendations shorter and longer than guideline recommendations as potential overuse and underuse, respectively. We used multivariable generalized linear mixed models to identify correlates of guideline-adherent recommendations. Results: The proportion of guideline-adherent surveillance recommendations was significantly higher post-CoRS than pre-CoRS (84.6% vs 77.4%; P<.001), with fewer recommendations for potential overuse and underuse. In the post-CoRS period, CoRS was used for 89.8% of cases and, compared with cases for which it was not used, was associated with a higher proportion of guideline-adherent recommendations (87.0% vs 63.4%; RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.23–1.42). In multivariable analysis, surveillance recommendations were also more likely to be guideline-adherent in patients with adenomas but less likely among those with fair bowel preparation and those with family history of CRC. Of 203 nonadherent recommendations, 70.4% were considered potential overuse, 20.2% potential underuse, and 9.4% were not provided surveillance recommendations. Conclusions: An EMR-based CoRS was widely used and significantly improved guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations.
These authors contributed equally and are co-first authors.
These authors contributed equally and are co-senior authors.
Author contributions:Study concept and design: Gupta, Halm, Skinner, Singal. Data acquisition: Magrath, Yang, Singal. Data analysis: Ahn, Borton, Singal. Data interpretation: Ahn, Mayorga, Gopal, Murphy, Agrawal, Halm, Borton, Skinner, Singal. Manuscript preparation: Magrath, Yang, Singal. Critical revision: Ahn, Mayorga, Gopal, Murphy, Gupta, Agrawal, Halm, Borton, Skinner, Singal. Funding: Halm, Skinner. Guarantor: Singal.Correspondence: Amit G. Singal, MD, MS, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5959 Harry Hines Boulevard, PO Box 1, Suite 420, Dallas, TX 75390-8887. Email: email@example.com
LiebermanDARexDKWinawerSJ. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology2012;143:844–857.
LiebermanDARexDKWinawerSJ. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. 2012;143:844–857.
SkinnerCSGuptaSHalmEA. Development of the Parkland-UT Southwestern Colonoscopy Reporting System (CoRS) for evidence-based colon cancer surveillance recommendations. J Am Med Inform Assoc2016;23:402–406.
SkinnerCSGuptaSHalmEA. Development of the Parkland-UT Southwestern Colonoscopy Reporting System (CoRS) for evidence-based colon cancer surveillance recommendations. 2016;23:402–406.